If called when already popped down, warnings would be issued due
to priv->grab_pointer being unexpectedly NULL, this would happen
in regular operation when selecting items in appears-as-list mode.
So both add a NULL check for priv->grab_pointer, and bail out early
if the popup window is already hidden.
GtkKineticScrolling implements the actual physics laws for friction
and springs. When created, position/velocity/boundaries/constants are
given, so at every gtk_kinetic_scrolling_tick() it returns the current
position, and whether the system is in rest.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729608
A multipress gesture takes care of link handling, and char/word/all
selection mode on selectable labels. A drag gesture is used for both
text selection and DnD checks on selectable labels.
A multipress gesture takes care of clicks, and where those happened.
If the click is meant to move the slider while pressed, the drag gesture
takes over, dragging the slider while active.
Widgets becoming insensitive won't receive further events, but there
could be chances the controllers don't get properly notified and reset
in those situations.
The signal handler for the visibility of menu items changing had the
wrong signature, resulting in the GParamSpec from the notify signal
being treated as a boolean (which was always true). This resulted in
items being added over and over and never being removed.
Fix that...
Since commit 872fbfac the GtkWindowGroup was split out from the GtkWindow
sources, so include gtkwindowgroup.h to avoid C4013 warnings/errors
(implicit declaration of ...) on gtk_window_group_add_window().
We were setting the next-tab properly, but were trying to
read it off the wrong object. Now, going from a cell renderer
attribute mapping to the model, or from an action-name to the
action actually works.
The touch_event handler was missing those when emulating pointer events
for the widgets that get GDK_TOUCH_MASK set, but have no specialized
touch handlers.
This code is a product of early stages in the gestures branch, where
capturing would have an effect outside grab boundaries. But this isn't
really the case, so every gesture outside the grab scope must be reset
to avoid keeping stale data.
This tests both a sequence being claimed early to be then denied
(and handled deeper in propagation chain), and a sequence being
claimed late in the capture phase (and thus being cancelled deeper
in the propagation chain)
Before this change, a sequence being claimed deep in the event propagation
chain would make the sequence go denied on every ancestor, regardless of
previous state.
To make things more consistent, only deny the sequence if it was previously
claimed, so the behavior is the same for gesture groups within the widget
than for those outside the widget.
The gestures testsuite has been updated to reflect this new behavior.
It might happen that a gesture claims a sequence before any other gesture
in its group even handled a single event from that sequence. In that case,
ensure the state is set accordingly right when the sequence is handled in
those.
The "group" gesture testcase has been updated to observe this behavior.
The CSS editor was feeling a little sluggish, because it was
reparsing and reapplying the CSS on every keystroke. Add a small
delay, to make this feel smoother.
Like the GDK and GTK portions, use autotools scripts to generate the
complete projects for gtk-inspector as sources there seem to change from
time to time.
It might be so that this, like the a11y sources, will be referenced from
the main Makefile.am of GTK directly, but just do this so that the
projects can build properly.
This test check that resizing the window when expanding
the expander yields the same end result as having the
expander expanded to begin with. The test uses the inhibit
mechanism introduced in the previous commit.
This adds an inhibit api that code from the reftest module
can use to delay the taking of the snapshot. Also refactor
the code in gtk-reftest to use the inhibit mechanism for
its own delaying of the snapshot until after the first
expose.
Every button press/release event reaching the the multipress gesture in GtkWindow
and happening in the "title" region must be handled, regardless of the event widget.
Children there wanting the event(s) for themselves are (and were always) expected
to stop event propagation.
So the only place to check for the event widget's "window-dragging" style property
is the "content" region, which matches the pre-gestures behavior.
This fixes some issues with sequences being mistakenly claimed (and events not
propagated further) on situations it shouldn't.
