Commit Graph

6 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
borenet
1e37d1762c Update [dm|nanobench]_flags for CPU/GPU split
TBR=mtklein
NOTREECHECKS=true
BUG=skia:2073

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1036223002
2015-03-27 05:42:18 -07:00
egdaniel
9a0f629973 Only use 256x256 tiles on hd2000 nanobench bots
Initial experiments did show that the 256 tile size fixed the hd2000 win7
nanobot failures. However it did not have any effect on other bots, so this
change is to move back to the larger tile size on all bots expect for the
hd2000.

BUG=skia:

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1022083002
2015-03-20 07:03:52 -07:00
mtklein
7e78f3d0e7 Fix bug in Valgrind flags config.
'GPU' is in 'Test-Ubuntu14-GCE-NoGPU-x86_64-Release-Valgrind_CPU' too.

This means we're building it in no-GPU mode, and running it in no-CPU mode.
At least it finishes quite quickly this way (~10 seconds).

BUG=skia:

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/992203004
2015-03-10 08:03:26 -07:00
borenet
13e51f91ef Run Valgrind bots with --nogpu and --nocpu as appropriate
BUG=skia:3506
NOPRESUBMIT=true

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/986583004
2015-03-09 06:59:16 -07:00
bsalomon
bdff1fc494 Add msaa runs to nanobench
TBR=mtklein@google.com

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/964053002
2015-02-28 16:56:31 -08:00
mtklein
f73e589c0d Add tools/nanobench_flags.py.
This should look suspiciously similar to tools/dm_flags.py.  In fact, I
tweaked tools/dm_flags.py a bit to make it even more suspiciously similar.
I'll leave actually deduping this to future me.

I noticed we have an opportunity to make our Valgrind run of nanobench faster,
by not only making it not auto-calibrate (--loops 1) but also take only one
measurement (--samples 1).  Should be 5-10x faster than the default.

BUG=skia:

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/957503002
2015-02-24 11:45:11 -08:00