This is one of the few cases where it makes some sense to blur
the line between and empty string and NULL: without this, it is
hard to reset the subtitle e.g. from a builder file. And we
have the has-subtitle property now to enforce subtitle size
allocation independently.
Only fill the location entry with the file name of the tree view's
selected file when the selection was done by the user.
When the file chooser's action is GTK_FILE_CHOOSER_ACTION_OPEN, it
selects the first file in the tree view once loading has finished. For
this case we don't want it to insert the file name in the location
entry, as it hinders efficient navigation using the location entry. To
achieve this, use a priv flag to keep track of whether the
selection-changed signal was caused by the file chooser itself.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=386569
Now that the nice titlebar example is in gtk3-demo, we can
use testtitlebar as an actual testbed for headerbar stuff.
This immediately reveals size allocation issues when titlebar
widgets change size.
It is a fairly common case to just want a title, and not
reserve extra space for a subtitle. This is much easier
to get right by setting a boolean property than by
constructing a custom title widget.
When setting a custom titlebar that happens to be a GtkHeaderBar,
we connect to notify::title to pick up title changes on the headerbar,
but we forgot to sync the title initially. Fix that.
You can still hover a mouse on insensitive elements; it's up to the
theme to disable that.
This is in line with the HTML/CSS interpretation of :hover.
Insensitive elements still cannot be clicked.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719486
Failing to load a thumbnail returns a NULL pixbuf. Since the hidpi
patches this wasn't checked when creating the surface. Result: assertion
failure.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719977
This demo condenses the essentials of advanced management of
input events. Depending on the information available in input events,
this demo will try to represent as much information as possible for
those.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719987
The focus handling code is shared between core and XI2 implementations,
so just handle the extra XI2 types for passive grabs. Those must be dealt
with in the same way than active grabs. Focus events with this crossing
mode could happen currently through the XIGrabFocusIn passive grab.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719762
This fixes potential assertions if a GTK+ app gets to receive
a XINotifyPassiveGrab/Ungrab pointer crossing event, currently
triggerable by XIGrabEnter passive grabs.
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719762
The bin window's background would have to be drawn in the bin window's
size and inside the pixel cache draw function to not cause transparency
issues.
But because it's unnecessary as the view window draws the same
background, we just skip it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709027
...for all files except the README.txt and the .sln files, which have to
have DOS/Windows line endings. This makes application of patches, when
applicable, easier.
