The current implementation of qIsNull only returns true if the value is
positive zero. This behaviour is not useful for use cases like
QPointF::isNull, where QPointF(-0, -0).isNull() will return false.
There doesn't seem to be a reason why the function exhibits this
behaviour (-0.0 is not accounted for in the unit tests), and for the
case of QSizeF::scale it causes a bug: qIsNull is used to check for
division by 0.0 before it proceeds, which fails in the case of -0.0.
Task-number: QTBUG-7303
Change-Id: I767e5280bd26614e8e78ae62b274eb9bc4ade385
Reviewed-by: Lars Knoll <lars.knoll@nokia.com>
Reviewed-by: Gunnar Sletta <gunnar.sletta@nokia.com>
09dd19df5c