Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Stefan Liebler
3150cc0c90 Fix elf/tst-env-setuid[-static] if test needs to be rerun.
If /tmp is mounted nosuid and make xcheck is run,
then tst-env-setuid fails UNSUPPORTED with "SGID failed: GID and EGID match"
and /var/tmp/tst-sonamemove-runmod1.so.profile is created.

If you then try to rerun the test with a suid mounted test-dir
(the SGID binary is created in test-dir which defaults to /tmp)
with something like that:
make tst-env-setuid-ENV="TMPDIR=..." t=elf/tst-env-setuid test
the test fails as the LD_PROFILE output file is still available
from the previous run.

Thus this patch removes the LD_PROFILE output file in parent
before spawning the SGID binary.

Even if LD_PROFILE is not supported anymore in static binaries,
use a different library and thus output file for tst-env-setuid
and tst-env-setuid-static in order to not interfere if both
tests are run in parallel.

Furthermore the checks in test_child are now more verbose.
Reviewed-by: Adhemerval Zanella  <adhemerval.zanella@linaro.org>
2023-12-20 08:41:06 +01:00
Adhemerval Zanella
11f7e3dd8f elf: Add all malloc tunable to unsecvars
Some environment variables allow alteration of allocator behavior
across setuid boundaries, where a setuid program may ignore the
tunable, but its non-setuid child can read it and adjust the memory
allocator behavior accordingly.

Most library behavior tunings is limited to the current process and does
not bleed in scope; so it is unclear how pratical this misfeature is.
If behavior change across privilege boundaries is desirable, it would be
better done with a wrapper program around the non-setuid child that sets
these envvars, instead of using the setuid process as the messenger.

The patch as fixes tst-env-setuid, where it fail if any unsecvars is
set.  It also adds a dynamic test, although it requires
--enable-hardcoded-path-in-tests so kernel correctly sets the setuid
bit (using the loader command directly would require to set the
setuid bit on the loader itself, which is not a usual deployment).

Co-authored-by: Siddhesh Poyarekar <siddhesh@sourceware.org>

Checked on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Reviewed-by: DJ Delorie <dj@redhat.com>
2023-11-21 16:15:42 -03:00