With gcc 6.5.0, 7.5.0, 8.5.0, and 9.5.0 the tst-stdbit-Wconversion
issues the warnings:
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__clo16_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:128:26: error: conversion to ‘uint16_t {aka short
unsigned int}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __clz16_inline (~__x);
^
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__clo8_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:134:25: error: conversion to ‘uint8_t {aka unsigned
char}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __clz8_inline (~__x);
^
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__cto16_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:232:26: error: conversion to ‘uint16_t {aka short
unsigned int}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __ctz16_inline (~__x);
^
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__cto8_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:238:25: error: conversion to ‘uint8_t {aka unsigned
char}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __ctz8_inline (~__x);
^
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__bf16_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:701:23: error: conversion to ‘uint16_t {aka short
unsigned int}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __x == 0 ? 0 : ((uint16_t) 1) << (__bw16_inline (__x) - 1);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__bf8_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:707:23: error: conversion to ‘uint8_t {aka unsigned
char}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __x == 0 ? 0 : ((uint8_t) 1) << (__bw8_inline (__x) - 1);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__bc16_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:751:59: error: conversion to ‘uint16_t {aka short
unsigned int}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __x <= 1 ? 1 : ((uint16_t) 2) << (__bw16_inline (__x - 1) -
1);
^~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:751:23: error: conversion to ‘uint16_t {aka short
unsigned int}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __x <= 1 ? 1 : ((uint16_t) 2) << (__bw16_inline (__x - 1) -
1);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h: In function ‘__bc8_inline’:
../stdlib/stdbit.h:757:57: error: conversion to ‘uint8_t {aka unsigned
char}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __x <= 1 ? 1 : ((uint8_t) 2) << (__bw8_inline (__x - 1) - 1);
^~~
../stdlib/stdbit.h:757:23: error: conversion to ‘uint8_t {aka unsigned
char}’ from ‘int’ may alter its value [-Werror=conversion]
return __x <= 1 ? 1 : ((uint8_t) 2) << (__bw8_inline (__x - 1) - 1);
It seems to boiler down to __builtin_clz not having a variant for 8 or
16 bits. Fix it by explicit casting to the expected types.
Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu and i686-linux-gnu with gcc 9.5.0.
Add ELF_DYNAMIC_AFTER_RELOC to allow target specific processing after
relocation.
For x86-64, add
#define DT_X86_64_PLT (DT_LOPROC + 0)
#define DT_X86_64_PLTSZ (DT_LOPROC + 1)
#define DT_X86_64_PLTENT (DT_LOPROC + 3)
1. DT_X86_64_PLT: The address of the procedure linkage table.
2. DT_X86_64_PLTSZ: The total size, in bytes, of the procedure linkage
table.
3. DT_X86_64_PLTENT: The size, in bytes, of a procedure linkage table
entry.
With the r_addend field of the R_X86_64_JUMP_SLOT relocation set to the
memory offset of the indirect branch instruction.
Define ELF_DYNAMIC_AFTER_RELOC for x86-64 to rewrite the PLT section
with direct branch after relocation when the lazy binding is disabled.
PLT rewrite is disabled by default since SELinux may disallow modifying
code pages and ld.so can't detect it in all cases. Use
$ export GLIBC_TUNABLES=glibc.cpu.plt_rewrite=1
to enable PLT rewrite with 32-bit direct jump at run-time or
$ export GLIBC_TUNABLES=glibc.cpu.plt_rewrite=2
to enable PLT rewrite with 32-bit direct jump and on APX processors with
64-bit absolute jump at run-time.
Reviewed-by: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
These describe generic AArch64 CPU features, and are not tied to a
kernel-specific way of determining them. We can share them between
the Linux and Hurd AArch64 ports.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20240103171502.1358371-13-bugaevc@gmail.com>
We fetch __vm_page_size as the very first RPC that we do, inside
__mach_init (). Propagate that to _dl_pagesize ASAP after that,
before any other initialization.
In dynamic builds, this is already done immediately after
__mach_init (), inside _dl_sysdep_start ().
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20240103171502.1358371-12-bugaevc@gmail.com>
This is the case on both x86 architectures, but not on AArch64.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20240103171502.1358371-11-bugaevc@gmail.com>
We already have the RETURN_TO macro for this exact use case, and it's already
used in the non-static code path. Use it here too.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20240103171502.1358371-9-bugaevc@gmail.com>
Instead of relying on the stack frame layout to figure out where the stack
pointer was prior to the _hurd_stack_setup () call, just pass the pointer
as an argument explicitly. This is less brittle and much more portable.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20240103171502.1358371-8-bugaevc@gmail.com>
setcontext and swapcontext put a restore token on the old shadow stack
which is used to restore the target shadow stack when switching user
contexts. When longjmp from a user context, the target shadow stack
can be different from the current shadow stack and INCSSP can't be
used to restore the shadow stack pointer to the target shadow stack.
Update longjmp to search for a restore token. If found, use the token
to restore the shadow stack pointer before using INCSSP to pop the
shadow stack. Stop the token search and use INCSSP if the shadow stack
entry value is the same as the current shadow stack pointer.
It is a user error if there is a shadow stack switch without leaving a
restore token on the old shadow stack.
The only difference between __longjmp.S and __longjmp_chk.S is that
__longjmp_chk.S has a check for invalid longjmp usages. Merge
__longjmp.S and __longjmp_chk.S by adding the CHECK_INVALID_LONGJMP
macro.
Reviewed-by: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
Since shadow stack is only supported for x86-64, ignore --enable-cet for
i386. Always setting $(enable-cet) for i386 to "no" to support
ifneq ($(enable-cet),no)
in x86 Makefiles. We can't use
ifeq ($(enable-cet),yes)
since $(enable-cet) can be "yes", "no" or "permissive".
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
These symbols are internal and never exported; make sure the compiler
realizes that when compiling hurdsig.c and does not try to emit GOT
reads.
Signed-off-by: Sergey Bugaev <bugaevc@gmail.com>
C23 adds a header <stdbit.h> with various functions and type-generic
macros for bit-manipulation of unsigned integers (plus macro defines
related to endianness). Implement this header for glibc.
The functions have both inline definitions in the header (referenced
by macros defined in the header) and copies with external linkage in
the library (which are implemented in terms of those macros to avoid
duplication). They are documented in the glibc manual. Tests, as
well as verifying results for various inputs (of both the macros and
the out-of-line functions), verify the types of those results (which
showed up a bug in an earlier version with the type-generic macro
stdc_has_single_bit wrongly returning a promoted type), that the
macros can be used at top level in a source file (so don't use ({})),
that they evaluate their arguments exactly once, and that the macros
for the type-specific functions have the expected implicit conversions
to the relevant argument type.
Jakub previously referred to -Wconversion warnings in type-generic
macros, so I've included a test with -Wconversion (but the only
warnings I saw and fixed from that test were actually in inline
functions in the <stdbit.h> header - not anything coming from use of
the type-generic macros themselves).
This implementation of the type-generic macros does not handle
unsigned __int128, or unsigned _BitInt types with a width other than
that of a standard integer type (and C23 doesn't require the header to
handle such types either). Support for those types, using the new
type-generic built-in functions Jakub's added for GCC 14, can
reasonably be added in a followup (along of course with associated
tests).
This implementation doesn't do anything special to handle C++, or have
any tests of functionality in C++ beyond the existing tests that all
headers can be compiled in C++ code; it's not clear exactly what form
this header should take in C++, but probably not one using macros.
DIS ballot comment AT-107 asks for the word "count" to be added to the
names of the stdc_leading_zeros, stdc_leading_ones,
stdc_trailing_zeros and stdc_trailing_ones functions and macros. I
don't think it's likely to be accepted (accepting any technical
comments would mean having an FDIS ballot), but if it is accepted at
the WG14 meeting (22-26 January in Strasbourg, starting with DIS
ballot comment handling) then there would still be time to update
glibc for the renaming before the 2.39 release.
The new functions and header are placed in the stdlib/ directory in
glibc, rather than creating a new toplevel stdbit/ or putting them in
string/ alongside ffs.
Tested for x86_64 and x86.
Includes test for setcontext too.
The test directly checks after longjmp if ZA got disabled and the
ZA contents got saved following the lazy saving scheme. It does not
use ACLE code to verify that gcc can interoperate with glibc.
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
For the ZA lazy saving scheme to work, setcontext has to call
__libc_arm_za_disable.
Also fixes swapcontext which uses setcontext internally.
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
For the ZA lazy saving scheme to work, longjmp has to call
__libc_arm_za_disable.
In ld.so we assume ZA is not used so longjmp does not need
special support there.
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
The runtime support routines for the call ABI of the Scalable Matrix
Extension (SME) are mostly in libgcc. Since libc.so cannot depend on
libgcc_s.so have an implementation of __arm_za_disable in libc for
libc internal use in longjmp and similar APIs.
__libc_arm_za_disable follows the same PCS rules as __arm_za_disable,
but it's a hidden symbol so it does not need variant PCS marking.
Using __libc_fatal instead of abort because it can print a message and
works in ld.so too. But for now we don't need SME routines in ld.so.
To check the SME HWCAP in asm, we need the _dl_hwcap2 member offset in
_rtld_global_ro in the shared libc.so, while in libc.a the _dl_hwcap2
object is accessed.
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
The multibyte character needs to fit into the remaining buffer space,
not the already-written buffer space. Without the fix, we were never
moving the write pointer from the start of the buffer, always using
the single-character fallback buffer.
Fixes commit 04b76b5aa8 ("Don't error out writing
a multibyte character to an unbuffered stream (bug 17522)").
Seeing occasional failures in `__strchrnul_evex512` that are not
consistently reproducible. Hopefully by adding this the next failure
will provide enough information to debug.
Reviewed-by: H.J. Lu <hjl.tools@gmail.com>
Verify that setjmp and longjmp work correctly between user contexts.
Arrange stacks for uctx_func1 and uctx_func2 so that ____longjmp_chk
works when setjmp and longjmp are called from different user contexts.
Reviewed-by: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
When shadow stack is enabled, some CET tests failed when compiled with
GCC 14:
FAIL: elf/tst-cet-legacy-4
FAIL: elf/tst-cet-legacy-5a
FAIL: elf/tst-cet-legacy-6a
which are caused by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113039
These tests use -fcf-protection -fcf-protection=branch and assume that
-fcf-protection=branch will override -fcf-protection. But this GCC 14
commit:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=gcc.git;h=1c6231c05bdcca
changed the -fcf-protection behavior such that
-fcf-protection -fcf-protection=branch
is treated the same as
-fcf-protection
Use
-fcf-protection -fcf-protection=none -fcf-protection=branch
as the workaround. This fixes BZ #31187.
Tested with GCC 13 and GCC 14 on Intel Tiger Lake.
Reviewed-by: Noah Goldstein <goldstein.w.n@gmail.com>
* posix/regex.c: [!_LIBC && __GNUC_PREREQ (4, 3)]:
Omit GCC pragmas no longer needed when this file is used as part of Gnulib.
-Wold-style-definition no longer needs to be ignored because the regex
code no longer uses old style definitions. -Wtype-limits no longer
needs to be ignored because Gnulib already arranges for it to be
ignored in the C compiler flags. This patch is taken from Gnulib.
I've updated copyright dates in glibc for 2024. This is the patch for
the changes not generated by scripts/update-copyrights and subsequent
build / regeneration of generated files.
Not all CET enabled applications and libraries have been properly tested
in CET enabled environments. Some CET enabled applications or libraries
will crash or misbehave when CET is enabled. Don't set CET active by
default so that all applications and libraries will run normally regardless
of whether CET is active or not. Shadow stack can be enabled by
$ export GLIBC_TUNABLES=glibc.cpu.hwcaps=SHSTK
at run-time if shadow stack can be enabled by kernel.
NB: This commit can be reverted if it is OK to enable CET by default for
all applications and libraries.
Initially, IBT and SHSTK are marked as active when CPU supports them
and CET are enabled in glibc. They can be disabled early by tunables
before relocation. Since after relocation, GLRO(dl_x86_cpu_features)
becomes read-only, we can't update GLRO(dl_x86_cpu_features) to mark
IBT and SHSTK as inactive. Instead, check the feature_1 field in TCB
to decide if IBT and SHST are active.
Previously, CET was enabled by kernel before passing control to user
space and the startup code must disable CET if applications or shared
libraries aren't CET enabled. Since the current kernel only supports
shadow stack and won't enable shadow stack before passing control to
user space, we need to enable shadow stack during startup if the
application and all shared library are shadow stack enabled. There
is no need to disable shadow stack at startup. Shadow stack can only
be enabled in a function which will never return. Otherwise, shadow
stack will underflow at the function return.
1. GL(dl_x86_feature_1) is set to the CET features which are supported
by the processor and are not disabled by the tunable. Only non-zero
features in GL(dl_x86_feature_1) should be enabled. After enabling
shadow stack with ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE, ARCH_SHSTK_STATUS is used to check
if shadow stack is really enabled.
2. Use ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE in RTLD_START in dynamic executable. It is
safe since RTLD_START never returns.
3. Call arch_prctl (ARCH_SHSTK_ENABLE) from ARCH_SETUP_TLS in static
executable. Since the start function using ARCH_SETUP_TLS never returns,
it is safe to enable shadow stack in ARCH_SETUP_TLS.
