AuroraMiddleware/v8
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 2 Pull Requests Releases Wiki Activity

[wasm-spec-tests] Document failed memory64 tests

Browse Source 
We currently skip a few memory64 spec tests; some for missing rebase,
some for unknown reasons.
It turns out that all of the failures are due to missing rebase on bulk
memory or reference types.
This CL documents that in the comment and removes a TODO.

R=jkummerow@chromium.org
CC=sbc@chromium.org

Bug: v8:13692
Change-Id: I0ddf2bee0dcc36af5bc39251ed7b6b83d8de9aeb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/4191771
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#85457}
This commit is contained in:
Clemens Backes 2023-01-24 14:20:34 +01:00 committed by V8 LUCI CQ
parent f71d232a67
commit 7aac4791c0
1 changed files with 15 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

21
test/wasm-spec-tests/wasm-spec-tests.status
View File

@ -7,8 +7,23 @@
'skip-stack-guard-page': [PASS, ['((arch == ppc or arch == ppc64 or arch == s390 or arch == s390x) and simulator_run)', SKIP]], 'skip-stack-guard-page': [PASS, ['((arch == ppc or arch == ppc64 or arch == s390 or arch == s390x) and simulator_run)', SKIP]],
# Missing rebase in the proposal repository. # Missing rebase in the proposal repository.
'proposals/js-types/table': [FAIL], 'proposals/js-types/table': [FAIL],
# "data" is supposed to fail for "data segment does not fit"; missing rebase on
# https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/commit/7fa2f20a.
'proposals/memory64/data': [FAIL],
# "elem" is supposed to fail for "elements segment does not fit"; missing rebase on
# https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/commit/7fa2f20a.
'proposals/memory64/elem': [FAIL],
# "imports" is supposed to fail for "multiple tables"; missing rebase on
# https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/commit/7fa2f20a.
'proposals/memory64/imports': [FAIL],
# "linking" is supposed to fail for "elements segment does not fit"; missing rebase on
# https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/commit/7fa2f20a.
'proposals/memory64/linking': [FAIL], 'proposals/memory64/linking': [FAIL],
# "table" is supposed to fail for "multiple tables"; missing rebase on
# https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/commit/7fa2f20a.
'proposals/memory64/table': [FAIL], 'proposals/memory64/table': [FAIL],
# "unreached-invalid" is supposed to fail for "type mismatch"; missing rebase on
# https://github.com/WebAssembly/spec/commit/7fa2f20a.
'proposals/memory64/unreached-invalid': [FAIL], 'proposals/memory64/unreached-invalid': [FAIL],
# TODO(wasm): Roll newest tests into "js-types" repository. # TODO(wasm): Roll newest tests into "js-types" repository.
@ -21,12 +36,6 @@
'proposals/tail-call/globals': [FAIL], 'proposals/tail-call/globals': [FAIL],
'proposals/tail-call/linking': [FAIL], 'proposals/tail-call/linking': [FAIL],
# TODO(v8:11401): Fix memory64 spec tests / the v8 implementation (whatever
# is broken).
'proposals/memory64/data': [FAIL],
'proposals/memory64/elem': [FAIL],
'proposals/memory64/imports': [FAIL],
# Tests that need to run sequentially (e.g. due to memory consumption). # Tests that need to run sequentially (e.g. due to memory consumption).
'simd_f32x4*': [PASS, HEAVY], 'simd_f32x4*': [PASS, HEAVY],
'simd_f64x2*': [PASS, HEAVY], 'simd_f64x2*': [PASS, HEAVY],