This was only being used in one effect (and for no good reason). SkSL is
plenty powerful to re-implement something similar if required, at no
real performance cost.
Re-implemented the one effect that used it with simpler math in the
script, updated the copy of that effect in the gallery.
Docs-Preview: https://skia.org/?cl=247040
Change-Id: I68c86d6550dd4f003f6ba5ecd0febab37b86540b
Bug: skia:9513
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/247040
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
* Added a new binding type, SkEffectBinding. This stores another
entire effect params structure (so the JSON is just nested).
The name is a callable value that spawns a new instance of
that effect, inheriting the parameters of the spawning effect
or particle (depending on which kind of script made the call).
* Broke up the monolithic update function into some helpers,
got some code reuse with the script calling logic.
* Unlike particle capacity, there is no upper limit on child
effects (yet), so it's easy to trigger runaway memory and
CPU consumption. Be careful.
* Added death scripts to effects and particles, which are a
common place to want to spawn sub-effects. Like spawn,
these run on each loop, but for one-shots they play at the
end. Even with loops, this is helpful for timing sub-effects
(see fireworks2.json).
* Finally, added a much more comprehensive example effect,
raincloud.json. This includes a total of three effects, to
generate a cloud, raindrops, and splashes when those drops
hit "the ground".
Change-Id: I3d7b72bcbb684642cd9723518b67ab1c7d7a538a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/242479
Reviewed-by: Michael Ludwig <michaelludwig@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Also simplify type registration.
Change-Id: Ia47febb2ae2cd5821476c3dd33a688b688aa6d6d
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/238359
Commit-Queue: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
