Removes the disabled SSE2 optimization of ColorRect32 and deletes
the two files containing the code.
Measured on both Core Haswell and Atom Silvermont, and only got
some miniscule improvement compared to the default implementation.
Also tried to write a new, ultimate, version of this optimization,
but only got ~5% improvement on ColorRect32-heavy tests.
Signed-off-by: Henrik Smiding <henrik.smiding@intel.com>
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/957433002
Reason for revert:
Going to punt on 16-bit float support for now. Can't figure out ARM 64.
Original issue's description:
> GYP groudwork for half-float opts support.
>
> This sets us up two new opts targets with the immediate goal of adding half-float (SkHalf.h) opts:
> - opts_neon_fp16: uses hardware support on most ARM chips with NEON to do 4 conversions at a time;
> - opts_avx: uses hardware support on Intel chips with AVX to do 8 conversions at a time.
>
> opts_avx will be a handy thing to have around later too, especially if we want to work with floats.
>
> This doesn't actually add any new source files to these libraries yet, so they're no-ops for now.
> I'll need to write a parallel change to Chrome's GN and GYPs before we can start adding sources.
>
> This also rolls GYP up to head, to get suppport for EnableEnhancedInstructionSet: '3' on Windows,
> which is how we turn on AVX there. There's no Mac-specific flag, so we use OTHER_CPLUSPLUSFLAGS.
>
> BUG=skia:
>
> TBR=reed@google.com
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/46b80833394d7919cadf2abf2b93802141dd21c5TBR=reed@google.com,mtklein@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/912223002
This sets us up two new opts targets with the immediate goal of adding half-float (SkHalf.h) opts:
- opts_neon_fp16: uses hardware support on most ARM chips with NEON to do 4 conversions at a time;
- opts_avx: uses hardware support on Intel chips with AVX to do 8 conversions at a time.
opts_avx will be a handy thing to have around later too, especially if we want to work with floats.
This doesn't actually add any new source files to these libraries yet, so they're no-ops for now.
I'll need to write a parallel change to Chrome's GN and GYPs before we can start adding sources.
This also rolls GYP up to head, to get suppport for EnableEnhancedInstructionSet: '3' on Windows,
which is how we turn on AVX there. There's no Mac-specific flag, so we use OTHER_CPLUSPLUSFLAGS.
BUG=skia:
TBR=reed@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/915693002
Reason for revert:
Reverted the wrong CL.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly. (patchset #16 id:300001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/874863002/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> This causes a bug on the 'hittestpath' GM on MacMini 4,1
>
> See:
>
> https://gold.skia.org/#/triage/hittestpath?head=0
>
> for details.
>
> Original issue's description:
> > SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly.
> >
> > Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the
> > point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take
> > a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics.
> >
> > The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*)
> > to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque
> > or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract
> > all those alphas.
> >
> > It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using
> > _mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX.
> >
> > My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win
> > (there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just
> > powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential
> > does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.)
> >
> > DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code.
> >
> > Microbenchmarks:
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x
> > bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x
> >
> > Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x
> > the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should
> > be a decent predictor of real-world impact.
> >
> > BUG=chromium:399842
> >
> > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04bc91b972417038fecfa87c484771eac2b9b785
> >
> > CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Mac10.6-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86_64-Release-Trybot
> >
> > Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6dbfb21a6c88af6d94e8c823c3ad559f1a41b493
>
> TBR=henrik.smiding@intel.com,mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,thakis@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=chromium:399842
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/4988891a1173cd405bf1c1dd3a3668c451f45e4cTBR=henrik.smiding@intel.com,mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,thakis@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:399842
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/894083002
Reason for revert:
This causes a bug on the 'hittestpath' GM on MacMini 4,1
See:
https://gold.skia.org/#/triage/hittestpath?head=0
for details.
Original issue's description:
> SSE4 opaque blend using intrinsics instead of assembly.
>
> Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the
> point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take
> a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics.
>
> The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*)
> to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque
> or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract
> all those alphas.
>
> It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using
> _mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX.
>
> My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win
> (there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just
> powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential
> does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.)
>
> DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code.
>
> Microbenchmarks:
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x
> bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x
>
> Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x
> the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should
> be a decent predictor of real-world impact.
>
> BUG=chromium:399842
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04bc91b972417038fecfa87c484771eac2b9b785
>
> CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Mac10.6-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86_64-Release-Trybot
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/6dbfb21a6c88af6d94e8c823c3ad559f1a41b493TBR=henrik.smiding@intel.com,mtklein@google.com,herb@google.com,reed@google.com,thakis@chromium.org,mtklein@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=chromium:399842
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/873553003
Since we had such a hard time with the assembly versions of this blit (to the
point that we have them completely disabled everywhere), I thought I'd take
a shot at writing a version of the blit using intrinsics.
The key feature of SSE4 we're exploiting is that we can use ptest (_mm_test*)
to skip the blend when the 16 src pixels we consider each loop are all opaque
or all transparent. _mm_shuffle_epi8 from SSSE3 also lends a hand to extract
all those alphas.
It's worth looking to see if we can backport this type of logic to SSE2 using
_mm_movemask_epi8, or up to 32 pixels at a time using AVX.
My local performance testing doesn't show this to be an unambiguous win
(there are probably microbenchmarks and SKPs where we'd be better off just
powering through the blend rather than looking at alphas), but the potential
does seem tantalizing enough to let skiaperf vet it on the bots. (< 1.0x is a win.)
DM says it draws pixel perfect compare to the old code.
Microbenchmarks:
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_two 14us -> 14.4us 1.03x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_stripes_three 14.3us -> 14.5us 1.01x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_bilerp 61.9us -> 62.2us 1.01x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile_scale_rotate_bilerp 102us -> 101us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_scale 18.4us -> 18.2us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bicubic 71us -> 70us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_scale_rotate_bilerp 103us -> 101us 0.99x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_rotate_bilerp 112us -> 109us 0.98x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_update_volatile 5.72us -> 5.58us 0.98x
bitmap_RGBA_8888 5.73us -> 5.58us 0.97x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_update 5.78us -> 5.6us 0.97x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bilerp 70.7us -> 68us 0.96x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_scale_bicubic 23.7us -> 21.8us 0.92x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A 13.9us -> 10.9us 0.78x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_opaque 14us -> 6.29us 0.45x
bitmap_RGBA_8888_A_source_transparent 14us -> 3.65us 0.26x
Running over our ~70 SKP web page captures, this looks like we spend 0.7x
the time in S32A_Opaque_BlitRow compared to the SSE2 version, which should
be a decent predictor of real-world impact.
BUG=chromium:399842
Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/04bc91b972417038fecfa87c484771eac2b9b785
CQ_EXTRA_TRYBOTS=client.skia:Test-Mac10.6-MacMini4.1-GeForce320M-x86_64-Release-Trybot
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/874863002
