Perform scrollbar visibility checks through a motion controller,
always based on GtkScrolledView-relative coordinates. The captured
event handler remains though, for a tiny bit of GDK_SCROLL event
handling.
GLib master propagates argument types in g_clear_pointer(), which causes
the usual function pointer casts to GDestroyNotify to trip compiler
warnings. Additionally, this commit changes some cleanup functions where
appropriate (wl_data_source_destroy ->
gtk_primary_selection_source_destroy for struct
gtk_primary_selection_source).
(A) Put a space in "scrolled window" like the other doc comments
(B) Say "i.e." rather than "ie."
(C) Fix grammar from "makes [...] exactly reaches" to "exactly reach"
This is an automated change doing these command:
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_has_window gtk_widget_set_has_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_has_window gtk_widget_get_has_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_parent_window gtk_widget_set_parent_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_parent_window gtk_widget_get_parent_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_window gtk_widget_set_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_window gtk_widget_get_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_register_window gtk_widget_register_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_unregister_window gtk_widget_unregister_surface
git checkout NEWS*
Remove all the old 2.x and 3.x version annotations.
GTK+ 4 is a new start, and from the perspective of a
GTK+ 4 developer all these APIs have been around since
the beginning.
The main GDK thread lock is not portable and deprecated.
The only reason why gdk_threads_add_timeout() and
gdk_threads_add_timeout_full() exist is to allow invoking a callback
with the GDK lock held, in case 3rd party libraries still use the
deprecated gdk_threads_enter()/gdk_threads_leave() API.
Since we're removing the GDK lock, and we're releasing a new major API,
such code cannot exist any more; this means we can use the GLib API for
installing timeout callbacks.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793124
Change constructors to reflect that.
While doing so, also add a fallback argument to the cursor constructors,
so it is now possible to create cursors with fallback.
This patch makes that work using 1 of 2 options:
1. Add all missing enums to the switch statement
or
2. Cast the switch argument to a uint to avoid having to do that (mostly
for GdkEventType).
I even found a bug while doing that: clearing a GtkImage with a surface
did not notify thae surface property.
The reason for enabling this flag even though it is tedious at times is
that it is very useful when adding values to an enum, because it makes
GTK immediately warn about all the switch statements where this enum is
relevant.
And I expect changes to enums to be frequent during the GTK4 development
cycle.
All kinetic scrolling initial velocity calculations are now
taken from the scroll controller. The handling of timeouts
to snap back when overshooting has been also made to just
apply on devices that can't emit ::scroll-begin/end.
• Use disconnect_by_data() to catch both _adjustment_changed() and now
_adjustment_value_changed(), as the latter had been missed until now.
• Also disconnect from indicator_value_changed(), which was not done in
destroy() due to indicator_reset() and remove_indicator() disagreeing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775074
Since setting a clip is mandatory for almost all widgets, we can as well
change the size-allocate signature to include a out_clip parameter, just
like GtkCssGadget did. And since we now always propagate baselines, we
might as well pass that one on to size-allocate.
This way we can also make sure to transform the clip returned from
size-allocate to parent-coordinates, i.e. the same coordinate space
priv->allocation is in.
We now rely on toplevels receiving and forwarding all the events
the windowing should be able to handle. Event masks are no longer a
way to determine whether an event is deliverable ot a widget.
Events will always be delivered in the three captured/target/bubbled
phases, widgets can now just attach GtkEventControllers and let those
handle the events.
POLICY_AUTOMATIC means scrollbars are only shown when needed, i.e. when
the size of the window is not large enough to show the entire child. So
when measuring the preferred size, such scrollbars should be ignored.
But measure() added size for *any* non-overlay scrollbar of the opposite
orientation, e.g. for horizontal size, it added the width of vscrollbar.
So we requested for child + bar, & having enough for child meant that the
policy hid the bar, leaving extra space empty below/right of the child.
Fix this by only adding size for such bars if they use POLICY_ALWAYS.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
• Only calculate the specified dimension – rather than measuring both &
discarding the other (which will often be recalculated right after)
• Only measure a given child scrollbar if it may be visible, not always
• Move variables into narrowest scopes & otherwise improve readability
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
If the child added is not a Scrollable, it gets wrapped in a ViewPort –
which is. So it is impossible to end up with a non-Scrollable child.
Just check we have /any/ child where needed, which is semantically nicer
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
• intro: Clarify that external policy and/or adjustments can be used.
• add(): Don’t waffle on about having to add a ViewPort since we handle
that transparently for the user, so they can add() any widget.
• Adjustment stuff: most of this was repeating the docs for Scrollbar,
so just refer the user to that. Also, mention how
policies NEVER and EXTERNAL interact with all this.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
This reverts commit 901e5ff3a3.
This causes criticals in e.g. the Text View: Multiple Buffers demo.
More work is required to get a fix for Bug 778853 that does not cause
anything else to regress.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
POLICY_AUTOMATIC means scrollbars are only shown when needed, i.e. when
the size of the window is not large enough to show the entire child. So
when measuring the preferred size, such scrollbars should be ignored.
But measure() was adding size for bars for which policy_may_be_visible()
was TRUE, which it returns for POLICY_ALWAYS (good) & _AUTOMATIC (bad).
So we reserved space for child plus scrollbars, & because we have enough
space for the child, POLICY_AUTOMATIC hides the scrollbar, leaving the
extra reserved space empty at the right/bottom sides of the child. This
is very noticeable/inconvenient for non-overlay, automatic scrollbars.
Fix this by only requesting size for scrollbars that use POLICY_ALWAYS,
rather than basing the decision on policy_may_be_visible().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778853
the scrollbar passed in better be either priv->hscrollbar or
priv->vscrollbar. Ensure that by using a simple else instead of an
else-if and a g_assert.
...which treats the first '.' in doc comments as the end of the summary.
So, e.g., in gtkmm, get_kinetic_scrolling() is currently summarised as
"Changes the behaviour of @scrolled_window wrt." Not very informative!
No need for a period there & anyway, the phrase "wrt to" is superfluous,
and we have space to actually say "with regard to", so just do that now.
These complicate a lot of GdkWindow internals to implement features
that not a lot of apps use, and will be better achieved using gsk.
So, we just drop it all.
Add a new ::measure vfunc similar to GtkCssGadget's that widget
implementations have to override instead of the old get_preferred_width,
get_preferred_height, get_preferred_width_for_height,
get_preferred_height_for_width and
get_preferred_height_and_baseline_for_width.
And with it, gtk_widget_get_visual() and gtk_widget_set_visual() are
gone.
We now always use the RGBA visual (if available) and otherwise fall back
to the system visual.
In gtkscrolledwindow.c, the return type of _get_propagate_natural_width()
and _get_propagate_natural_height() were accidentally gint instead of
gboolean, fixed to match the type correctly declared in the header file.
Making propagation of child natural sizes mandatory (or default, even) was
evidently a mistake as this causes dynamic content in a scrolled window
to resize it's parent when the scrolled window is competing for space
with an adjacent widget.
This patch instead adds API to control whether natural width and
height of the child should be propagated through the scrolled windows
size requests.
Scroll history must refer to a timespan for the values to be valid, otherwise
we return FALSE, in this case the stored event(s) should be discarded anyway.
It could be the case that the last scroll event is received long after any
previous scroll event, in this case the last scroll event discards all "old"
scroll events, and scroll_history_finish() returns FALSE because there's no
time/offset deltas in the scroll history.
This is desired so we don't trigger the deceleration effect if there was no
effective velocity, we still must reset the installed scroll cursor, so take
it out of this if() condition.
This is a bit of fallout from 34feba1, now that we resolve
the has_indicators value earlier than realize, it becomes
possible to call gdk_window_move_resize() before realization.
Just added the appropriate checks.
Widgets should support size requests before being realized in general,
otherwise this can cause flicker/resize at initial display time as
the toplevel window can make a request before realize/allocate.
This also makes the added testsuite/gtk/scrolledwindow.c test work again,
this was broken because we only ever calculate whether we are going
to use overlay scrollbars once the scrolled window is realized (and
the test case does not realize any window).
This patch does a couple of things:
o Removes the obscure 'extra_width' and 'extra_height' variables
making the request code exceedingly difficult to read
o Fixes the max-content-size properties introduced in bug 742281
so that they do not grow the minimum request.
o Cleanup of request code in general:
- min/max content sizes are clamped around the child request as needed
- scrollbar requests are only added in one place, after child request
sizes are calculated and without the extra_width/height thing.
If gtk_scrolled_window_add() has added a GtkViewport,
gtk_container_remove (GTK_CONTAINER (scrolled_window), child_widget);
or
gtk_container_remove(GTK_CONTAINER(scrolled_window),
gtk_bin_get_child(GTK_BIN(scrolled_window)));
removes both the added child widget and the viewport.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710471
This reverts commit 0943c9f6b2.
The commit caused unexpected breakage in gtk3-widget-factory,
and also broke the just-added max-content-size properties.
Needed to adjust this again after applying commit 4e5ecb7
for bug 742281. Now that we also have max content size properties,
pushed the addition of possible scrollbar sizes to after the
clause which clamps the child request size into min/max content
sizes.
This patch causes the scrolled window default behavior to change in
such a way that the natural size request of the child is unconditionally
reported, which probably should have been the case since day 1.
This should not cause significant fallout since a scrolled window is
normally used to expand/fill, eating up remaining space for scrollable
content - it will however cause the scrolled window to compete for
additional space with siblings, proportionally to the size of the
scrolled window's content.
The GtkScrolledWindow has support to set the minimum content size (both
width and height) which controls the minimum space allocated, but does
not exposes any way to control the maximum size the content can grow.
After the introduction of GtkPopover, which always uses the minimum
size of it's children widgets, the lack of max-content-width and -height
properties became a concrete use case.
This patch introduces the GtkScrolledWindow::max-content-width and
-height properties. The properties will alter the minimum size of
the scrolled window, making it grow up to the set value. They also
respect the previously set ::min-content-width and -height.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=742281
GtkScrolledWindow leans towards using the minimum size of its child
widget, unless the scrollbar policy is GTK_POLICY_NEVER. This is
probably fine for most GtkScrollable implementations out there.
Especially when using GTK_SCROLL_MINIMUM, which is the default for all
implementations inside gtk+.
However, this is not good for GTK_SCROLL_NATURAL children. eg.,
VteTerminal's minimum size is 1x1 and natural size is the number of
visible rows and columns requested by the user. We really want to use
the natural size unless the user has resized the window to change that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766569
This code tries to add the minimum content size, if one is set, to the
GtkScrolledWindow's size requisition. This is obvious from the check
for non-negative values of min-content-height and min-content-width.
Using MAX needlessly makes the code harder to read by implying that
there is more to it when there actually isn't.
Fall out from 0d9ebb501dhttps://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766569
When we are beginning to calculate the height, if the vscrollbar_policy
is not GTK_POLICY_NEVER, and there is no min-content-height, then we
need some small non-zero value to get started. The idea is to always
ask for at least enough to fit the horizontal scrollbar.
Simply put, this should be the mirror image of the corresponding width
calculation code.
Those who got used to the buggy behaviour might notice that their
GtkScrolledWindows are not as tall as they used to be.
Fall out from 55196a705fhttps://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766530
Children tend to call back into the scrolled window while being removed
and that doesn't work too well if the scrolled window is destroyed
already as Christian Hergert found out.
The implicit grab may be finished so the pointer lies on top of the other
scrollbar, in this case one scrollbar should lose the hovering state, and
the other should gain it. So we must check for proximity in both indicators.
We were not taking the scrollable borders into account when
requesting size for the scrolled window, which could lead
to underallocating the scrollbars at size allocation time
when we *did* take the borders into account.
This is most notable with treeviews, where we have the
headers as borders, and was causing the treeview-crash-too-wide
reftest to fail.
And use it to handle kinetic scrolling in the GtkScrolledWindow.
However, dropping the delta check causes the X11-based kinetic
scroll to break since we don't have the stop event here. Correct handling of
xf86-input-libinput-based scroll events is still being discussed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756729
Otherwise it's attempted through a timeout, which gets cancelled early after,
and the slider disappears after a while with no mouse activity despite the
ongoing implicit grab.
Once the grab is finished, check_update_scrollbar_proximity() will be called
again on both scrollbars, and the fade out animation will be triggered as a
result.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754745
These days exposure happens only on the native windows (generally the
toplevel window) and is propagated down recursively. The expose event
is only useful for backwards compat, and in fact, for double buffered
widgets we totally ignore the event (and non-double buffering breaks
on wayland).
So, by not setting the mask we avoid emitting these events and then
later ignoring them.
We still keep it on eventbox, fixed and layout as these are used
in weird ways that want backwards compat.
In order to play along with child widgets that use scroll events for anything
else than scrolling, it will be better to do this in the bubble phase, so
the child widget has an opportunity to GDK_EVENT_STOP the event before we
trigger kinetic scrolling.
This of course won't work for widgets that choose to reimplement scroll event
handling themselves, they should be smart at resorting to GtkScrolledWindow's
scroll event handling.
This fixes kinetic scrolling kicking in too pervasively on widgets that eg.
implement zoom on scroll events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753495
