Pre-cleanup as I start looking at how structs are parsed and handled in
the IR.
Bug: skia:11228
Change-Id: I6334d1073211cbbdf69ddffa8df420c45fd59fcc
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/361059
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This reverts commit 578f1acbe8.
Reason for revert: updated test to pass on Mac Intel 5100/6000
Original change's description:
> Revert "Add SkSL for-loop control flow test to dm."
>
> This reverts commit a0c266283a.
>
> Reason for revert: failing on Mac Intel
>
> Original change's description:
> > Add SkSL for-loop control flow test to dm.
> >
> > While loops and do-while loops remain untested in dm, as they are not
> > supported in ES2 (and therefore not available in Runtime Effects).
> >
> > Change-Id: I2f1bfccccd571cc4ced096bc18ebbb9ecc9f9b4a
> > Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/359556
> > Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> > Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
> > Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
>
> TBR=brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
>
> Change-Id: I45335d16a695644eaeb8a535298c0efcc616c1ce
> No-Presubmit: true
> No-Tree-Checks: true
> No-Try: true
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/359840
> Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
TBR=brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: I2dc6e870393708a12286658001b723f25a6aec4a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/359856
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This creates a helper function, _entrypoint, which invokes main() and
assigns its result into sk_FragColor. We also make sure to prevent
sk_FragColor from being dead-stripped from the code during IR
generation.
At present this is useful for allowing our SkSL test shaders to compile.
Change-Id: I2d7fab0e1959a77778ffdb18ca569e869bcaeece
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/358525
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This lets us use descriptive names like `colorRed` and `colorGreen`
instead of `half4(1,0,0,1)` and `half4(0,1,0,1)`. It also lets us use
actual unknown values instead of synthesizing sorta-kinda-unknowns by
calling sqrt.
Change-Id: I61481c33b7ff42182955777b05cfa5fcc13e0efc
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/359567
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This allows uniforms to be specified without an explicit `layout(set=N)`
modifier. They will assume a default set value instead.
This turns out to fix a handful of tests in Metal/SPIR-V which were
written with GLSL in mind, or adapted from real generated GLSL code, and
didn't have layout information specified on their uniforms. It will also
make it easier to write SkSL tests using uniforms that can compile
either as a runtime effect or as plain Metal/SPIR-V code.
Change-Id: Id79ec06f278b913a45c09c2e6211195dc98b42c0
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/359838
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Checking each variation can occasionally shake out extra bugs--for
instance, the mix intrinsic in SPIR-V breaks when adding coverage for
its various overloads here. (See skia:11222; this will be addressed in
a separate CL.)
Change-Id: I2c3ca7523e59d4c6cce25a70e081a558afedfb87
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/359758
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
In most cases, this works properly and a `;` is emitted, but in one
particular case (int x, y;) we get nothing.
Change-Id: If88d92502f6a533284dd4e0f78daedaf1481ff3d
Bug: skia:11218
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/359558
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
In GLSL and SkSL, control statements don't require explicit braces
around single-statement children. That is, the `match = true` child
statement here doesn't need to be braced.
if (condition) match = true;
Because there are no braces, we never create a Block or a dedicated
SymbolTable here. This is normally not a problem, but the fuzzer
discovered that it can dump things into the symbol table inside a child
statement:
if (condition) int newSymbol;
This becomes problematic because the symbol name now outlives its block.
This means `newSymbol` can be referred to later, which should be illegal
(and can cause the optimizer to blow up since the structure is bogus).
There doesn't seem to be any reason to allow this code to compile; the
user can add an explicit scope here to make it reasonable, and it's
(almost) meaningless to declare a symbol that's instantly going to fall
out of scope. This code is now rejected with an error message.
Change-Id: I44778e5b59652d345b10eecd4c88efbf7d86a5e0
Bug: oss-fuzz:29849
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/358960
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Change-Id: I94094be7163a04bf48e86406230156a5433469b6
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/359140
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Change-Id: I924ac75b5f8a397f7af7a06925ef0c9deba5c509
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/359141
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Change-Id: I8309940f8e40d0e84847ae272830896d010c39de
Bug: skia:11219
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/359138
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
The previous change caused varDeclarations() to sometimes return an
expression-statement. This only made sense in the context of being
called from Parser::statement(). Other places which called
varDeclarations() expect vardecls and nothing else.
Change-Id: I562657cadfa20dcd77b527f2dc43dca0c6bf389f
Bug: oss-fuzz:29845
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/358528
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Comparing sqrt(5) against a variable containing sqrt(5) was not working
properly in some versions of Android running Vulkan.
Change-Id: I4f6bbff78a9ba56ec6e222f2037d66b13e3cd635
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/358530
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This is a reland of 4ecab92584
This reland folds in subsequent code cleanups and disables a test that
failed on Android + Vulkan.
Original change's description:
> Run unit tests to verify SkSL folding behavior.
>
> The unit test loads SkSL source files from `resources/sksl`, compiles
> the code, and uses SkRuntimeEffect to render a pixel using the effect.
> If solid green is rendered, the test passes.
>
> Change-Id: I2ccb427a907975ae84aee19d8e68d774b2cb638c
> Bug: skia:11009
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/355983
> Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Bug: skia:11009
Change-Id: I09196c8ca3041e8957324a0cbb7f7d6963c6e4e7
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/358523
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
This reverts commit 4ecab92584.
Reason for revert: breaking all the vulkan bots
Original change's description:
> Run unit tests to verify SkSL folding behavior.
>
> The unit test loads SkSL source files from `resources/sksl`, compiles
> the code, and uses SkRuntimeEffect to render a pixel using the effect.
> If solid green is rendered, the test passes.
>
> Change-Id: I2ccb427a907975ae84aee19d8e68d774b2cb638c
> Bug: skia:11009
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/355983
> Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
TBR=brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: Ife32f6c33d9ba7a9580b66eb312cffb249c43cb2
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: skia:11009
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/357780
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com>
This allows us to write SkSL shaders which are valid both for use as
Runtime Effect, and for compilation with skslc targeting Metal.
Change-Id: I74e125d81865d4092e657a7d9948d2e72054bda5
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/357777
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Added asserts that verify we don't try to emit the same struct or array
with two different memory layout rules. Some code paths were failing to
inspect the associated variable, leading to incorrect errors about the
attached offsets of members.
Added a test case that triggered that error, and also triggers the new
asserts.
Then, fixed the underlying cause: writing out the struct definition as a
side effect of accessing a member in getLValue().
Bug: skia:11205
Change-Id: I6e5fb76ea918ec9ff10425f2d519ddbc54404b27
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/357436
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
The unit test loads SkSL source files from `resources/sksl`, compiles
the code, and uses SkRuntimeEffect to render a pixel using the effect.
If solid green is rendered, the test passes.
Change-Id: I2ccb427a907975ae84aee19d8e68d774b2cb638c
Bug: skia:11009
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/355983
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This will allow us to load these inputs for unit testing in `dm`.
Change-Id: Id256ba7c30d3ec94b98048e47af44cf9efe580d5
Bug: skia:11009
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/357282
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
