This is a reland of 830c69ca66
Original change's description:
> Implement operator== and != for Metal structs and arrays.
>
> GLSL/SkSL assumes that == and != on struct/array types should work.
> We need to emit equality and inequality operators whenever we find code
> that compares a struct or array.
>
> Structs and arrays can be arbitrarily nested, and either type can
> contain a matrix. All of these things need custom equality operators in
> Metal. Therefore, we need to recursively generate comparison operators
> when any of these types are encountered.
>
> For arrays we get lucky, and we can cover all possible array types and
> sizes with a single templated operator== method. Structs and matrices
> have no such luck, and are generated separately on a per-type basis.
>
> For each of these types, operator== is implemented as an equality check
> on each field, and operator!= is implemented in terms of operator==.
> Equality and inequality are always emitted together. (Previously, matrix
> equality and inequality were emitted and implemented independently, but
> this is no longer the case.)
>
> Change-Id: I69ee01c0a390d7db6bcb2253ed6336ab20cc4d1d
> Bug: skia:11908, skia:11924
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/402016
> Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Bug: skia:11908, skia:11924, skia:11929
Change-Id: I6336b6125e9774c1ca73e3d497e3466f11f6f25f
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/402559
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This is a reland of 22dcb5fd7e
Original change's description:
> Add coords parameter to all .sksl test files used as runtime effects
>
> Convert to use the newer MakeForShader factory, which requires this.
>
> Change-Id: Ifaf6054054027c78f3f3fe15596e435e0f79b877
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/399336
> Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Bug: skia:11919
Change-Id: I5f745c54b2bc3712f2281db6e067345903e81931
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/401836
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This reverts commit 22dcb5fd7e.
Reason for revert: Lot's of red Android and Win bots.
Original change's description:
> Add coords parameter to all .sksl test files used as runtime effects
>
> Convert to use the newer MakeForShader factory, which requires this.
>
> Change-Id: Ifaf6054054027c78f3f3fe15596e435e0f79b877
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/399336
> Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
TBR=brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: I0fa844c6cf985d16e72c7f26aa217752612dcfc1
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/401077
Reviewed-by: Joe Gregorio <jcgregorio@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Joe Gregorio <jcgregorio@google.com>
Convert to use the newer MakeForShader factory, which requires this.
Change-Id: Ifaf6054054027c78f3f3fe15596e435e0f79b877
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/399336
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This is allowed in OpenGL ES2, and its absence in SkSL has been a pain
point for new users adopting Runtime Effects.
Change-Id: Id2ed78261a2cd2b14b49ad22cb74cdc9e0905f8a
Bug: skia:11368
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/393418
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
OpenGL ES2 allows structs to be compared: http://screen/6KnX4ZfkdLtqDWv
This already worked in GLSL, Metal and SkVM.
Change-Id: Iaf7029c0c1ea9d447348c8280a2788f0d36befad
Bug: skia:11846
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/393598
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
SPIR-V doesn't seem to mind overlapping function names, since they're
not load-bearing in any way, but this keeps us consistent with the other
code generators.
Change-Id: Ifdb4cb17795da88eabc0db841af746fb76caf423
Bug: skia:10851
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/387757
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
This reverts commit a9c187e5cc.
Change-Id: Icbfb8abdfc67fc2e6428d97a6cdede2726fb56e4
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/385596
Auto-Submit: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This reverts commit 9e476b798f.
Reason for revert: Angry Vulkan bots
Original change's description:
> Refactored SPIR-V RelaxedPrecision handling
>
> The RelaxedPrecision decoration is now handled by nextId(), to make it
> easier to see all spots where a RelaxedPrecision decoration might be
> necessary. The goal of this initial refactor is not to actually fix the
> issues with RelaxedPrecision decorations, but rather to lay the
> groundwork for doing so in followup CLs.
>
> The initial intent of this change was to not affect the SPIR-V at all,
> saving modifications for followups, but there ended up being three kinds
> of changes to the output:
>
> 1. Doing things at nextId() time rather than later means some
> decorations move to an earlier spot in the output. This results in
> diffs, but should not cause any behavioral changes.
> 2. We were incorrectly tagging bools as RelaxedPrecision in some
> situations. By funneling things through fewer code paths, the refactor
> would have caused this to happen in even more situations, and the code
> responsible for the bug was being rewritten in this CL anyway, so it
> seemed worth just fixing the issue as part of this change.
> 3. Funneling things through fewer code paths ended up adding
> (correct) RelaxedPrecision modifiers to binary operations that had
> previously been missing them. It seemed better to just let it happen
> than to try to maintain bug-for-bug compatibility with the previous
> approach.
>
> Change-Id: Ia9654d6b5754e2c797e02226660cb618c9189b36
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384318
> Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
TBR=brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: I9ada728e5fd5798bc1179640560c2e6045b7efd1
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/385158
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
The RelaxedPrecision decoration is now handled by nextId(), to make it
easier to see all spots where a RelaxedPrecision decoration might be
necessary. The goal of this initial refactor is not to actually fix the
issues with RelaxedPrecision decorations, but rather to lay the
groundwork for doing so in followup CLs.
The initial intent of this change was to not affect the SPIR-V at all,
saving modifications for followups, but there ended up being three kinds
of changes to the output:
1. Doing things at nextId() time rather than later means some
decorations move to an earlier spot in the output. This results in
diffs, but should not cause any behavioral changes.
2. We were incorrectly tagging bools as RelaxedPrecision in some
situations. By funneling things through fewer code paths, the refactor
would have caused this to happen in even more situations, and the code
responsible for the bug was being rewritten in this CL anyway, so it
seemed worth just fixing the issue as part of this change.
3. Funneling things through fewer code paths ended up adding
(correct) RelaxedPrecision modifiers to binary operations that had
previously been missing them. It seemed better to just let it happen
than to try to maintain bug-for-bug compatibility with the previous
approach.
Change-Id: Ia9654d6b5754e2c797e02226660cb618c9189b36
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384318
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
This reverts commit a04692f69e.
Reason for revert: Angry Vulkan bots.
Original change's description:
> Fixed a number of spots where we should have been using RelaxedPrecision
>
> Our SPIR-V output was missing many RelaxedPrecision decorations, which
> was presumably impacting performance.
>
> Change-Id: Iee32d4a42f37af167fe0e45f3db94c2142129695
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384178
> Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
TBR=egdaniel@google.com,brianosman@google.com,ethannicholas@google.com,johnstiles@google.com
Change-Id: If4fe945cb363c9b61b5a4abfde649a437689d2eb
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384217
Reviewed-by: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Our SPIR-V output was missing many RelaxedPrecision decorations, which
was presumably impacting performance.
Change-Id: Iee32d4a42f37af167fe0e45f3db94c2142129695
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/384178
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ethan Nicholas <ethannicholas@google.com>
Previously, a uniform not wrapped in an interface block would report a
SPIR-V error:
"Variables identified with the Uniform storage class are
used to access transparent buffer backed resources. Such variables must
be typed as OpTypeStruct, or an array of this type..."
Now, the SPIR-V code generator automatically detects such global
variables and synthesizes a struct named _UniformBuffer to hold them.
When these variables are accessed, an OpAccessChain instruction is added
to grab the variable out of the struct.
Change-Id: I5e852d4de01b866c291506cc8cf6eb547f097d66
Bug: skia:11225
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/360776
Commit-Queue: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Auto-Submit: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
This is a known deficiency of runtime effects, next step is to fix how
they manage function signatures to solve the problem.
Bug: skia:10939
Change-Id: Id934e0acdf774b03bd6edce78d7b2c077bdeae00
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/360603
Reviewed-by: John Stiles <johnstiles@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
