ef9b51ce99
It was an old test written in a very low-level way, which perhaps is ok to be independent of testlib in a few tests; OTOH, it was blacklisted on a couple of platforms. Perhaps doing touch events the standard way could be more stable. While we're at it: - verify that the touch events are accepted, and thus verify the new bool return value from commit() - implement paintEvent() to help understand the layout, and touchpoint locations - remove repeated QCOMPARE lines - skip the test if window positioning fails - try to un-blacklist it, on the assumption that window positioning failure was the reason Task-number: QTBUG-87025 Task-number: QTBUG-104656 Pick-to: 6.4 Change-Id: Ie22eb24abf95cd849990a56212be87d06ce8e574 Reviewed-by: Volker Hilsheimer <volker.hilsheimer@qt.io> Reviewed-by: Doris Verria <doris.verria@qt.io> |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
image | ||
itemmodels | ||
kernel | ||
math3d | ||
painting | ||
platform | ||
qopengl | ||
qopenglconfig | ||
qvulkan | ||
rhi | ||
text | ||
util | ||
CMakeLists.txt |