This adds a new binary block coverage mode (in addition to the existing count
block coverage), as well as a few transformation passes to reduce the number of
uselessly reported ranges.
Bug: v8:6000
Change-Id: I4fb234ca015990d00aa2f1dccb87f76ba4748994
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/552642
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46463}
This CL adds a few transformations that clean up the set of reported
source ranges. Duplicates, empty, and uncovered ranges are removed, and
nested/consecutive ranges are merged if possible.
BUG=v8:6000
Change-Id: I421ee35ce8292cfe84c1eea4f653762cea5d909d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/558411
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46450}
This piggy-backs on top of existing precise and best-effort coverage to expose
block coverage through the inspector protocol.
Coverage collection now implicitly reports block-granularity coverage when
available. A new 'isBlockCoverage' property on Inspector's FunctionCoverage
type specifies the granularity of reported coverage.
For now, only count-based block coverage is supported, but binary block
coverage should follow soon.
Support is still gated behind the --block-coverage flag.
Bug: v8:6000
Cq-Include-Trybots: master.tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng
Change-Id: I9c4d64e1d2a098e66178b3a68dcee800de0081af
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/532975
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aleksey Kozyatinskiy <kozyatinskiy@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#46157}
This refactoring makes it easier to write advanced tests and
gives full control over what's happening to the test code.
It also forces description for every test.
BUG=none
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2891213002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#45412}
1. Replaces --crankshaft with --opt in tests.
2. Also fixes presubmit to check for --opt flag when
assertOptimized is used.
3. Updates testrunner/local/variants.py and
v8_foozie.py to use --opt flag.
This would mean, nooptimize variant means there are
no optimizations. Not even with %OptimizeFunctionOnNextCall.
Bug:v8:6325
Change-Id: I638e743d0773a6729c6b9749e2ca1e2537f12ce6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/490206
Commit-Queue: Mythri Alle <mythria@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Starzinger <mstarzinger@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44985}
With precise binary code coverage, the reported count is either 0 or 1.
We only report 1 the first time we collect coverage data after the
function has been executed.
Since we do not care about the accurate execution count, we can optimize
the function once it has been executed once.
Also change best effort coverage to be implicitly binary.
R=caseq@chromium.org, jgruber@chromium.org, pfeldman@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2766573003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#44074}
We used to clear invocation counts when enabling precise coverage.
This is not necessary, and we could continue to use the existing
invocation counts on the heap. The old behavior can be achieved
by explicitly resetting the counts by polling coverage data.
R=jgruber@chromium.org,caseq@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2768453002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43964}
If the top-level function cannot be found, we previously assumed an
invocation count of 1. This is wrong when we expect the invocation
counts to be reset for precise coverage.
TBR=jgruber@chromium.orgR=caseq@chromium.org,pfeldman@chromium.org
BUG=v8:5808
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2723003007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#43620}
