Splits up size_request() so that the height calculations are only done
when get_preferred_height() is called and the width calculations are
only done when get_preferred_width() is called. Since
get_preferred_width() does not change the treeview->priv->width value,
treeview->priv->prev_width will always be equal to it and can therefore
be removed. The only place where prev_width was used is a block in
gtk_tree_view_size_allocate(). This block seems to be adjusting the
horizontal scrollbar to account for treeview->priv->width having been
changed in size_request() and should no longer be necessary. A similar
block immediately above it seems to already account for the width change
in size_allocate().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691751
After “validation” (i.e., background size calculations) of some cells,
size_request() was called here to update the internally cached size of
the treeview. Apparently not updating the sizes leads to some kind of
“inconsistency” that messes with top_row_to_dy(). In the GTK3 model for
size allocation, things are more complicated. The treeview can’t just
go ahead and calculate its own size any more; instead it reports both a
“minimum” and a “natural” size, and it doesn’t know what size it will
actually get until size_allocate(). It may be necessary to update
top_row_to_dy() to deal with not knowing the exact size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691751
We want to reserve space for the size of the scrollbars even when they
are not visible. And because toggling visibile to off now returns 0 for
size requests, this won't work anymore.
The window size can be queried on widget->window directly, no need to
store it in widget->allocation.
This change is necessary because gtk_widget_set_allcation() is now
checking invariants that assume it's called from insize
gtk_widget_size_allocate() and that wasn;t the case here.
Commit e32da246a8 made GtkRange's trough
respect the CSS margin property, but it also trimmed the box in which
the trough reacts to click events by the margin.
We still want to catch events in that area instead, and just make sure
the margin is applied when drawing (which was already implemented by
that commit).
This commit reverts the parts of
e32da246a8 that didn't involve drawing,
fixing the bug.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691677
Before acting on any hint that is set by the window manager we must
first check that the hint is supported by the current window manager.
Checking that a property has a value is insufficient as it may have
been set by a previous window manager which did support the hint.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691515
When cross-compiling, instead of depending on a natively built GTK+ (which means
building Glib, ATK, Pango, gdk-pixbuf, libX11...) for gtk-update-icon-cache,
find the host compiler and gdk-pixbuf, and build another gtk-update-icon-cache
with that.
This uses AX_PROG_CC_FOR_BUILD from autostars to find the host compiler, and
assumes that you'd set PKG_CONFIG_FOR_BUILD to a host pkg-config binary.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691301
With this we always roundtrip position change to the webbrowser.
This avoids conflicts when things change from both directions (app and user).
Also, we fake configure evens when there is no web client to ensure
apps get the events.
GtkWidget::visible is required for the widget to:
- have a preferred size other than 0/0
- have a size allocated
- return other values than { -1, -1, 1, 1 } from get_allocation()
This is an experimental patch aiming to make concepts and behaviors
inside GTK more concreate. GtkWidget::visible is now essentially what
CSS does for "display: none".
Note that if you want the effect of CSS's "visibility: hidden", you'll
have to use a GtkNotebook with an empty page as the concept of reserving
space but not drawing anything isn't supported natively in GTK.
