skia2/tests/SkSharedMutexTest.cpp
mtklein 279c786409 If we swap its arguments, SkTaskGroup::batch() _is_ sk_parallel_for.
Why have two names if we can get away with one?

This kills off sk_parallel_for_thread_count(), which was only used to avoid forcing a deadlock in OncePtrTest on multicore machines in singlethreaded mode... a really niche use case.  Instead just don't explicitly force a race.

BUG=skia:
GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search2?unt=true&query=source_type%3Dgm&master=false&issue=1552093002

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1552093002
2016-01-04 19:13:19 -08:00

55 lines
1.4 KiB
C++

/*
* Copyright 2015 Google Inc.
*
* Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
* found in the LICENSE file.
*/
#include "SkSharedMutex.h"
#include "SkTaskGroup.h"
#include "Test.h"
DEF_TEST(SkSharedMutexBasic, r) {
SkSharedMutex sm;
sm.acquire();
sm.assertHeld();
sm.release();
sm.acquireShared();
sm.assertHeldShared();
sm.releaseShared();
}
DEF_TEST(SkSharedMutexMultiThreaded, r) {
SkSharedMutex sm;
static const int kSharedSize = 10;
int shared[kSharedSize];
int value = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < kSharedSize; ++i) {
shared[i] = 0;
}
SkTaskGroup().batch(8, [&](int threadIndex) {
if (threadIndex % 4 != 0) {
for (int c = 0; c < 100000; ++c) {
sm.acquireShared();
sm.assertHeldShared();
int v = shared[0];
for (int i = 1; i < kSharedSize; ++i) {
REPORTER_ASSERT(r, v == shared[i]);
}
sm.releaseShared();
}
} else {
for (int c = 0; c < 100000; ++c) {
sm.acquire();
sm.assertHeld();
value += 1;
for (int i = 0; i < kSharedSize; ++i) {
shared[i] = value;
}
sm.release();
}
}
});
}