Windows WM handles AeroSnap for normal windows on keydown. We did this
on keyup only because we do not get a keydown message, even if Windows WM
does nothing with a combination. However, in some specific cases it DOES
do something - and we have no way to detect that. Specifically, winkey+downarrow
causes maximized window to be restored by WM, and GDK fails to detect that. Then
GDK gets a keyup message, figures that winkey+downarrow was pressed and released,
and handles the combination - by minimizing the window.
To overcome this, install a low-level keyboard hook (high-level ones have
the same problem as normal message loop - they don't get messages when
Windows WM handles combinations) and use it to detect interesting key combinations
before Windows WM has a chance to block them from being processed.
Once an interesting combination is detected, post a message to the window, which
will be handled in due order.
It should be noted that this code handles key repetitions in a very crude manner.
The downside is that AeroSnap will not work if hook installation function call fails.
Also, this is a global hook, and if the hook procedure does something wrong, bad things
can happen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776031
Instead of using some kind of flawed logic about modifying a keypress result
when CapsLock is toggled, just add a CapsLock shift level (and all derived
shift levels, i.e. Shift+CapsLock and CapsLock+AltGr and Shift+CapsLock+AltGr)
and query Windows keyboard layout API about the result of keypresses involving
CapsLock.
Keysym table is going to be (roughly) twice as large now, but CapsLock'ed
keypresses will give correct results for some keyboard layouts (such as
Czech keyboard layout, which without this change produces lowercase letters
for CapsLock->[0,2,3,4...] instead of uppercase ones).
Keymap update time also increases accordingly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165385
Instead of checking for window state and giving it extra styles that
fit, just give it all styles that it is missing. It turned out that
otherwise it is impossible to, for example, restore a maximized window
via sysmenu. Also, be more flexible towards GDK/WM window state mismatches
and consider the window minimized/maximized if *either* GDK or WM thinks so.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=776485
Just set check_for_dpi_awareness = TRUE and eventually it will be handled
correctly, even if setDpiAwareFunc() returns E_ACCESSDENIED or shcore functions
are NULL.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=777031
When primary monitor is smaller than the actual monitor on which the
window is being maximized, the WM will do widnow size adjustments
that will completely screw the window size if we try to make it
smaller than 100% fullscreen (to account for taskbar size, for example).
Fix this by overriding maximized window size during WM_WINDOWPOSCHANGING.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775808
Change the name of the property from stock-size to icon-size,
and make it an enum property instead of uint. This makes it
impossible to specify invalid numeric values in ui files, and
at the same time makes it possible to refer to the existing
values by their nick.
Fix up the callers.
If the rounded clip node is rectilinear, we can simplify it to a normal
clip node. If not, we really need to use a rounded clip node. In both
cases, we can do the same check we do when collecting normal clips and
avoid the clip node altogether if the child node does not get clipped
anyway.
This saves between 3 and 10 nodes in the widget factory, depending on
what page gets rendered.
Clip nodes have a clip rect and we only need to actually create a clip
node if any child node gets clipped at all. If the clip rect conains the
child node bounds entirely, we don't need a clip node.
Every added widget having a separate random widget type makes it useless
to use the widgetbowl demo for any sort of performance comparison.
Instead. use only one widget type for all the moving children but make
that changable.
I got a lot of "clip in clip" cases, for example a CellClip with a
CellTextClip inside. It is really trivial to merge these when we
pop and makes it easier for all backends, so lets do that.
