These cuts reduce the number of files by 2/3 and the size by 1/3
There's not too much more that could be trimmed - now the size
is dominated by the specially compiled LLVM/Clang binaries
Bug: skia:7186
Change-Id: Ie88fb6f2277eafbefac0f676daaca809dcb53f62
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/107061
Reviewed-by: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Previously, we needed vulkan-1.dll from the Vulkan runtime because some
drivers did not include the Vulkan loader. Now, all drivers include this
DLL and using the version from assets causes problems for newer Intel
drivers.
Bug: skia:7490
Change-Id: I7bd37fb0d2c88a4753f354ab2bc88761562ced2f
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/107060
Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
I will use this in skcms-Win bots.
Change-Id: Id2e253a73e562181649f17908e5d587cc0d098d6
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/106973
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I55bb57a7f199d0f57531523f1fedfec2bf49502c
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/106802
Commit-Queue: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Stephan Altmueller <stephana@google.com>
This is a hack to get around the fact that we can't update the normal
version of depot_tools we receive through recipe deps, since we are not
yet using kitchen (See skia:7050).
Bug: skia:7609
Change-Id: I7d39e1e5db716960b2df2c8e3d4325c4b20c774e
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/106720
Reviewed-by: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Temporarily serialize the NexusPlayer Test bots to help diagnose
skia:7614.
Bug: skia:7614
Change-Id: I190327070f27e53d8344820f2215bad00f12e1ab
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/106621
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
No-Try: true
Change-Id: Ia55bb4bf1e4de5167ed181f4dfcde9210e7a447c
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/106024
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Bug: skia:7586
Change-Id: If52cefadc657fa93d90fe11b08e3efc5aeacb634
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/105767
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Having removed the NVPR text renderer, the nvprdit* configs are no longer interesting/useful.
Change-Id: Ic4b9d6507d3e3595723a27636cb58b5e811fb3a3
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/105563
Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Robert Phillips <robertphillips@google.com>
Noticed this when trybots were not using changes to
trigger_wait_ac_task.py
NoTry: true
Bug: skia:7469
Change-Id: Ifac964e247bfd6862fa030fbf5176f179ef7f3c4
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/103521
Commit-Queue: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Bug: skia:7469
Change-Id: I4a570a92d266d86fca20c9394c8d446df3c41e9b
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/102600
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
It will be called from a new recipe.
This script follows the same pattern that the trigger_wait_ct_task.py used to
(https://codereview.chromium.org/1370523002).
NoTry: true
Bug: skia:7469
Change-Id: I450e415b004e7f481ca1b377d350eb64e5fa8250
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/102340
Commit-Queue: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Here's the current error:
==6835==WARNING: AddressSanitizer failed to allocate 0xc0000028 bytes
==6835==AddressSanitizer's allocator is terminating the process instead of returning 0
==6835==If you don't like this behavior set allocator_may_return_null=1
==6835==AddressSanitizer CHECK failed: external/compiler-rt/lib/sanitizer_common/sanitizer_allocator.cc:221 "((0)) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0)
Looking at how sk_malloc and co all funnel into sk_malloc_flags(), and
how our local sk_malloc_flags() works, I think everything would be fine
to run this bot with allocator_may_return_null=1, but I'm not sure how
to do that.
Change-Id: I155439e17dd6353b82056de12f49de34e9538643
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/101660
Reviewed-by: Leon Scroggins <scroggo@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I8154b9a0b2fcf76fa02af0efa6b57425c6f9ac31
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/101580
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Our 32-bit "arm" builds can run just fine on most ARMv8 devices. This
mode of operation is called "aarch32", as opposed to the usual mode
we're used to thinking about of running 64-bit "arm64" binaries,
"aarch64".
(Unimportant side note: there are ARMv8 chips that support only
aarch64... I think e.g. the iPhone X's CPU? There are also ARMv8 chips
that support only aarch32, rare and usually for tiny embedded things
like a watch. All the devices we test with support both aarch64 and
aarch32.)
(Technically what we call "arm" is more properly "T32" for Thumb2 32,
and "arm64" is "A64" for... ARM 64. This note is even less important
than the previous one.)
Android ships 64-bit Skia on devices that support it, but Chrome still
clings to 32-bit. So I thought it'd make sense for us to run some of
these Chrome-like builds too. I wasn't sure which ones, so I just went
nuts and mirrored all the Nexus5x bots. If you notice bots that seem
under your purview and you really don't care about how Chrome would work
in that mode, please mark them in the code review and I'll drop them.
Change-Id: I3e67070c669f5c459f4c0f5f46a68529a8eb9afc
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/101545
Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
ViaSingletonPictures simulates a load pattern that Blink no longer produces.
I don't even remember what Via2ndPic and ViaTwice are meant to test,
but I imagine they're quite obsolete.
There was a lingering reference to ViaMojo, which otherwise doesn't exist.
Bug: skia:7544
Change-Id: I033fd344314054ad66c363e5dbd0a373be188069
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/88780
Reviewed-by: Mike Reed <reed@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Bug: skia:6687
Change-Id: I1562d7e9ded7f1be8a7ddc0c2341e54d5abbc0ae
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/97901
Reviewed-by: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
I think the Chorizo is now enforcing that our aligned loads are really
aligned. If this sticks, I'll follow up with the rest of the tests
disabled on the bug.
Bug: skia:7497
Change-Id: Id392e20ead395474f716a2c32d2643c801e03a2e
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/97202
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: If1fc0854a42407fa6acd8d333ef49ae0b6302a81
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/95640
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Also a few more blacklists to avoid shader compilation errors
in the Debug-GPU configuration.
Bug: skia:7166
Bug: skia:6687
Change-Id: I07b5adfc62e8029ece21406f0b79b32d9adf346f
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/95560
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Bug: skia:7166
Change-Id: Iefc8c6c1b72805dfe3ec8bd06d6ba6a878307582
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/93620
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
It should work on 32 and 64 bit android running M or newer.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I7e6d4000f4fee8f2704b84b7174174dd0e68d21c
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/93700
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
This may fix weird races in tests.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I41c36424c7b559301e915a0892590c74931ae463
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/93942
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I7394d2f392d7179777b65e77194436271efea80d
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/93760
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com>
We do some of this already in skpbench.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: Ia698466e83f9b476644c126747a2f89346361d13
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/93561
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
- fill in a couple switches to allow software to rasterize gray8
- add a gray8 config to DM so we can test it
- enable this config on some bots
Today we draw gray8 using SkRasterPipeline, loading it as {g,g,g,1}
and storing using the same fixed luma math as SkLumaColorFilter.
One day it'd be nice to use the color space's luma vector if present.
Can we support this on GPU?
Change-Id: I4ee661c8bd5f33f5db2433ffb6e1bc2483af8397
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/92681
Reviewed-by: Brian Osman <brianosman@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Bug: skia:7463
Change-Id: I5dd17a5ba33f867346837f006f9dc4cb775cfa04
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/91960
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Bug: skia:7344
Change-Id: I019fe5e3178d13ccf3a510bdcf1c81915149def5
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/89900
Commit-Queue: Yuqian Li <liyuqian@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Bug: skia:7344
Change-Id: I458afe4abe5edff8b8ccbd5abdaf4ebbf892ee00
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/90245
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
This is a followup to https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/90343,
which causes task durations to increase due to copying over images, skps,
etc. on every run.
Bug: skia:7408
Change-Id: I42e829e287b7343e969159ac19c587a87ebe99e8
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/90942
Reviewed-by: Stephan Altmueller <stephana@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I42c528d86f19d369609b26763334e055501a9b9b
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/90880
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Bug: skia:2679
Change-Id: Ia462af01b9832da90206b9e9be2278cb48c6c502
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/86401
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Context: Email to skiabot@ from mcgreevy@
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: Ic3bc19600809bde5adcd9edd23ba4d8b126ec852
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/88540
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
These were removed in
https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/78640
However, we've now decided on the 640 rather than the 540 due to
inventory.
No-Try: true
Change-Id: Icf6db636287e151d3dd3ac74cfddf8f6bd3bea6a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/87202
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
This reverts commit de71572f65.
Revert "Revert "Transform vertices for distance field glyphs on CPU.""
This reverts commit f226e66d75.
Change-Id: I2545afae3beb1d6b14bba056853ed826ae7a4679
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/86603
Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
Bug: skia:7409
Change-Id: I6c9d86af147f5234a0484e43e053ce1758cb312d
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/85400
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
This will make it easier to transition to new cert.
Bug: skia:7408
Change-Id: I9263851233f492c5e62155b61541783aa86ba634
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/85006
Reviewed-by: Stephan Altmueller <stephana@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Bug: skia:7409
Change-Id: Ic86696880858b9744bf9cea86caa3564c1a5e5af
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/85003
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Add a job that doesn't allow fallback so we know when things aren't
working as expected.
Change-Id: If993976d6807635bde455c2091f8a1ba18c41e27
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83700
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
No-Try: true
Change-Id: I229c2839d423d543ea7bd1aedec893d7bfeb27ea
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83701
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
This reverts commit 43307c09b9.
Reason for revert: Fixed this time. Echo 1 > already online cpu
returns exit code 1, which makes python over-react.
Original change's description:
> Revert "Disable extra CPUs during Nanobench"
>
> This reverts commit 32af335e7a.
>
> Reason for revert: many unhappy android bots
>
> Original change's description:
> > Disable extra CPUs during Nanobench
> >
> > The previous experiment revealed that nanobench can
> > run on any of the online CPUs, so rather than put
> > the ones we don't need/want into powersave mode, just
> > disable them.
> >
> > Maybe in the future we can run CPU tests on the big
> > or LITTLE cpus to get perf data on higher end or
> > lower end cpus, but only if we get very stable
> > results from this.
> >
> > Bug: skia:7378
> > Change-Id: I057513a691093e7f73c0f5790e17fab1a5ec0bc4
> > Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84820
> > Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
> > Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
>
> TBR=borenet@google.com,mtklein@google.com,kjlubick@google.com
>
> Change-Id: I23c37a6bde631e95f0b4ae7277ec8fcf325a00e9
> Bug: skia:7378
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84921
> Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
No-Tree-Checks: true
Change-Id: Ie7f0a3dc6ba55c124c796aba16a0f0497f285f3a
Bug: skia:7378
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84865
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
This reverts commit 32af335e7a.
Reason for revert: many unhappy android bots
Original change's description:
> Disable extra CPUs during Nanobench
>
> The previous experiment revealed that nanobench can
> run on any of the online CPUs, so rather than put
> the ones we don't need/want into powersave mode, just
> disable them.
>
> Maybe in the future we can run CPU tests on the big
> or LITTLE cpus to get perf data on higher end or
> lower end cpus, but only if we get very stable
> results from this.
>
> Bug: skia:7378
> notry=true
> notreechecks=true
> Change-Id: I057513a691093e7f73c0f5790e17fab1a5ec0bc4
> Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84820
> Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
> Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
TBR=borenet@google.com,mtklein@google.com,kjlubick@google.com
Change-Id: I23c37a6bde631e95f0b4ae7277ec8fcf325a00e9
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: skia:7378
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84921
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
The previous experiment revealed that nanobench can
run on any of the online CPUs, so rather than put
the ones we don't need/want into powersave mode, just
disable them.
Maybe in the future we can run CPU tests on the big
or LITTLE cpus to get perf data on higher end or
lower end cpus, but only if we get very stable
results from this.
Bug: skia:7378
notry=true
notreechecks=true
Change-Id: I057513a691093e7f73c0f5790e17fab1a5ec0bc4
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84820
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Change-Id: I26e75cf6cd865ec6c47b7766679177bfd30387da
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/82921
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
We no longer have any reason to suspect there's anything wrong with
these configurations, and we're not actively debugging anything
related to them anymore.
I've kept the normal Debug/Release bots.
Change-Id: I1a3d8087b519d6f01223d3b33bce762511056d1a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84522
Reviewed-by: Yuqian Li <liyuqian@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
These should be free of overflows now.
Bug: skia:7052
Change-Id: I05118fb8f565ffb0d973b6d93a8cd8d8e27f31a9
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84561
Reviewed-by: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I7baae5f90b2e510b66443cda449071c7c6ec9ec7
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83520
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Bug: skia:7384
Change-Id: Ifcb19c864d422781d6023606406ac2b7dd23b0f8
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84121
Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Perf was nice and flat after https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/83240
but there was a 4-5x slowdown on the benchmarks themselves,
indicating that perhaps we were running nanobench on the
LITTLE cores (now on powersave) instead of the big cores we
thought (which were recently scaled down).
This experiment will show us FOR CERTAIN that we are
running on core 0 or 1 which is at .6 max frequency.
We expect to see a speedup from the previous results.
This is leading to turning of CPUs we don't need
to make sure nanobench is running on the ones we expect.
Bug: skia:
NOTRY=true
Change-Id: Ida65181e4d90e778e65e3f22d761288b9ade64f6
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/84201
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Bug: skia:7399
Change-Id: Id60773f77694b06a938f9a126f30ca56e4965d30
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83981
Commit-Queue: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Bug: skia:7310
Change-Id: I7eeb73eb6d9c07549bf7a5d7c2d8b4d3049ac3da
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83860
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
They seem to be their own special cases for what
governors they support.
Bug: skia:
NOTRY=true
Change-Id: I7bb220e1d3ba6851c17c7e6ef327aab24ffdba42
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83900
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
If the stacktrace wasn't in the last 200 lines, we couldn't
find and symbolize it.
https://chromium-swarm.appspot.com/task?id=3a5e86a9d0e04e10&refresh=10
We increase the window to 500 lines to account for large memory maps.
Bug: skia:7397
NOTRY=true
Change-Id: Ic8583e383663a9beb62a32e90a5bd5d73d7446a7
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83540
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
This scaling logic correctly accounts for some devices
which have multiple CPUs. Previously, we were scaling
the smaller of these CPUs, which likely had a negative
impact on nanobench, given nanobench was single threaded
and the CPUs weren't allowed to idle much (because we
set the CPU).
This CL sets those additional CPUs to powersave when we run
nanobench and then correctly scales down the beefier
CPU we want to run nanobench on.
For DM, we just run it in ondemand mode, which will
hopefully be "as fast as possible", but allow the CPU
governor to scale down if overheating becomes a problem.
Bug: skia:7378
notry=TRUE
Change-Id: I45ca5d9fb32182233d1b2d094842c879f2b84da4
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83240
Commit-Queue: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@chromium.org>
To enable, set skia_embed_resources=true in args.gn.
Also add *-EmbededResouces bots.
Change-Id: Ia69b26e926a3ad4676a4fa021894432ea2104538
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/82626
Commit-Queue: Hal Canary <halcanary@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Mike Klein <mtklein@google.com>
The Nexus5x took these jobs in https://skia-review.googlesource.com/c/skia/+/82624
Also filed skia:7394 for missing coverage of "--gpuThreads 0".
Bug: skia:7382
Change-Id: If0fd823722d8b8cc3845f8d96a0a285fec935f74
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/83360
Reviewed-by: Kevin Lubick <kjlubick@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
No-Try: true
Change-Id: I9c07250623603be1baccdc177191326017784aa2
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/82604
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Yuqian Li <liyuqian@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Ben Wagner <benjaminwagner@google.com>
The new bot:
1) Extracts all fiddles out of markdown files.
2) Forces fiddle.skia.org to compile all those fiddles and get output in JSON.
3) Scans the output and reports any compiletime/runtime errors.
4) Updates markdown in site/user/api/ using the new hashes (if any) from fiddle.skia.org.
To ensure the bot does not check in unexpected changes:
* upload_md.py makes sure that all modified files are under site/user/api/. It errors out if this is not the case.
* CLs with docs only changes normally have 'NoTry: true' added to their descriptions. This is not done for the new bot because we want to run it through trybots to make sure nothing unexpected snuck in.
* rmistry@ and caryclark@ are automatically CC'ed on all uploaded changes. I plan to watch the bot closely for at least a couple of weeks.
Bug: skia:7310
Change-Id: I759fc8bae1e32a6f175e3b1a895947d14ca5fe3a
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/79941
Commit-Queue: Ravi Mistry <rmistry@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Boren <borenet@google.com>
