2021-01-07 15:57:27 +00:00
|
|
|
/*
|
|
|
|
* Copyright 2020 Google LLC
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
|
|
|
|
* found in the LICENSE file.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-09 18:10:59 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "include/private/SkSLIRNode.h"
|
2021-03-04 19:30:25 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "include/sksl/DSL.h"
|
2021-01-07 15:57:27 +00:00
|
|
|
#include "src/gpu/GrDirectContextPriv.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "src/gpu/GrGpu.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "src/sksl/SkSLIRGenerator.h"
|
|
|
|
#include "src/sksl/dsl/priv/DSLWriter.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "tests/Test.h"
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
#include <limits>
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-07 15:57:27 +00:00
|
|
|
using namespace SkSL::dsl;
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
SkSL::ProgramSettings default_settings() {
|
|
|
|
SkSL::ProgramSettings result;
|
|
|
|
result.fDSLMarkVarsDeclared = true;
|
|
|
|
result.fDSLMangling = false;
|
|
|
|
return result;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SkSL::ProgramSettings no_mark_vars_declared() {
|
|
|
|
SkSL::ProgramSettings result = default_settings();
|
|
|
|
result.fDSLMarkVarsDeclared = false;
|
|
|
|
return result;
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-05-12 15:26:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* In addition to issuing an automatic Start() and End(), disables mangling and optionally
|
|
|
|
* auto-declares variables during its lifetime. Variable auto-declaration simplifies testing so we
|
|
|
|
* don't have to sprinkle all the tests with a bunch of Declare(foo).release() calls just to avoid
|
|
|
|
* errors, especially given that some of the variables have options that make them an error to
|
|
|
|
* actually declare.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
2021-01-07 15:57:27 +00:00
|
|
|
class AutoDSLContext {
|
|
|
|
public:
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext(GrGpu* gpu, SkSL::ProgramSettings settings = default_settings(),
|
2021-04-09 19:33:53 +00:00
|
|
|
SkSL::ProgramKind kind = SkSL::ProgramKind::kFragment) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
Start(gpu->shaderCompiler(), kind, settings);
|
2021-01-07 15:57:27 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~AutoDSLContext() {
|
|
|
|
End();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
class ExpectError : public ErrorHandler {
|
|
|
|
public:
|
|
|
|
ExpectError(skiatest::Reporter* reporter, const char* msg)
|
|
|
|
: fMsg(msg)
|
|
|
|
, fReporter(reporter) {
|
|
|
|
SetErrorHandler(this);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
~ExpectError() override {
|
2021-02-23 19:57:01 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, !fMsg,
|
|
|
|
"Error mismatch: expected:\n%sbut no error occurred\n", fMsg);
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
SetErrorHandler(nullptr);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-25 14:45:49 +00:00
|
|
|
void handleError(const char* msg, PositionInfo* pos) override {
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, !strcmp(msg, fMsg),
|
|
|
|
"Error mismatch: expected:\n%sbut received:\n%s", fMsg, msg);
|
|
|
|
fMsg = nullptr;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
private:
|
|
|
|
const char* fMsg;
|
|
|
|
skiatest::Reporter* fReporter;
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
static bool whitespace_insensitive_compare(const char* a, const char* b) {
|
|
|
|
for (;;) {
|
|
|
|
while (isspace(*a)) {
|
|
|
|
++a;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
while (isspace(*b)) {
|
|
|
|
++b;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (*a != *b) {
|
|
|
|
return false;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
if (*a == 0) {
|
|
|
|
return true;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
++a;
|
|
|
|
++b;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-09 18:10:59 +00:00
|
|
|
// for use from SkSLDSLOnlyTest.cpp
|
|
|
|
void StartDSL(const sk_gpu_test::ContextInfo ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
Start(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu()->shaderCompiler());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLStartup, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-01-07 15:57:27 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
Expression e1 = 1;
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, e1.release()->description() == "1");
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = 1.0;
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, e2.release()->description() == "1.0");
|
|
|
|
Expression e3 = true;
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, e3.release()->description() == "true");
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a");
|
2021-01-11 20:42:44 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e4 = a;
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, e4.release()->description() == "a");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, whitespace_insensitive_compare("", ""));
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !whitespace_insensitive_compare("", "a"));
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !whitespace_insensitive_compare("a", ""));
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, whitespace_insensitive_compare("a", "a"));
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, whitespace_insensitive_compare("abc", "abc"));
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, whitespace_insensitive_compare("abc", " abc "));
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, whitespace_insensitive_compare("a b c ", "\n\n\nabc"));
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !whitespace_insensitive_compare("a b c d", "\n\n\nabc"));
|
2021-01-07 15:57:27 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
static SkSL::String stringize(DSLStatement& stmt) { return stmt.release()->description(); }
|
|
|
|
static SkSL::String stringize(DSLPossibleStatement& stmt) { return stmt.release()->description(); }
|
|
|
|
static SkSL::String stringize(DSLExpression& expr) { return expr.release()->description(); }
|
|
|
|
static SkSL::String stringize(DSLPossibleExpression& expr) { return expr.release()->description(); }
|
2021-05-06 14:47:06 +00:00
|
|
|
static SkSL::String stringize(DSLBlock& blck) { return blck.release()->description(); }
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
static SkSL::String stringize(SkSL::IRNode& node) { return node.description(); }
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
|
|
static void expect_equal(skiatest::Reporter* r, int lineNumber, T& input, const char* expected) {
|
|
|
|
SkSL::String actual = stringize(input);
|
|
|
|
if (!whitespace_insensitive_compare(expected, actual.c_str())) {
|
|
|
|
ERRORF(r, "(Failed on line %d)\nExpected: %s\n Actual: %s\n",
|
|
|
|
lineNumber, expected, actual.c_str());
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
template <typename T>
|
|
|
|
static void expect_equal(skiatest::Reporter* r, int lineNumber, T&& dsl, const char* expected) {
|
|
|
|
// This overload allows temporary values to be passed to expect_equal.
|
|
|
|
return expect_equal(r, lineNumber, dsl, expected);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#define EXPECT_EQUAL(a, b) expect_equal(r, __LINE__, (a), (b))
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-12 15:26:58 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLFlags, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), no_mark_vars_declared());
|
2021-05-12 15:26:58 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(All(GreaterThan(Float4(1), Float4(0))), "true");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Var x(kInt_Type, "x");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Declare(x), "int x;");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
SkSL::ProgramSettings settings;
|
|
|
|
settings.fOptimize = false;
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), settings,
|
|
|
|
SkSL::ProgramKind::kFragmentProcessor);
|
2021-05-12 15:26:58 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(All(GreaterThan(Float4(1), Float4(0))),
|
|
|
|
"all(greaterThan(float4(1.0), float4(0.0)))");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), SkSL::ProgramSettings());
|
2021-05-12 15:26:58 +00:00
|
|
|
Var x(kInt_Type, "x");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Declare(x), "int _0_x;");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLFloat, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
Expression e1 = Float(std::numeric_limits<float>::max());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, atof(e1.release()->description().c_str()) ==
|
|
|
|
std::numeric_limits<float>::max());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = Float(std::numeric_limits<float>::min());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, atof(e2.release()->description().c_str()) ==
|
|
|
|
std::numeric_limits<float>::min());
|
|
|
|
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Float2(0),
|
|
|
|
"float2(0.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Float2(-0.5, 1),
|
|
|
|
"float2(-0.5, 1.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Float3(0.75),
|
|
|
|
"float3(0.75)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Float3(Float2(0, 1), -2),
|
2021-03-05 14:11:38 +00:00
|
|
|
"float3(0.0, 1.0, -2.0)");
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Float3(0, 1, 2),
|
|
|
|
"float3(0.0, 1.0, 2.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Float4(0),
|
|
|
|
"float4(0.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Float4(Float2(0, 1), Float2(2, 3)),
|
2021-03-05 14:11:38 +00:00
|
|
|
"float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)");
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Float4(0, 1, Float2(2, 3)),
|
2021-03-05 14:11:38 +00:00
|
|
|
"float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)");
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Float4(0, 1, 2, 3),
|
|
|
|
"float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)");
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-23 20:15:11 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLVar x(kFloat_Type, "x");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(x = 1.0, "(x = 1.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(x = 1.0f, "(x = 1.0)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSLVar y(kFloat2_Type, "y");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(y.x() = 1.0, "(y.x = 1.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(y.x() = 1.0f, "(y.x = 1.0)");
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: floating point value is infinite\n");
|
|
|
|
Float(std::numeric_limits<float>::infinity()).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: floating point value is NaN\n");
|
|
|
|
Float(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN()).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'float2' constructor (expected 2 scalars,"
|
|
|
|
" but found 4)\n");
|
|
|
|
Float2(Float4(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'float4' constructor (expected 4 scalars,"
|
|
|
|
" but found 3)\n");
|
|
|
|
Float4(Float3(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLHalf, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
Expression e1 = Half(std::numeric_limits<float>::max());
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r,
|
|
|
|
atof(e1.release()->description().c_str()) == std::numeric_limits<float>::max());
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = Half(std::numeric_limits<float>::min());
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r,
|
|
|
|
atof(e2.release()->description().c_str()) == std::numeric_limits<float>::min());
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-05 14:11:38 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Half2(0),
|
|
|
|
"half2(0.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Half2(-0.5, 1),
|
|
|
|
"half2(-0.5, 1.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Half3(0.75),
|
|
|
|
"half3(0.75)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Half3(Half2(0, 1), -2),
|
|
|
|
"half3(0.0, 1.0, -2.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Half3(0, 1, 2),
|
|
|
|
"half3(0.0, 1.0, 2.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Half4(0),
|
|
|
|
"half4(0.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Half4(Half2(0, 1), Half2(2, 3)),
|
|
|
|
"half4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Half4(0, 1, Half2(2, 3)),
|
|
|
|
"half4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Half4(0, 1, 2, 3),
|
|
|
|
"half4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)");
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: floating point value is infinite\n");
|
|
|
|
Half(std::numeric_limits<float>::infinity()).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: floating point value is NaN\n");
|
|
|
|
Half(std::numeric_limits<float>::quiet_NaN()).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'half2' constructor (expected 2 scalars,"
|
|
|
|
" but found 4)\n");
|
|
|
|
Half2(Half4(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'half4' constructor (expected 4 scalars,"
|
|
|
|
" but found 3)\n");
|
|
|
|
Half4(Half3(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLInt, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-05 14:11:38 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Int(std::numeric_limits<int32_t>::max()),
|
|
|
|
"2147483647");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Int2(std::numeric_limits<int32_t>::min()),
|
|
|
|
"int2(-2147483648)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Int2(0, 1),
|
|
|
|
"int2(0, 1)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Int3(0),
|
|
|
|
"int3(0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Int3(Int2(0, 1), -2),
|
|
|
|
"int3(0, 1, -2)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Int3(0, 1, 2),
|
|
|
|
"int3(0, 1, 2)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Int4(0),
|
|
|
|
"int4(0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Int4(Int2(0, 1), Int2(2, 3)),
|
|
|
|
"int4(0, 1, 2, 3)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Int4(0, 1, Int2(2, 3)),
|
|
|
|
"int4(0, 1, 2, 3)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Int4(0, 1, 2, 3),
|
|
|
|
"int4(0, 1, 2, 3)");
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'int2' constructor (expected 2 scalars,"
|
|
|
|
" but found 4)\n");
|
|
|
|
Int2(Int4(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'int4' constructor (expected 4 scalars,"
|
|
|
|
" but found 3)\n");
|
|
|
|
Int4(Int3(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-03 18:25:35 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLUInt, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UInt(std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::max()),
|
|
|
|
"4294967295");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UInt2(std::numeric_limits<uint32_t>::min()),
|
|
|
|
"uint2(0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UInt2(0, 1),
|
|
|
|
"uint2(0, 1)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UInt3(0),
|
|
|
|
"uint3(0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UInt3(UInt2(0, 1), -2),
|
|
|
|
"uint3(0, 1, -2)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UInt3(0, 1, 2),
|
|
|
|
"uint3(0, 1, 2)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UInt4(0),
|
|
|
|
"uint4(0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UInt4(UInt2(0, 1), UInt2(2, 3)),
|
|
|
|
"uint4(0, 1, 2, 3)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UInt4(0, 1, UInt2(2, 3)),
|
|
|
|
"uint4(0, 1, 2, 3)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UInt4(0, 1, 2, 3),
|
|
|
|
"uint4(0, 1, 2, 3)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'uint2' constructor (expected 2 scalars,"
|
|
|
|
" but found 4)\n");
|
|
|
|
UInt2(UInt4(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'uint4' constructor (expected 4 scalars,"
|
|
|
|
" but found 3)\n");
|
|
|
|
UInt4(UInt3(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLShort, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-05 14:11:38 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Short(std::numeric_limits<int16_t>::max()),
|
|
|
|
"32767");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Short2(std::numeric_limits<int16_t>::min()),
|
|
|
|
"short2(-32768)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Short2(0, 1),
|
|
|
|
"short2(0, 1)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Short3(0),
|
|
|
|
"short3(0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Short3(Short2(0, 1), -2),
|
|
|
|
"short3(0, 1, -2)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Short3(0, 1, 2),
|
|
|
|
"short3(0, 1, 2)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Short4(0),
|
|
|
|
"short4(0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Short4(Short2(0, 1), Short2(2, 3)),
|
|
|
|
"short4(0, 1, 2, 3)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Short4(0, 1, Short2(2, 3)),
|
|
|
|
"short4(0, 1, 2, 3)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Short4(0, 1, 2, 3),
|
|
|
|
"short4(0, 1, 2, 3)");
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'short2' constructor (expected 2 scalars,"
|
|
|
|
" but found 4)\n");
|
|
|
|
Short2(Short4(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'short4' constructor (expected 4 scalars,"
|
|
|
|
" but found 3)\n");
|
|
|
|
Short4(Short3(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-05-03 18:25:35 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLUShort, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UShort(std::numeric_limits<uint16_t>::max()),
|
|
|
|
"65535");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UShort2(std::numeric_limits<uint16_t>::min()),
|
|
|
|
"ushort2(0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UShort2(0, 1),
|
|
|
|
"ushort2(0, 1)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UShort3(0),
|
|
|
|
"ushort3(0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UShort3(UShort2(0, 1), -2),
|
|
|
|
"ushort3(0, 1, -2)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UShort3(0, 1, 2),
|
|
|
|
"ushort3(0, 1, 2)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UShort4(0),
|
|
|
|
"ushort4(0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UShort4(UShort2(0, 1), UShort2(2, 3)),
|
|
|
|
"ushort4(0, 1, 2, 3)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UShort4(0, 1, UShort2(2, 3)),
|
|
|
|
"ushort4(0, 1, 2, 3)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(UShort4(0, 1, 2, 3),
|
|
|
|
"ushort4(0, 1, 2, 3)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'ushort2' constructor (expected 2 "
|
|
|
|
"scalars, but found 4)\n");
|
|
|
|
UShort2(UShort4(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'ushort4' constructor (expected 4 "
|
|
|
|
"scalars, but found 3)\n");
|
|
|
|
UShort4(UShort3(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLBool, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-05 14:11:38 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Bool2(false),
|
|
|
|
"bool2(false)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Bool2(false, true),
|
|
|
|
"bool2(false, true)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Bool3(false),
|
|
|
|
"bool3(false)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Bool3(Bool2(false, true), false),
|
|
|
|
"bool3(false, true, false)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Bool3(false, true, false),
|
|
|
|
"bool3(false, true, false)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Bool4(false),
|
|
|
|
"bool4(false)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Bool4(Bool2(false, true), Bool2(false, true)),
|
|
|
|
"bool4(false, true, false, true)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Bool4(false, true, Bool2(false, true)),
|
|
|
|
"bool4(false, true, false, true)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Bool4(false, true, false, true),
|
|
|
|
"bool4(false, true, false, true)");
|
2021-01-08 16:42:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'bool2' constructor (expected 2 scalars,"
|
|
|
|
" but found 4)\n");
|
|
|
|
Bool2(Bool4(true)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'bool4' constructor (expected 4 scalars,"
|
|
|
|
" but found 3)\n");
|
|
|
|
Bool4(Bool3(true)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-03 18:25:35 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLType, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kBool_Type).isBoolean());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kBool_Type).isNumber());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kBool_Type).isFloat());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kBool_Type).isSigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kBool_Type).isUnsigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kBool_Type).isInteger());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kBool_Type).isScalar());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kBool_Type).isVector());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kBool_Type).isMatrix());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kBool_Type).isArray());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kBool_Type).isStruct());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kInt_Type).isBoolean());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kInt_Type).isNumber());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kInt_Type).isFloat());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kInt_Type).isSigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kInt_Type).isUnsigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kInt_Type).isInteger());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kInt_Type).isScalar());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kInt_Type).isVector());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kInt_Type).isMatrix());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kInt_Type).isArray());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kInt_Type).isStruct());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kUInt_Type).isBoolean());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kUInt_Type).isNumber());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kUInt_Type).isFloat());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kUInt_Type).isSigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kUInt_Type).isUnsigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kUInt_Type).isInteger());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kUInt_Type).isScalar());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kUInt_Type).isVector());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kUInt_Type).isMatrix());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kUInt_Type).isArray());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kUInt_Type).isStruct());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat_Type).isBoolean());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kFloat_Type).isNumber());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kFloat_Type).isFloat());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat_Type).isSigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat_Type).isUnsigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat_Type).isInteger());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kFloat_Type).isScalar());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat_Type).isVector());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat_Type).isMatrix());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat_Type).isArray());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat_Type).isStruct());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat2_Type).isBoolean());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat2_Type).isNumber());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat2_Type).isFloat());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat2_Type).isSigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat2_Type).isUnsigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat2_Type).isInteger());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat2_Type).isScalar());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kFloat2_Type).isVector());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat2_Type).isMatrix());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat2_Type).isArray());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kFloat2_Type).isStruct());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kHalf2x2_Type).isBoolean());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kHalf2x2_Type).isNumber());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kHalf2x2_Type).isFloat());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kHalf2x2_Type).isSigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kHalf2x2_Type).isUnsigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kHalf2x2_Type).isInteger());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kHalf2x2_Type).isScalar());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kHalf2x2_Type).isVector());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(kHalf2x2_Type).isMatrix());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kHalf2x2_Type).isArray());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(kHalf2x2_Type).isStruct());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(Array(kFloat_Type, 2)).isBoolean());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(Array(kFloat_Type, 2)).isNumber());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(Array(kFloat_Type, 2)).isFloat());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(Array(kFloat_Type, 2)).isSigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(Array(kFloat_Type, 2)).isUnsigned());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(Array(kFloat_Type, 2)).isInteger());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(Array(kFloat_Type, 2)).isScalar());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(Array(kFloat_Type, 2)).isVector());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(Array(kFloat_Type, 2)).isMatrix());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLType(Array(kFloat_Type, 2)).isArray());
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, !DSLType(Array(kFloat_Type, 2)).isStruct());
|
2021-05-06 14:47:06 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Var x(kFloat_Type);
|
|
|
|
DSLExpression e = x + 1;
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, e.type().isFloat());
|
|
|
|
e.release();
|
2021-05-03 18:25:35 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-12 20:56:37 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLMatrices, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
Var f22(kFloat2x2_Type, "f22");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(f22 = Float2x2(1), "(f22 = float2x2(1.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var f32(kFloat3x2_Type, "f32");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(f32 = Float3x2(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6),
|
|
|
|
"(f32 = float3x2(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var f42(kFloat4x2_Type, "f42");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(f42 = Float4x2(Float4(1, 2, 3, 4), 5, 6, 7, 8),
|
|
|
|
"(f42 = float4x2(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var f23(kFloat2x3_Type, "f23");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(f23 = Float2x3(1, Float2(2, 3), 4, Float2(5, 6)),
|
|
|
|
"(f23 = float2x3(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var f33(kFloat3x3_Type, "f33");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(f33 = Float3x3(Float3(1, 2, 3), 4, Float2(5, 6), 7, 8, 9),
|
|
|
|
"(f33 = float3x3(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var f43(kFloat4x3_Type, "f43");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(f43 = Float4x3(Float4(1, 2, 3, 4), Float4(5, 6, 7, 8), Float4(9, 10, 11, 12)),
|
|
|
|
"(f43 = float4x3(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, 12.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var f24(kFloat2x4_Type, "f24");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(f24 = Float2x4(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8),
|
|
|
|
"(f24 = float2x4(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var f34(kFloat3x4_Type, "f34");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(f34 = Float3x4(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Float3(10, 11, 12)),
|
|
|
|
"(f34 = float3x4(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, 12.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var f44(kFloat4x4_Type, "f44");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(f44 = Float4x4(1), "(f44 = float4x4(1.0))");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Var h22(kHalf2x2_Type, "h22");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(h22 = Half2x2(1), "(h22 = half2x2(1.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var h32(kHalf3x2_Type, "h32");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(h32 = Half3x2(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6),
|
|
|
|
"(h32 = half3x2(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var h42(kHalf4x2_Type, "h42");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(h42 = Half4x2(Half4(1, 2, 3, 4), 5, 6, 7, 8),
|
|
|
|
"(h42 = half4x2(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var h23(kHalf2x3_Type, "h23");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(h23 = Half2x3(1, Half2(2, 3), 4, Half2(5, 6)),
|
|
|
|
"(h23 = half2x3(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var h33(kHalf3x3_Type, "h33");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(h33 = Half3x3(Half3(1, 2, 3), 4, Half2(5, 6), 7, 8, 9),
|
|
|
|
"(h33 = half3x3(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var h43(kHalf4x3_Type, "h43");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(h43 = Half4x3(Half4(1, 2, 3, 4), Half4(5, 6, 7, 8), Half4(9, 10, 11, 12)),
|
|
|
|
"(h43 = half4x3(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, 12.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var h24(kHalf2x4_Type, "h24");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(h24 = Half2x4(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8),
|
|
|
|
"(h24 = half2x4(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var h34(kHalf3x4_Type, "h34");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(h34 = Half3x4(1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, Half3(10, 11, 12)),
|
|
|
|
"(h34 = half3x4(1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 9.0, 10.0, 11.0, 12.0))");
|
|
|
|
Var h44(kHalf4x4_Type, "h44");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(h44 = Half4x4(1), "(h44 = half4x4(1.0))");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(f22 * 2, "(f22 * 2.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(f22 == Float2x2(1), "(f22 == float2x2(1.0))");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(h42[0][1], "h42[0].y");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(f43 * Float4(0), "(f43 * float4(0.0))");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(h23 * 2, "(h23 * 2.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Inverse(f44), "inverse(f44)");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'float3x3' constructor (expected 9 "
|
|
|
|
"scalars, but found 2)\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLExpression(Float3x3(Float2(1))).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid arguments to 'half2x2' constructor (expected 4 "
|
|
|
|
"scalars, but found 5)\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLExpression(Half2x2(1, 2, 3, 4, 5)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '*' cannot operate on 'float4x3', 'float3'\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLExpression(f43 * Float3(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '=' cannot operate on 'float4x3', "
|
|
|
|
"'float3x3'\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLExpression(f43 = f33).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '=' cannot operate on 'half2x2', "
|
|
|
|
"'float2x2'\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLExpression(h22 = f22).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r,
|
|
|
|
"error: no match for inverse(float4x3)\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLExpression(Inverse(f43)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLPlus, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kFloat_Type, "a"), b(kFloat_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Optimize away no-op arithmetic in ConstantFolder.
Expressions like `x * 1`, `x *= 1`, `x + 0`, `x * 0`, or `0 / x` don't
actually do anything, and can be simplified to just `x` or `0`. (The
zero case must also check that `x` doesn't have side effects, because
`0 * myFunction()` still needs to call `myFunction`.)
`0 - x` is also detected and rewritten as `-x`.
`0 / 0` is left as-is.
This logic works for scalars and vectors; matrices are left as-is.
A similar optimization also occurs in the constant-propagation pass, so
we see almost no diffs in the tests. If control-flow analysis is turned
off, we do see some improvements. (I didn't reuse the existing code at
all, since it was designed around rewriting the CFG tree, but the
concept was identical.)
Change-Id: Ia99cd81f1d4cd3dafaa43ccac6a2261e3257a185
Bug: skia:11343
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/380356
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-03-05 21:48:56 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a + b,
|
|
|
|
"(a + b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a + 1,
|
|
|
|
"(a + 1.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(0.5 + a + -99,
|
|
|
|
"((0.5 + a) + -99.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a += b + 1,
|
|
|
|
"(a += (b + 1.0))");
|
2021-03-08 22:07:58 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(+a,
|
|
|
|
"a");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(+(a + b),
|
|
|
|
"(a + b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '+' cannot operate on 'bool2', 'float'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression((Bool2(true) + a)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '+=' cannot operate on 'float', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression((a += Bool2(true))).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression((1.0 += a)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-03-08 22:07:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: '+' cannot operate on 'bool'\n");
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var c(kBool_Type);
|
2021-06-25 16:31:44 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(+c).release();
|
2021-03-08 22:07:58 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLMinus, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Optimize away no-op arithmetic in ConstantFolder.
Expressions like `x * 1`, `x *= 1`, `x + 0`, `x * 0`, or `0 / x` don't
actually do anything, and can be simplified to just `x` or `0`. (The
zero case must also check that `x` doesn't have side effects, because
`0 * myFunction()` still needs to call `myFunction`.)
`0 - x` is also detected and rewritten as `-x`.
`0 / 0` is left as-is.
This logic works for scalars and vectors; matrices are left as-is.
A similar optimization also occurs in the constant-propagation pass, so
we see almost no diffs in the tests. If control-flow analysis is turned
off, we do see some improvements. (I didn't reuse the existing code at
all, since it was designed around rewriting the CFG tree, but the
concept was identical.)
Change-Id: Ia99cd81f1d4cd3dafaa43ccac6a2261e3257a185
Bug: skia:11343
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/380356
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-03-05 21:48:56 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a - b,
|
|
|
|
"(a - b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a - 1,
|
|
|
|
"(a - 1)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(2 - a - b,
|
|
|
|
"((2 - a) - b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a -= b + 1,
|
|
|
|
"(a -= (b + 1))");
|
2021-03-08 22:07:58 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(-a,
|
|
|
|
"-a");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(-(a - b),
|
|
|
|
"-(a - b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '-' cannot operate on 'bool2', 'int'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(Bool2(true) - a).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '-=' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a -= Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(1.0 -= a).release();
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-03-08 22:07:58 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: '-' cannot operate on 'bool'\n");
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var c(kBool_Type);
|
2021-06-25 16:31:44 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(-c).release();
|
2021-03-08 22:07:58 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLMultiply, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kFloat_Type, "a"), b(kFloat_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Optimize away no-op arithmetic in ConstantFolder.
Expressions like `x * 1`, `x *= 1`, `x + 0`, `x * 0`, or `0 / x` don't
actually do anything, and can be simplified to just `x` or `0`. (The
zero case must also check that `x` doesn't have side effects, because
`0 * myFunction()` still needs to call `myFunction`.)
`0 - x` is also detected and rewritten as `-x`.
`0 / 0` is left as-is.
This logic works for scalars and vectors; matrices are left as-is.
A similar optimization also occurs in the constant-propagation pass, so
we see almost no diffs in the tests. If control-flow analysis is turned
off, we do see some improvements. (I didn't reuse the existing code at
all, since it was designed around rewriting the CFG tree, but the
concept was identical.)
Change-Id: Ia99cd81f1d4cd3dafaa43ccac6a2261e3257a185
Bug: skia:11343
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/380356
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-03-05 21:48:56 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a * b,
|
|
|
|
"(a * b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a * 2,
|
|
|
|
"(a * 2.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(0.5 * a * -99,
|
|
|
|
"((0.5 * a) * -99.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a *= b + 1,
|
|
|
|
"(a *= (b + 1.0))");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '*' cannot operate on 'bool2', 'float'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(Bool2(true) * a).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '*=' cannot operate on 'float', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a *= Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(1.0 *= a).release();
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLDivide, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kFloat_Type, "a"), b(kFloat_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
Optimize away no-op arithmetic in ConstantFolder.
Expressions like `x * 1`, `x *= 1`, `x + 0`, `x * 0`, or `0 / x` don't
actually do anything, and can be simplified to just `x` or `0`. (The
zero case must also check that `x` doesn't have side effects, because
`0 * myFunction()` still needs to call `myFunction`.)
`0 - x` is also detected and rewritten as `-x`.
`0 / 0` is left as-is.
This logic works for scalars and vectors; matrices are left as-is.
A similar optimization also occurs in the constant-propagation pass, so
we see almost no diffs in the tests. If control-flow analysis is turned
off, we do see some improvements. (I didn't reuse the existing code at
all, since it was designed around rewriting the CFG tree, but the
concept was identical.)
Change-Id: Ia99cd81f1d4cd3dafaa43ccac6a2261e3257a185
Bug: skia:11343
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/380356
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-03-05 21:48:56 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a / b,
|
|
|
|
"(a / b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a / 2,
|
|
|
|
"(a / 2.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(0.5 / a / -99,
|
|
|
|
"((0.5 / a) / -99.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(b / (a - 1),
|
|
|
|
"(b / (a - 1.0))");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a /= b + 1,
|
|
|
|
"(a /= (b + 1.0))");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '/' cannot operate on 'bool2', 'float'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(Bool2(true) / a).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '/=' cannot operate on 'float', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a /= Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(1.0 /= a).release();
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-02-05 21:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: division by zero\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a /= 0).release();
|
2021-02-05 21:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var c(kFloat2_Type, "c");
|
2021-02-05 21:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: division by zero\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(c /= Float2(Float(0), 1)).release();
|
2021-02-05 21:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLMod, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a % b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a % b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a % 2;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a % 2)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e3 = 10 % a % -99;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e3, "((10 % a) % -99)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e4 = a %= b + 1;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e4, "(a %= (b + 1))");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '%' cannot operate on 'bool2', 'int'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(Bool2(true) % a).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '%=' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a %= Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(1 %= a).release();
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-02-05 21:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: division by zero\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a %= 0).release();
|
2021-02-05 21:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var c(kInt2_Type, "c");
|
2021-02-05 21:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: division by zero\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(c %= Int2(Int(0), 1)).release();
|
2021-02-05 21:21:10 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLShl, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a << b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a << b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a << 1;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a << 1)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e3 = 1 << a << 2;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e3, "((1 << a) << 2)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e4 = a <<= b + 1;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e4, "(a <<= (b + 1))");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '<<' cannot operate on 'bool2', 'int'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(Bool2(true) << a).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '<<=' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a <<= Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(1 <<= a).release();
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLShr, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a >> b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a >> b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a >> 1;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a >> 1)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e3 = 1 >> a >> 2;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e3, "((1 >> a) >> 2)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e4 = a >>= b + 1;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e4, "(a >>= (b + 1))");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '>>' cannot operate on 'bool2', 'int'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(Bool2(true) >> a).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '>>=' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a >>= Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(1 >>= a).release();
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLBitwiseAnd, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a & b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a & b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a & 1;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a & 1)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e3 = 1 & a & 2;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e3, "((1 & a) & 2)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e4 = a &= b + 1;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e4, "(a &= (b + 1))");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '&' cannot operate on 'bool2', 'int'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(Bool2(true) & a).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '&=' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a &= Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(1 &= a).release();
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLBitwiseOr, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a | b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a | b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a | 1;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a | 1)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e3 = 1 | a | 2;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e3, "((1 | a) | 2)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e4 = a |= b + 1;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e4, "(a |= (b + 1))");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '|' cannot operate on 'bool2', 'int'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(Bool2(true) | a).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '|=' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a |= Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(1 |= a).release();
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLBitwiseXor, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a ^ b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a ^ b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a ^ 1;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a ^ 1)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e3 = 1 ^ a ^ 2;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e3, "((1 ^ a) ^ 2)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e4 = a ^= b + 1;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e4, "(a ^= (b + 1))");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '^' cannot operate on 'bool2', 'int'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(Bool2(true) ^ a).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '^=' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a ^= Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(1 ^= a).release();
|
2021-01-13 17:36:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLLogicalAnd, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kBool_Type, "a"), b(kBool_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a && b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a && b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a && true && b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a && b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e3 = a && false && b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e3, "false");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '&&' cannot operate on 'bool', 'int'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a && 5).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLLogicalOr, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kBool_Type, "a"), b(kBool_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a || b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a || b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a || true || b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "true");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e3 = a || false || b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e3, "(a || b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '||' cannot operate on 'bool', 'int'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a || 5).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLComma, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = (a += b, b);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "((a += b) , b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = (a += b, b += b, Int2(a));
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(((a += b) , (b += b)) , int2(a))");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLEqual, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a == b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a == b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a == 5;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a == 5)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '==' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a == Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLNotEqual, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a != b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a != b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a != 5;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a != 5)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '!=' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a != Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLGreaterThan, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a > b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a > b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a > 5;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a > 5)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '>' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a > Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLGreaterThanOrEqual, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a >= b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a >= b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a >= 5;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a >= 5)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '>=' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a >= Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLLessThan, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a < b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a < b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a < 5;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a < 5)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '<' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a < Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLLessThanOrEqual, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = a <= b;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "(a <= b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a <= 5;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "(a <= 5)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: type mismatch: '<=' cannot operate on 'int', 'bool2'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(a <= Bool2(true)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLLogicalNot, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = !(a <= b);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "!(a <= b)");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: '!' cannot operate on 'int'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(!a).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLBitwiseNot, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kBool_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = ~a;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "~a");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: '~' cannot operate on 'bool'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(~b).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLIncrement, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kBool_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = ++a;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "++a");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a++;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "a++");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: '++' cannot operate on 'bool'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(++b).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: '++' cannot operate on 'bool'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(b++).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(++(a + 1)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression((a + 1)++).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLDecrement, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a"), b(kBool_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression e1 = --a;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e1, "--a");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expression e2 = a--;
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(e2, "a--");
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: '--' cannot operate on 'bool'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(--b).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: '--' cannot operate on 'bool'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(b--).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression(--(a + 1)).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: cannot assign to this expression\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression((a + 1)--).release();
|
2021-01-13 15:38:59 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-06 14:47:06 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLCall, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-06-23 14:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression sqrt(DSLWriter::IRGenerator().convertIdentifier(/*offset=*/-1, "sqrt"));
|
2021-05-06 14:47:06 +00:00
|
|
|
SkTArray<DSLWrapper<DSLExpression>> args;
|
2021-05-25 03:46:46 +00:00
|
|
|
args.emplace_back(16);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(sqrt(std::move(args)), "4.0"); // sqrt(16) gets optimized to 4
|
2021-05-06 14:47:06 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-06-23 14:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLExpression pow(DSLWriter::IRGenerator().convertIdentifier(/*offset=*/-1, "pow"));
|
2021-05-06 14:47:06 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLVar a(kFloat_Type, "a");
|
|
|
|
DSLVar b(kFloat_Type, "b");
|
|
|
|
SkTArray<DSLWrapper<DSLExpression>> args;
|
|
|
|
args.emplace_back(a);
|
|
|
|
args.emplace_back(b);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(pow(std::move(args)), "pow(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLBlock, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), no_mark_vars_declared());
|
2021-05-06 14:47:06 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Block(), "{ }");
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a", 1), b(kInt_Type, "b", 2);
|
2021-05-06 14:47:06 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Block(Declare(a), Declare(b), a = b), "{ int a = 1; int b = 2; (a = b); }");
|
2021-04-19 14:55:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-06 14:47:06 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL((If(a > 0, --a), ++b), "if ((a > 0)) --a; ++b;");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SkTArray<DSLStatement> statements;
|
|
|
|
statements.push_back(a = 0);
|
|
|
|
statements.push_back(++a);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Block(std::move(statements)), "{ (a = 0); ++a; }");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-05 19:22:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLBreak, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), no_mark_vars_declared());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var i(kInt_Type, "i", 0);
|
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kVoid_Type, "success").define(
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
For(Declare(i), i < 10, ++i, Block(
|
2021-02-05 19:22:32 +00:00
|
|
|
If(i > 5, Break())
|
|
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLWriter::ProgramElements().size() == 1);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(*DSLWriter::ProgramElements()[0],
|
|
|
|
"void success() { for (int i = 0; (i < 10); ++i) { if ((i > 5)) break; } }");
|
2021-02-05 19:22:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: break statement must be inside a loop or switch\n");
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kVoid_Type, "fail").define(
|
2021-02-05 19:22:32 +00:00
|
|
|
Break()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLContinue, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), no_mark_vars_declared());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var i(kInt_Type, "i", 0);
|
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kVoid_Type, "success").define(
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
For(Declare(i), i < 10, ++i, Block(
|
2021-02-05 19:22:32 +00:00
|
|
|
If(i < 5, Continue())
|
|
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLWriter::ProgramElements().size() == 1);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(*DSLWriter::ProgramElements()[0],
|
|
|
|
"void success() { for (int i = 0; (i < 10); ++i) { if ((i < 5)) continue; } }");
|
2021-02-05 19:22:32 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: continue statement must be inside a loop\n");
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kVoid_Type, "fail").define(
|
2021-02-05 19:22:32 +00:00
|
|
|
Continue()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLDeclare, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), no_mark_vars_declared());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kHalf4_Type, "a"), b(kHalf4_Type, "b", Half4(1));
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
Statement x = Declare(a);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(x, "half4 a;");
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
Statement y = Declare(b);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(y, "half4 b = half4(1.0);");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var c(kHalf4_Type, "c", 1);
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: expected 'half4', but found 'int'\n");
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
Declare(c).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var d(kInt_Type, "d");
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
Declare(d).release();
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: variable has already been declared\n");
|
|
|
|
Declare(d).release();
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-04-30 17:14:24 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Var e(kUniform_Modifier, kInt_Type, "e");
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: this variable must be declared with DeclareGlobal\n");
|
|
|
|
Declare(e).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLDeclareGlobal, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), no_mark_vars_declared());
|
2021-04-30 17:14:24 +00:00
|
|
|
Var x(kInt_Type, "x", 0);
|
|
|
|
DeclareGlobal(x);
|
|
|
|
Var y(kUniform_Modifier, kFloat2_Type, "y");
|
|
|
|
DeclareGlobal(y);
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLWriter::ProgramElements().size() == 2);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(*DSLWriter::ProgramElements()[0], "int x = 0;");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(*DSLWriter::ProgramElements()[1], "uniform float2 y;");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-05 19:22:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLDiscard, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-05-25 03:46:46 +00:00
|
|
|
Var x(kFloat_Type, "x", 1);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(If(Sqrt(x) > 0, Discard()), "if ((sqrt(x) > 0.0)) discard;");
|
2021-02-05 19:22:32 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLDo, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
Statement x = Do(Block(), true);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(x, "do {} while (true);");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kFloat_Type, "a"), b(kFloat_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
Statement y = Do(Block(a++, --b), a != b);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(y, "do { a++; --b; } while ((a != b));");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: expected 'bool', but found 'int'\n");
|
|
|
|
Do(Block(), 7).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLFor, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), no_mark_vars_declared());
|
2021-04-20 19:30:41 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(For(Statement(), Expression(), Expression(), Block()),
|
|
|
|
"for (;;) {}");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var i(kInt_Type, "i", 0);
|
2021-04-20 19:30:41 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(For(Declare(i), i < 10, ++i, i += 5),
|
|
|
|
"for (int i = 0; (i < 10); ++i) (i += 5);");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Var j(kInt_Type, "j", 0);
|
|
|
|
Var k(kInt_Type, "k", 10);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(For((Declare(j), Declare(k)), j < k, ++j, Block()), R"(
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int j = 0;
|
|
|
|
int k = 10;
|
|
|
|
for (; (j < k); ++j) {}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
)");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: expected 'bool', but found 'int'\n");
|
|
|
|
For(i = 0, i + 10, ++i, i += 5).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-04-16 20:02:18 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: invalid for loop initializer\n");
|
|
|
|
For(If(i == 0, i = 1), i < 10, ++i, i += 5).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-03 15:27:22 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLFunction, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), no_mark_vars_declared());
|
2021-05-04 18:30:02 +00:00
|
|
|
Var coords(kFloat2_Type, "coords");
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kVoid_Type, "main", coords).define(
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
sk_FragColor() = Half4(coords, 0, 1)
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLWriter::ProgramElements().size() == 1);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(*DSLWriter::ProgramElements()[0],
|
2021-05-04 18:30:02 +00:00
|
|
|
"void main(float2 coords) { (sk_FragColor = half4(half2(coords), 0.0, 1.0)); }");
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-02-23 17:05:49 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::Reset();
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var x(kFloat_Type, "x");
|
|
|
|
DSLFunction sqr(kFloat_Type, "sqr", x);
|
2021-02-23 17:05:49 +00:00
|
|
|
sqr.define(
|
|
|
|
Return(x * x)
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(sqr(sk_FragCoord().x()), "sqr(sk_FragCoord.x)");
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLWriter::ProgramElements().size() == 1);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(*DSLWriter::ProgramElements()[0], "float sqr(float x) { return (x * x); }");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::Reset();
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var x(kFloat2_Type, "x");
|
|
|
|
Var y(kFloat2_Type, "y");
|
|
|
|
DSLFunction dot(kFloat2_Type, "dot", x, y);
|
2021-02-23 17:05:49 +00:00
|
|
|
dot.define(
|
|
|
|
Return(x * x + y * y)
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(dot(Float2(1.0f, 2.0f), Float2(3.0f, 4.0f)),
|
|
|
|
"dot(float2(1.0, 2.0), float2(3.0, 4.0))");
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLWriter::ProgramElements().size() == 1);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(*DSLWriter::ProgramElements()[0],
|
|
|
|
"float2 dot(float2 x, float2 y) { return ((x * x) + (y * y)); }");
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-09 16:25:03 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
DSLWriter::Reset();
|
|
|
|
Var x(kFloat_Type, "x");
|
|
|
|
Var y(kFloat_Type, "y");
|
|
|
|
DSLFunction pair(kFloat2_Type, "pair", x, y);
|
|
|
|
pair.define(
|
|
|
|
Return(Float2(x, y))
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Var varArg1(kFloat_Type, "varArg1");
|
|
|
|
Var varArg2(kFloat_Type, "varArg2");
|
|
|
|
DSLWriter::MarkDeclared(varArg1);
|
|
|
|
DSLWriter::MarkDeclared(varArg2);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(pair(varArg1, varArg2), "pair(varArg1, varArg2)");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: expected 'float', but found 'bool'\n");
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::Reset();
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kFloat_Type, "broken").define(
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
Return(true)
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-03-04 21:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: expected function to return 'float'\n");
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::Reset();
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kFloat_Type, "broken").define(
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
Return()
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-03-04 21:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: function 'broken' can exit without returning a value\n");
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::Reset();
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var x(kFloat_Type, "x", 0);
|
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kFloat_Type, "broken").define(
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
Declare(x),
|
2021-03-04 21:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
If(x == 1, Return(x))
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: may not return a value from a void function\n");
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::Reset();
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kVoid_Type, "broken").define(
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
Return(0)
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-03-04 21:00:20 +00:00
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: function 'broken' can exit without returning a value\n");
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::Reset();
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kFloat_Type, "broken").define(
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: using an already-declared variable as a function parameter\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLWriter::Reset();
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLVar p(kFloat_Type);
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
Declare(p).release();
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kVoid_Type, "broken", p).define(
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: variable has already been declared\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLWriter::Reset();
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLVar p(kFloat_Type);
|
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kVoid_Type, "broken", p).define(
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
Declare(p).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: variables used as function parameters cannot have initial "
|
|
|
|
"values\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLWriter::Reset();
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLVar p(kFloat_Type, 1);
|
|
|
|
DSLFunction(kVoid_Type, "broken", p).define(
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLIf, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kFloat_Type, "a"), b(kFloat_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
Statement x = If(a > b, a -= b);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(x, "if ((a > b)) (a -= b);");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement y = If(a > b, a -= b, b -= a);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(y, "if ((a > b)) (a -= b); else (b -= a);");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-30 16:44:00 +00:00
|
|
|
Statement z = StaticIf(a > b, a -= b, b -= a);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(z, "@if ((a > b)) (a -= b); else (b -= a);");
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: expected 'bool', but found 'float'\n");
|
|
|
|
If(a + b, a -= b).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLReturn, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement x = Return();
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(x, "return;");
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Statement y = Return(true);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(y, "return true;");
|
2021-01-28 15:02:43 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-17 17:13:20 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLSelect, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kInt_Type, "a");
|
2021-02-17 17:13:20 +00:00
|
|
|
Expression x = Select(a > 0, 1, -1);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(x, "((a > 0) ? 1 : -1)");
|
2021-02-17 17:13:20 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: expected 'bool', but found 'int'\n");
|
2021-06-25 16:31:44 +00:00
|
|
|
Select(a, 1, -1).release();
|
2021-02-17 17:13:20 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: ternary operator result mismatch: 'float2', 'float3'\n");
|
2021-06-25 16:31:44 +00:00
|
|
|
Select(a > 0, Float2(1), Float3(1)).release();
|
2021-02-17 17:13:20 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-09 20:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLSwitch, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kFloat_Type, "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
2021-02-09 20:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-06 14:47:06 +00:00
|
|
|
SkTArray<DSLStatement> caseStatements;
|
|
|
|
caseStatements.push_back(a = 1);
|
|
|
|
caseStatements.push_back(Continue());
|
2021-03-11 04:00:47 +00:00
|
|
|
Statement x = Switch(b,
|
2021-02-09 20:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
Case(0, a = 0, Break()),
|
2021-05-06 14:47:06 +00:00
|
|
|
Case(1, std::move(caseStatements)),
|
2021-02-23 18:44:36 +00:00
|
|
|
Case(2, a = 2 /*Fallthrough*/),
|
2021-02-09 20:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
Default(Discard())
|
|
|
|
);
|
2021-02-23 18:44:36 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(x, R"(
|
2021-03-11 04:00:47 +00:00
|
|
|
switch (b) {
|
2021-02-23 18:44:36 +00:00
|
|
|
case 0: (a = 0.0); break;
|
|
|
|
case 1: (a = 1.0); continue;
|
|
|
|
case 2: (a = 2.0);
|
|
|
|
default: discard;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
)");
|
2021-02-09 20:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-30 16:44:00 +00:00
|
|
|
Statement y = StaticSwitch(b,
|
|
|
|
Case(0, a = 0, Break()),
|
|
|
|
Case(1, a = 1, Continue()),
|
|
|
|
Case(2, a = 2 /*Fallthrough*/),
|
|
|
|
Default(Discard())
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(y, R"(
|
|
|
|
@switch (b) {
|
|
|
|
case 0: (a = 0.0); break;
|
|
|
|
case 1: (a = 1.0); continue;
|
|
|
|
case 2: (a = 2.0);
|
|
|
|
default: discard;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
)");
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-23 19:57:01 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Switch(b),
|
|
|
|
"switch (b) {}");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Switch(b, Default(), Case(0), Case(1)),
|
|
|
|
"switch (b) { default: case 0: case 1: }");
|
2021-02-09 20:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
2021-02-23 18:44:36 +00:00
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: duplicate case value '0'\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLStatement(Switch(0, Case(0), Case(0))).release();
|
2021-02-09 20:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-23 18:44:36 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: duplicate default case\n");
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLStatement(Switch(0, Default(a = 0), Default(a = 1))).release();
|
2021-02-23 18:44:36 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-09 20:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: case value must be a constant integer\n");
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var b(kInt_Type);
|
2021-02-26 01:50:32 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLStatement(Switch(0, Case(b))).release();
|
2021-02-09 20:22:57 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-26 19:31:29 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLSwizzle, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kFloat4_Type, "a");
|
2021-01-26 19:31:29 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-03-05 18:13:14 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a.x(),
|
|
|
|
"a.x");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a.y(),
|
|
|
|
"a.y");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a.z(),
|
|
|
|
"a.z");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a.w(),
|
|
|
|
"a.w");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a.r(),
|
|
|
|
"a.x");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a.g(),
|
|
|
|
"a.y");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a.b(),
|
|
|
|
"a.z");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a.a(),
|
|
|
|
"a.w");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Swizzle(a, R),
|
|
|
|
"a.x");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Swizzle(a, ZERO, G),
|
|
|
|
"float2(0.0, a.y)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Swizzle(a, B, G, G),
|
|
|
|
"a.zyy");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Swizzle(a, R, G, B, ONE),
|
|
|
|
"float4(a.xyz, 1.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Swizzle(a, B, G, R, ONE).r(),
|
|
|
|
"a.z");
|
2021-01-26 19:31:29 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-26 13:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLVarSwap, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), no_mark_vars_declared());
|
2021-04-26 13:35:10 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// We should be able to convert `a` into a proper var by swapping it, even from within a scope.
|
|
|
|
Var a;
|
|
|
|
if (true)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
Var(kInt_Type, "a").swap(a);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Statement(Block(Declare(a), a = 123)),
|
|
|
|
"{ int a; (a = 123); }");
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLWhile, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
Statement x = While(true, Block());
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(x, "for (; true;) {}");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kFloat_Type, "a"), b(kFloat_Type, "b");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
Statement y = While(a != b, Block(a++, --b));
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(y, "for (; (a != b);) { a++; --b; }");
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: expected 'bool', but found 'int'\n");
|
2021-06-25 16:31:44 +00:00
|
|
|
While(7, Block()).release();
|
2021-01-22 20:18:25 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-26 15:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLIndex, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(Array(kInt_Type, 5), "a"), b(kInt_Type, "b");
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a[0], "a[0]");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(a[b], "a[b]");
|
2021-01-26 15:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: expected 'int', but found 'bool'\n");
|
2021-06-25 16:31:44 +00:00
|
|
|
a[true].release();
|
2021-01-26 15:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: expected array, but found 'int'\n");
|
2021-06-25 16:31:44 +00:00
|
|
|
b[0].release();
|
2021-01-26 15:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: index -1 out of range for 'int[5]'\n");
|
2021-06-25 16:31:44 +00:00
|
|
|
a[-1].release();
|
2021-01-26 15:07:01 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-26 17:00:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLBuiltins, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
// There is a Fract type on Mac which can conflict with our Fract builtin
|
|
|
|
using SkSL::dsl::Fract;
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var a(kHalf4_Type, "a"), b(kHalf4_Type, "b"), c(kHalf4_Type, "c");
|
|
|
|
Var h3(kHalf3_Type, "h3");
|
|
|
|
Var b4(kBool4_Type, "b4");
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Abs(a), "abs(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(All(b4), "all(b4)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Any(b4), "any(b4)");
|
2021-04-26 13:36:07 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Atan(a), "atan(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Atan(a, b), "atan(a, b)");
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Ceil(a), "ceil(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Clamp(a, 0, 1), "clamp(a, 0.0, 1.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Cos(a), "cos(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Cross(h3, h3), "cross(h3, h3)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Degrees(a), "degrees(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Distance(a, b), "distance(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Dot(a, b), "dot(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Equal(a, b), "equal(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Exp(a), "exp(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Exp2(a), "exp2(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Faceforward(a, b, c), "faceforward(a, b, c)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Floor(a), "floor(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Fract(a), "fract(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(GreaterThan(a, b), "greaterThan(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(GreaterThanEqual(a, b), "greaterThanEqual(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Inversesqrt(a), "inversesqrt(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(LessThan(a, b), "lessThan(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(LessThanEqual(a, b), "lessThanEqual(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Length(a), "length(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Log(a), "log(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Log2(a), "log2(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Max(a, b), "max(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Min(a, b), "min(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Mix(a, b, c), "mix(a, b, c)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Mod(a, b), "mod(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Normalize(a), "normalize(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(NotEqual(a, b), "notEqual(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Pow(a, b), "pow(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Radians(a), "radians(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Reflect(a, b), "reflect(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Refract(a, b, 1), "refract(a, b, 1.0)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Saturate(a), "saturate(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Sign(a), "sign(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Sin(a), "sin(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Smoothstep(a, b, c), "smoothstep(a, b, c)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Sqrt(a), "sqrt(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Step(a, b), "step(a, b)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Tan(a), "tan(a)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Unpremul(a), "unpremul(a)");
|
2021-01-26 17:00:25 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// these calls all go through the normal channels, so it ought to be sufficient to prove that
|
|
|
|
// one of them reports errors correctly
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: no match for ceil(bool)\n");
|
|
|
|
Ceil(a == b).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-01-27 12:53:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLModifiers, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), no_mark_vars_declared());
|
2021-01-27 12:53:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var v1(kConst_Modifier, kInt_Type, "v1", 0);
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
Statement d1 = Declare(v1);
|
2021-02-22 21:20:06 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(d1, "const int v1 = 0;");
|
2021-01-27 12:53:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Most modifiers require an appropriate context to be legal. We can't yet give them that
|
|
|
|
// context, so we can't as yet Declare() variables with these modifiers.
|
|
|
|
// TODO: better tests when able
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var v2(kIn_Modifier, kInt_Type, "v2");
|
2021-06-23 14:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, v2.modifiers().flags() == SkSL::Modifiers::kIn_Flag);
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::MarkDeclared(v2);
|
2021-01-27 12:53:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var v3(kOut_Modifier, kInt_Type, "v3");
|
2021-06-23 14:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, v3.modifiers().flags() == SkSL::Modifiers::kOut_Flag);
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::MarkDeclared(v3);
|
2021-01-27 12:53:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var v4(kFlat_Modifier, kInt_Type, "v4");
|
2021-06-23 14:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, v4.modifiers().flags() == SkSL::Modifiers::kFlat_Flag);
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::MarkDeclared(v4);
|
2021-01-27 12:53:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var v5(kNoPerspective_Modifier, kInt_Type, "v5");
|
2021-06-23 14:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, v5.modifiers().flags() == SkSL::Modifiers::kNoPerspective_Flag);
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::MarkDeclared(v5);
|
2021-01-27 12:53:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var v6(kIn_Modifier | kOut_Modifier, kInt_Type, "v6");
|
2021-06-23 14:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, v6.modifiers().flags() == (SkSL::Modifiers::kIn_Flag |
|
|
|
|
SkSL::Modifiers::kOut_Flag));
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::MarkDeclared(v6);
|
2021-01-27 12:53:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var v7(kInOut_Modifier, kInt_Type, "v7");
|
2021-06-23 14:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, v7.modifiers().flags() == (SkSL::Modifiers::kIn_Flag |
|
|
|
|
SkSL::Modifiers::kOut_Flag));
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::MarkDeclared(v7);
|
2021-01-27 12:53:46 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Var v8(kUniform_Modifier, kInt_Type, "v8");
|
2021-06-23 14:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, v8.modifiers().flags() == SkSL::Modifiers::kUniform_Flag);
|
2021-04-30 17:14:24 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLWriter::MarkDeclared(v8);
|
2021-03-16 20:37:29 +00:00
|
|
|
// Uniforms do not need to be explicitly declared
|
2021-01-27 12:53:46 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-02-11 20:18:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
2021-05-10 20:17:22 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLLayout, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), no_mark_vars_declared());
|
2021-05-10 20:17:22 +00:00
|
|
|
Var v1(DSLModifiers(DSLLayout().location(1).set(2).binding(3).offset(4).index(5).builtin(6)
|
|
|
|
.inputAttachmentIndex(7),
|
|
|
|
kConst_Modifier), kInt_Type, "v1", 0);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Declare(v1), "layout (location = 1, offset = 4, binding = 3, index = 5, set = 2, "
|
|
|
|
"builtin = 6, input_attachment_index = 7) const int v1 = 0;");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Var v2(DSLLayout().originUpperLeft(), kFloat2_Type, "v2");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Declare(v2), "layout (origin_upper_left) float2 v2;");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Var v4(DSLLayout().pushConstant(), kBool_Type, "v4");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Declare(v4), "layout (push_constant) bool v4;");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Var v5(DSLLayout().blendSupportAllEquations(), kHalf4_Type, "v5");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Declare(v5), "layout (blend_support_all_equations) half4 v5;");
|
|
|
|
|
2021-06-23 14:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: 'srgb_unpremul' is only permitted in runtime effects\n");
|
|
|
|
Var v(DSLModifiers(DSLLayout().srgbUnpremul(), kUniform_Modifier), kHalf4_Type, "v");
|
|
|
|
DeclareGlobal(v);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2021-05-10 20:17:22 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: layout qualifier 'location' appears more than once\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLLayout().location(1).location(2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: layout qualifier 'set' appears more than once\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLLayout().set(1).set(2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: layout qualifier 'binding' appears more than once\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLLayout().binding(1).binding(2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: layout qualifier 'offset' appears more than once\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLLayout().offset(1).offset(2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: layout qualifier 'index' appears more than once\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLLayout().index(1).index(2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: layout qualifier 'builtin' appears more than once\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLLayout().builtin(1).builtin(2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: layout qualifier 'input_attachment_index' appears more than "
|
|
|
|
"once\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLLayout().inputAttachmentIndex(1).inputAttachmentIndex(2);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: layout qualifier 'origin_upper_left' appears more than "
|
|
|
|
"once\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLLayout().originUpperLeft().originUpperLeft();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: layout qualifier 'push_constant' appears more than once\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLLayout().pushConstant().pushConstant();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: layout qualifier 'blend_support_all_equations' appears more "
|
|
|
|
"than once\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLLayout().blendSupportAllEquations().blendSupportAllEquations();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: layout qualifier 'srgb_unpremul' appears more than once\n");
|
|
|
|
DSLLayout().srgbUnpremul().srgbUnpremul();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-16 18:54:43 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLSampleFragmentProcessor, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), default_settings(),
|
2021-04-09 19:33:53 +00:00
|
|
|
SkSL::ProgramKind::kFragmentProcessor);
|
|
|
|
DSLVar child(kUniform_Modifier, kFragmentProcessor_Type, "child");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Sample(child), "sample(child)");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Sample(child, Float2(0, 0)), "sample(child, float2(0.0, 0.0))");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Sample(child, Half4(1)), "sample(child, half4(1.0))");
|
2021-04-13 13:50:27 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Sample(child, Float2(0), Half4(1)), "sample(child, float2(0.0), half4(1.0))");
|
2021-04-09 19:33:53 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: no match for sample(fragmentProcessor, bool)\n");
|
|
|
|
Sample(child, true).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-04-16 18:54:43 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLSampleShader, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), default_settings(),
|
2021-04-28 21:41:57 +00:00
|
|
|
SkSL::ProgramKind::kRuntimeShader);
|
2021-04-16 18:54:43 +00:00
|
|
|
DSLVar shader(kUniform_Modifier, kShader_Type, "shader");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(Sample(shader, Float2(0, 0)), "sample(shader, float2(0.0, 0.0))");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
Reland "Better first-class shader & color filter support in runtime effects"
This is a reland of adadb95a9f1ef21ccc5264c7d0bdc83b56cf91e9
... adds a temporary workaround for some Android framework code.
Original change's description:
> Better first-class shader & color filter support in runtime effects
>
> This does a few things, because they're all intertwined:
>
> 1) SkRuntimeEffect's API now includes details about children (which Skia
> stage was declared, not just the name). The factories verify that the
> declared types in the SkSL match up with the C++ types being passed.
> Today, we still only support adding children of the same type, so the
> checks are simple. Once we allow mixing types, we'll be testing the
> declared type against the actual C++ type supplied for each slot.
> 2) Adds sample variants that supply the input color to the child. This
> is now the only way to invoke a colorFilter child. Internally, we
> support passing a color when invoking a child shader, but I'm not
> exposing that. It's not clearly part of the semantics of the Skia
> pipeline, and is almost never useful. It also exposes users to
> several inconsistencies (skbug.com/11942).
> 3) Because of #2, it's possible that we can't compute a reusable program
> to filter individual colors. In that case, we don't set the constant
> output for constant input optimization, and filterColor4f falls back
> to the slower base-class implementation.
>
> Bug: skia:11813 skia:11942
> Change-Id: I06c41e1b35056e486f3163a72acf6b9535d7fed4
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/401917
> Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Bug: skia:11813 skia:11942
Change-Id: I2c31b147ed86fa8c4dddefb7066bc1d07fe0d285
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/404637
Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
2021-04-21 13:57:19 +00:00
|
|
|
ExpectError error(r, "error: no match for sample(shader, half4)\n");
|
2021-04-16 18:54:43 +00:00
|
|
|
Sample(shader, Half4(1)).release();
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2021-02-11 20:18:31 +00:00
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLStruct, r, ctxInfo) {
|
2021-05-18 14:12:58 +00:00
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu(), no_mark_vars_declared());
|
2021-02-11 20:18:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSLType simpleStruct = Struct("SimpleStruct",
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Field(kFloat_Type, "x"),
|
|
|
|
Field(kBool_Type, "b"),
|
|
|
|
Field(Array(kFloat_Type, 3), "a")
|
2021-02-11 20:18:31 +00:00
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
DSLVar result(simpleStruct, "result");
|
|
|
|
DSLFunction(simpleStruct, "returnStruct").define(
|
|
|
|
Declare(result),
|
|
|
|
result.field("x") = 123,
|
|
|
|
result.field("b") = result.field("x") > 0,
|
|
|
|
result.field("a")[0] = result.field("x"),
|
|
|
|
Return(result)
|
|
|
|
);
|
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLWriter::ProgramElements().size() == 2);
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(*DSLWriter::ProgramElements()[0],
|
|
|
|
"struct SimpleStruct { float x; bool b; float[3] a; };");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(*DSLWriter::ProgramElements()[1],
|
|
|
|
"SimpleStruct returnStruct() { SimpleStruct result; (result.x = 123.0);"
|
|
|
|
"(result.b = (result.x > 0.0)); (result.a[0] = result.x); return result; }");
|
2021-02-11 20:18:31 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Struct("NestedStruct",
|
2021-04-08 20:56:05 +00:00
|
|
|
Field(kInt_Type, "x"),
|
2021-02-11 20:18:31 +00:00
|
|
|
Field(simpleStruct, "simple")
|
|
|
|
);
|
2021-03-05 19:23:48 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLWriter::ProgramElements().size() == 3);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(*DSLWriter::ProgramElements()[2],
|
Improve error reporting from DSL unit tests.
Previously, a DSL unit test failure would not report the actual text
generated by the DSL, or the line number of the failure.
Added a new macro EXPECT_EQUAL which
- supports DSL statements, DSL expressions, and IR nodes equally
- reports both the expected string and actual DSL output
- reports the line number of the failure
- always compares in a whitespace-insensitive fashion
- supports passing rvalue DSL expressions directly, rather than forcing
us to create single-use lvalues for each test
Existing DSL tests have been updated to use this macro.
A failing test looks like this:
FAILURE: ../../tests/SkSLDSLTest.cpp:107 (Failed on line 146)
Expected: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0)
Actual: float4(0.0, 1.0, 2.0, 4.0)
[DSLFloat, Mock]
Change-Id: Ie99d449690252f289bf48a66ab9c58e19dda9a07
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/372198
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
2021-02-19 14:56:31 +00:00
|
|
|
"struct NestedStruct { int x; SimpleStruct simple; };");
|
2021-02-11 20:18:31 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|
2021-05-04 16:22:02 +00:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEF_GPUTEST_FOR_MOCK_CONTEXT(DSLWrapper, r, ctxInfo) {
|
|
|
|
AutoDSLContext context(ctxInfo.directContext()->priv().getGpu());
|
|
|
|
std::vector<Wrapper<DSLExpression>> exprs;
|
|
|
|
exprs.push_back(DSLExpression(1));
|
|
|
|
exprs.emplace_back(2.0);
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(std::move(*exprs[0]), "1");
|
|
|
|
EXPECT_EQUAL(std::move(*exprs[1]), "2.0");
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
std::vector<Wrapper<DSLVar>> vars;
|
|
|
|
vars.emplace_back(DSLVar(kInt_Type, "x"));
|
2021-06-23 14:27:09 +00:00
|
|
|
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, DSLWriter::Var(*vars[0])->name() == "x");
|
2021-05-04 16:22:02 +00:00
|
|
|
}
|