The reuse of CodeCreateEvent for deopt events caused a CodeCreateEvent
fired twice for a code object. When the event was processed for the first
time it seized the no-fp-ranges from code object, so the second event
had no ranges info leaving code entry without them.
As a result when a cpu profile sample falls into the region it missed the
2nd stack frame.
LOG=N
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, loislo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/290093005
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@21418 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
All methods for accessing collected profiles by index are deprecated. The indexed storage may well be implemented by the embedder should he need it. CpuProfiler's responsibility is just to create CpuProfile object that contains all collected data and whose lifetime can be managed by the embedder.
BUG=chromium:327298
LOG=Y
R=svenpanne@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/117353002
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@18337 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Profiler is now started from JavaScript. Since we always capture stack trace when starting profiler there should always be at least one expected sample in the profile.
Also changed ProfilerEventsProcessor::AddCurrentStack to make sure it call TickSample::Init to instead of custom initialization code.
BUG=v8:2920
R=jkummerow@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/25686011
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@17140 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
VS2013 contains a number of improvements, most notably the addition of all C99 math functions.
I'm a little bit concerned about the change I had to make in cpu-profiler.cc, but I spent quite a bit of time looking at it and was unable to figure out any rational explanation for the warning. It's possible it's spurious. Since it seems like a useful warning in general though, I chose not to disable globally at the gyp level.
I do think someone with expertise here should probably try to determine if this is a legitimate warning.
BUG=288948
R=dslomov@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/23449035
Patch from Zach Turner <zturner@chromium.org>.
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@16775 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
To avoid long intervals between taking samples due to processing all accumulated samples at once, the samples are processed one by one and we check if the sampling interval has elapsed after each step rather than after processing all the samples in the queue.
This is a modified version of r16549 whith a fix for test flakiness. The test flakiness introduced by the previous version of this changed was fixed by changing return type of ProfilerEventsProcessor::ProcessOneSample from bool to enum with 3 options. In the main profiling loop we decide that the next code event should be processed when sample with a greater ordinal number is encountered. When processing remaining samples we shouldn't wait for more samples and if the samples queue is empty we just process next code event.
BUG=v8:2814,v8:2871
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, loislo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/23455036
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@16564 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Current v8 implementation may disable optimization for a particular function or block it with help of dont_optimize flag.
The patch propagates the reason of that to the SharedFunctionInfo where cpu profiler can get it.
SharedFunctionInfo is a heap object so I extracted 8 bits from OptsCount for handling bailout reason code.
BUG=none
TEST=test-profile-generator/BailoutReason
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/23817003
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@16555 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
These classes are meant to replace OS::Ticks() and OS::TimeCurrentMillis(),
which are broken in several ways. The ElapsedTimer class implements a
stopwatch using TimeTicks::HighResNow() for high resolution, monotonic
timing.
Also fix the CpuProfile::GetStartTime() and CpuProfile::GetEndTime()
methods to actually return the time relative to the unix epoch as stated
in the documentation (previously that was relative to some arbitrary
point in time, i.e. boot time).
The previous Windows issues have been resolved, and we now use GetTickCount64()
on Windows Vista and later, falling back to timeGetTime() with rollover
protection for earlier Windows versions.
BUG=v8:2853
R=machenbach@chromium.org, yurys@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/23490015
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@16413 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
These classes are meant to replace OS::Ticks() and OS::TimeCurrentMillis(),
which are broken in several ways. The ElapsedTimer class implements a
stopwatch using TimeTicks::HighResNow() for high resolution, monotonic
timing.
Also fix the CpuProfile::GetStartTime() and CpuProfile::GetEndTime()
methods to actually return the time relative to the unix epoch as stated
in the documentation (previously that was relative to some arbitrary
point in time, i.e. boot time).
BUG=v8:2853
R=machenbach@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/23469013
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@16398 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
These classes are meant to replace OS::Ticks() and OS::TimeCurrentMillis(),
which are broken in several ways. The ElapsedTimer class implements a
stopwatch using TimeTicks::HighResNow() for high resolution, monotonic
timing.
Also fix the CpuProfile::GetStartTime() and CpuProfile::GetEndTime()
methods to actually return the time relative to the unix epoch as stated
in the documentation (previously that was relative to some arbitrary
point in time, i.e. boot time).
BUG=v8:2853
R=machenbach@chromium.org, yurys@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/23295034
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@16388 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
New flag is added that allows to specify CPU profiler sampling rate in microseconds as command line argument. It was tested to work fine with 100us interval(currently it is 1ms). Default values are kept the same as in the current implementation. The new implementation is enabled only on POSIX platforms which use signals to collect samples. Other platforms that pause thread being sampled are to follow.
SIGPROF signals are now sent on the profiler event processor thread to make sure that the processing thread does fall far behind the sampling.
The patch is based on the previous one that was rolled out in r13851. The main difference is that the circular queue is not modified for now.
On Linux sampling for CPU profiler is initiated on the profiler event processor thread, other platforms to follow.
CPU profiler continues to use SamplingCircularQueue, we will probably replace it with a single sample buffer when Mac and Win ports support profiling on the event processing thread.
When --prof option is specified profiling is initiated either on the profiler event processor thread if CPU profiler is on or on the SignalSender thread as it used to be if no CPU profiles are being collected.
ProfilerEventsProcessor::ProcessEventsAndDoSample now waits in a tight loop, processing collected samples until sampling interval expires. To save CPU resources I'm planning to change that to use nanosleep as only one sample is expected in the queue at any point.
BUG=v8:2814
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/21101002
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@16310 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
Sampling rate is now calculated as total number of samples divided by profiling time in ms. Before the patch the sampling rate was updated once per 100ms which doesn't have any obvious advantage over the simpler method.
Also we are going to get rid of the profile node self and total time calculation in the v8 CPU profiler and only expose profiling start/end time for CpuProfile and number of ticks on each ProfileNode and let clients do all the math should they need it.
BUG=None
R=bmeurer@chromium.org, loislo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/21105003
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@15944 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
1) report line number even if a script has no resource_name (evals);
a) do that for already compiled functions in log.cc;
b) do that for fresh evals in compiler.cc;
2) Implement the test for LineNumbers and make it fast and stable, otherwise we have to wait for tick samples;
a) move processor_->Join() call into new Processor::StopSynchronously method;
b) Process all the CodeEvents even if we are stopping Processor thread;
c) make getters for generator and processor;
3) Fix the test for Jit that didn't expect line numbers;
4) Minor refactoring:
a) in ProcessTicks;
b) rename enqueue_order_ to last_code_event_id_ for better readability;
c) rename dequeue_order_ to last_processed_code_event_id_ and make it a member for better readability;
BUG=
TEST=test-profile-generator/LineNumber
R=jkummerow@chromium.org, yurys@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/18058008
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@15530 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
When current function is FunctionCall builtin we have no reliable way to determine its caller function (in many cases the top of the sampled stack contains address of the caller but sometimes it does not). Instead of dropping the sample or its two top frames we simply mark the caller frame as '(unresolved function)'. It seems like a better approach that dropping whole sample as knowing the top function and the rest of the stack the user should be able to figure out what the caller was.
This change adds builtin id to CodeEntry objects. It will be used later to add similar top frame analysis for FunctionApply and probably other builtins.
BUG=None
TBR=loislo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/18422003
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@15436 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
When current function is FunctionCall builtin we have no reliable way to determine its caller function (in many cases the top of the sampled stack contains address of the caller but sometimes it does not). Instead of dropping the sample or its two top frames we simply mark the caller frame as '(unresolved function)'. It seems like a better approach that dropping whole sample as knowing the top function and the rest of the stack the user should be able to figure out what the caller was.
This change adds builtin id to CodeEntry objects. It will be used later to add similar top frame analysis for FunctionApply and probably other builtins.
BUG=None
R=jkummerow@chromium.org, loislo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/18316004
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@15426 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The only way to get v8::CpuProfiler instance in the V8 public API is to call v8::Iolate::GetCpuProfiler(). The method will return NULL if the isolate has not been initialized yet or has been torn down already. It is the client's reponsibility to make sure that CPU profiling has been stopped before disposing of the isolate.
This CL adds a test for this and several ASSRTS enforcing that assumptions. This allowed to be sure that heap is always setup when CPU profiling is being started. Based on that the number of places where already compiled functions are reported to the profiler event processor boils down to the single place (CpuProfiler::StartProcessorIfNotStarted). I'm going to rely on this assumption in further changes.
BUG=None
R=loislo@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/18336002
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@15415 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
The bodies of methods in ProfilerEventProcessor were moved into CpuProfiler.
Multiple NewCodeEntry methods in CpuProfilesCollection were replaced with one which
simply passes arguments to the CodeEntry constructor.
And CpuProfiler just calls this method when it needs a CodeEntry object.
This NewCodeEntry method is required because CpuProfilesCollection keeps ownership of CodeEntry objects.
BUG=255392
TEST=existing tests
R=yangguo@chromium.org, yurys@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/18053004
git-svn-id: http://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@15405 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
