A StepOver at a return (either explicit return instruction, or implicit
return at the end of the function) should stop again in the caller
frame.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10321
Change-Id: I313e6b612ac52e73b33ef07c6da1ced2aa0db600
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2110250
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66852}
This fixes issues with replacing the return address of deeper (non-top)
wasm frames, i.e. frames which are at a call position. The replaced
address should also point after the call in the new code, so we don't
execute the same call again.
This is achieved by using slightly different encodings for breakpoint
positions and other (wasm instruction) positions. Breakpoints set
{is_instruction} to {false} in the source position table entry, whereas
usual wasm instruction set it to {true}.
Also, during stack walking for OSR, we remember whether we want to OSR
to the position before the instruction (if it's the top frame), or after
the call instruction (if it's deeper in the stack). We then use the
{is_instruction} predicate to find the right location.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10321
Change-Id: I73212a7532c6ecf4c82bde76fe4059c8203e422c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2116206
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66850}
Since now the IterationBody StackChecks are implicit within JumpLoops,
we are able to eagerly deopt in them. If we do that, whenever we advance
to the next bytecode we don't have to advance to the next literal
bytecode, but instead "advance" in the sense of doing the JumpLoop.
Adding tests that test this advancing for wide and extra wide JumpLoops.
Also, marking JumpLoop as needing source positions since now it has
the ability of causing an interrupt.
Bug: v8:10149, v8:9960
Fixes: v8:10149
Change-Id: Ib0d9efdfb379e0dfbba7a7f67cba9262668813b0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2064226
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Santiago Aboy Solanes <solanes@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66809}
Update the "hook on function call" flag also in the wasm case, and
slightly change the {IsStepping} logic to stop in any frame if the last
step action was anything other than StepNext.
In future CLs, this has to be extended further for StepOut and for
StepOver at a return location.
When that is done, we can also reenable more stepping in the test.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10321
Change-Id: Ib3aa8c2c2e137690140e5879a33e2bcc340821e3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2108035
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66789}
And fix a few issues revealed by this new test. Incidentally, the test
uses removeBreakpoint which was still untested with Liftoff. But as
expected this seems to work out of the box.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10321
Change-Id: Ifa4e867737d925ea8c6c9731575a32f3da3e16dc
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2106206
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66752}
Add a scriptLanguage enum to the new scripts events. This overhauls
crrev.com/c/2011083 that was related. Report the code section offset
as well as the script language on the Debugger.scriptParsed and
Debugger.scriptFailedToParse events.
Bug: chromium:1057569
Change-Id: I40b43f28f0b3e094720db4fc1f07db1a0c293ee0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2083025
Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Philip Pfaffe <pfaffe@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66749}
At the moment when the static private method is unused
in source code (either explicitly or through eval) but is accessed
at runtime through the debugger, and there are no other potential
references to the class variable in the source code otherwise,
the reference to the class variable is lost here since the class
variable would not be context-allocated, then we could not rebuild
a proper brand check for it.
For now, a ReferenceError would be thrown and the method is considered
"optimized away", similar to how unused ordinary methods in closures
work. Before this patch it would DCHECK when generating bytecode
for the debugger instead of throwing errors.
Bug: v8:9839, v8:8330
Change-Id: I5d63131a7bdba141d01a3e6459bc27d0f5953c1a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2095637
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ross McIlroy <rmcilroy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66734}
Port 83ff405b1a
Original Commit Message:
Flood functions with breakpoints to prepare them for stepping. With a
small modification to the runtime function, this already implements a
basic step over functionality.
We still cannot resume, step in or step out (including stepping over a
return instruction).
R=thibaudm@chromium.org, joransiu@ca.ibm.com, jyan@ca.ibm.com, michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com
BUG=
LOG=N
Change-Id: Id153b2611c528e679e8d7722e3d209fb15bcf6d1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2105055
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Milad Farazmand <miladfar@ca.ibm.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66724}
This tests inspecting a bigger number of registers (covers all registers
on many platforms). It also executes all four intrinsic types (i32, i64,
f32, f64).
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10222
Change-Id: I340696d525e4001f241bb22f62f0338018ad9804
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2102575
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66720}
This implements inspection of live registers on breakpoints in Liftoff.
To that end, the frame pointer of the WasmDebugBreak frame is remembered
when iterating the stack. Based on a platform-specific implementation of
{WasmDebugBreakFrameConstants}, the offset of the respective register
within that frame is computed, and the value is read from the frame.
As a drive-by, the wasm debug side table is storing register codes as
liftoff codes, which can also store register pairs (needed for i64 on
32-bit platforms, and for SIMD, which is not supported yet).
R=jkummerow@chromium.orgCC=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10222
Change-Id: I01b669baf56430e100cd46cc46f210121ea679da
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2102574
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66719}
Flood functions with breakpoints to prepare them for stepping. With a
small modification to the runtime function, this already implements a
basic step over functionality.
We still cannot resume, step in or step out (including stepping over a
return instruction).
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10321
Change-Id: Ia4a6335d24c1a511c2f1fc9b48d728f327b3df56
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2098732
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66697}
When looking for private members in an object for the inspector,
we check if that object is a class constructor with the a bit
has_static_private_methods set on its SFI. If it
is, we look for any variables in the context locals
with a VariableMode associated with private methods or accessors
and a IsStaticFlag being kStatic.
This patch also filters out static private methods when inspecting
instances.
Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1N91LObhQexnB0eE7EvGe57HsvNMFX16CaWu-XCTnnmY/edit
See also: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14maU596YbHcWR7XR-_iXM_ANhAAmiuRlJZysM61lqaE/edit
Bug: v8:9839, v8:8330
Change-Id: Idad15349c983898de2ce632c38b0174da10e639d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1955664
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66636}
We now always tier down to Liftoff when the debugger is enabled, hence
we don't need to force Liftoff-only execution in the test.
R=thibaudm@chromium.orgCC=duongn@microsoft.com
Bug: v8:9654
Change-Id: I9b9e21b2ee977b349bb4f5d0e34c6ebf82166cb9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2093504
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66630}
String::NewFromLiteral is a templated function that takes a char[N]
argument that can be used as an alternative to String::NewFromUtf8 and
returns a Local<String> rather than a MaybeLocal<String> reducing the
number of ToLocalChecked() or other checks.
Since the string length is known at compile time, it can statically
assert that the length is less than String::kMaxLength, which means that
it can never fail at runtime.
This also converts all found uses of NewFromUtf8 taking a string literal
or a variable initialized from a string literal to use the new API. In
some cases the types of stored string literals are changed from const
char* to const char[] to ensure the size is retained.
This API does introduce a small difference compared to NewFromUtf8. For
a case like "abc\0def", NewFromUtf8 (using length -1 to infer length)
would treat this as a 3 character string, whereas the new API will treat
it as a 7 character string.
As a drive-by fix, this also fixes all redundant uses of
v8::NewStringType::kNormal when passed to any of the String::New*
functions.
Change-Id: Id96a44bc068d9c4eaa634aea688e024675a0e5b3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2089935
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mathias Bynens <mathias@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66622}
When an empty class is nested inside a class with private instance
methods, like this:
class Outer {
constructor() {}
#method() {}
factory() {
class Inner {
constructor() { }
}
return Inner;
}
run(obj) {
obj.#method();
}
}
The bytecode generator previously generate private brand
initialization for the constructor of Inner by mistake,
because during scope chain serialization/deserialization,
the outer scopes of Inner and factory() are not allocated
or serialized (as they are empty). In the eyes of the bytecode
generator, it then appeared as if Outer is the direct outer
scope of Inner's constructor.
In order to work around this information loss, in this patch
we rely on SharedFunctionInfo instead of the Context/ScopeInfo
chain to maintain the information about private brand initialization.
This is done by shrinking expected_nof_properties to 8 bits and
freeing 8 bits for a second bitfield on the SFI.
Design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/14maU596YbHcWR7XR-_iXM_ANhAAmiuRlJZysM61lqaE/edit#
Bug: v8:9839, v8:8330, v8:10098
Change-Id: I4370a0459bfc0da388052ad5a91aac59582d811d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2056889
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66575}
Example can be inspector tests.
Bug: v8:10264
Change-Id: I996bb68d0f36920568a04f93cd8c1256a4f41a96
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2070912
Commit-Queue: Z Nguyen-Huu <duongn@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66572}
We want to be consistent with wasdk/wasmparser.
The names used in V8 should follow the WAT convention and always start
with a dollar, both for names from the "names" section as well as
generated names.
Bug: v8:10242
Change-Id: If4dbd4c38208c9dd9377dd2f79120635a531d881
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2070637
Commit-Queue: Z Nguyen-Huu <duongn@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kim-Anh Tran <kimanh@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66434}
This extends the existing test to also print scope information on every
break. Note that the currently printed information is not correct, since
register values are not reconstructed yet. We just always print {-11}
for register values.
Thus the expected output will change with follow-up CL.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10222
Change-Id: I7be13ecb02957454c875a4280cec154a08c2deb7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2062403
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66433}
This is a reland of 78defee492
Original change's description:
> [inspector] Check that wasm wrappers appear in profiles
>
> This extends the existing wasm profiling test to also check that
> wasm-to-js and js-to-wasm wrappers appear in the profiles as expected.
> It thus serves as a regression test for the status quo.
>
> R=bmeurer@chromium.org
>
> Bug: chromium:1054386
> Change-Id: I5d4d8e6a252c6eb266b910621fca43a6ff0837bd
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2066970
> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66401}
TBR=bmeurer@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1054386, v8:10266
Change-Id: Iae04c0564ee8f0330d61ce954d895a41497c5a85
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2071260
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66424}
This reverts commit 827107a7dc.
Reason for revert: https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=1054664
Original change's description:
> [wasm-debug] Let wasm scripts report correct column information.
>
> In the debugger, wasm scripts currently do not contain meaningful column
> informations. Fix that by keeping track of the offset and size of the
> wasm code section inthe module and reporting that to the debugger.
>
> Bug: chromium:1042636
> Change-Id: Ie2b5d3a50952a467d256f815c16e459cb0ae600e
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2011083
> Commit-Queue: Philip Pfaffe <pfaffe@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65913}
Bug: chromium:1042636
Change-Id: Ic59d71111c3274688828bdbf6894f7f3274dc50a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2066983
Commit-Queue: Philip Pfaffe <pfaffe@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Sigurd Schneider <sigurds@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66409}
This reverts commit 78defee492.
Reason for revert: Timeout on TSan: https://ci.chromium.org/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Linux64%20TSAN/30410
Original change's description:
> [inspector] Check that wasm wrappers appear in profiles
>
> This extends the existing wasm profiling test to also check that
> wasm-to-js and js-to-wasm wrappers appear in the profiles as expected.
> It thus serves as a regression test for the status quo.
>
> R=bmeurer@chromium.org
>
> Bug: chromium:1054386
> Change-Id: I5d4d8e6a252c6eb266b910621fca43a6ff0837bd
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2066970
> Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66401}
TBR=clemensb@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org
Change-Id: Iac4299d5a4dc74041fbceac98cd2c2b96b9425df
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Bug: chromium:1054386
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2069328
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66406}
This extends the existing wasm profiling test to also check that
wasm-to-js and js-to-wasm wrappers appear in the profiles as expected.
It thus serves as a regression test for the status quo.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1054386
Change-Id: I5d4d8e6a252c6eb266b910621fca43a6ff0837bd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2066970
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66401}
After compiling a function with a different set of breakpoints, update
return addresses on the stack so that execution resumes in the new
code.
This allows new breakpoints to take effect immediately, which is the
expected behavior and a prerequisite for stepping.
R=clemensb@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10147
Change-Id: I67eb3b4ce23a1f3b0519935447f8b847ec888ead
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2064218
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66351}
Since liftoff is turned on upon debugger.enable, these tests need to be
skipped.
Change-Id: Icaa02ffb77d0bbcb24b2c232e519c0547e714a24
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2062940
Reviewed-by: Milad Farazmand <miladfar@ca.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Milad Farazmand <miladfar@ca.ibm.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66335}
Store a flag per isolate whether new modules should be kept in
tiered-down state from the beginning. Adjust initial compilation if flag
is set.
Bug: v8:9654
Change-Id: I5aae435fb807f3eaa7efafe9af60451ad3c7e14d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2028452
Commit-Queue: Z Nguyen-Huu <duongn@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66321}
REPL 'let' declared variables use VariableLocation::REPL_GLOBAL which
was not handled by a switch in the bytecode generator. The default
case ran into an UNREACHABLE.
This CL fixes this by properly handling VariableLocation::REPL_GLOBAL
for delete.
Drive-by: Replaced the default case with an explicit case for
VariableLocation::MODULE.
Bug: chromium:1052721
Change-Id: I1330ff2f2c6f042a596a8298599a5d58769894f3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2060488
Commit-Queue: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66301}
By replacing usage of the IsNotArrayIndex bit with IsNotIntegerIndex,
we get back one bit that we can use to increase the number of hash bits
stored. The price is that strings that represent array/integer indices
beyond the cacheable range will have to be scanned more often, but these
strings should be rare, and we expect that the additional hash bit is
more worthwhile to have.
Bug: v8:9904
Change-Id: I33f74b0a73f4754aee85805d4b7c409177668439
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2051947
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66299}
If new Liftoff code is generated but we already have either Liftoff or
TurboFan code, we still want to install and use the new Liftoff code if
we are in debugging.
This logic can probably be simplified again when the "tier down to
liftoff on Debugger.enable" logic is fully implemented. I left a TODO to
revisit the logic later.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10147
Change-Id: Ie3a6bdf1cde4f1af884edc8cf1f1b5a507283a5c
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2036089
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66129}
This CL fixes a parser crash in REPL mode. Some SyntaxErrors can cause
the AST to contain NULL nodes, resulting in a crash when we want to
rewrite the AST after parsing.
Instead of re-writing a broken AST we bail early.
R=leszeks@chromium.org
Bug: chromium:1040034, chromium:1045758
Change-Id: I9c559f6de5969c8db17833ccbdb1608627b46311
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2023547
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#66008}
Add a test that does the same thing the devtools-frontend does when
evaluating console inputs.
1) Declare a const variable with throwOnSideEffect=true. This should
throw.
2) Declare the same const variable with throwOnSideEffect=false.
This should successfully declare the variable.
Previously it could be the case that even though we threw in 1), the
variable would fail to be initialized in 2) with a re-declaration
error.
Bug: chromium:1043151
Change-Id: I1a6126b518f7bb3788c39b9f8e3adb8850aa962a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2016587
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65991}
Port 7b79a02d2b
Original Commit Message:
This CL adds a --debug-in-liftoff flag, which takes another path in
{WasmScript::SetBreakPointForFunction}, and sets the breakpoint via
{wasm::DebugInfo} (Liftoff-related) instead of {WasmDebugInfo} (C++
interpreter related).
Actual breakpoint support is not there yet, so the new test which sets
this flag does not currently break anywhere. This will change with a
future CL.
R=clemensb@chromium.org, joransiu@ca.ibm.com, jyan@ca.ibm.com, michael_dawson@ca.ibm.com
BUG=
LOG=N
Change-Id: I632e4c945c88f58d8caba8688356f66406bc04aa
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2016915
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Milad Farazmand <miladfar@ca.ibm.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65953}
This CL adds a --debug-in-liftoff flag, which takes another path in
{WasmScript::SetBreakPointForFunction}, and sets the breakpoint via
{wasm::DebugInfo} (Liftoff-related) instead of {WasmDebugInfo} (C++
interpreter related).
Actual breakpoint support is not there yet, so the new test which sets
this flag does not currently break anywhere. This will change with a
future CL.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10147
Change-Id: I95a905e666b8f502366d2c7273c8f25a267ee184
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2012920
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65921}
Changing script context handling from bytecode based to metadata on the
function. This fixes the debugger to explicitly check the code rather
than implicitly relying on a NewScriptContext bytecode causing side
effects.
Bug: chromium:1043151
Tbr: ulan@chromium.org
Change-Id: I38c5c04d7c76155e0a055ae6efd57f25986bdb7d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2013117
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65920}
Add a test that const declarations are recognized as having side-
effects in REPL mode.
Bug: chromium:1043151
Change-Id: I6f8038ab4a5ee446d23904ed46637223157db5c7
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2013114
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65916}
In the debugger, wasm scripts currently do not contain meaningful column
informations. Fix that by keeping track of the offset and size of the
wasm code section inthe module and reporting that to the debugger.
Bug: chromium:1042636
Change-Id: Ie2b5d3a50952a467d256f815c16e459cb0ae600e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2011083
Commit-Queue: Philip Pfaffe <pfaffe@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65913}
This fixes the DevTools console preview when using REPL mode.
AsyncFunction* intriniscs are side-effect free and marking them as such
is correct.
Bug: chromium:1043151
Change-Id: Ie0c36507b98b0c12f3d627c34102c04c27358ff2
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2010106
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65876}
Previously these would silently fail unless the caller checked the
.error property of the return value. There are no tests that check
iteractions with non-existent methods so this should always be an
error at the test runner level, rather than relying on clients to
check the error.
1. Fix the tests that accidentally call methods that don't exist.
2. Change the test runner so that it prints an error and ends the test.
3. Add a test that the test runner does #2.
Bug: v8:10134
Change-Id: Idd619950a057290c565d58fba6db3ddbcaf2c5eb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2006093
Commit-Queue: Peter Marshall <petermarshall@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65835}
Re-use set breakpoint logic for wasm script to set breakpoint to first
breakable position of given wasm function.
Bug: v8:9724
Change-Id: Ibd6b59d5b93c6895f71f0114291bf78db03aee0b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2001564
Commit-Queue: Z Nguyen-Huu <duongn@microsoft.com>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65827}
This makes Liftoff inspection (scope reporting) also use the decoded
names of locals, which are now stored in a C++ data structure (see
https://crrev.com/c/2002541).
The call to {SetOwnPropertyIgnoreAttributes} had to be replaced by a
proper lookup first, to handle integer names and duplicate names
correctly. The test already covered these cases.
The test was extended by another unnamed local to also test the
generation of default names in case no name is provided.
R=thibaudm@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10019
Change-Id: I475bb4db9a32c39203180e9c8d3f8181c3882138
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2002544
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Thibaud Michaud <thibaudm@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65821}
This way we don't need to generate bytecodes to push the context.
This drops the stack trace for redeclaration SyntaxErrors but keeps the
message location. This is in line with what we do for other
SyntaxErrors.
Change-Id: Id8e3cc348b4d56a8196753baf51cfd810f07512b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1997439
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Ulan Degenbaev <ulan@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65810}
This extends the debug side table to track stack offsets of locals and
operand stack slots, and uses this to read spilled value from the
physical stack frame when inspecting Liftoff frames.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10019
Change-Id: Ida7ab5256fcc1e9d408201f4eafe26919f1432a1
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2000739
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65789}
This fixes local names that are the string representation of a valid
element index.
Even though both the Liftoff and the interpreter-based test are changed,
only the latter needs to be fixed right now since Liftoff does not use
the names currently. Modifying the test just ensures that we implement
this correctly once we use the name.
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Bug: v8:10019
Change-Id: Ib7f7d6e244a344a85ab540b6c2c67f98b1f3078e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/1998079
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#65751}
