We released all the 3.9x development snapshots using:
libgtk-4.0.so.0.xxxx.y
which means that the 4.0.0 release of GTK will have a lower SONAME than
the snapshots. To avoid that, bump the SONAME to 1.xxxx.y.
Fixes: #3392
We don't want to increase the interface age manually, because we're
going to end up forgetting about it.
Instead, we should tie it to the rest of the version:
- in stable (even minor) cycles, we don't add new API; the interface
age is the same as the micro version
- in unstable (odd minor) cycles, every new release might have new API,
or updates to newly added API; keep the interface age to 0
This removes one more manual thing to change during release, and keeps
us honest with our promise not to add symbols during stable cycles.
Having a property with the same name of a method makes some languages
which put properties and method names in the same flat namespace not
really happy about our choices. To avoid collisions, let's put the the
"fullscreen" property into the past, alongside the "maximized" property.
Drop the "don't write code that crashes" folksy bit; don't start
sentences with conjunctions; remove copy-pasted references to
"iconified" states; point to the corresponding property notification in
a consistent manner.
Currently, the implicit grab is broken on the first button release,
in the case of pressing multiple buttons simultaneously. This means
that we emit crossing events early, and the next button releases
are sent to the pointer focus widget instead.
Consider the implicit grab effective until all buttons are released,
and only unset the pointer implicit grab (and emit crossing events)
after there are no further buttons pressed. We do this by checking
event modifiers, given button release events do contain the modifiers
in effect at the time the event was generated, we have to look for
exactly one active button modifier.
Fixes weird pointer states after pressing multiple buttons on a
widget.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3426
Those requests are received while dealing with the ::layout frame
clock phase, this has the unintended side effect of making the
frame clock "rewind" to handle ::flush-events again during this
frame, which delays everything and practically halves the frame
rate.
We do intend to make the motion events dispatches on the next frame,
so do this in an idle at a slightly lower priority than layout/draw,
so the ::flush-events phase is actually requested for the next frame.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gtk/-/issues/3264
It tested that a widget shown after the window was mapped deals with
window resizing appropriately when doing the follow-up allocation. Now,
doing this only allocates both at the same time, as allocation happens
during the frame dispatch.
To do the equivalent now, one would have to write code that shows the
label after the first frame was drawn, and that's not possible via a
reftest, so lets remove it.
We don't need to go through the NSOpenGLContext for these.
We can just use the C API directly. It's also clearer what is using
CGLEnable() vs CGLSetParameter().
It was used by all surfaces to track 'is-mapped', but still part of the
GdkToplevelState, and is now replaced with a separate boolean in the
GdkSurface structure.
It also caused issues when a widget was unmapped, and due to that
unmapped a popover which hid its corresponding surface. When this
surface was hidden, it emitted a state change event, which would then go
back into GTK and queue a resize on popover widget, which would travel
back down to the widget that was originally unmapped, causing confusino
when doing future allocations.
To summarize, one should not hide widgets during allocation, and to
avoid this, make this new is-mapped boolean asynchronous when hiding a
surface, meaning the notification event for the changed mapped state
will be emitted in an idle callback. This avoids the above described
reentry issue.
