Remove all the old 2.x and 3.x version annotations.
GTK+ 4 is a new start, and from the perspective of a
GTK+ 4 developer all these APIs have been around since
the beginning.
The main GDK thread lock is not portable and deprecated.
The only reason why gdk_threads_add_timeout() and
gdk_threads_add_timeout_full() exist is to allow invoking a callback
with the GDK lock held, in case 3rd party libraries still use the
deprecated gdk_threads_enter()/gdk_threads_leave() API.
Since we're removing the GDK lock, and we're releasing a new major API,
such code cannot exist any more; this means we can use the GLib API for
installing timeout callbacks.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=793124
The trough widgets have the slider on top of the fill level and the
hilight widget. Make sure the widget stacking respects that.
This is particularly relevant because picking event targets should pick
the slider and not the hilight widget.
Bug 737175 aimed to ensure that scrolling up on a horizontal range would
result in its value increasing, as that’s what users intuitively expect.
However, its commit 416c370da1 meant that,
if the event gives scroll deltas, we inverted our delta unconditionally.
So it broke horizontal scrolling: scrolling left moved the slider right…
We must only invert if using dy as delta. dx already has the right sign,
so inverting it was wrong.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788905
It does not hurt us to keep middle clicks doing the same
as shift-primary clicks. This makes the transition from gtk2
less painful in terms of muscle memory.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787669
This patch makes that work using 1 of 2 options:
1. Add all missing enums to the switch statement
or
2. Cast the switch argument to a uint to avoid having to do that (mostly
for GdkEventType).
I even found a bug while doing that: clearing a GtkImage with a surface
did not notify thae surface property.
The reason for enabling this flag even though it is tedious at times is
that it is very useful when adding values to an enum, because it makes
GTK immediately warn about all the switch statements where this enum is
relevant.
And I expect changes to enums to be frequent during the GTK4 development
cycle.
Since setting a clip is mandatory for almost all widgets, we can as well
change the size-allocate signature to include a out_clip parameter, just
like GtkCssGadget did. And since we now always propagate baselines, we
might as well pass that one on to size-allocate.
This way we can also make sure to transform the clip returned from
size-allocate to parent-coordinates, i.e. the same coordinate space
priv->allocation is in.
We now rely on toplevels receiving and forwarding all the events
the windowing should be able to handle. Event masks are no longer a
way to determine whether an event is deliverable ot a widget.
Events will always be delivered in the three captured/target/bubbled
phases, widgets can now just attach GtkEventControllers and let those
handle the events.
Add a new ::measure vfunc similar to GtkCssGadget's that widget
implementations have to override instead of the old get_preferred_width,
get_preferred_height, get_preferred_width_for_height,
get_preferred_height_for_width and
get_preferred_height_and_baseline_for_width.
We only keep one align flag per child, so it seems odd to
keep separate h/v expand flags. Just keep one expand flag
and interpret it according to orientation. Allow setting
the expand flag for child widgets too, though, so we can
make widget expand without interfering with the recursive
widget expand flag.
Update all callers.
Use the new possibility of expanding child widgets to make
the label of check and radio buttons expand. This fixes
unexpected behavior of these widgets in RTL in some places.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765742
Since we are really only interested in the center point of the
slider allocation, the pre-computed slider geometry is perfectly
fine, just use it always. This avoids the complication with
gadget visibility.
The slider gadget may be turned invisible as side-effect of
gtk_range_calc_slider(). If that happens,
gtk_css_gadget_get_content_allocation() returns { 0, 0, 0, 0},
which leads us to calculate a negative allocation for the highlight
node. Avoid this, by just reusing our already calculated slider
allocation in this case (it is not technically the same as the
content, allocation, but the difference hardly matter here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764022
We previously considered any click inside the trough if it
hit an area that the slider might cover. Bring this behavior
back; the trough of scales is otherwise just too narrow to
hit easily with a click.
The contents node was not getting state updates at all, and the
trough node was missing some state updates as well, because we
were not calling update_trough_state() in all the places where
it is needed.
And add a default color like it was before.
This also fixes other issues with scale values interacting with scale
mark labels, which were buggy at least since 3.18.
The way this method is used from the GtkRange subclasses doesn't really
work well when the slider properties change as a consequence of e.g. a
style class being applied (e.g. the fine-tune style class).
In fact, there's no need to read the minimum slider size out of band,
and we can obtain the same result in a way that always work by setting a
private property on GtkRange.
Since we can use negative margins, we should not use the margin box
for the slider area. Use the border box instead, since that's what is
typically mapped to the visible area.
This commit introduces another node, called "contents", that holds the
main contents of the range. This allows for the main gadget itself to
span across the whole surface of the widget now.
