When using the pre-rendered png symbolics it seems that we're off a
tiny bit in a few of the pixels on the antialiased borders of a
stroke. To fix this we switch the icon to media-playback-stop-symbolic
which has no such antialiased borders.
I don't quite understand why the pixels are off, this needs more
research.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734668
If the foreground color has an alpha != 1 we used to just pass that into
the svg. This is useful to e.g. render an insensitive icon. However,
that is not an ideal model for symbolics. For instance, if the icon uses
overlapping areas when drawing, expecting these to be opaque then the
transparent color will result in a different alpha value for the overlapping
area. Also, non-foreground symbolic colors are still rendered opaque, and
the recoloring of pngs can't handle transparent colors.
So, instead we extract any alpha from the foreground, render using the
opaque colors and then apply the foreground alpha to the entire result.
This means we get an even transparency, even for other colors, and we
can apply alpha for the pngs too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734668
_gtk_icon_helper_get_size() is often used during size request and may
not necessary mean that the icon will be displayed immediately. In
many common cases we know the size without having to ensure a surface.
In many cases this means we can avoid loading an icon until needed, and
in the case of stateless IconHelpers such as GtkCellRendererPixbuf this
is very important as otherwise it will constantly be reloading icons
if the displayed set is larger than the in-memory icon cache.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734651
If a child has set_has_window == FALSE, it purely relies on the events set on
the parent window, for which the bin window used to just ensure the exposure
mask, eating all input events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734357
gtk_widget_get_events() must indeed tell about events enabled purely through
a GtkEventController, those events will most surely trigger event handlers.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734357
Change the initial value to something that is not a multiple of 3, so
that dismissing the notification on reset makes sense. Let's use 50
because that is already being used elsewhere.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734614
This check used to be present in the pre-gestures code, but was unintentionally
removed when splitting code into drag/multiclick gestures. The policy used to
be that if clicking happened on an already selected node, DnD would happen
instead of rubberband selection, so this behavior is resuscitated.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734143
Make gtk-reftest consult the REFTEST_MODULE_DIR environment
variable to find out where to look for modules, and fix the
libtool hack to construct the .libs subdirectory correctly.
This was another victim of clipping changes - the labels were
overdrawing each other, leading to test failure. Prevent this
by separating the grid columns.
I found that setting margins to zero makes the textview clip
away some overshooting pixels. So, instead of a 0/10 split,
do this test with a 2/8 split of margins, to avoid the clipping
issue.
AM_PATH_GTK_3_0([3.4], [], [], [gthread]) results in calling
"pkg-config --atleast-version 3.4 gtk+-3.0 gthread-2.0".
With pkg-config 0.28, that test fails, because the version of
gthread-2.0 is smaller than 3.4. This appears to be a behaviour
change since 0.26, but matches what the documentation said in 0.26.
Bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641638
Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/756476
Reviewed-by: Matthias Clasen <mclasen@redhat.com>
This shows what one currently has to do manually to get the typical
selection mode with blue headerbar and checkboxes in list rows.
The goal is to make this easier.
Make the Visual C++-related build files contain the actual GTK+ version, by
generating them during the configure stage and dist'ing them in the release
tarballs. This is especially important for builds of introspection files,
as one may need to look at the release version of GTK+ in those files.
