Have an implementation of ->request_layout() and ->compute_size() for the Win32
surface backend so that we can properly display and move and resize the
windows, as we request from the Win32 APIs.
Hxndling Aerosnap properly is mostly done except for snap_up(), which needs to
to be looked at later.
In line with what is done with the Wayland backend, enable the mapped state
independently as needed from the toplevel surface presentation, and also enable
the mapped state if necessary when presenting the popup surface.
The fact that we are using gdk-pixbuf for loading files currrently does not mean we will use it going forward.
Also, "anything gdk-pixbuf can load" does not mean anything, because what gdk-pixbuf can load is a compile-time option.
As new_from_resource() will assert() if it cannot load a resource, we must be very sure that people do not use anything but PNG and JPEG for resources and the docs were not clear on that.
When destroying a wl_surface (e.g. when a window or menu is closed), the
surface may continue to exist in the compositor slightly longer than on
the client side. In that case, the surface can still receive input
events, which need to be ignored gracefully.
In particular, this prevents segfaulting on wl_surface_get_user_data()
in that situation.
Reported in
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3296
The same issue for pointers/keyboards was reported in
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693338
and fixed with in
bfd7137ffb3625f17857a8fc099a72
In pointer_surface_update_scale(), only rescale the cursor surface when
the scale has actually changed and the cursor is on at least one output.
fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3350
Right now, this issue is not completely understood, so it might also
involve some questionable handling of cursor surface by sway/wlroots.
However, irrespective of that issue, this patch avoids unnecessary calls to the
compositor, and there should be no drawback: Whenever the pointer enters
a new output, pointer_surface_update_scale() will be called again, such
that correct scaling of the cursor is still ensured.
There is a slight difference: When the cursor leaves the last output,
previously the image was reset to scale factor 1. Now, it keeps whatever
was last. That might be more sensible than the previous behaviour,
assuming that it's likely that when the cursor enter an output again, it
has the same scaling. Alternatively, if one cares about resource usage
at this level, it might make more sense to destroy the surface than
rescaling to 1.
Visual Studio 2013 is just shy of being sufficiently C99-compliant to
build GTK master, as it did not support snprintf() in its CRT
implementation.
Use g_snprintf() to cover for this.
This rule is almost always wrong, and we're having some trouble agreeing
on replacement text. Let's remove the whole paragraph for now, to avoid
confusion.
