Setting windows undecorated was broken by some of the recent
shadow width changes. We need to ensure that shadow width is
zero for undecorated windows, then things work again.
If the delete event ends up destroying the widget, unsetting
priv->delete_event_handler will happen on invalid memory, so
unset it before the widget is possibly destroyed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726825
Theoretically, we apply the shape mask client-side ourselves
with an ARGB32 pixmap and intersect it to get a union shape,
but I don't particularly care enough to write that code.
Realistic application code using bounding shapes in 2014 is
quite rare.
Widgets should only call set_realized() after having created and
registered their GDK windows. In this case, the creation of the style
context (or more exactly: figuring out the scale factor for it) requires
knowing if the widget is already realized. Which it isn't.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726717
expected a valid semicolon
sounds kinda not so great. Make it say
expected semicolon
Unless somebody can tell me the difference between valid and invalid
semicolons?
We had a margin of 30 before/after the text. Put that add around
the icon as well, and separate the icon and text by 30 pixels.
This does not affect the appearance of message dialogs without
icons.
It seems that some backends implemented get_root_origin wrong
and returned the client window coordinates, not the frame window
coordinates. Since it's possible to implement generically for all
windows, let's do that instead of having a separate impl vfunc.
Lots of code, including dragging code in GtkWindow, use these
fields. Setting them to 0 causes lots of strange and weird bugs.
Use the same "hack" from query_device_state of just using
win_x / win_y for now. We'll convert this to the proper fake root
coordinate system used by get_root_coords in the next commit.
If a textview had lateral windows that might displace the text window, the
handles and popovers would appear displaced. Those lateral windows aren't
affected by RTL/LTR settings, so just checking for left/top is ok here.
And the counterpart to unmaximize when dragging a maximized window, if
touch devices aren't going to use EWMH moveresize, having this one at least
makes things feel a bit less awkward.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709914
Sadly, EWMH moveresize mechanism can't work with touch devices for two
reasons:
1) As a mutter implementation detail, the device is queried in order
to check whether the dragging button is still pressed. Touch devices
won't report the button 1 being pressed through pointer emulation.
2) Even bypassing that check, on X11 touch events are selected prior
to sequences being started, either through XISelectEvents or
XIGrabTouchBegin, no late registering through active grabs is allowed,
as WMs do on reaction to EWMH moveresize messages.
So for the time being, make touch devices fallback on emulated window
dragging, which at least allows for moving windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=709914
We want to present a clean, rounded top when there is nothing
else to show, but many dialogs in applications rely on showing
information in their title, so add a label and show the title
when it is not empty.
