> We also initialize the Isolate on creation.
>
> This should allow for getting rid of the last remaining default isolate
> traces. Also, it'll speed up several isolate related operations that no
> longer require locks.
>
> Embedders that relied on v8::Isolate to return an uninitialized Isolate
> (so they can set ResourceConstraints for example, or set flags that
> modify the way the isolate is created) should either do the setup before
> creating the isolate, or use the recently added CreateParams to pass e.g.
> ResourceConstraints.
>
> BUG=none
> LOG=y
> R=svenpanne@chromium.org
>
> Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/469783002
BUG=none
LOG=y
TBR=svenpanne@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/583153002
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@24067 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
We also initialize the Isolate on creation.
This should allow for getting rid of the last remaining default isolate
traces. Also, it'll speed up several isolate related operations that no
longer require locks.
Embedders that relied on v8::Isolate to return an uninitialized Isolate
(so they can set ResourceConstraints for example, or set flags that
modify the way the isolate is created) should either do the setup before
creating the isolate, or use the recently added CreateParams to pass e.g.
ResourceConstraints.
BUG=none
LOG=y
R=svenpanne@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/469783002
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@24052 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
We can only set resource constraints before the isolate is initialized.
Since in the future, we want to initialize isolates at construction
time, we need to set constraints there.
It's possible to later modify the stack limit, so introduce an
Isolate::SetStackLimit method for that.
The SetResourceConstraints method will be deprecated. Users should pass
ResourceConstraints to Isolate::New, and use Isolate::SetStackLimit to
later modify the stack limit.
BUG=none
R=svenpanne@chromium.org
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/559993005
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@23964 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
several API methods will automatically initialize it. During this
uninitialized state, code event handlers and function entry handlers can
be attached to the isolate.
This CL deprecates SetFunctionEntryHook and moves the configuration of
those handlers to the Isolate factory method.
This will allow for initializing the Isolate at creation time in the
future.
Users of V8::SetFunctionEntryHook should pass the entry hook to
Isolate::New instead. V8::SetJitCodeEventHandler should either be passed
to Isolate::New as well, or (if startup events are not required) invoked
via the Isolate.
BUG=none
LOG=y
R=svenpanne@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/570993002
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@23940 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Add new "Name" type to API that is a supertype of Symbol and String.
Object::SetDeclaredAccessor, Object::SetAccessorProperty, Template::Set,
Template::SetAccessorProperty, and Template::SetDeclaredAccessor now
take a Name as the property name instead of a String.
Add Object::SetAccessor, Template::SetNativeDataProperty, and
ObjectTemplate::SetAccessor overloads that can define accessors for
symbol-named properties.
R=dcarney@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3394
TEST=cctest/test-api/TestSymbolProperties
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/459413002
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@23247 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The bit counting functions provided by CompilerIntrinsics were undefined
for zero, which was easily overlooked and unsafe in general. Also their
implementation was kinda hacky and mostly untested. Fixed the
implementation and moved the functions to base/bits.h.
TEST=base-unittests,cctest,compiler-unittests,mjsunit
R=hpayer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/494633002
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@23229 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
(parser or code) and to be explicit about cache consumption or production
(rather than making presence of cached_data imply one or the other.)
Also add a --cache flag to d8, to allow testing the functionality.
-----------------------------
API change
Reason: Currently, V8 supports a 'parser cache' for repeatedly executing the same script. We'd like to add a 2nd mode that would cache code, and would like to let the embedder decide which mode they chose (if any).
Note: Previously, the 'use cached data' property was implied by the presence of the cached data itself. (That is, kNoCompileOptions and source->cached_data != NULL.) That is no longer sufficient, since the presence of data is no longer sufficient to determine /which kind/ of data is present.
Changes from old behaviour:
- If you previously didn't use caching, nothing changes.
Example:
v8::CompileUnbound(isolate, source, kNoCompileOptions);
- If you previously used caching, it worked like this:
- 1st run:
v8::CompileUnbound(isolate, source, kProduceToCache);
Then, source->cached_data would contain the
data-to-be cached. This remains the same, except you
need to tell V8 which type of data you want.
v8::CompileUnbound(isolate, source, kProduceParserCache);
- 2nd run:
v8::CompileUnbound(isolate, source, kNoCompileOptions);
with source->cached_data set to the data you received in
the first run. This will now ignore the cached data, and
you need to explicitly tell V8 to use it:
v8::CompileUnbound(isolate, source, kConsumeParserCache);
-----------------------------
BUG=
R=marja@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/389573006
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@22431 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
During https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=19925 checkin context bound scripts (Script)
and context unbound scripts (UnboundScript) are Distinguished.
And then Sven Panne helped to fix the vtune support compilation
error in https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=20955.
The problem is that there is runtime error for vtune
support.
In our original implementation, we encapsulated and passed v8::internal::Script
to V8 API. It will leads to type check error for current V8::Script definition.
So I changed the Handle<Script> definition in JitCodeEvent
to Handle<UnboundScript>
and add the corresponding change in log.cc.
If you do NOT prefer to change in include/v8.h. I think I can change the definition of
CodeEventLogger::LogRecordedBuffer(...) so that the we can pass the correct
type (JSFunction) as V8::Script to V8 API.
BUG=
R=danno@chromium.org, svenpanne@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/334263018
Patch from Chunyang Dai <chunyang.dai@intel.com>.
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@22393 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The callbacks are per isolate, so we shouldn't get the isolate implicitly
from TLS. Also, we shouldn't allow calls to these methods prior to
initializing the respective isolate (and silently ignore them).
Esp. add a per-isolate API to set the stats counter callbacks and
make it possible to set the stats counter callback after the isolate
was touched.
Embedders should use e.g. isolate->SetCounterFunction(callback) instead
of v8::V8::SetCounterFunction(callback).
BUG=none
R=svenpanne@chromium.org
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/365153002
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@22223 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
