This is an automated change doing these command:
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_has_window gtk_widget_set_has_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_has_window gtk_widget_get_has_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_parent_window gtk_widget_set_parent_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_parent_window gtk_widget_get_parent_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_set_window gtk_widget_set_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_get_window gtk_widget_get_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_register_window gtk_widget_register_surface
git sed -f g gtk_widget_unregister_window gtk_widget_unregister_surface
git checkout NEWS*
Remove all the old 2.x and 3.x version annotations.
GTK+ 4 is a new start, and from the perspective of a
GTK+ 4 developer all these APIs have been around since
the beginning.
Same reason as GtkViewport does it: We might allocate child widgets
outside of the paned's content allocation. For drawing, we add a clip
node.
This was causing the "Record" button in the inspector recorder to ignore
pointer events since the treeview column header label in the GtkPaned
was swallowing it.
Change constructors to reflect that.
While doing so, also add a fallback argument to the cursor constructors,
so it is now possible to create cursors with fallback.
This patch makes that work using 1 of 2 options:
1. Add all missing enums to the switch statement
or
2. Cast the switch argument to a uint to avoid having to do that (mostly
for GdkEventType).
I even found a bug while doing that: clearing a GtkImage with a surface
did not notify thae surface property.
The reason for enabling this flag even though it is tedious at times is
that it is very useful when adding values to an enum, because it makes
GTK immediately warn about all the switch statements where this enum is
relevant.
And I expect changes to enums to be frequent during the GTK4 development
cycle.
Since setting a clip is mandatory for almost all widgets, we can as well
change the size-allocate signature to include a out_clip parameter, just
like GtkCssGadget did. And since we now always propagate baselines, we
might as well pass that one on to size-allocate.
This way we can also make sure to transform the clip returned from
size-allocate to parent-coordinates, i.e. the same coordinate space
priv->allocation is in.
We now rely on toplevels receiving and forwarding all the events
the windowing should be able to handle. Event masks are no longer a
way to determine whether an event is deliverable ot a widget.
Events will always be delivered in the three captured/target/bubbled
phases, widgets can now just attach GtkEventControllers and let those
handle the events.
gtk_snapshot_pop() => removed
gtk_snapshot_pop_and_append() => gtk_snapshot_pop()
So now there is no way to get a rendernode out of the snapshotting API
until you gtk_snapshot_finish().
Add a new ::measure vfunc similar to GtkCssGadget's that widget
implementations have to override instead of the old get_preferred_width,
get_preferred_height, get_preferred_width_for_height,
get_preferred_height_for_width and
get_preferred_height_and_baseline_for_width.
And with it, gtk_widget_get_visual() and gtk_widget_set_visual() are
gone.
We now always use the RGBA visual (if available) and otherwise fall back
to the system visual.
The cursor was set using gdk_window_set_cursor() even in
gdk_window_new().
So instead of having yet another flag, just make the users of that flag
call gdk_window_set_cursor() directly after the window was created.
Clip children to their window's size. That way no overdraw happens for
these widgets. But don't clip the handle.
We might in the future consider not clipping un-shrinkable children.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762021
The GtkGesturePan behavior of locking onto certain orientations may
come across as confusing, and is not strictly necessary for mice and
other pointing devices.
As GtkGesturePan is also a GtkGestureDrag, we just use the same
callbacks on both gestures.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759670
This was causing problems in the case when only one of the paned
children is visible - we would use uninitialized memory, leading
to invalide clip regions. Concretely, the signal tab in the inspector
would sometimes not render at all.
Drop the margin misuse and use the border allocation of the
handle gadget. We use negative margins to make the border allocation
larger without pushing the paned children out.
Instead of having old and new style, now have a GtkCssStyleChange opaque
object that will compute the changes you are interested in for you.
This simplifies change signal handlers quite a bit and avoids lots of
repeated computation in every signal handler.
Use CHILD1/CHILD2 instead of 0 and 1, always use the same order and
don't check for child NULL-ness, because it will be done in
gtk_paned_set_child_visible anyways.
These days exposure happens only on the native windows (generally the
toplevel window) and is propagated down recursively. The expose event
is only useful for backwards compat, and in fact, for double buffered
widgets we totally ignore the event (and non-double buffering breaks
on wayland).
So, by not setting the mask we avoid emitting these events and then
later ignoring them.
We still keep it on eventbox, fixed and layout as these are used
in weird ways that want backwards compat.
This can be used by applications to indicate that a paned is expected
to be actively used by the users for configuring the UI, and needs
a prominent handle.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738860
Event controllers now auto-attach, and the GtkCapturePhase only determines
when are events dispatched, but all controllers are managed by the widget wrt
grabs.
All callers have been updated.
GtkPaned may just capture pointer events because the child widget
doesn't happen to have GDK_TOUCH_MASK set, resort to checking the
device in that case.
Dragging is all handled by a GtkGesturePan now, matching the
paned orientation.
On touch events, a wider area is listened for, so touch events
don't need to be as accurate to initiate dragging, if no dragging
is truly initiated in this case, events are just forwarded for
child widgets to handle.
This should allow theme developers to use a very small width for
the resize handle, but still let users easily move the handle by
defining a wider resize area.
The additional resize area follows the "margin" style property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728073
