... in support of programs for colorspacexforms
Change-Id: I72ace09f10511ef8994038a4af3feab8bc1a299e
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/278466
Commit-Queue: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
While I think trunc(mad(x, scale, 0.5)) is fine for doing our float
to fixed point conversions, round(mul(x, scale)) was kind of better
all around:
- better rounding than +0.5 and trunc
- faster when mad() is not an fma
- often now no need to use the constant 0.5f or have it in a register
- allows the mul() in to_unorm to use mul_f32_imm
Those last two points are key... this actually frees up 2 registers in
the x86 JIT when using to_unorm().
So I think maybe we can resurrect round and still guarantee our desired
intra-machine stability by committing to using instructions that follow
the current rounding mode, which is what [v]cvtps2dq inextricably uses.
Left some notes on the ARM impl... we're rounding to nearest even there,
which is probably the current mode anyway, but to be more correct we
need a slightly longer impl that rounds float->float then "truncates".
Unsure whether it matters in practice. Same deal in the unit test that
I added back, now testing negative and 0.5 cases too. The expectations
assume the current mode is nearest even.
I had the idea to resurrect this when I was looking at adding _imm Ops
for fma_f32. I noticed that the y and z arguments to an fma_f32 were by
far most likely to be constants, and when they are, they're by far likely
to both be constants, e.g. 255.0f & 0.5f from to_unorm(8,...).
llvm disassembly for SkVM_round unit test looks good:
~ $ llc -mcpu=haswell /tmp/skvm-jit-1231521224.bc -o -
.section __TEXT,__text,regular,pure_instructions
.macosx_version_min 10, 15
.globl "_skvm-jit-1231521224" ## -- Begin function skvm-jit-1231521224
.p2align 4, 0x90
"_skvm-jit-1231521224": ## @skvm-jit-1231521224
.cfi_startproc
cmpl $8, %edi
jl LBB0_3
.p2align 4, 0x90
LBB0_2: ## %loopK
## =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
vcvtps2dq (%rsi), %ymm0
vmovupd %ymm0, (%rdx)
addl $-8, %edi
addq $32, %rsi
addq $32, %rdx
cmpl $8, %edi
jge LBB0_2
LBB0_3: ## %hoist1
xorl %eax, %eax
testl %edi, %edi
jle LBB0_6
.p2align 4, 0x90
LBB0_5: ## %loop1
## =>This Inner Loop Header: Depth=1
vcvtss2si (%rsi,%rax), %ecx
movl %ecx, (%rdx,%rax)
decl %edi
addq $4, %rax
testl %edi, %edi
jg LBB0_5
LBB0_6: ## %leave
vzeroupper
retq
.cfi_endproc
## -- End function
Change-Id: Ib59eb3fd8a6805397850d93226c6c6d37cc3ab84
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/276738
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
- hook up fmls.4s as fnma_f32
- add fneg.4s
- use fneg.4s + fmls.4s to impl fms_f32
- more tests to exercise these
Change-Id: I60173a5e4618ab968a9361e15334a1d63c001372
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/275412
Commit-Queue: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
They'll never see fma_f32 ops.
Change-Id: I39371606c673fb76bdcbbe08c1b25308675f8f2c
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/275151
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
We really only need to_unorm(),
and that's fine with trunc(mad(x, scale, 0.5)).
Change-Id: I1561c678501963a9ae53c22994fc906159fc7199
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/275075
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Change-Id: I225e8f7395e58a4ca3c1c151d8711796e6a56939
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/274185
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
- test sqrt
- impl. sqrt for llvm
Change-Id: I38a06ee57bf4d50e7d068321ab765ede3d1d73bc
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/274183
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
- test index
- impl. index in llvm
- convert to loop counter from uint64_t -> int32_t
to match how we use it in other backends
Change-Id: Iee371d67eddaace068906b861292eb5ed3d74c95
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/274135
Commit-Queue: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Change-Id: I4226393275a11be3babe21b7f8461767c5b55f23
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/274127
Commit-Queue: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
SE(val) -> S(dst_type, val) to make this work.
Change-Id: Icf42f706b2e7761db8ce83f1e1ef95c288bfecf4
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/274120
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
This is enough for another swath of tests.
Change-Id: Ida43fa2ee2ebd8e6086923fb9fafef8f646d0a93
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/274074
Commit-Queue: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This means we can write a memset32 (load32 -> store32),
tested explicitly with the new unit test.
Slightly changes to the type protocol,
- load and splat now generate scalars or vectors
depending on how `scalar` is set
- store should no longer have to pay attention to `scalar`;
it's input values will already be the right size
Clean up some of the type declarations where we don't
actually need the subclass types, holding llvm::Type* instead.
This makes using ?: easier.
Change-Id: I2f98701ebdeead0513d355b2666b024794b90193
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/273781
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Change-Id: Ia1752196fd50ade2c3160dc401a36618433420d8
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/270822
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
There are probably ways to make this more efficient by only optimizing
what's necessary (e.g. try JIT first, then interpreter only if it fails)
and some other performance improvements to make, but for now I want to
focus mostly on keeping things simple and correct.
The line between Builder::done() and Program::Program() is particularly
fuzzy and becoming fuzzier here, and I think that'll be something
that'll change eventually.
This makes SkVMTest debug dumps more portable, though perhaps less
useful. Might kill that feature soon now that SkVM is tested more
thoroughly in unit tests and GMs and bots and such.
Change-Id: Id9ce8daaf8570e5bea8b10f1a80b97f5b33d45dc
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/269941
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Kind of brewing a big refactor here, to give me some room between
skvm::Builder and skvm::Program to do optimizations, bakend
specializations and analysis.
As a warmup, I'm trying to split up today's Builder::Instruction into
two forms, first just what the user requested in Builder (this stays
Builder::Instruction) then a new type representing any transformation or
analysis we've done to it (OptimizedInstruction).
Roughly six important optimizations happen in SkVM today, in this order:
1) constant folding
2) backend-specific instruction specialization
3) common sub-expression elimination
4) reordering + dead code elimination
5) loop invariant and lifetime analysis
6) register assignment
At head 1-5 all happen in Builder, and 2 is particularly
awkward to have there (e.g. mul_f32 -> mul_f32_imm).
6 happens in Program per-backend, and that seems healthy.
As of this CL, 1-3 happen in Builder, 4-5 now on this middle
OptimizedInstruction format, and 6 still in Program.
I'd like to get to the point where 1 stays in Builder, 2-5 all happen on
this middle IR, and 6 stays in Program. That ought to let me do things
like turn mul_f32 -> mul_f32_imm when it's good to and still benefit
from things like common sub-expression elimination and code reordering
happening after that trnasformation.
And then, I hope that's also a good spot to do more complicated
transformations, like lowering gather8 into gather32 plus some fix up
when targeting an x86 JIT but not anywhere else. Today's Builder is too
early to know whether we should do this or not, and in Program it's
actually kind of awkward to do this sort of thing while also doing
having to do register assignment. Some middle might be right.
Change-Id: I9c00268a084f07fbab88d05eb441f1957a0d7c67
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/269181
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This reverts commit d4e3b9e8bc.
Reason for revert: will reland with fixes
Original change's description:
> impl gather8/gather16 with gather32
>
> This is our quick path to JIT small gathers.
>
> The idea is roughly,
>
> const uint32_t* ptr32 = ptr8;
> uint32_t abcd = ptr32[ix/4];
> switch (ix & 3) {
> case 3: return (abcd >> 24) ;
> case 2: return (abcd >> 16) & 0xff;
> case 1: return (abcd >> 8) & 0xff;
> case 0: return (abcd ) & 0xff;
> }
>
> With the idea that if we may load a given byte,
> we should also be allowed to load the four byte
> aligned word that byte falls within.
>
> Change-Id: I7fb1085306050c918ccf505f1d2e1e87db3b8c9a
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/268381
> Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
TBR=mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com
Change-Id: I48d800edc6517f37e04752c91616b666a5e0f384
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/268490
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This is our quick path to JIT small gathers.
The idea is roughly,
const uint32_t* ptr32 = ptr8;
uint32_t abcd = ptr32[ix/4];
switch (ix & 3) {
case 3: return (abcd >> 24) ;
case 2: return (abcd >> 16) & 0xff;
case 1: return (abcd >> 8) & 0xff;
case 0: return (abcd ) & 0xff;
}
With the idea that if we may load a given byte,
we should also be allowed to load the four byte
aligned word that byte falls within.
Change-Id: I7fb1085306050c918ccf505f1d2e1e87db3b8c9a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/268381
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Constant propagation means we can always notionally
unpremul and premul at the right points, and if alpha
was already opaque, they'll just drop away.
This has been true, but it's nice to put a test on it.
Change-Id: Iacd2002d9e1a10b73e800a452f377001d5ba3777
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/268336
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
- Add sqrt(), vsqrtps for x86.
- Hook into SkRadialGradient.
Change-Id: I66a4598e30fe16610c59a512f7d962323ee5134a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/267196
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This loads 32 bits instead of gathering 256 in the tail part of loops.
To make it work, add a vmovd with SIB addressing.
I also remembered that the mysterious 0b100 is actually a signal that
the instruction uses SIB addressing, and is usually denoted by `rsp`.
(SIB addressing may be something we'd want to generalize over like we
did recently with YmmOrLabel, but I'll leave that for Future Me.)
Slight rewording where "scratch" is mentioned to keep it focused on
scratch GP registers, not "tmp" ymm registers. Not a hugely important
distinction but helps when I'm grepping through code.
Change-Id: I39a6ab1a76ea0c103ae7d3ebc97a1b7d4b530e73
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/264376
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Some TODOs left over to make the scalar
tail case better... as is it issues a
256-bit gather for each 32-bit load!
I added a trimmed down variant of the existing
SkVM_gathers unit test to test just gather32,
covering this new JIT code.
Change-Id: Iabd2e6a61f0213b6d02d222b9f7aec2be000b70b
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/264217
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This does the equivalent of dst = *(src + off),
which we use to find our gather base pointer in gather32.
Change-Id: I09ca7bfd404d7dce6de454ef1ed4eee78ab29932
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/264216
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
A complicated instruction to say the least!
A "fun" wrinkle is that all the ymm registers must be unique!
(And the mask register is cleared by the instruction...)
Still kind of TODO is what that 0b100 r/m in the mod_rm() means. Every
variant of the instruction I've assembled seems to have it set to 0b100
(e.g. 0x0c or 0x04) but I'd feel better if I knew what it meant.
Change-Id: Ia4ff5f8175bff545e2d10bb2d1b14f49073445a3
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/264116
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
- Add YmmOrLabel struct to represent the concept that many
x86 instructions can take a final argument as either a
register or memory address, and that they all handle them
the same way.
- Convert existing overloads like vmulps() to use YmmOrLabel.
- upgrade some other instructions to take YmmOrLabel
- use them to implement today's new _imm ops
This feels like a good spot for implicit constructors, no?
Change-Id: I435028acc3fbfcc16f634cfccc98fe38bbce9d19
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/263207
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
- Remove extract... it's not going to have any special impl.
I've left it on skvm::Builder as an inline compound method.
- Add no-op shift short circuits.
- Add immediate ops for bit_{and,or,xor,clear}.
This comes from me noticing that the masks for extract today are always
immediates, and then when I started converting it to be (I32, int shift,
int mask), I realized it might be even better to break it up into its
component pieces. There's no backend that can do extract any better
than shift-then-mask, so might as well leave it that way so we can
dedup, reorder, and specialize those micro ops.
Will follow up soon to get this all JITing again,
and these can-we-JIT test changes will be reverted.
Change-Id: I0835bcd825e417104ccc7efc79e9a0f2f4897841
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/263217
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Basic support for clamp/clamp/nearest/RGBA-8888/premul images.
A couple little changes to make this work:
- add pixel-center offset to shader (x,y)
- change the signature of gather??() calls to work
more naturally with how we let effects build uniforms.
Instead of gathering directly from one of the program
arguments, load the gather base pointer off another
uniforms pointer, just like any other uniform.
- remove the default argument to uniform??() so that
they parallel the new gather??() calls more closely.
There was only one place that was using the default
and I think it's clearer as an explicit 0 offset.
- centralize some more helpers onto skvm::Builder so
we can use the in both SkVMBlitter and SkImageShader.
Some diffs:
- very, very small color diffs probably due to slightly
different math converting between byte and float or blending;
- small sampling coordinate diffs where skvm + SkRP agree,
and the legacy shaders disagree. That's fine by me.
Change-Id: I72634e7fed4f13e6cb41b8067104760f392ea3bf
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/262368
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
These are really designed around x86, so forcing them
on ARM where our existing non-immediate ops work better
is kind of silly.
Change-Id: I6b66ed0b0a71b335becdcb1d67dec471620542b0
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/254440
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This all comes together as
uminv tmp, condition
fmov gp, tmp
cbnz gp, all_true
brk 0
all_true:
...
The key idea is uminv(vec) will return 0 if any of the inputs are 0,
and non-zero if all of the inputs are non-zero, namely 0xffffffff.
fmov moves that minimum from a vector register to a general purpose
register where we can test it with cbnz, compare and branch if non-zero.
This jumps over the `brk 0` debug trap when all inputs are true.
Change-Id: If5deb77a77f52221d0649e537179743c45eb9cc5
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/254479
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Lots of x86 instructions can take their right hand side argument from
memory directly rather than a register. We can use this to avoid the
need to allocate a register for many constants.
The strategy in this CL is one of several I've been stewing over, the
simplest of those strategies I think. There are some trade offs
particularly on ARM; this naive ARM implementation means we'll load&op
every time, even though the load part of the operation can logically be
hoisted. From here on I'm going to just briefly enumerate a few other
approaches that allow the optimization on x86 and still allow the
immediate splats to hoist on ARM.
1) don't do it on ARM
A very simple approach is to simply not perform this optimization on
ARM. ARM has more vector registers than x86, and so register pressure
is lower there. We're going to end up with splatted constants in
registers anyway, so maybe just let that happen the normal way instead
of some roundabout complicated hack like I'll talk about in 2). The
only downside in my mind is that this approach would make high-level
program descriptions platform dependent, which isn't so bad, but it's
been nice to be able to compare and diff debug dumps.
2) split Op::splat up
The next less-simple approach to this problem could fix this by
splitting splats into two Ops internally, one inner Op::immediate that
guantees at least the constant is in memory and is compatible with
immediate-aware Ops like mul_f32_imm, and an outer Op::constant that
depends on that Op::immediate and further guarantees that constant has
been broadcast into a register to be compatible with non-immediate-aware
ops like div_f32. When building a program, immediate-aware ops would
peek for Op::constants as they do today for Op::splats, but instead of
embedding the immediate themselves, they'd replace their dependency with
the inner Op::immediate.
On x86 these new Ops would work just as advertised, with Op::immediate a
runtime no-op, Op::constant the usual vbroadcastss. On ARM
Op::immediate needs to go all the way and splat out a register to make
the constant compatible with immediate-aware ops, and the Op::constant
becomes a noop now instead. All this comes together to let the
Op::immediate splat hoist up out of the loop while still feeding
Op::mul_f32_imm and co. It's a rather complicated approach to solving
this issue, but I might want to explore it just to see how bad it is.
3) do it inside the x86 JIT
The conceptually best approach is to find a way to do this peepholing
only inside the JIT only on x86, avoiding the need for new
Op::mul_f32_imm and co. ARM and the interpreter don't benefit from this
peephole, so the x86 JIT is the logical owner of this optimization.
Finding a clean way to do this without too much disruption is the least
baked idea I've got here, though I think the most desirable long-term.
Cq-Include-Trybots: skia.primary:Test-Debian9-Clang-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Debug-All-SK_USE_SKVM_BLITTER,Test-Debian9-Clang-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-All-SK_USE_SKVM_BLITTER
Change-Id: Ie9c6336ed08b6fbeb89acf920a48a319f74f3643
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/254217
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
The logic implemented here is roughly
assert_true(v):
if any ~v {
int3()
}
in assembly as
```
vptest v, constant 0xffffffff mask
jc ok
int3
ok:
```
jc branches if (~v & mask) are all zero, with mask set fully, that's
branch if ~v are all zero, which is to say, v are all ~0, true. So we
jump over the int3 breakpoint if v are all true.
Cq-Include-Trybots: skia.primary:Test-Debian9-Clang-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Debug-All-SK_USE_SKVM_BLITTER
Change-Id: Ie0fc1da15b1a0dba00c66af610ccde18f5985f8a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/253897
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Will use these to implement assert_true on x86.
Change-Id: I9d2595a35518b6971dd8e418b583febd3960c7f6
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/253896
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
This is an assert that is active in debug mode. For the moment it only
works in the interpreter, but I plan to follow up with JIT code too.
assert_true() is a data sink like a store() as far as lifetime goes,
though we take care to allow it to be hoisted if its inputs are. An
assert_true's existence will keep all its inputs alive, and in release
builds where we skip the instruction, those inputs will all drop away
automatically.
Tested locally by forcing the interpreter. It shouldn't be long before
I have at least x86 JIT asserts working too.
Change-Id: I7aba40d040436a57a6b930790f7b8962bafb1a8c
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/253756
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This plumbs through round but doesn't use it. I want that change to be
its own CL. It's nice to have assembler support and the name changes
even if I revert using round.
Change-Id: I6d67ec5c63546069eb7cc1c91599b599bafcda66
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/253724
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
No diffs.
Change-Id: Ia0b35c2787e27d74763f21b81072affa6caf1e5a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/253720
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
This is a reland of 12cea8d6c4
Now implementing float comparisons on ARM also.
Only vaguely tricky thing is that x!=y is ~(x==y).
Original change's description:
> hook up float comparisons to x86 JIT
>
> This gets the draws in gm/skvm.cpp all JITing again,
> and in one of the unit tests.
>
> (Everything draws the same of course.)
>
> Change-Id: Iada28690d9df78f9d444ee3765e21beb29239672
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/253166
> Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Cq-Include-Trybots: skia.primary:Test-Android-Clang-NVIDIA_Shield-CPU-TegraX1-arm64-Debug-All-Android
Change-Id: I771b8a327a958db8a0d509d55863ade935a00035
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/253401
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
JIT code isn't MSAN-instrumented, so we won't see when it uses
uninitialized memory, and we'll not see the writes it makes as properly
initializing memory. Instead force the interpreter, which should let
MSAN see everything our programs do properly.
This refactors so that SkVM.cpp is the only code to look at whether
SKVM_JIT is defined, and undefines it when built with MSAN. Added
a simple regression test too.
Cq-Include-Trybots: skia.primary:Test-Debian9-Clang-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Debug-All-MSAN
Change-Id: Ic7cca2621f84dfba7174127738744d6c68f85f2e
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/253410
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This reverts commit 12cea8d6c4.
Reason for revert: unit tests failing on ARM... will try again once I have float comparisons implemented for ARM too.
Original change's description:
> hook up float comparisons to x86 JIT
>
> This gets the draws in gm/skvm.cpp all JITing again,
> and in one of the unit tests.
>
> (Everything draws the same of course.)
>
> Change-Id: Iada28690d9df78f9d444ee3765e21beb29239672
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/253166
> Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
TBR=mtklein@google.com,reed@google.com
Change-Id: Ie07e580b4998199338217a27d4fad34c679ffc23
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/253399
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This gets the draws in gm/skvm.cpp all JITing again,
and in one of the unit tests.
(Everything draws the same of course.)
Change-Id: Iada28690d9df78f9d444ee3765e21beb29239672
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/253166
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This lets shaders that use 'x' JIT on x86.
I started with paddd and {0,-1,-2,-3,...}, which worked fine but on
second thought seemed a bit odd. I've switched to psubd and
{0,1,2,3,...} but I've left in support for paddd with a memory arg.
gm/skvm.cpp now JITs fully again and continues to draw the same as
the interpreter did.
Simplify embedded data alignment a little... memory operands don't
need full register alignment in AVX like they used to in SSE. So
just align everything to the vector element size like we do on ARM,
and reorder [splats,bytes_masks,iota] to match the order we declare
and handle them in the code above.
Add unit tests for vpaddd + vpsubd.
Cq-Include-Trybots: skia.primary:Test-Debian9-Clang-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Debug-All-SK_USE_SKVM_BLITTER
Change-Id: I6b8d060450cca7f437a1d2a597a8a0e0e8d51b33
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/252797
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Rewrite program instructions so that each value becomes available as
late as possible, just before it's used by another instruction. This
reorders blocks of instructions to reduce them number of temporary
registers in flight.
Take this example of the sort of program that we naturally write,
noting the registers needed as we progress down the right:
src = load32 ... (1)
sr = extract src ... (2)
sg = extract src ... (3)
sb = extract src ... (4)
sa = extract src ... (4, src dies)
dst = load32 ... (5)
dr = extract dst ... (6)
dg = extract dst ... (7)
db = extract dst ... (8)
da = extract dst ... (8, dst dies)
r = add sr dr (7, sr and dr die)
g = add sg dg (6, sg and dg die)
b = add sb db (5, sb and db die)
a = add sa da (4, sa and da die)
rg = pack r g ... (3, r and g die)
ba = pack b a ... (2, b and a die)
rgba = pack rg ba ... (1, rg and ba die)
store32 rgba ... (0, rgba dies)
That original ordering of the code needs 8 registers (perhaps with a
temporary 9th, but we'll ignore that here). This CL will rewrite the
program to something more like this by recursively issuing inputs only
once needed:
src = load32 ... (1)
sr = extract src ... (2)
dst = load32 ... (3)
dr = extract dst ... (4)
r = add sr dr (3, sr and dr die)
sg = extract src ... (4)
dg = extract dst ... (5)
g = add sg dg (4, sg and dg die)
rg = pack r g (3, r and g die)
sb = extract src ... (4)
db = extract dst ... (5)
b = add sb db (4, sb and db die)
sa = extract src ... (4, src dies)
da = extract dst ... (4, dst dies)
a = add sa da (3, sa and da die)
ba = pack b a (2, b and a die)
rgba = pack rg ba ... (1, rg and ba die)
store32 rgba ... (0)
That trims 3 registers off the example, just by reordering!
I've added the real version of this example to SkVMTest.cpp.
(Its 6th register comes from holding the 0xff byte mask used
by extract, in case you're curious).
I'll admit it's not exactly easy to work out how this reordering works
without a pen and paper or trial and error. I've tried to make the
implementation preserve the original program's order as much as makes
sense (i.e. when order is an otherwise arbitrary choice) to keep it
somewhat sane to follow.
This reordering naturally skips dead code, so pour one out for ☠️ .
We lose our cute dead code emoji marker, but on the other hand all code
downstream of Builder::done() can assume every instruction is live.
Change-Id: Iceffcd10fd7465eae51a39ef8eec7a7189766ba2
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/249999
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
These implement select, eq_i32, lt_i32, and gt_i32 on ARMv8.
Change-Id: Ic36dda1cc425ca91700f9b120594e420ea0f560a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/248970
Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Most hoisted values are used in the loop body (and that's really the
whole point of hoisting) but some are just temporaries to help produce
other hoisted values. This used_in_loop bit helps us distinguish the
two, and lets us recycle registers holding temporary hoisted values not
used in the loop.
The can-we-recycle logic now becomes:
- is this a real value?
- is it time for it to die?
- is it either not hoisted or a hoisted temporary?
The set-death-to-infinity approach for hoisted values is now gone. That
worked great for hoisted values used inside the loop, but was too
conservative for hoisted temporaries. This lifetime extension was
preventing us from recycling those registers, pinning enough registers
that we run out and fail to JIT.
Small amounts of refactoring to make this clearer:
- move the Instruction hash function definition near its operator==
- rename the two "hoist" variables to "can_hoist" for Instructions
and "try_hoisting" for the JIT approach
- add ↟ to mark hoisted temporaries, _really_ hoisted values.
There's some redundancy here between tracking the can_hoist bit, the
used_in_loop bit, and lifetime tracking. I think it should be true, for
instance, that !can_hoist && !used_in_loop implies an instruction is
dead code. I plan to continue refactoring lifetime analysis (in
particular reordering instructions to decrease register pressure) so
hopefully by the time I'm done that metadata will shake out a little
crisper.
Change-Id: I6460ca96d1cbec0315bed3c9a0774cd88ab5be26
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/248986
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
This is a reland of 52435503e9
with better checks for when we should expect JIT and not.
Original change's description:
> mark which SkVM tests should JIT or not
>
> Most of these tests converted over to test_interpreter_only()
> are failing to JIT because of unimplemented instructions. No
> bug there, just TODOs.
>
> But SkVM_hoist _should_ be JITting. A while back I landed a CL
> that messed with value lifetimes that prevents it from JITting.
> Will be using this as a regression test to fix that bug.
>
> Change-Id: Id2034f6548a45ed9aeb9ae3cbb24d389cad7dc60
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/248980
> Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
> Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
Cq-Include-Trybots: skia.primary:Test-Android-Clang-NVIDIA_Shield-CPU-TegraX1-arm64-Release-All-Android,Test-Debian9-Clang-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-All-SK_CPU_LIMIT_SSE2,Test-Debian9-Clang-GCE-CPU-AVX2-x86_64-Release-All-SK_CPU_LIMIT_SSE41,Test-Mac10.13-Clang-VMware7.1-CPU-AVX-x86_64-Debug-All-NativeFonts,Test-Mac10.14-Clang-VMware7.1-CPU-AVX-x86_64-Debug-All-NativeFonts
Change-Id: Id7bde7e879649e435fa424a9c9d6c51a31afd5e9
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/248990
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This reverts commit 52435503e9.
Reason for revert: lots of bots can't JIT, duh...
Original change's description:
> mark which SkVM tests should JIT or not
>
> Most of these tests converted over to test_interpreter_only()
> are failing to JIT because of unimplemented instructions. No
> bug there, just TODOs.
>
> But SkVM_hoist _should_ be JITting. A while back I landed a CL
> that messed with value lifetimes that prevents it from JITting.
> Will be using this as a regression test to fix that bug.
>
> Change-Id: Id2034f6548a45ed9aeb9ae3cbb24d389cad7dc60
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/248980
> Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
> Auto-Submit: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Herb Derby <herb@google.com>
TBR=mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com
Change-Id: Ieea4b06f0d32249e3da56c6810d3c45c2abf2689
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/248989
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
