When placing tooltips, the csd shadow will get 'pushed up' and
may end up underneath the pointer. We don't want this to cause
the tooltip to be hidden, because that leads to flickering, so
ignore the shadow when finding the widget under the pointer.
For csd override-redirect windows, we don't set up resize handles,
but we were not ignoring the margin in all places, causing some
size calculations to go wrong.
... from per style data to only existing once per style context. This is
technically an API break because it no longer allows getting different
style properties between save()/restore() pairs, but I don't think this
was ever intended to work that way, as the style property API was to be
used and is used via gtk_widget_get_style().
And it simplifies code a lot.
We used to accept the same syntax for text-shadow and icon-shadow as
we accept for box-shadow. However, box-shadow does accept a spread and
the inset keyword while the others should not.
The signal needs to be emitted after the text insertion as at-spi gets
the text to compute the inserted text due to the AtkText::insert-text
signal not containing it.
Also adjust position to reflect changes to the offsets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731429
This is old code from dating back many years. Nowadays, we can
just use css drawing and csd windows to achieve much the same
effect.
Themes will need some adjustment for this change.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731187
This commit makes it possible to use client-side decorations for
override-redirect windows by calling _gtk_window_request_csd()
before realizing the window. Since the wm won't do interactive
resizing for us in this case anyway, don't bother creating
the border windows we use for this purpose on regular toplevels.
To make this accessible to themes, we set a "csd" style class
on client-side decorated windows. With this, .window-frame.csd.menu
can be used to define the shadow for csd menus, and .menu can be
used to define a border for menus under non-composited wms.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731187
This tests just a few basic things for now. Mainly, that we don't
emit redundant notifications for enum, flags, int and boolean
properties. It also checks that we do emit the expected notifications
when the value actually changes. This is checked for string, double
and float properties as well.
There is a large number of exceptions in the test, and a lot more
checks that could be done. One class of exceptions is all the places
where we have -set booleans to go along with another property. We
should have a dedicated test for these pairs. Another class of
exceptions is where naked objects created by g_object_new () just
don't have the full functionality - e.g. a tree selection without
a tree view does not work very well. We set up the instance object
better for these situations.
