Using GList is a bit lame, and makes the API more complicated to use
than necessary in the common case.
The only real use case for a GList is gtk_widget_add_mnemonic_label(),
and for that we can use the GValue-based API instead.
Fixes: #3343
The accessible-role property in GtkWidget has three possible targets:
- the :accessible-role of a GtkATContext, if realized
- the accessible_role field of GtkWidgetPrivate
- the accessible_role field of GtkWidgetClassPrivate
When we set the accessible role of a widget using the GObject property
mechanism, we want to either set the GtkWidgetPrivate.accessible_role
field, if there's no ATContext *or* if the ATContext is not realized.
Conversely, when we get the accessible-role property we want to have a
series of fallbacks in place:
- if GtkAccessible.get_at_context() returns an ATContext, and that
ATContext is realized, return the :accessible-role of the context
- if GtkWidgetPrivate.accessible_role is not WIDGET, return the
stored accessible role
- return GtkWidgetClassPrivate.accessible_role
This should help catch the case of getting the accessible role of
widgets that override GtkAccessible.get_at_context(), like
GtkModelButton.
See: #3342
We are doing too much work during the construction phase of the
AT-SPI backend for GtkATContext. Instead of having the AtSpiContext
register itself at construction time, let's add explicit realize
and unrealize operations, and connect the ATContext realization to the
rooting operation of a GtkWidget.
We are setting the value to TRUE initially, but
the property had a declared default of FALSE.
This is messing up the simplification of .ui files
with gtk4-builder-tool, since it thinks it can
omit can-target properties when it really can't.
gtk_widget_reposition_after is called both to add new children,
and to reposition existing children. We only want to emit
accessible changes in the former case (since AT-SPI doesn't
have events for reordering).
A bit hacky: we skip parsing values that have a reference or
reference-list type, but we do not error out. Instead, we return a NULL
value, which we catch in the GtkBuildable interface implementation to
get the actual object, and construct a reference list value.
There's still some ickyness around the value type that can only be
solved by having an attribute and role taxonomy.
Accessible attributes are not GObject properties. This means that we
need a custom parser for setting attributes in our UI description files.
The new section is defined as a sub-tree with the `<accessibility>`
element at its root, and elements for each type of accessible
attributes, i.e. properties, relations, and states:
```xml
<object class="..." id="...">
<accessibility>
<property name="label">The accessible label</property>
<state name="pressed">false</state>
<relation name="labelled-by">label1</relation>
</accessibility>
</object>
```
The name of the attribute is the enumeration value; the value is defined
by the WAI-ARIA specification.
There were several places where we were confusing
GList and GSList and list->data and list->next, causing
a crash in the accessible name computation for buttons
with mnemonic labels.
Anybody who keeps their own CSS nodes around or wants to order CSS nodes
different from widgets will from now on have to do it manually all the
time.
This is outdated behavior, nobody should be doing either of those two
things.
Also, the correct case is much more common, and not doing it
automatically was causing bugs.
Fixes#3280
And honor it in gtk_popover_popdown(). By default, a GtkPopover
pops down automatically if a child popover was closed, if this
property is FALSE, the popover will remain opened.
As a companion to go with the platform_change api,
add a gtk_accessible_get_platform_state() function
that can be used by backends to get the platform
state.
This is in preparation for making entries inherit
their focus states from the text widget within.
Since we need to check at run time what kind of AT context to use, we
need a hook into the whole GDK backend machinery. The display connection
seems to be the best choice, in this case, as it allows us to determine
whether we're running on an X11 or Wayland system, and thus whether we
should create a GtkAtSpiContext.
This requires some surgery to fix the GtkATContext creation function, in
order to include a GdkDisplay instance.
GtkBuildable's get_name()/set_name() methods may shadow
GtkWidget's methods. Avoid that by renaming the API to
get_buildable_id()/set_buildable_id(), which also reflects
the name of the XML attribute the API refers to.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3191
Using gtk_widget_insert_before on a complex container
is a *bad* idea; it will mess up the containers bookkeeping
of its children and can easily lead to failure and crashes.
My previous change here was too hasty - this code is not
actually transforming points - it is just a convoluted
way to transform the z axis from child coordinates to
the parent.
Replace our uses of graphene_matrix_transform_point,
_point3d and _bounds by our own versions that handle
projective transforms correctly.
This fixes render node bounds being incorrect for widgets
involving projective transforms (e.g. testrevealer swing
transformations), and also fixes picking on such widgets.
The code in gtk_widget_real_css_changed assumes that
queue_resize > queue_allocate > queue_draw, but the
second one is not really true. These days, we happily
keep reusing the same render node even when the child
allocation is changed.
So, if a css change has flags that tell us we should
redraw, we need to queue a draw, otherwise we might
end up reusing an outdated render node.
This fixes spinners staying visible when they stop
spinning, despite the theme setting their opacity
to 0.
Make GdkEvents hold a single GdkDevice. This device is closer to
the logical device conceptually, although it must be sufficient for
device checks (i.e. GdkInputSource), which makes it similar to the
physical devices.
Make the logical devices have a more accurate GdkInputSource where
needed, and conflate the event devices altogether.
Some widgets have different roles after they are constructed, so we need
to allow changing the role defined by the class. We should still avoid
setting a role after the GtkATContext has been created.
Some widgets have different accessible roles depending on some
parameter, so we cannot set the role at class init time. For those
widgets, we add an "accessible-role" property to GtkAccessible, and we
allow setting it (only) at construction time.
Each widget type has an accessible role associated to its class, as
roles cannot change during the life time of a widget instance.
Each widget is also responsible for creating an ATContext, to proxy
state changes to the underlying accessibility infrastructure.
GtkAccessible is an interface for accessible UI elements.
Currently, it doesn't do much except exist as a type; in the future, it
will be the entry point for all accessible state in GTK.
To build a better world sometimes means having to tear the old one down.
-- Alexander Pierce, "Captain America: The Winter Soldier"
ATK served us well for nearly 20 years, but the world has changed, and
GTK has changed with it. Now ATK is mostly a hindrance towards improving
the accessibility stack:
- it maps to a very specific implementation, AT-SPI, which is Linux and
Unix specific
- it requires implementing the same functionality in three different
layers of the stack: AT-SPI, ATK, and GTK
- only GTK uses it; every other Linux and Unix toolkit and application
talks to AT-SPI directly, including assistive technologies
Sadly, we cannot incrementally port GTK to a new accessibility stack;
since ATK insulates us entirely from the underlying implementation, we
cannot replace it piecemeal. Instead, we're going to remove everything
and then incrementally build on a clean slate:
- add an "accessible" interface, implemented by GTK objects directly,
which describe the accessible role and state changes for every UI
element
- add an "assistive technology context" to proxy a native accessibility
API, and assign it to every widget
- implement the AT context depending on the platform
For more information, see: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/2833
This got stuck in ancient times when widgets were windowed, so the devices
in a window to know the devices in that widget would pan out. We do only
want here the devices that are inside the widget, not spread over the
surface, so rewrite this helper function to poke the toplevel foci, and
look they are contained inside the widget.
Crossing events are now detached from widget state, all tricky consequences
from getting multiple crossing events are now somewhat moot. Resort to sending
all generated crossing events, and drop this barely (ever?) used API.
When a gesture (group) claims a sequence, all other gesture groups
in the same widget should get cancelled. Not just previously claimed
ones, that shouldn't happen actually.
Add a variant of gtk_widget_add_controller that
inserts the controller at the beginning, instead
of the end. This will be used in entry completion
to make sure the entry completion key event handling
supersedes the entry one while the popup is open.
Keep this private for now, until we determine if
it needs to be public api.
We were adding event controllers at the end, but
announcing a change at the beginning, in
gtk_widget_add_controller. Fix that by emitting
::items-changed for the position where we actually
inserted the controller.
We already know that a widget will have literally 1 node, not more.
Avoid doing the GtkSnapshot state stack dance and just append a new
transform node instead.
Seems to give me around 400 more icons in the fishbowl
