...which treats the first '.' in doc comments as the end of the summary.
So, e.g., in gtkmm, get_kinetic_scrolling() is currently summarised as
"Changes the behaviour of @scrolled_window wrt." Not very informative!
No need for a period there & anyway, the phrase "wrt to" is superfluous,
and we have space to actually say "with regard to", so just do that now.
Instead of
-gtk-icon-effect: dim;
-gtk-icon-effect: hilight;
we now use
-gtk-icon-filter: opacity(0.5);
-gtk-icon-filter: brightness(1.2);
respectively.
This node essentially implements the feColorMatrix SVG filter. I got the
idea yesterday after looking at the opacity implementation.
It can be used for opacity (not sure if we want to) and to implement a
bunch of the CSS filters.
If the signal handler ends up changing the label text,
the link is no longer around to update the css node.
Check for this possibility to avoid a crash here.
Homogeneous branches repeated the calculation/assignment of the initial
space available to children. This avoids that by shuffling some code.
Perhaps more importantly, in doing that, I ended up with some ambiguous
names, and Company and I realised how vague the pre-existing naming was.
"size" becomes "extra_space", as this is what it represents. Conversely,
"extra" becomes "size_given_to_child" (albeit still given out in two
different ways depending on whether the Box is homogeneous). My hope is
that these sections of code are now somewhat less baffling than before!
Now that every call to GtkCellArea is a snapshot call and no more cairo
calls are left, move the actual differentiation between Cairo and
Snapshot down to the cell renderer.
I had originally thought I'd use GskShadow for box-shadow, but didn't in
the end.
So now it's only used for text-shadow and icon-shadow, and those don't
have a spread.
VLAs are not supported by Visual Studio and possibly other compilers that
are supported by GTK+-3.90+, and probably never will be, although it is a
C99 specification, and it became optional for C11. It is also not a part
of the newer compiler requirements that are listed out for GTK+-3.90.x.
There exist concerns about the implementation of VLAs in compilers that
support them as well, so change it to a g_newa() approach.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773299
This causes the snapshotting algorithm to dump all widget nodes into
their own container node. We then name that group accordingly (ie
"GtkSwitch<0xdeadbeef>") so you can easily see which node belongs where.
The feature is toggleable in the inspector's visual tab.
There's a few problems with it, becuse GtkSnapshot optimized container
nodes away if they are not needed, so we are losing some widgets...
When the first/last color stop is not at 0%/100%, we need to start the
repeating at their offsets and not at 0%/100%.
Attached reftest demonstrates the problem.
Instead of making people intiialize a rectangle and then applying border
radius manually, provide a constructor that does it for them.
While doing that, also allow people to instead request the padding box
or the content box.
Refactor all relevant code to use this new constructor.
... and make the icon rendering code use it.
This requires moving even more shadow renering code into GSK, but so be
it. At least the "shadows not implemented" warning is now gone!
