The node declaration has the same functionality as
gtk_css_node_declaration_add_to_widget_path(). So instead of using that
function on a path, you can use the original path and the declaration in
a matcher.
So far the vfunc is kinda quirky (the path argument is an out argument
for something you have to free when you're done with the matcher), but
I'm about to change that.
We don't want to add the current classes to the widget path - which
might potentially be different after a gtk_style_context_save() - but
the root node's ones. So what better thing to do than actually using the
root node?
Instead of directly requesting the layout phase, register a tick
callback. This is what the docs suggest for animations and it's what we
need for the next commit.
... to a bunch of functions.
This requires a tiny change to the heuristics for the style cache - we
now cache styles when they have the same style provider as their parent
instead of when they have the default provider - but that change doesn't
have any effect in practice.
The parent refs the child, so gtk_css_node_set_parent() adds/removes a
reference.
We should probably refactor this so that we name the function
parent.add(node) instead of node.set_parent(parent) - makes the
refcounting more clear.
Instead of passing the style declaration, take the node's style
declaration. Add arguments to allow overriding the state for the one
case where this didn't work.
The code is confusing the stylecontext=>node transition, so I'll remove
it.
WIth the recent introduction of the parent style cachen, I'm not sure
it's worth it at all. Some crude benchmarking suggests a slight speedup
when removing the cache.
So no guarantees about adding it back later.
- GtkCssWidgetNode
for style contexts owned by a widget
- GtkCssPathNode
for style contexts using a GtkWidgetPath
- GtkCssTransientNode
for nodes created with gtk_style_context_save()/restore()
The functionality of it is supposed to grow, so better put it in a
custom file early.
This is just a naive split so far, the next patches will split things
further.
The wl_data_source may be the clipboard's. Looking up the drag context in
order to get the display isn't going to fare well there. So, just use the
default display, and only look up the drag context when we know we need it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746386
This commit adds the GtkTextTag:underline-rgba and :strikethrough-rgba
properties and the necessary plumbing to apply these colors in GtkTextLayout.
With this change, you can alter the color of underlines including those
of type PANGO_UNDERLINE_ERROR.
You might want to alter the underline color to differentiate between
spelling and grammer mistakes. In code editors, it is convenient to
differentiate between errors and warnings.
Note that the GtkTextAppearance struct is public ABI and has no spare
room for new fields, so we are resorting to some tricky packing to store
the colors in the unused pixel field of the fg_color and bg_color structs.
This packing is accomplished by the macros in gtktextattributesprivate.h.
Signed-off-by: Christian Hergert <christian@hergert.me>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=402168
It has been a long-standing request to interpret scroll events
with Shift held down as horizontal instead of vertical, and
some applications are already doing this on their own.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132197
