POLICY_AUTOMATIC means scrollbars are only shown when needed, i.e. when
the size of the window is not large enough to show the entire child. So
when measuring the preferred size, such scrollbars should be ignored.
But measure() added size for *any* non-overlay scrollbar of the opposite
orientation, e.g. for horizontal size, it added the width of vscrollbar.
So we requested for child + bar, & having enough for child meant that the
policy hid the bar, leaving extra space empty below/right of the child.
Fix this by only adding size for such bars if they use POLICY_ALWAYS.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
If the child added is not a Scrollable, it gets wrapped in a ViewPort –
which is. So it is impossible to end up with a non-Scrollable child.
Just check we have /any/ child where needed, which is semantically nicer
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
• intro: Clarify that external policy and/or adjustments can be used.
• add(): Don’t waffle on about having to add a ViewPort since we handle
that transparently for the user, so they can add() any widget.
• Adjustment stuff: most of this was repeating the docs for Scrollbar,
so just refer the user to that. Also, mention how
policies NEVER and EXTERNAL interact with all this.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
This reverts commit 367e021652.
This causes criticals in e.g. the Text View: Multiple Buffers demo.
More work is required to get a fix for Bug 778853 that does not cause
anything else to regress.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
POLICY_AUTOMATIC means scrollbars are only shown when needed, i.e. when
the size of the window is not large enough to show the entire child. So
when measuring the preferred size, such scrollbars should be ignored.
But measure() was adding size for bars for which policy_may_be_visible()
was TRUE, which it returns for POLICY_ALWAYS (good) & _AUTOMATIC (bad).
So we reserved space for child plus scrollbars, & because we have enough
space for the child, POLICY_AUTOMATIC hides the scrollbar, leaving the
extra reserved space empty at the right/bottom sides of the child. This
is very noticeable/inconvenient for non-overlay, automatic scrollbars.
Fix this by only requesting size for scrollbars that use POLICY_ALWAYS,
rather than basing the decision on policy_may_be_visible().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
...which treats the first '.' in doc comments as the end of the summary.
So, e.g., in gtkmm, get_kinetic_scrolling() is currently summarised as
"Changes the behaviour of @scrolled_window wrt." Not very informative!
No need for a period there & anyway, the phrase "wrt to" is superfluous,
and we have space to actually say "with regard to", so just do that now.
In gtkscrolledwindow.c, the return type of _get_propagate_natural_width()
and _get_propagate_natural_height() were accidentally gint instead of
gboolean, fixed to match the type correctly declared in the header file.
Making propagation of child natural sizes mandatory (or default, even) was
evidently a mistake as this causes dynamic content in a scrolled window
to resize it's parent when the scrolled window is competing for space
with an adjacent widget.
This patch instead adds API to control whether natural width and
height of the child should be propagated through the scrolled windows
size requests.
Scroll history must refer to a timespan for the values to be valid, otherwise
we return FALSE, in this case the stored event(s) should be discarded anyway.
It could be the case that the last scroll event is received long after any
previous scroll event, in this case the last scroll event discards all "old"
scroll events, and scroll_history_finish() returns FALSE because there's no
time/offset deltas in the scroll history.
This is desired so we don't trigger the deceleration effect if there was no
effective velocity, we still must reset the installed scroll cursor, so take
it out of this if() condition.
This is a bit of fallout from 34feba1, now that we resolve
the has_indicators value earlier than realize, it becomes
possible to call gdk_window_move_resize() before realization.
Just added the appropriate checks.
Widgets should support size requests before being realized in general,
otherwise this can cause flicker/resize at initial display time as
the toplevel window can make a request before realize/allocate.
This also makes the added testsuite/gtk/scrolledwindow.c test work again,
this was broken because we only ever calculate whether we are going
to use overlay scrollbars once the scrolled window is realized (and
the test case does not realize any window).
This patch does a couple of things:
o Removes the obscure 'extra_width' and 'extra_height' variables
making the request code exceedingly difficult to read
o Fixes the max-content-size properties introduced in bug 742281
so that they do not grow the minimum request.
o Cleanup of request code in general:
- min/max content sizes are clamped around the child request as needed
- scrollbar requests are only added in one place, after child request
sizes are calculated and without the extra_width/height thing.
If gtk_scrolled_window_add() has added a GtkViewport,
gtk_container_remove (GTK_CONTAINER (scrolled_window), child_widget);
or
gtk_container_remove(GTK_CONTAINER(scrolled_window),
gtk_bin_get_child(GTK_BIN(scrolled_window)));
removes both the added child widget and the viewport.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710471
This reverts commit 0943c9f6b2.
The commit caused unexpected breakage in gtk3-widget-factory,
and also broke the just-added max-content-size properties.
Needed to adjust this again after applying commit 4e5ecb7
for bug 742281. Now that we also have max content size properties,
pushed the addition of possible scrollbar sizes to after the
clause which clamps the child request size into min/max content
sizes.
This patch causes the scrolled window default behavior to change in
such a way that the natural size request of the child is unconditionally
reported, which probably should have been the case since day 1.
This should not cause significant fallout since a scrolled window is
normally used to expand/fill, eating up remaining space for scrollable
content - it will however cause the scrolled window to compete for
additional space with siblings, proportionally to the size of the
scrolled window's content.
The GtkScrolledWindow has support to set the minimum content size (both
width and height) which controls the minimum space allocated, but does
not exposes any way to control the maximum size the content can grow.
After the introduction of GtkPopover, which always uses the minimum
size of it's children widgets, the lack of max-content-width and -height
properties became a concrete use case.
This patch introduces the GtkScrolledWindow::max-content-width and
-height properties. The properties will alter the minimum size of
the scrolled window, making it grow up to the set value. They also
respect the previously set ::min-content-width and -height.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742281
GtkScrolledWindow leans towards using the minimum size of its child
widget, unless the scrollbar policy is GTK_POLICY_NEVER. This is
probably fine for most GtkScrollable implementations out there.
Especially when using GTK_SCROLL_MINIMUM, which is the default for all
implementations inside gtk+.
However, this is not good for GTK_SCROLL_NATURAL children. eg.,
VteTerminal's minimum size is 1x1 and natural size is the number of
visible rows and columns requested by the user. We really want to use
the natural size unless the user has resized the window to change that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766569
This code tries to add the minimum content size, if one is set, to the
GtkScrolledWindow's size requisition. This is obvious from the check
for non-negative values of min-content-height and min-content-width.
Using MAX needlessly makes the code harder to read by implying that
there is more to it when there actually isn't.
Fall out from 0d9ebb501dhttps://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766569
When we are beginning to calculate the height, if the vscrollbar_policy
is not GTK_POLICY_NEVER, and there is no min-content-height, then we
need some small non-zero value to get started. The idea is to always
ask for at least enough to fit the horizontal scrollbar.
Simply put, this should be the mirror image of the corresponding width
calculation code.
Those who got used to the buggy behaviour might notice that their
GtkScrolledWindows are not as tall as they used to be.
Fall out from 55196a705fhttps://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766530
Children tend to call back into the scrolled window while being removed
and that doesn't work too well if the scrolled window is destroyed
already as Christian Hergert found out.
The implicit grab may be finished so the pointer lies on top of the other
scrollbar, in this case one scrollbar should lose the hovering state, and
the other should gain it. So we must check for proximity in both indicators.
We were not taking the scrollable borders into account when
requesting size for the scrolled window, which could lead
to underallocating the scrollbars at size allocation time
when we *did* take the borders into account.
This is most notable with treeviews, where we have the
headers as borders, and was causing the treeview-crash-too-wide
reftest to fail.
And use it to handle kinetic scrolling in the GtkScrolledWindow.
However, dropping the delta check causes the X11-based kinetic
scroll to break since we don't have the stop event here. Correct handling of
xf86-input-libinput-based scroll events is still being discussed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756729
