This patch adds UseCounters for the various language modes. This may
be useful for helping us to prioritize future optimization and
language design decisions.
R=adamk
CC=seththompson
BUG=none
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1429173002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31841}
The calling context is the second top-most non-debugger context on the
stack, but that's not necessarily the actually calling context, e.g.,
when a tail-call was used.
BUG=chromium:541703
R=verwaest@chromium.org
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1431473003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31719}
V8 zaps (writes 0xdeadbeef) over the mmapped regions when in debug mode.
This causes more resident size than displayed in tracing. So, This CL
adds an api to tell if zapping is done.
BUG=546492
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1419523008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31716}
Adds a scavenge GC pass that collects unmodified references instead of
processing object groups. This mode can be controlled by setting
FLAG_scavenge_reclaim_unmodified_objects. By default this is turned off.
Also, modified a test case to suit the handle the new GC pass.
BUG=v8:4421
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1410593005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31599}
This will allow us to remove background idle notification calls in Chrome.
BUG=chromium:490559
LOG=NO
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1406303008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31464}
This reverts commit 24aca87090.
The API makes these values appear to be per-isolate, when in fact
they are per-context. Installing the results of these on Template
objects instantiated in multiple contexts can result in security
violations and contexts being retained indefinitely.
An alternative mechanism for using these in a sensible way is
provided by https://crrev.com/1409593002
BUG=
LOG=N
R=jochen@chromium.org, adamk@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1415663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31417}
Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
Original code review from Sven Panne:
https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.v8:v8_linux_arm_dbg,v8_linux_arm64_dbg,v8_mac64_dbg,v8_win_compile_dbg,v8_linux_gcc_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1393023003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31185}
Reason for revert:
Breaks Arm debug.
Original issue's description:
> Reland: Introduce a V8_NORETURN macro and use it to make GCC 4.9.2 happy again.
>
> Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
> Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
>
> Original code review from Sven Panne:
> https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
>
> CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.v8:v8_linux_arm_dbg,v8_linux_arm64_dbg,v8_mac64_dbg,v8_win_compile_dbg
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/93ae81101af68d81b7af84ea4046ea849e605116
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31163}
TBR=jochen@chromium.org,karl@skomski.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1398643002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31167}
Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
Original code review from Sven Panne:
https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.v8:v8_linux_arm_dbg,v8_linux_arm64_dbg,v8_mac64_dbg,v8_win_compile_dbg
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1383053005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31163}
Allow access to Array Iterator through the API, in order to simplify
setting up interfaces which use these methods. This applies to
WebIDL interfaces with "length" attributes returning integer types and
a getter taking an unsigned long type.
BUG=
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1378403004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31152}
Symbols marked as "well-known" now return an undefined value when loaded with a failed access check, instead of throwing.
Currently, only @@isConcatSpreadable is marked as well-known, until the correct behaviour is properly specified.
BUG=v8:4289, 507553
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org, jochen@chromium.org, verwaest@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1230793002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31131}
The --abort-on-uncaught-exception command line switch makes
Isolate::Throw abort if the error being thrown cannot be caught by a
try/catch block.
Embedders may want to use other mechanisms than try/catch blocks to
handle uncaught exceptions. For instance, Node.js has "domain" objects
that have error handlers that can handle uncaught exception like
following:
var d = domain.create();
d.on('error', function onError(err) {
console.log('Handling error');
});
d.run(function() {
throw new Error("boom");
});
These error handlers are called by isolates' message listeners.
If --abort-on-uncaught-exception is *not* used, the isolate's
message listener will be called, which will in turn call the domain's
error handler. The process will output 'Handling error' and will exit
successfully (not due to an uncaught exception). This is the behavior
that Node.js users expect.
However, if --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used and when throwing an
error within a domain that has an error handler, the process will abort
and the domain's error handler will not be called. This is not the
behavior that Node.js users expect.
Having a SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API allows embedders to
determine when it's not appropriate to abort and instead handle the
exception via the isolate's message listener.
In the example above, Node.js would set a custom callback with
SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback that would be implemented as
following (the sample code has been simplified to remove what's not
relevant to this change):
bool ShouldAbortOnUncaughtException(Isolate* isolate) {
return !IsDomainActive();
}
Now when --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used, Isolate::Throw would
call that callback and determine that it should not abort if a domain
with an error handler is active. Instead, the isolate's message listener
would be called and the error would be handled by the domain's error
handler.
I believe this can also be useful for other embedders.
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1375933003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31111}
Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
Original code review from Sven Panne:
https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.v8:v8_linux_arm_dbg,v8_linux_arm64_dbg,v8_mac64_dbg,v8_win_compile_dbg
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1384873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31105}
This enables linter checking for "readability/namespace" violations
during presubmit and instead marks the few known exceptions that we
allow explicitly.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1371083003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31019}
This prevents the internal incremental-marking.h to be usable outisde
of the "heap" directory. The logic inside that component is only useful
within the GC and is now properly encapsulated.
R=hpayer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1374203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31010}
Reason for revert:
This CL breaks cross-compiling to arm.
Original issue's description:
> Introduce a V8_NORETURN macro and use it to make GCC 4.9.2 happy again.
>
> Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
> Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
>
> Original code review from Sven Panne:
> https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/0b48b2a8ebfc791a36f4ec1f299f46db76265a3a
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30977}
TBR=jochen@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,jkummerow@chromium.org,karl@skomski.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1370203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30982}
This enables the general linter checking for "build/c++11" violations
during presubmit and instead marks the few known exceptions that we
allow explicitly.
R=jochen@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1317463007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30621}
This CL is a nightmare! For the utterly irrelevant edge case of a sloppy function with non-simple parameters and a call to direct eval, like here,
let x = 1;
function f(g = () => x) {
var y
eval("var x = 2")
return g() + x // f() = 3
}
we have to do all of the following, on top of the declaration block ("varblock") contexts we already introduce around the body:
- Introduce the ability for varblock contexts to have both a ScopeInfo and an extension object (e.g., the body varblock in the example will contain both a static var y and a dynamic var x). No other scope needs that. Since there are no context slots left, a special new struct is introduced that pairs up scope info and extension object.
- When declaring lookup slots in the runtime, this new struct is allocated in the case where an extension object has to be added to a block scope (at which point the block's extension slot still contains a plain ScopeInfo).
- While at it, introduce some abstraction to access context extension slots in a more controlled manner, in order to keep special-casing to a minimum.
- Make sure that even empty varblock contexts do not get optimised away when they contain a sloppy eval, so that they can host the potential extension object.
- Extend dynamic search for declaration contexts (used by sloppy direct eval) to recognize varblock contexts.
- In the parser, if a function has a sloppy direct eval, introduce an additional varblock scope around each non-simple (desugared) parameter, as required by the spec to contain possible dynamic var bindings.
- In the pattern rewriter, add the ability to hoist the named variables the pattern declares to an outer scope. That is required because the actual destructuring has to be evaluated inside the protecting varblock scope, but the bindings that the desugaring introduces are in the outer scope.
- ScopeInfos need to save the information whether a block is a varblock, to make sloppy eval calls work correctly that deserialise them as part of the scope chain.
- Add the ability to materialize block scopes with extension objects in the debugger. Likewise, enable setting extension variables in block scopes via the debugger interface.
- While at it, refactor and unify some respective code in the debugger.
Sorry, this CL is large. I could try to split it up, but everything is rather entangled.
@mstarzinger: Please review the changes to contexts.
@yangguo: Please have a look at the debugger stuff.
R=littledan@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=v8:811,v8:2160
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1292753007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30295}
* Add types to properly report what has been executed in the GC
* Unify GCPrologueCallback and GCEpilogueCallback into GCCallback
* Report processing of second round weak handels, either synchronously or asynchronously
BUG=chromium:521946
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1298113003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30218}
- Make the API look like v8::V8::InitializeICU.
(That is: A static method call, not an object to be created on the stack.)
- Fix path separator on Windows, by calling base::OS::isPathSeparator.
- Move into API, so that it can be called by hello-world & friends.
- Actually call it from hello-world and friends.
R=jochen@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1292053002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30174}
Improves on aec8987b5e by not forcing external GCs
(blink) through the GC epilogue callback.
BUG=chromium:515795
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1287323002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30164}
First step to simplify the TypeofStub. This is similar to the
optimization that we use for ToNumber and ToString on Oddballs already.
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1272763005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30108}
