When events are paused, we should not return TRUE from prepare() or check().
GTK+ handles this for events that are already in the GTK+ queue, but
we also need suppress checks for events that are in the system queue - if we
return TRUE indicating that there are events in the system queue, then we'll
call dispatch(), and do nothing. The event source will spin, and will never
run the other phases of the paint clock.
(Broadway doesn't have a window system queue separate from the GDK event queue,
but we write the function the same way for consistency.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694274
When events are paused, we should not return TRUE from prepare() or check().
GTK+ handles this for events that are already in the GTK+ queue, but
we also need suppress checks for events that are in the system queue - if we
return TRUE indicating that there are events in the system queue, then we'll
call dispatch(), and do nothing. The event source will spin, and will never
run the other phases of the paint clock.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694274
Update the Visual Studio projects for gtka11y and the completion of the
projects that go along with it. This have been distcheck'ed on my Ubuntu
12.04 system.
Link to winmm.lib as well, as we are now using timeEndPeriod() and
timeBeginPeriod() since commit 5dbf814f (win32: Request higher
precision timers during animations).
This may ensure that the dialog is actually done initializing. We need to kill this
sleeping business and really use signals, sigh...
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
We only emit that signal when the user confirms the button's internal GtkFileChooserDialog,
or when he drags-and-drops stuff into the button.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
This ensures that data maintained by the button while the dialog opens/closes remains consistent.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
Previously we could end up in a situation where browse_list_model==NULL, and yet load_state==LOAD_FINISHED.
This is not a valid state. So, when we get rid of the list model, really ensure that we end up
in LOAD_EMPTY so nothing assumes that there is a valid list model around.
Signed-off-by: Federico Mena Quintero <federico@gnome.org>
We don't want to emit state changes for all the cells in a row, just for
the cell in the expander column. It's the only one that reports EXPANDED
or EXPANDABLE states, after all.
Also, contains refactoring of the affected functions for all the special
cases.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694059
We weren't checking the removed flag but the added flag for removal
emissions, so what would happen for every state change notification was:
- on state-added, both an "added" and a "removed" event were emitted
- on state-removed, nothing
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694059
Commit 1db87c897f accidentally removed
a check for !in_paint_idle in maybe_start_idle which causes us
to create a paint loop whenever something requests a phase
inside the paint_idle.
