Clang complains that this check can never be true. Since this
is a argument range check which we do to catch bad input,
convince clang to not complain instead of taking it out.
clang complains that the expression involving sqrt() is not
constant, and thus refuses to accept it as a case label. So,
use precomputed values instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746468
Break out a setter that manages the weak pointer, and
use it in finalize. This also fixes a bug where we were
forgetting to disconnect the right signal handler in
some cases.
The other Radio* widgets have this convenience method that removes the
memory management of the opaque GSList used to handle the group from the
API usable from language bindings (especially the ones not based on
introspection).
This commit adds gtk_radio_menu_item_join_group().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671362
Some arguments, like the group and the label of a RadioMenuItem, can be
NULL: the RadioMenuItem has all the code to deal with them. The argument
validation is too strict, though, for instance doing:
return_if_fail (IS_RADIO_MENU_ITEM (foo))
if (foo != NULL)
set_foo (foo)
Which is obviously incorrect.
This commit also modifies the annotations of the API, to ensure that
language bindings do the right thing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671362
If we create a RadioMenuItem without a group, and then set a group, the
menu item will still be set as active, which means an inconsistently
drawn radio menu item - as the RadioMenuItem will set the active flag on
itself, but then it won't reset it when it gets a new group.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=671362
It turned out that using mwm hints to instruct wms to
create border-only decorations is not really working
universally. So, instead of doing this, render a solid
frame without shadow on the client-side to handle this
case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746222
Signed-off-by: Olivier Fourdan <fourdan@xfce.org>
If the widget has been destroyed since a DBus message had been sent,
we could be in a condition that the widget pointer exists but it does
not have a window.
This bails as if the widget didn't exist if there is no available
GdkWindow.
We also set the extents to 0 to be defensive since this is a vfunc
implementation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746586
Since these part really are the same in all of the x or y direction
and we don't blur in that direction we can just blur one line and
repeat it during drawing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746468
There is no need to e.g. blur in the x-direction for the top part
of a box shadow. Also, there is no need to extend the mask in the
non-blurred direction.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746468
For radius 1px the current implementation rounds down to a 1 px box
filter which is a no-op. Rather than creating useless shadow masks
in this case we bail out blurring early.
Another alternative would be to make radius 1px round up to a 2 px box
filter, but that would change the rendering of Adwaita which is probably
not a great idea this late in the cycle.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746468
