Note that this implementation does not respect GDK windows at all. If
your widget requires respecting them, you should write your own
snapshot implementation and not chain up.
We now look at which of get_render_mode, draw or snapshot vfuncs is the
latest to have been overwritten in the class tree and then use that one.
This allows GtkContainerClass and GtkBinClass to override all of them
for without screwing things up.
and gtk_snapshot_render_frame() to be direct replacements for the
old gtk_render_*() functions.
Use them to replace Cairo usage completely in gtk_window_snapshot().
We now try to emulate cairo_t:
We keep a stack of nodes via push/pop and a transform matrix.
So whenever a new node is added to the snapshot, we transform it
by the current transform matrix and append it to the current node.
Unlike other container widgets, GtkStack would allocate its children
prior to moving its windows, which might prevent further valid size
allocation signals to be emitted.
Re-order the size allocation of child widgets to be performed after
moving the GtkStack windows.
Thanks to Owen for spotting the real issue here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767713
As in the last commit on gdkdisplay-win32.c, we need to define that to be
0x0600 (Vista) or later so that the items needed in the Windows headers be
activated.
See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768081#c62
... to be for Vista (0x0600) or later. This is so that the necessary
items in the Windows headers be activated so that the code will build
properly on mingw-w64, and we already require Vista or later for GTK+.
Thanks Ting-Wei Lan for pointing this out.
See: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768081#c62
This fixes a DOS where any app can cause all running gtk apps
to use arbitrary amounts of memory.
Originally reported against mate-panel, where running a big slideshow
in eye-of-mate caused increasing RAM usage in mate-panel.
v2: Hardcode the value
Signed-off-by: Lauri Kasanen <curaga@operamail.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773587
Making sure the surfaces are using the same scale factor makes it more
likely a fast path will be used when pixman gets involved, as pointed
out by Benjamin Otte.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772075
