Commit Graph

789 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Chun-wei Fan
b9e189150b gdk/gdkwindow.c, gtk/gtkwidget.c: Include fallback-c89.c
Both of them started to make use of round(), a C99 function.  So, include
fallback-c89.c to provide a fallback implementation for round() for
compilers that don't have round()

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694339
2013-03-13 13:22:48 +08:00
Alexander Larsson
8ee578468d gdkwindow: Update window debug dump code
This makes it build without warning and also dumps alpha
2013-03-01 14:55:54 +01:00
Owen W. Taylor
b61198cfcb GdkWindow: don't leak the newly created frame clock 2013-02-18 15:25:52 -05:00
Owen W. Taylor
bb11195ec0 GdkFrameClock: Clean up the public API
* remove gdk_frame_clock_get_frame_time_val(); a convenience
  function that would rarely be used.
* remove gdk_frame_clock_get_requested() and
  ::frame-requested signal; while we might want to eventually
   be able to track the requested phases for a clock, we don't
  have a current use case.
* Make gdk_frame_clock_freeze/thaw() private: they are only
  used within GTK+ and have complex semantics.
* Remove gdk_frame_clock_get_last_complete(). Another convenience
  function that I don't have a current use case for.
* Rename:
  gdk_frame_clock_get_start() => gdk_frame_clock_get_history_start()
  gdk_frame_clocK_get_current_frame_timings() => gdk_frame_clock_get_timings()
2013-02-14 17:19:52 -05:00
Owen W. Taylor
be22b9fbb9 GdkWindow: make the frame clock an inherent property of the window
Instead of making the frame clock a settable property of a window, make
toplevel windows inherently have a frame clock when created (getting
rid of the default frame clock.) We need to create or destroy frame
clocks when reparenting a window to be a toplevel, or to not be a
toplevel, but otherwise the frame clock for a window is immutable.
2013-02-14 17:19:52 -05:00
Owen W. Taylor
645b5f398d Reimplement _NET_WM_SYNC_REQUEST inside X11 backend
Deprecate gdk_window_enable_synchronized_configure() and
gdk_window_configure_done() and make them no-ops. Implement the
handling of _NET_WM_SYNC_REQUEST in terms of the frame cycle -
we know that all processing will be finished in the next frame
cycle after the ConfigureNotify is received.
2013-02-14 17:19:51 -05:00
Owen W. Taylor
e4aa9f05ae GdkDisplay: handle multiple calls to _gdk_display_pause_events()
Since events can be paused independently for each window during processing,
make _gdk_display_pause_events() count how many times it is called
and only unpause when unpause_events() is called the same number of
times.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685460
2013-02-14 17:19:50 -05:00
Owen W. Taylor
a69285da08 Compress motion synchronized with the paint cycle
When we have pending motion events, instead of delivering them
directly, request the new FLUSH_EVENTS phase of the frame clock.
This allows us to compress repeated motion events sent to the
same window.

In the FLUSH_EVENTS phase, which occur at priority GDK_PRIORITY_EVENTS + 1,
we deliver any pending motion events then turn off event delivery
until the end of the next frame. Turning off event delivery means
that we'll reliably paint the compressed motion events even if more
have arrived.

Add a motion-compression test case which demonstrates behavior when
an application takes too long handle motion events. It is unusable
without this patch but behaves fine with the patch.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685460
2013-02-14 17:19:49 -05:00
Owen W. Taylor
1824796bfb GdkFrameClock: add freeze/thaw
Add the ability to freeze a frame clock, which pauses its operation,
then thaw it again later to resume.

Initially this is used to implement freezing updates when we are
waiting for ConfigureNotify in response to changing the size of
a toplevel.

We need a per-window clock for this to work properly, so add that
for the X11 backend.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685460
2013-02-14 17:19:48 -05:00
Owen W. Taylor
c4545cc5d4 GdkFrameClock: Make the phase explicit when requesting the frame
Instead of having gdk_frame_clock_request_frame() have
gdk_frame_clock_request_phase() where we can say what phase we need.
This allows us to know if we get a frame-request during layout whether
it's just a request for drawing from the layout, or whether another
layout phase is needed.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685460
2013-02-14 17:19:48 -05:00
Owen W. Taylor
77bac0d6ae Add GdkFrameClock
Add an object GdkFrameClock that we associate with a GdkWindow.
This tracks when the window needs to be repainted, and will also
be used for other operations in the future like relayout and
updating animations.

Based on a patch from Havoc Pennington:

 https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2010-October/msg00004.html

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685460
2013-02-14 17:19:47 -05:00
Thomas Wood
8568d66a73 gdkwindow: don't use last_slave for the source device if it is NULL
Some backends do not have slave devices, which means last_slave may be
NULL. Use the current device as the source device if last_slave is NULL
when synthesizing a crossing event.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692411
2013-02-12 15:30:56 +00:00
Alexander Larsson
4d3c77f920 gdkwindow: Allow gdk_window_set_opacity on non-native children
We now store the current opacity for all windows. For native windows
we just call into the native implementation whenever the opacity changes.
However, for non-native windows we implement opacity by pushing a
second implicit paint that "stacks" on the existing one, acting as
an opacity group while rendering the window and its children.

This works well in general, although any native child windows will of
course not be opaque. However, there is no way to implement
implicit paint flushing (i.e. draw the currently drawn double buffer
to the window in order to allow direct drawing to the window).
We can't flush in the stacked implicit paint case because there
is no way to get the right drawing behaviour when drawing directly
to the window. We *must* draw to the opacity group to get the right
behaviour.

We currently flush if:
* A widget disables double buffering
* You call move/resize/scroll a window and it has non-native children
  during the expose handler

In case this happens we warn and flush the outermost group, so there may
be drawing errors.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
2013-02-07 11:11:37 +01:00
Alexander Larsson
ada6d81247 gdkwindow: Store the implicit paint in a list
This changes nothing, but lets us later have multiple
implicit paints

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
2013-02-07 11:11:37 +01:00
Rob Bradford
03d405e484 gdkwindow: Do not rely on a previous slave device when updating grab
_gdk_display_device_grab_update does not support passing in NULL for the
source device. If we don't have a slave device (saved in the pointer info)
then do not try and use that NULL pointer for the source_device.

This bug appeared in the Wayland backend where we (currently) only have master
devices exposed and as such no slave device is ever saved.

Fixes: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692411
2013-02-06 14:17:46 +00:00
Olivier Fourdan
54dc823d67 gdk: add gdk_window_set_fullscreen_mode()
and gdk_window_get_fullscreen_mode() API to allow
applications to specify if a fullscreen window should
span across all monitors in a multi-monitor setup or
remain on the current monitor where the window is
placed.

Fullscreen mode can be either GDK_FULLSCREEN_ON_ALL_MONITORS
or GDK_FULLSCREEN_ON_CURRENT_MONITOR.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691856
2013-01-25 13:16:56 +01:00
Carlos Garnacho
3210cd6511 gdk: strengthen touch crossing event synthesizing on programmatical crossings
There are cases where crossing events aren't generated by input devices themselves
but rather through programmatical means (windows being moved/hidden/destroyed while
the pointer is on top).

Those events come from X as sourceid=deviceid, and GDK does its deal at lessening
this by setting a meaningful source device on such events, although this caused
some confusion on the mechanism to block/synthesize touch crossing events that
could possibly cause bogus enter events on the new window below the pointer.

Fixes https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691572
2013-01-15 17:48:56 +01:00
Benjamin Otte
4cfd1f51c0 gdk: API: constify argument
gdk_window_set_background_rgba() should take a const RGBA.
2012-12-17 17:21:07 +01:00
Alexander Larsson
8a40d8fe2a gdk: Add gdk_window_has_alpha helper
This centralizes the current checks for has_alpha_bg, which
lets us extend the check later.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687842
2012-11-09 10:08:22 +01:00
Benjamin Otte
8f96966178 window: Fail if the parent window and the visual don't match
They must be on the same screen.
2012-09-28 18:27:49 +02:00
Matthias Clasen
e95490c15e GdkWindow: remove reference to a long-removed example 2012-09-18 13:54:22 -04:00
Bastien Nocera
42f953eead gdk: s/availible/available/ 2012-09-10 17:39:27 +01:00
Alexander Larsson
29a42085c6 Remove gdk_window_flush_if_exposing as its not needed anymore
We no longer support modifying GdkWindow hierarchies during
expose events. This is not working anymore anyway as the
flush operation now does not push already rendered pixels
in the flushed window from the double buffer to the window.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679144
2012-08-23 16:31:31 +02:00
Alexander Larsson
e112cdacd4 Fix flashing in non-double-buffered widgets
Avoid copying back partially drawn double-buffer data
when flushing to avoid flicker. This means non double
buffered widgets must draw opaque pixels in its expose
handlers, and that you are not allowed to use direct
rendering (or modify GdkWindow pos/size/order) from
inside the expose handler of a double buffered widget.

See https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679144 for more
details
2012-08-23 16:31:30 +02:00
Alexander Larsson
820b0cafe0 gdkwindow.c: Fix up window debug code
Make this build and fully print clip regions.
2012-08-23 12:16:43 +02:00
Alexander Larsson
04811d9483 Avoid unnecessary window flushes
The code was calling _gdk_window_ref_cairo_surface in a few places
where the intent was not to read/write to the surface, but just look
at its type (to e.g. create a similar surface). This is bad, as that
operation causes a flush which may cause unnecessary work and/or
flashing. Instead we just get the impl surface in these cases.
2012-08-23 12:16:43 +02:00
Phil Clayton
bd3e3974c9 Change signal parameter names in GdkWindow to be valid C identifiers
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=679228
2012-07-11 07:24:47 -04:00
Torsten Schönfeld
61972a3f8d gdk: annotate the attributes_mask type for gdk_window_new
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670369
2012-06-11 22:34:35 +02:00
Bastien Nocera
0c6b54aa44 Revert "gdk: Don't crash when resetting cursor"
Patch didn't get reviewed yet.

This reverts commit 779591b62f.
2012-05-15 17:57:33 +01:00
Bastien Nocera
779591b62f gdk: Don't crash when resetting cursor
When the toplevel is a GdkOffscreenWindow which doesn't
implement the set_device_cursor() vfunc.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=675809
2012-05-15 17:49:33 +01:00
Matthias Clasen
2ef4b930c7 Don't force BUTTON1_MASK on non-touch events
This problem was pointed out by Hans de Goede in
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=673458
2012-04-06 20:25:21 -04:00
Alexander Larsson
c5a8f3cb61 gdk: Remove GdkDisplay->ignore_core_pointer
This is not used anywhere anymore
2012-04-03 11:37:42 +02:00
Benjamin Otte
bd55519f7e gdk: A TOUCHPAD device behaves like a mouse
and not like a TOUCHSCREEN. So treat it like that.

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672009
2012-03-20 02:07:29 +01:00
Matthias Clasen
0e07d6589e gdk: Don't drop the emulating_pointer flag
When manually copying touch events, we must not forget the
emulating_pointer flag.
2012-03-04 11:24:51 -05:00
Matthias Clasen
88ebe2285f gdk: Emulate motion events when requested
GtkRange was using GDK_POINTER_MOTION_MASK, and it was not
getting any emulated motion events, because we only translate
from GDK_BUTTON_MOTION_MASK to GDK_POINTER_MOTION_MASK, but not
the other way around, and emulated_mask only had
GDK_BUTTON_MOTION_MASK in it. Now we put GDK_POINTER_MOTION_MASK
in emulated_mask and successfully match for windows that
have GDK_POINTER_MOTION_MASK or any of the button motion masks
selected.

This fixes range sliders not following the finger and jumping
to the last position upon release.
2012-03-02 23:33:16 -05:00
Paolo Borelli
1a75eff9a9 Annotate gdk_window_get_frame_extents
"rect" is an output parameter
2012-03-02 18:58:03 +01:00
Carlos Garnacho
77cbc98044 gdk: update csw event mask filter to handle smooth scroll
Events of type GDK_SCROLL will be received if the client side window
event mask has either GDK_SCROLL_MASK or GDK_SMOOTH_SCROLL_MASK.

GDK_BUTTON_PRESS_MASK has been removed from type_masks[GDK_SCROLL]
as that bit is often set for other-than-scrolling purposes, and
yet have the window receive scroll events. In GTK+, this forces
non-smooth events bubbling, even if the widgets above want smooth
events, and legitimately set GDK_[SMOOTH_]SCROLL_MASK.
2012-03-01 16:28:57 -05:00
Carlos Garnacho
b177bd92aa gdk: Filter out either smooth or non-smooth event depending on the evmask
If a device provides both smooth and non-smooth events, the latter will be
flagged with _gdk_event_set_pointer_emulated() so the client side window
receives one or the other. If a device is only able to deliver non-smooth
events, those will be sent, so both direction/deltas may need to be handled.
2012-03-01 16:28:57 -05:00
Michael Natterer
c41b52b4f6 gdk: transfer event->scroll.delta_x/y through csw 2012-03-01 16:28:57 -05:00
Carlos Garnacho
28e7d3c148 gdk: Get the right event window for pointer emulated events
get_event_window() just checked on GDK_TOUCH_MASK, including for emulated
pointer events, so at the very least those should also match evmasks with
no touch events whatsoever
2012-03-01 16:25:28 -05:00
Carlos Garnacho
0bb2e6f264 gdk: Set correct GdkModifierType on pointer emulated events 2012-03-01 16:25:27 -05:00
Carlos Garnacho
fcbcac0ca3 gdk: translate correctly from touch events into emulated pointer events 2012-03-01 16:25:27 -05:00
Matthias Clasen
11fdf1667c gdk: Don't treat touch events as button events
One more place where we assumed that touch events have a button
field.
2012-03-01 16:25:27 -05:00
Matthias Clasen
3880b12196 gdk: Use the last alive grab in order to get the event window
If an active grab kicks in on a different window, _gdk_display_has_device_grab()
would still find the former implicit grab for the window below the pointer, thus
sending events to an unrelated place.
2012-03-01 16:25:27 -05:00
Carlos Garnacho
9c6f71bfc7 gdk: Don't mutate pointer events to touch events just because a grab says so
If a grab with GDK_TOUCH_MASK kicks in due to a touch sequence emulating pointer
events, don't mutate the sequence into emitting touch events right away.
2012-03-01 16:25:27 -05:00
Carlos Garnacho
5942fee240 gdk: Let implicit touch grabs coexist with an implicit pointer grab
Create the backing GdkTouchGrabInfo for touches even if the pointer
emulating touch sequence is already holding an implicit grab on a
window that didn't select for touch events.
2012-03-01 16:25:26 -05:00
Carlos Garnacho
b897ba0cd8 gdk: Don't fully destroy the implicit touch grab on ::grab-broken
the backing GdkTouchGrabInfo will be needed if the overriding device
grab finishes before the touch does in order to send events back to
the implicit grab window. Instead, wait until the touch is physically
finished before removing the matching GdkTouchGrabInfo
2012-03-01 16:25:26 -05:00
Carlos Garnacho
6efe116715 gdk: Listen to touch events by default on the native window
GDK will only receive touch events when dealing with a multitouch
device, so these must be transformed to pointer events if the
client-side window receiving the event doesn't listen to touch
events, and the touch sequence the event is from does emulate
the pointer.

If a sequence emulates pointer events, it will result in a
button-press, N motions with GDK_BUTTON1_MASK set and a
button-release event, and it will deliver crossing events
as specified by the current device grab.
2012-03-01 16:25:26 -05:00
Carlos Garnacho
0a80c26cdf gdk: Only trigger motion hints machinery on motion events
Touch events have no need for it, plus the concept behind
gdk_event_request_motions() doesn't wrap around multiple
touches within a device.
2012-03-01 16:25:26 -05:00
Carlos Garnacho
2f2774b7a9 gdk: Have touch grabs behave like the implicit grab wrt crossing events
These are equivalent to an implicit grab (with !owner_events), so
if the touch leaves or enters the grab window, the other window
won't receive the corresponding counter-event.
2012-03-01 16:25:25 -05:00