This is ithe first step towards converting the parsing code to use
tokens. For now, the topken type is just a magic enum value that only
works as-needed.
This library is meant to be the new CSS library that gets used from GDK,
GSK and GTK for string printing and parsing.
As a first step, move GtkCssProviderError into it.
While doing so, split it into GtkCssParserError (for critical problems)
and GtkCssParserWarning (for non-critical problems).
Remove all the old 2.x and 3.x version annotations.
GTK+ 4 is a new start, and from the perspective of a
GTK+ 4 developer all these APIs have been around since
the beginning.
commit 475d916eb9 added various paths that
use theme-name for this, but the existing path already used THEME, with
a subsequent description referring to the latter. So use that everywhere
This is just lots of renaming.
The interface remains private, so the public API does not change, apart
from removing the definition of the Interface object to avoid
subclassing.
When loading a per-theme settings.ini file, look for it in
the same directory where we found the gtk.css file for the
theme. Previously, we were always looking in
$prefix/share/themes/THEME/gtk-3.0/, even if the css was
loaded from somewhere else.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641354
With this change, we now look in
$XDG_DATA_HOME/themes/THEME/gtk-3.x
$HOME/.themes/THEME/gtk-3.x
$XDG_DATA_DIRS/themes/THEME/gtk-3.x
GTK_DATA_PREFIX/themes/THEME/gtk-3.x
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641354
Instead of
/org/gtk/libgtk/theme/$THEME-$VARIANT.css
look at
/org/gtk/libgtk/theme/$THEME/gtk-$VARIANT.css
and that way mirror the directory layout of real themes.
Currently, GtkCssProvider can emit ::parsing-error only during
the actual parsing, although the documentation hints that it might
happen at other times.
This commit adds a emit_error method to the GtkStyleProviderPrivate
interface that will let us emit errors from the compute() implementations
as well, which can be useful (e.g. if an image fails to load).
Split the CSS docs off from the GtkCssProvider docs and
give them their own chapter. Among other things, this commit
introduces more or less complete definitions of the syntax for
the supported selectors, a complete list of all supported
properties, and definitions for their values. This includes
documentation for GTK+-specific properties such as -gtk-icon-source.
When loading a nonexisting CSS file using
gtk_css_provider_load_from_file() or gtk_css_provider_load_from_path()
we would emit the error using a NULL scanner. Don't do that, because
we'll have a NULL section in that case and error handlers don't like
that.
Testcase attached.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1277959
GtkCssProvider was using the wrong unref function for GtkCssKeyframe
objects. Funnily, this didn't crash at all, the refcount was at the
same place in the struct - it just didn't free all the memory, causing
valgrind to complain.
The node declaration has the same functionality as
gtk_css_node_declaration_add_to_widget_path(). So instead of using that
function on a path, you can use the original path and the declaration in
a matcher.
Look for themes in $prefix/themes/$name/gtk-$version/ (for
version = 3.16, 3.14, ...), before using the old location
$prefix/themes/$name/gtk-3.0/. This gives theme authors a
way to support multiple versions of GTK+ 3 with separate
css files.
Don't take a state when constructing the CSS matcher. Instead, rely on
the newly introduced state in the widget path.
This way, the state can be queried not only on the first element, but on
all elements of the widget path.
We want to have the "-gtk-" prefix for our custom CSS properties. But
we also want to parse names starting with a "-" as style properties.
So make sure that "-gtk-" is treated like a normal property and we emit
errors when somebody uses it wrong.
This is to catch errors with people typing
-gtk-iconsource: none;
instead of the correct
-gtk-icon-source: none;
expected a valid semicolon
sounds kinda not so great. Make it say
expected semicolon
Unless somebody can tell me the difference between valid and invalid
semicolons?
Non-inset box-shadows are no longer ignored by the GTK+ theming engine,
outset shadows are supported.
Signed-off-by: Rob Bradford <rob@linux.intel.com>
Rather than first collecting matches and then getting the change
for them we do the change collection directly on the tree. This
is about twice as fast.
Now we use the selector tree everywhere, so there is no need to
keep around the linear selectors unless we're using them to
verify the tree correctness, so free them.
