If a menu was not attached to any widget, we try to calculate its
position given where the grabbed pointer is and what window has its
focus. Previously we failed to do so if a "transfer window" was used
for the grab, and this patch adds a code path that, if the menu window
itself didn't have the grab, look for the transfer window and get the
grab device from there.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748951
If a position was already explicitly set, don't try to guess the
position of popup menus by looking at the pointer position, just use
the set coordinates.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748951
According to the xdg-shell protocol specification the (x, y) coordinates
passed when creating a popup surface is relative to top left corner of
the parent surface, but prior to this patch, if the parent surface
was an xdg_surface, we'd position it relative to top left corner of the
window geometry of that xdg_surface.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749717
When we are close the window edge, we need to shrink the 'invisible
border' around the handle to avoid mispositioning it. A fiddly
calculation, but it works.
The buttons on the popover where stealing the focus from the text
view on click, causing the popover to be dismissed before the action
was taken. Fix this by making the buttons not take focus on click.
The buttons on the popover where stealing the focus from the text
view on click, causing the popover to be dismissed before the action
was taken. Fix this by making the buttons not take focus on click.
- use dark theme assets for the checkboxes and radios
- darken the popover for legibility (white bg/black text is
really the most problematic background to have).
unfortunatley in terms of SCSS structure this is further digging us into the
hole of specificity. It would be much nicer to set the .osd class on the popover
and have everything just work. I'm sure we'll end up using OSD styled popovers
outside the touch context.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750396
After the recent changes, we could end up calling
gtk_entry_update_handles in cases where the text_handle
has not be created (e.g. when dragging text from an entry).
Avoid that.
Also make them more scary so people really really don't use it as a
random knob when trying to make things go fast.
//bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750505
The changes in commit 13e22e2030 made
_gtk_window_check_handle_wm_event() indirectly depend on
gtk_get_current_event_time() which relies on the current event being
available on the current_events stack.
Since the current event is only pushed on the stack afterwards we get
an invalid timestamp which breaks ewmh window moving.
This fixes the issue by pushing the current event before we start
relying on it being there in gtk_main_do_event() and, as a byproduct,
also fixes a potential memory leak when we have a rewritten event and
return early due to _gtk_window_check_handle_wm_event() being TRUE.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750384
Use the drag-started signal to differentiate between drags that
move a handle and taps on a handle. Show the touch selection popup
for the latter, but not the former.
Hide the handles when the popover appears, and brind them back
when it disappears. This will need revisiting if we start using
the popover for mouse interaction as well, where we may not
want handles to show up.
We don't want the popup to appear spontaneously, so eventually
the timeout may go away altogether. For now, shorten it to 50ms,
to avoid rewriting all the places where the timeout is set or
unset.
Use the drag-started signal to differentiate between drags that
move a handle and taps on a handle. Show the touch selection popup
for the latter, but not the former.
Hide the handles when the popover appears, and brind them back
when it disappears. This will need revisiting if we start using
the popover for mouse interaction as well, where we may not
want handles to show up.
We don't want the popover to appear spontaneously, so eventually
the timeout may go away altogether. For now, shorten it to 50ms,
to avoid rewriting all the places where the timeout is set or
unset.
Add bold/italics/underline styling to the context menu of
the 'Lorem ipsum...' text view in page 1. The point is not
to show good UI for this kind of styling, but to demonstrate
custom actions in the context menu / touch selection.
Update style for touch selection in GtkEntry and GtkTextView
according to https://wiki.gnome.org/Design/OS/Selections
Add 'Select All' to the default actions, change actions
to use icons and move the popover to the bottom. If there is
no selection, just offer to paste.
Since nautilus merge, we were not showing 'Recent' in the sidebar
if GIO did not support the recent: scheme. But the file chooser
can show recent files independent of gvfs - it loads the recent
files manually. This is relevant on Windows and OS X, where gvfs
is typically not used.
This commit adds a show-recent property which can be used to override
the recent: scheme check. We use it in the file chooser.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750068
- use consistent widget style. unfortunately using assets
- light/dark variant
- new assets for text selestions, using existing slider asset for
insertion point
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750396
We don't want scale marks to affect scale sizing and positioning,
so draw them inside the range recangle. This avoids size changes
for marks that don't have labels, at least.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749650
The change in 03213b9509 changed the rules
as to when CSD can be enabled, but it also unconditionally enables CSD
with the implicit assumption that client-side shadows were the real
issue, and that we could work around that by drawing our own borders.
This also means that setting a titlebar for a GtkWindow will enable CSD
unconditionally.
In reality, some window managers (like Matchbox) *only* support
server-side decorations, and will ignore all hints to the contrary, to
the point of drawing decorations at random locations on top of the
window.
Since CSD are enabled unconditionally, the GTK_CSD environment variable
is also not a suitable escape hatch.
In the grand tradition of asking ourselves if we should do something
just because we can, we should split the environment checks from the
checks on what the user requested; by doing that, we can also check
when enabling client-side decorations, and ideally bail out if needed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750343
