It was only testing the default configuration where overlay-scrolling is
TRUE and the policy is POLICY_AUTOMATIC. We should also test FALSE and
POLICY_ALWAYS. This commit adds those tests and makes the !overlay &&
POLICY_ALWAYS case pass by excluding the size of the relevant scrollbar,
as we are only interested in whether the content size is as requested.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
POLICY_AUTOMATIC means scrollbars are only shown when needed, i.e. when
the size of the window is not large enough to show the entire child. So
when measuring the preferred size, such scrollbars should be ignored.
But measure() was adding size for bars for which policy_may_be_visible()
was TRUE, which it returns for POLICY_ALWAYS (good) & _AUTOMATIC (bad).
So we reserved space for child plus scrollbars, & because we have enough
space for the child, POLICY_AUTOMATIC hides the scrollbar, leaving the
extra reserved space empty at the right/bottom sides of the child. This
is very noticeable/inconvenient for non-overlay, automatic scrollbars.
Fix this by only requesting size for scrollbars that use POLICY_ALWAYS,
rather than basing the decision on policy_may_be_visible().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
Using Ctrl + left/right to skip between words, or left/right to cancel a
selection, were causing movement on the screen in the opposite direction
of the glyph on the key. This was surprising and awful UX for RTL users.
This is based on a patch covering the former case by:
Author: Mehdi Sadeghi <mehdi@mehdix.org>
Date: Sat Feb 18 02:16:00 2017 +0000
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136059
Using Ctrl + left/right to skip between words, or left/right to cancel a
selection, were causing movement on the screen in the opposite direction
of the glyph on the key. This was surprising and awful UX for RTL users.
This is based on a patch covering the former case by:
Author: Ori Avtalion <ori@avtalion.name>
Date: Tue Apr 20 08:06:23 2010 +0000
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136059
The docs say that this class should be put on the frame node, and that’s
all we can do from C code, but the CSS was selecting on the border node.
The result was that adding .flat did not disable the border as expected.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778905
Some drivers don't do that (not sure whether that is the correct behaviour
or not). Remember each WT_PROXIMITY with LOWORD(lParam) != 0 that we get,
then look for a WT_CSRCHANGE. If WT_CSRCHANGE doesn't come, but a WT_PACKET
does, assume that this device is the one that sent WT_PROXIMITY.
Also include fallback code to ensure that WT_PACKETs for an enabled device
disable the system pointer, because WT_PROXIMITY handler might have
enabled it by mistake, since it's not possible to know which device left
the proximity (it might have been a disabled device).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778328
Previously HiDPI scale was retrieved and applied too late in the initialization
process to affect monitor size and monitor workarea size, but the code that
initializes these sizes *did* try to use the scale, even though it was always
getting scale=1.
To fix this, move the too-late code into monitor enumeration routine.
This also fixes a probable semantic bug where width and height were divided
by scale, again.
Now monitor and workarea should be in application pixels (i.e. divided by scale),
as intended.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778835
It was "Missing name of pseudo-class", but the real problem is exactly
the opposite: we /have/ been given a name, but it is not a valid one.
Change it to "Invalid name of pseudo-class" to minimise confusion.
gboolean ret for whether gtk_text_iter_backward_line() moved the iter
was declared but not used anywhere. I presume it was meant to be
checked, and it passes now, so let’s do it.
gtk_text_iter_backward_line() checks the value of
real->line_char_offset without previously calling
ensure_char_offsets (real) to make sure the former
is up-to-date.
As a consequence of this, when gtk_text_iter_backward_line()
is called after a gtk_text_buffer_insert_range() in the
first line of buffer, the iter is not moved to the start of
the line, and the return value is wrong.
Fixed by adding the ensure_char_offsets() call.
A test case for this bug is added to the textiter gtk testsuite.
Otherwise we wait for the next gdk_drag_motion() call, which will
happen on the next motion event, making the drag window briefly visible
on the 0,0 root coordinates.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778203
Update the autotools scripts so that we can support Visual Studio 2017
by copying the 2010 projects and updating items as needed to obtain
the 2017 projects.
Note that since the toolset version string changed for Visual Studio
2017, so allow the use of a custom toolset version string, otherwise
just generate the toolset version string as we did before.
Also, note that Visual Studio 2017 aims to be compatible with 2015
on the CRT level, so there should not be any problems using 2017-compiled
binaries with 2015-compiled ones.
When a widget is created, its default scale is the scale of the
primary screen (for instance 2). But once parented to another widget
its scale factor should be the one of its parent (if parented to a
widget on a screen at scale factor 1, it should be 1).
The problem is that we don't emit the notify::scale-factor signal when
reparenting happens.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776821
gtk_show_uri_on_window() will pass enough information for Portal helpers
to allow dialogue parenting in Flatpak, gtk_show_uri() won't, so
deprecate it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778678
Clamping the anchor values as introduced in commit 9a5ffcd to fix bug
777176 breaks menu positioning.
By keeping the anchors rectangle size greater than zero, we end up
deducting some positive value from the original position, so there is no
need to clamp() actually, keeping the values positive is enough and
avoids the issue with menu positioning on the menubar.
An additional benefit is to make the code a lot simpler.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778009
This is a workaround for a regression in updating scrollbars in
some applications; notably eog. We haven't fully tracked down yet
why a queue_allocation is not sufficient here, it should.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765410
