Commit Graph

113 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
mtklein
55b0ffc486 nanobench: Protect more against infinite loops.
BUG=skia:
R=mtklein@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/404543002
2014-07-17 08:38:23 -07:00
Mike Klein
912947737a Use __rdtsc on Windows.
This seems to be ~100x higher resolution than QueryPerformanceCounter.  AFAIK, all our Windows perf bots have constant_tsc, so we can be a bit more direct about using rdtsc directly: it'll always tick at the max CPU frequency.

Now, the question remains, what is the max CPU frequency to divide through by?  It looks like QueryPerformanceFrequency actually gives the CPU frequency in kHz, suspiciously exactly what we need to divide through to get elapsed milliseconds.  That was a freebie.

I did some before/after comparison on slow benchmarks.  Timings look the same.  Going to land this without review tonight to see what happens on the bots; happy to review carefully tomorrow.

R=mtklein@google.com
TBR=bungeman

BUG=skia:

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/394363003
2014-07-16 19:59:32 -04:00
Mike Klein
e3631364e9 Try to debug Windows infinite loops in nanobench.
NOTREECHECKS=true

BUG=skia:

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/396753004
2014-07-15 17:56:37 -04:00
Mike Klein
3944a1d237 destroyContexts after each bench instead of before
BUG=skia:

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/394893002
2014-07-15 13:40:19 -04:00
mtklein
6238688af0 Give windows boring bars and use 'us' for microseconds.
NOTREECHECKS=true

BUG=skia:
R=bsalomon@google.com, mtklein@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/393673006
2014-07-15 10:30:31 -07:00
mtklein
1e319f7342 Add --resetGpuContext to both DM and nanobench.
Defaulting to true to be conservative for now.

BUG=skia:

NOTREECHECKS=true
R=mtklein@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/398483005
2014-07-15 08:27:06 -07:00
mtklein
a189ccdb4d nanobench: add --runOnce.
BUG=skia:
R=egdaniel@google.com, mtklein@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/392583005
2014-07-14 12:28:48 -07:00
mtklein
60317d0ffb nanobench: support --outResultsFile
BUG=skia:
R=kelvinly@google.com, mtklein@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/390933002
2014-07-14 11:30:37 -07:00
mtklein
5d9d10e821 nanobench: add a cute bar chart
Give this a try?  Helpful, or gets in the way?

BUG=skia:
R=krajcevski@google.com, mtklein@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/390483002
2014-07-11 11:57:07 -07:00
mtklein
40b32be371 nanobench: add median and --cpu/--gpu
BUG=skia:
R=krajcevski@google.com, mtklein@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/377283002
2014-07-09 08:46:50 -07:00
mtklein
9bc86ed052 Hey, maybe we should _call_ glFinish.
BUG=skia:

CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=tryserver.skia:Build-Mac10.7-Clang-x86-Debug-Trybot
R=mtklein@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/345063004
2014-07-01 10:02:43 -07:00
mtklein
bb6a028239 draft gpu support in nanobench
BUG=skia:
R=bsalomon@google.com, mtklein@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/359473004
2014-07-01 08:43:42 -07:00
mtklein
f372321de3 Add nanobench, a fresh look at our microbenchmark harness.
out/Release/nanobench runs 4-5x faster on my Z620 and ~2x faster on my N5 than out/Release/bench with the same configs.

(Debug isn't really comparable.  I haven't added the Debug -> single loop check.)

BUG=skia:
R=djsollen@google.com, mtklein@google.com

Author: mtklein@chromium.org

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/347443002
2014-06-25 14:08:00 -07:00