This commit introduces GtkPicture, which is supposed to complement
GtkImage.
GtkImage will be adapted to always display an icon, while
GtkPicture displays regular imagery.
Instead declare a priv local. We should do this even if we don't remove
the priv pointer from GtkWidget entirely, just to stay consistent with
new code we introduce.
The code is mostly stolen from graphene.
Allocators support any alignment, but their implementation
only calls system aligned allocator functions if malloc()
is not aligned to 16-byte boundaries. If it is aligned,
the implementation just calls malloc() regardless of which
alignment is requested by the caller.
This can be fixed by saving the result of meson malloc()
alignment check and adding a few conditions to the implementation,
but right now GSK and GTK only need 16-byte alignment either way.
* A bunch of new variables for config.h.meson
* A check for aligned allocation being necessary at all
(graphene must use GCC vector instructions or SSE2)
* A check for C malloc() being aligned at 16-byte boundaries
* A check for a few special aligned allocator functions being
present and not being built-ins (posix_memalign is a builtin
in GCC, even on platforms where there is no posix_memalign
system function)
* Added -mstackrealign flag on Windows, since otherwise
stack variables may become unaligned when the stack briefly
passes through OS code (such as in various callbacks and
handlers)
Otherwise, requesting a min size in em where the equivalent in px had a
fractional part would lead to the widget getting allocated 1 too few px.
You could see this in the CSS property vs. allocation in the Inspector.
Note that margin/border/padding are left alone: the rationale is that we
do as browsers do, and Benjamin said we already do that for those,
whereas his tests on min-(width|height) showed otherwise. My subsequent
analysis indicated it to be far less clear-cut than that, but he remains
unconvinced that we should ceil() all the things! So just do these ones.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/1088
This is the API used by GtkMenu to properly position menus on the screen
without requiring GTK to query the menu window's position or the work
area of where the window is positioned. It makes it possible to position
popup windows properly when using Wayland.
Make this API available to external users so custom popup windows can be
positioned properly as well.
Related: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/issues/997
Causing a grab in the handler for ::pressed by, e.g., popping up a
context menu will cause the gesture to be canceled and, subsequently,
::end and ::released to be fired, all while the button is still
physically pressed. That results in no event being available to the
::released handler and garbage coordinates, given that
gtk_gesture_get_point() returns FALSE.
Emitting ::released can be avoided by checking the return value
gtk_gesture_get_point().
Querying the event sequence of a gesture will always yield NULL for
non-touch events, but passing NULL in to calls to
gtk_gesture_get_last_event() is a perfectly valid use case.
Application is not expecting that.
Bug found due gdk_seat_grab() failure on Lock Screen. When user
Unlock the screen, the application is visible but does not receive
enter-event any more on X11/GNOME.
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1485968
Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571422
Signed-off-by: Victor Toso <victortoso@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Carlos Garnacho <carlosg@gnome.org>
That code branch is meant to check for key events, seems obvious we want
GDK_KEY_PRESS, not GDK_BUTTON_PRESS (which also broke the branch right
below).
Makes us all able to dismiss popovers again.
