Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
Original code review from Sven Panne:
https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.v8:v8_linux_arm_dbg,v8_linux_arm64_dbg,v8_mac64_dbg,v8_win_compile_dbg,v8_linux_gcc_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1393023003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31185}
Reason for revert:
Breaks Arm debug.
Original issue's description:
> Reland: Introduce a V8_NORETURN macro and use it to make GCC 4.9.2 happy again.
>
> Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
> Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
>
> Original code review from Sven Panne:
> https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
>
> CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.v8:v8_linux_arm_dbg,v8_linux_arm64_dbg,v8_mac64_dbg,v8_win_compile_dbg
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/93ae81101af68d81b7af84ea4046ea849e605116
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31163}
TBR=jochen@chromium.org,karl@skomski.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1398643002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31167}
Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
Original code review from Sven Panne:
https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.v8:v8_linux_arm_dbg,v8_linux_arm64_dbg,v8_mac64_dbg,v8_win_compile_dbg
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1383053005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31163}
Allow access to Array Iterator through the API, in order to simplify
setting up interfaces which use these methods. This applies to
WebIDL interfaces with "length" attributes returning integer types and
a getter taking an unsigned long type.
BUG=
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1378403004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31152}
Symbols marked as "well-known" now return an undefined value when loaded with a failed access check, instead of throwing.
Currently, only @@isConcatSpreadable is marked as well-known, until the correct behaviour is properly specified.
BUG=v8:4289, 507553
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org, jochen@chromium.org, verwaest@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1230793002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31131}
The --abort-on-uncaught-exception command line switch makes
Isolate::Throw abort if the error being thrown cannot be caught by a
try/catch block.
Embedders may want to use other mechanisms than try/catch blocks to
handle uncaught exceptions. For instance, Node.js has "domain" objects
that have error handlers that can handle uncaught exception like
following:
var d = domain.create();
d.on('error', function onError(err) {
console.log('Handling error');
});
d.run(function() {
throw new Error("boom");
});
These error handlers are called by isolates' message listeners.
If --abort-on-uncaught-exception is *not* used, the isolate's
message listener will be called, which will in turn call the domain's
error handler. The process will output 'Handling error' and will exit
successfully (not due to an uncaught exception). This is the behavior
that Node.js users expect.
However, if --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used and when throwing an
error within a domain that has an error handler, the process will abort
and the domain's error handler will not be called. This is not the
behavior that Node.js users expect.
Having a SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback API allows embedders to
determine when it's not appropriate to abort and instead handle the
exception via the isolate's message listener.
In the example above, Node.js would set a custom callback with
SetAbortOnUncaughtExceptionCallback that would be implemented as
following (the sample code has been simplified to remove what's not
relevant to this change):
bool ShouldAbortOnUncaughtException(Isolate* isolate) {
return !IsDomainActive();
}
Now when --abort-on-uncaught-exception is used, Isolate::Throw would
call that callback and determine that it should not abort if a domain
with an error handler is active. Instead, the isolate's message listener
would be called and the error would be handled by the domain's error
handler.
I believe this can also be useful for other embedders.
BUG=
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1375933003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31111}
Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
Original code review from Sven Panne:
https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.v8:v8_linux_arm_dbg,v8_linux_arm64_dbg,v8_mac64_dbg,v8_win_compile_dbg
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1384873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31105}
This enables linter checking for "readability/namespace" violations
during presubmit and instead marks the few known exceptions that we
allow explicitly.
R=bmeurer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1371083003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31019}
This prevents the internal incremental-marking.h to be usable outisde
of the "heap" directory. The logic inside that component is only useful
within the GC and is now properly encapsulated.
R=hpayer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1374203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31010}
Reason for revert:
This CL breaks cross-compiling to arm.
Original issue's description:
> Introduce a V8_NORETURN macro and use it to make GCC 4.9.2 happy again.
>
> Without that, it has a few false positives about out-of-bounds array accesses.
> Also makes the clang static-analyzer happy.
>
> Original code review from Sven Panne:
> https://codereview.chromium.org/790723002/
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/0b48b2a8ebfc791a36f4ec1f299f46db76265a3a
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30977}
TBR=jochen@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,jkummerow@chromium.org,karl@skomski.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1370203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30982}
This enables the general linter checking for "build/c++11" violations
during presubmit and instead marks the few known exceptions that we
allow explicitly.
R=jochen@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1317463007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30621}
This CL is a nightmare! For the utterly irrelevant edge case of a sloppy function with non-simple parameters and a call to direct eval, like here,
let x = 1;
function f(g = () => x) {
var y
eval("var x = 2")
return g() + x // f() = 3
}
we have to do all of the following, on top of the declaration block ("varblock") contexts we already introduce around the body:
- Introduce the ability for varblock contexts to have both a ScopeInfo and an extension object (e.g., the body varblock in the example will contain both a static var y and a dynamic var x). No other scope needs that. Since there are no context slots left, a special new struct is introduced that pairs up scope info and extension object.
- When declaring lookup slots in the runtime, this new struct is allocated in the case where an extension object has to be added to a block scope (at which point the block's extension slot still contains a plain ScopeInfo).
- While at it, introduce some abstraction to access context extension slots in a more controlled manner, in order to keep special-casing to a minimum.
- Make sure that even empty varblock contexts do not get optimised away when they contain a sloppy eval, so that they can host the potential extension object.
- Extend dynamic search for declaration contexts (used by sloppy direct eval) to recognize varblock contexts.
- In the parser, if a function has a sloppy direct eval, introduce an additional varblock scope around each non-simple (desugared) parameter, as required by the spec to contain possible dynamic var bindings.
- In the pattern rewriter, add the ability to hoist the named variables the pattern declares to an outer scope. That is required because the actual destructuring has to be evaluated inside the protecting varblock scope, but the bindings that the desugaring introduces are in the outer scope.
- ScopeInfos need to save the information whether a block is a varblock, to make sloppy eval calls work correctly that deserialise them as part of the scope chain.
- Add the ability to materialize block scopes with extension objects in the debugger. Likewise, enable setting extension variables in block scopes via the debugger interface.
- While at it, refactor and unify some respective code in the debugger.
Sorry, this CL is large. I could try to split it up, but everything is rather entangled.
@mstarzinger: Please review the changes to contexts.
@yangguo: Please have a look at the debugger stuff.
R=littledan@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
BUG=v8:811,v8:2160
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1292753007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30295}
* Add types to properly report what has been executed in the GC
* Unify GCPrologueCallback and GCEpilogueCallback into GCCallback
* Report processing of second round weak handels, either synchronously or asynchronously
BUG=chromium:521946
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1298113003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30218}
- Make the API look like v8::V8::InitializeICU.
(That is: A static method call, not an object to be created on the stack.)
- Fix path separator on Windows, by calling base::OS::isPathSeparator.
- Move into API, so that it can be called by hello-world & friends.
- Actually call it from hello-world and friends.
R=jochen@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1292053002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30174}
Improves on aec8987b5e by not forcing external GCs
(blink) through the GC epilogue callback.
BUG=chromium:515795
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1287323002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30164}
First step to simplify the TypeofStub. This is similar to the
optimization that we use for ToNumber and ToString on Oddballs already.
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1272763005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30108}
There's no need to have one InstanceType per SIMD primitive type (this
will not scale long-term). Also reduce the amount of code duplication
and make it more robust wrt adding new SIMD types.
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1273353003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30107}
No need to provide TO_INT32/TO_UINT32 functions for every native
context, as they can be implemented in terms of TO_NUMBER more easily
and efficiently.
Also remove the obsolete TO_BOOLEAN_FUN_INDEX from the native contexts.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1275013004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30080}
This is only an estimate since it counts objects that could be shared,
for example strings, cow arrays, heap numbers, etc.
It however ignores objects that could be shared, but may only be used
by the context to be measured, for example shared function infos,
script objects, scope infos, etc.
R=jochen@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1268333004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30029}
There is only one use case for it: String.prototype.search converts a
string argument into a RegExp. The cache is used to avoid repeating that
conversion. However, this does not make the added complexity worthwhile.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1267493006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29985}
This is the initial (big) step towards a more uniform implementation of
the ToObject abstract operation (ES6 7.1.13), where we have a fallback
implementation in JSReceiver::ToObject() and a fast (hydrogen) CodeStub
to deal with the fast case (we should be able to do more cleanup on this
in a followup CL). For natives we expose the abstract operation via a
%_ToObject intrinsic, also exposed via a macro TO_OBJECT, that unifies
the previous confusion with TO_OBJECT_INLINE, ToObject, TO_OBJECT,
$toObject and %$toObject. Now the whole implementation of the abstract
operation is context independent, meaning we don't need any magic in the
builtins object nor the native context.
R=mvstanton@chromium.org,yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1266013006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29953}
This is required in order for Globals to be stored in STL containers.
Patch from Aaron Link <aaronlink@google.com>
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1244033002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29776}
This CL exposes the constructor function, defines type related
information, and implements value type semantics.
It also refactors test/mjsunit/samevalue.js to test SameValue and SameValueZero.
TEST=test/mjsunit/harmony/simd.js, test/cctest/test-simd.cc
LOG=Y
BUG=v8:4124
Committed: https://crrev.com/e5ed3bee99807c502fa7d7a367ec401e16d3f773
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29689}
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1219943002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29712}
These were added when I thought they would be useful in Blink, but as
it turned out they were not. They could likely be deleted immediately,
but to play it safe I'll go through the usual deprecation process.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1236263004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29690}
This CL exposes the constructor function, defines type related
information, and implements value type semantics.
It also refactors test/mjsunit/samevalue.js to test SameValue and SameValueZero.
TEST=test/mjsunit/harmony/simd.js, test/cctest/test-simd.cc
LOG=Y
BUG=v8:4124
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1219943002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29689}
The CL addes convenienve method that allows to write code like the following
v8::Local<v8::Object> local = v8::Local<v8::Object>::New(global, isolate);
in a more readable way:
v8::Local<v8::Object> local = global.Get(isolate);
There is already v8::Eternal::Get that does similar thing.
BUG=None
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1237603003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29616}
The only right way to enable access checks is to install access check callbacks on an object template via v8::ObjectTemplate::SetAccessCheckCallbacks(). It does not make sense to enable access checks on an arbitrary object.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1217893012
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29439}
