When downscaling images, Cairo apparently uses algorithms different
enough to make this test trip over. So add the downscaled image as the
reference instead of downscaling the previous reference image.
Fixes the border-image reftest. For real now.
The new downscaling code in Cairo doesn't allow this test, so we remove
the CSS that made the border downscaled.
So the test does test less now, but it still tests the repeat modes of
border images.
Passive grabs may take pointer focus out of the application, even though
the pointer didn't leave the window, but those events still trigger resetting
of the scroll axes. This is most visible with compiz, and possibly other
reparenting WMs, where passive grabs happen on the WM-managed window that
is a parent of the application toplevel.
As it is not possible to have scrolling happening on the timespan a passive
grab takes action, it is entirely safe for GTK+ to assume none happened if
it gets a crossing event of that nature.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574#c33
One requirement of .ui files is that each object must have an ID,
even if it is never referred to or directly loaded from the code.
This makes editing .ui files much more onerous than it has to be,
due to the frequent need to invent new IDs, while avoiding
clashes.
This commit makes IDs optional in the XML. They only need to
be provided for objects which are referred to or explictly loaded
from the code. Since GtkBuilder needs IDs for its own internal
accounting, we create IDs of the form ___object_N___ if not
specified in the XML.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712553
This information will be useful in case someone stumbles on a situation
similar to https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574, so we can
figure out where do the crossing events come from or go to easily.
It's been reported in several applications that scrolling feels jerky
since commit cc7b3985b3.
Investigation reported that the combination of passive 4-7 button grabs
on the toplevel and the presence of native subwindows might trigger
too often crossing events from the child window to the toplevel and
back as scroll "buttons" trigger the passive grab. Those crossing events
would reset the scroll valuators rendering scrolling from jerky on
touchpads (where there's intermediate smooth events between the emulated
button ones) to ineffective on regular mouse wheels (where the crossing
event would reset the valuators right before the single smooth scroll
event we get is delivered)
So, only reset scroll valuators when the pointer enters the toplevel
(we only care about this when the pointer is on the window after it's
been possibly scrolling somewhere else), and it doesn't come from an
inferior.
The situations where this happened varied though, the native subwindow
could be one created explicitly by the application, or created indirectly
through gdk_window_ensure_native(). The latter was mainly the case for
evolution (through gtk_selection_set_owner()) and any GtkScrolledWindow
under the oxygen-gtk3 theme (through gdk_window_set_composited())
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699574
When the menubar inserted by GtkApplicationWindow is the widest
widget in a csd window, its allocation gets cut short. Fix this
by taking the decoration size into account while calculating
the size request (it is implicitly taken into account in the
size allocation phase by _gtk_window_set_allocation).
Do the menubutton for app menu fallback ourselves in GtkWindow
for the csd, non-custom titlebar case. This fits better with
the way we handle other title buttons. Themes have control
over the placement of this button by placing menu in the
decoration-button-layout style property.
Make the sunny example useful by giving it a header bar
with app menu fallback. To test this under gnome-shell,
set APP_MENU_FALLBACK=1 in the environment.
Allow showing the fallback app menu with a menu button
in the header bar. Applications have to explicitly enable
this by calling gtk_header_bar_set_show_fallback_app_menu.
GtkAboutDialog highlights emails written as <...> and
urls written as http://... . gnome-terminal manages to
put <http://...> into its license text, which sadly
confuses the parser into running evolution on http://...
Fix things up far enough that <http://...> is now
recognized as url, and only the part inside the <> is
underlined (for email addresses, we include the <> in
the underline).
Commit 719dd636a9 replaces
margin-left/right with margin-start/end. CSS does not have
margin-start/margin-end properties, the sed script was a bit overeager.
Fwiw, CSS implements RTL margin styling via :dir(rtl) selectors.
