Commit Graph

1110 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Clemens Backes
dd74a0232c Replace STATIC_ASSERT with static_assert
Now that we require C++17 support, we can just use the standard
static_assert without message, instead of our STATIC_ASSERT macro.

R=leszeks@chromium.org

Bug: v8:12425
Change-Id: I1d4e39c310b533bcd3a4af33d027827e6c083afe
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3647353
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Payer <hpayer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#80524}
2022-05-13 13:46:27 +00:00
Camillo Bruni
e3e8ea5d65 [flags] Rename --opt to --turbofan
To be consistent with the all the other tiers and avoid confusion, we
rename --opt to ---turbofan, and --always-opt to --always-turbofan.

Change-Id: Ie23dc8282b3fb4cf2fbf73b6c3d5264de5d09718
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3610431
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Linke <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#80336}
2022-05-03 12:10:30 +00:00
Frank Tang
f47452080c [intl] NumberFormat v3 sync w/ spec PR 85 and 91
PR85 https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-numberformat-v3/pull/85
Throw RangeError while roundingIncrement is not 1 and
minimumFractionDigits != maximumFractionDigits
Test by new test cases in intl/number-format/rounding-increment-v3.js

Add more unit test to check the resolved options of roundingIncrement,
minimumFractionDigits, and maximumFractionDigits.

PR91 https://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-numberformat-v3/pull/91
Throw TypeError instead of RangeError while roundingIncrement is not 1
and RoundingType is not fractionDigits
Test by intl402/NumberFormat/constructor-roundingIncrement-invalid.js
in test262

Bug: v8:10776
Change-Id: I071bfe8b3e844c5999144d74bb5f79ea9811e37b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3603059
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Frank Tang <ftang@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#80196}
2022-04-26 20:50:43 +00:00
jameslahm
fce1047f00 Reland "[interpreter] Optimize strict equal boolean"
This is a reland of commit 62632c0805.
Reason for previous revert: Performance regressions crbug.com/1315724.
The reland only optimizes strict equal boolean literal like "a===true"
or "a===false", and we generate TestReferenceEqual rather than
TestStrictEqual for the comparasion. And also add typed optimization
for ReferenceEqual when all inputs are boolean with boolean constant.

Original change's description:
> [interpreter] Optimize strict equal boolean
>
> For strict equal boolean literal like "a===true"
> or "a===false", we could generate TestReferenceEqual
> rather than TestStrictEqual. And in `execution_result()->IsTest()`
> case, we could directly emit JumpIfTrue/JumpIfFalse.
>
> E.g.
> ```
> a === true
> ```
> Generated Bytecode From:
> ```
> LdaGlobal
> Star1
> LdaTrue
> TestEqualStrict
> ```
> To:
> ```
> LdaGlobal
> Star1
> LdaTrue
> TestReferenceEqual
> ```
>
> E.g.
> ```
> if (a === true)
> ```
> Generated Bytecode From:
> ```
> LdaGlobal
> Star1
> LdaTrue
> TestEqualStrict
> JumpIfFalse
> ```
> To
> ```
> LdaGlobal
> JumpIfTrue
> Jump
> ```
>
>
> Bug: v8:6403
> Change-Id: Ieaca147acd2d523ac0d2466e7861afb2d29a1310
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3568923
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: 王澳 <wangao.james@bytedance.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79935}

Bug: v8:6403
Change-Id: I2ae3ab57dce85313af200fa522e3632af5c3a554
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3592039
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Linke <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#80141}
2022-04-25 10:02:05 +00:00
legendecas
9135859a91 [ShadowRealm] Implement ShadowRealm.prototype.importValue
As per https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-hostimportmoduledynamically defined,
referencingScriptOrModule in HostImportModuleDynamically can be a Script
Record, a Module Record, or null.
So to https://tc39.es/proposal-shadowrealm/#sec-shadowrealmimportvalue,
the HostImportModuleDynamicallyCallback is been invoked with a `null`
resource_name. This may not be considered a breaking change as the
parameter resource_name is defined as Local<Value>.

Updates d8's DoHostImportModuleDynamically to handle null resource_name,
and resolve the dynamically imported specifier relative to the executing
script's origin. In this way, we have to set ModuleEmbedderData.origin
even if the JavaScript source to be evaluated is Script. Also, a
ModuleEmbedderData is created for each ShadowRealm to separate their
module maps from the initiator context's.

Bug: v8:11989
Change-Id: If70fb140657da4f2dd92eedfcc4515211602aa46
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3522883
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#80118}
2022-04-22 15:04:26 +00:00
jameslahm
4a285a2549 [iterator] Extend GetIterator to Check iterator type
This CL extends GetIterator to check whether the result of
calling @@iterator is JSReceiver and throw SymbolIteratorInvalid
if it's not JSReceiver.

GetIterator bytecode involves 3 steps now:
- method = GetMethod(obj, @@iterator)
- iterator = Call(method, obj)
- if(!IsJSReceiver(iterator)) throw SymbolIteratorInvalid [Added]

New Builtin: CallIteratorWithFeedbackLazyDeoptContinuation, which
is used when lazy deopt is triggered by call @@iterator.

Related spec: https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-getiterator.
Related doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1s67HC2f-4zxA_s1Bmm7dfwMFv_KDUfMiWIKkNSeQNKw/edit#heading=h.kdzv8mq4g4ks.

Bug: v8:9489
Change-Id: I17952c0f3e24e1e600ee1348809fb188c2c70f8e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3563447
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: 王澳 <wangao.james@bytedance.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#80112}
2022-04-22 12:58:56 +00:00
Jakob Gruber
447bf33d78 [osr] Add JumpLoop feedback slot operand
.. which points back at the corresponding feedback vector slot for each
JumpLoop bytecode.

Bug: v8:12161
Change-Id: I95f4d013544a69e088314655af7eb1dc504a8657
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3596166
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Linke <jgruber@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#80048}
2022-04-20 12:57:44 +00:00
Jakob Linke
3b772a2397 Revert "[interpreter] Optimize strict equal boolean"
This reverts commit 62632c0805.

Reason for revert: Performance regressions crbug.com/1315724

Original change's description:
> [interpreter] Optimize strict equal boolean
>
> For strict equal boolean literal like "a===true"
> or "a===false", we could generate TestReferenceEqual
> rather than TestStrictEqual. And in `execution_result()->IsTest()`
> case, we could directly emit JumpIfTrue/JumpIfFalse.
>
> E.g.
> ```
> a === true
> ```
> Generated Bytecode From:
> ```
> LdaGlobal
> Star1
> LdaTrue
> TestEqualStrict
> ```
> To:
> ```
> LdaGlobal
> Star1
> LdaTrue
> TestReferenceEqual
> ```
>
> E.g.
> ```
> if (a === true)
> ```
> Generated Bytecode From:
> ```
> LdaGlobal
> Star1
> LdaTrue
> TestEqualStrict
> JumpIfFalse
> ```
> To
> ```
> LdaGlobal
> JumpIfTrue
> Jump
> ```
>
>
> Bug: v8:6403
> Change-Id: Ieaca147acd2d523ac0d2466e7861afb2d29a1310
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3568923
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: 王澳 <wangao.james@bytedance.com>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79935}

Bug: v8:6403, chromium:1315724
Change-Id: I65c520590093724e838f738c795d229687efb9de
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3592752
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Linke <jgruber@chromium.org>
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#80010}
2022-04-19 08:29:07 +00:00
jameslahm
62632c0805 [interpreter] Optimize strict equal boolean
For strict equal boolean literal like "a===true"
or "a===false", we could generate TestReferenceEqual
rather than TestStrictEqual. And in `execution_result()->IsTest()`
case, we could directly emit JumpIfTrue/JumpIfFalse.

E.g.
```
a === true
```
Generated Bytecode From:
```
LdaGlobal
Star1
LdaTrue
TestEqualStrict
```
To:
```
LdaGlobal
Star1
LdaTrue
TestReferenceEqual
```

E.g.
```
if (a === true)
```
Generated Bytecode From:
```
LdaGlobal
Star1
LdaTrue
TestEqualStrict
JumpIfFalse
```
To
```
LdaGlobal
JumpIfTrue
Jump
```


Bug: v8:6403
Change-Id: Ieaca147acd2d523ac0d2466e7861afb2d29a1310
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3568923
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: 王澳 <wangao.james@bytedance.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79935}
2022-04-12 08:58:28 +00:00
Marja Hölttä
185d6116ae [super IC] Fix API getter related bugs and re-enable super IC
Bug: chromium:1308360,chromium:1309467,v8:9237
Change-Id: I2923e3ee60b4b30c4e2b57b9c8569a030fc7bfbd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3550588
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79676}
2022-03-30 13:09:20 +00:00
legendecas
0a0ad98a5a [ShadowRealm] WrappedFunction properties
Implement WrappedFunction properties name/length.

Bug: v8:11989
Change-Id: I050af5814537552ef6c2077802ffc726f2e08fa3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3507201
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79628}
2022-03-25 16:00:33 +00:00
Marja Hölttä
c6b68cbfbd [super IC] Turn off super ICs
They make assumptions which don't hold for API handlers.

Bug: v8:9237,chromium:1308360
Change-Id: I9f122c4e75a24d83ef3653cbf7a223ed522e4d13
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3548899
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79614}
2022-03-24 17:59:52 +00:00
Joyee Cheung
639c09a341 [class] fix read-only private references in logical assignments
Since assignments to read-only private references can be skipped due
to short-circuiting in logical assignments, we should not eagerly
emit the error of invalid writes, and should instead load the values
as usual, only emitting an error when the assignment happens,
which can be handled by BytecodeGenerator::BuildAssignment().

Bug: v8:12680, v8:8330, v8:10372
Change-Id: Ia5fea9090bc48b0af8a9c8d6f95174f7aa2d86f8
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3509298
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79583}
2022-03-23 16:16:32 +00:00
jameslahm
65ffd616b0 [interpreter] create array literal boilerplates for spread calls
when BuildCreateArrayLiteral

In spread calls, create array literal boilerplates for
BuildCreateArrayLiteral rather than emit array literals
without any boilerplates

Bug: v8:11582
Change-Id: Ia0538bd043eab040c3059440e982c7f0037d1a3f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3507126
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79447}
2022-03-10 16:29:05 +00:00
Joyee Cheung
0d1ffe30f8 [ic] name Set/Define/Store property operations more consistently
For background and reasoning, see
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jvSEvXFHRkxg4JX-j6ho3nRqAF8vZI2Ai7RI8AY54gM/edit
This is the first step towards pulling the DefineNamedOwn operation out
of StoreIC.

Summary of the renamed identifiers:

Bytecodes:

- StaNamedProperty -> SetNamedProperty: calls StoreIC and emitted for
  normal named property sets like obj.x = 1.
- StaNamedOwnProperty -> DefineNamedOwnProperty: calls
  DefineNamedOwnIC (previously StoreOwnIC), and emitted for
  initialization of named properties in object literals and named
  public class fields.
- StaKeyedProperty -> SetKeyedProperty: calls KeyedStoreIC and emitted
  for keyed property sets like obj[x] = 1.
- StaKeyedPropertyAsDefine -> DefineKeyedOwnProperty: calls
  DefineKeyedOwnIC (previously KeyedDefineOwnIC) and emitted for
  initialization of private class fields and computed public class
  fields.
- StaDataPropertyInLiteral -> DefineKeyedOwnPropertyInLiteral: calls
  DefineKeyedOwnPropertyInLiteral runtime function (previously
  DefineDataPropertyInLiteral) and emitted for initialization of keyed
  properties in object literals and static class initializers. (note
  that previously the StoreDataPropertyInLiteral runtime function name
  was taken by object spreads and array literal creation instead)
- LdaKeyedProperty -> GetKeyedProperty, LdaNamedProperty ->
  GetNamedProperty, LdaNamedPropertyFromSuper ->
  GetNamedPropertyFromSuper: we drop the Sta prefix for the property
  store operations since the accumulator use is implicit and to make
  the wording more natural, for symmetry the Lda prefix for the
  property load operations is also dropped.

opcodes:

- (JS)StoreNamed -> (JS)SetNamedProperty: implements set semantics for
  named properties, compiled from SetNamedProperty (previously
  StaNamedProperty) and lowers to StoreIC or Runtime::kSetNamedProperty
- (JS)StoreNamedOwn -> (JS)DefineNamedOwnProperty: implements define
  semantics for initializing named own properties in object literal and
  public class fields, compiled from DefineNamedOwnProperty (previously
  StaNamedOwnProperty) and lowers to DefineNamedOwnIC
  (previously StoreOwnIC)
- (JS)StoreProperty -> (JS)SetKeyedProperty: implements set semantics
  for keyed properties, only compiled from SetKeyedProperty(previously
  StaKeyedProperty) and lowers to KeyedStoreIC
- (JS)DefineProperty -> (JS)DefineKeyedOwnProperty: implements define
  semantics for initialization of private class fields and computed
  public class fields, compiled from DefineKeyedOwnProperty (previously
  StaKeyedPropertyAsDefine) and calls DefineKeyedOwnIC (previously
  KeyedDefineOwnIC).
- (JS)StoreDataPropertyInLiteral ->
  (JS)DefineKeyedOwnPropertyInLiteral: implements define semantics for
  initialization of keyed properties in object literals and static
  class initializers, compiled from DefineKeyedOwnPropertyInLiteral
  (previously StaDataPropertyInLiteral) and calls the
  DefineKeyedOwnPropertyInLiteral runtime function (previously
  DefineDataPropertyInLiteral).

Runtime:
- DefineDataPropertyInLiteral -> DefineKeyedOwnPropertyInLiteral:
  following the bytecode/opcodes change, this is used by
  DefineKeyedOwnPropertyInLiteral (previously StaDataPropertyInLiteral)
  for object and class literal initialization.
- StoreDataPropertyInLiteral -> DefineKeyedOwnPropertyInLiteral_Simple:
  it's just a simplified version of DefineDataPropertyInLiteral that
  does not update feedback or perform function name configuration.
  This is used by object spread and array literal creation. Since we
  are renaming DefineDataPropertyInLiteral to
  DefineKeyedOwnPropertyInLiteral, rename this simplified version with
  a `_Simple` suffix. We can consider merging it into
  DefineKeyedOwnPropertyInLiteral in the future. See
  https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jvSEvXFHRkxg4JX-j6ho3nRqAF8vZI2Ai7RI8AY54gM/edit?disco=AAAAQQIz6mU
- Other changes following the bytecode/IR changes

IC:

- StoreOwn -> DefineNamedOwn: used for initialization of named
  properties in object literals and named public class fields.
  - StoreOwnIC -> DefineNamedOwnIC
  - StoreMode::kStoreOwn -> StoreMode::kDefineNamedOwn
  - StoreICMode::kStoreOwn -> StoreICMode::kDefineNamedOwn
  - IsStoreOwn() -> IsDefineNamedOwn()
- DefineOwn -> DefineKeyedOwn: IsDefineOwnIC() was already just
  IsDefineKeyedOwnIC(), and IsAnyDefineOwn() includes both named and
  keyed defines so we don't need an extra generic predicate.
  - StoreMode::kDefineOwn -> StoreMode::kDefineKeyedOwn
  - StoreICMode::kDefineOwn -> StoreICMode::kDefineKeyedOwn
  - IsDefineOwn() -> IsDefineKeyedOwn()
  - IsDefineOwnIC() -> IsDefineKeyedOwnIC()
  - Removing IsKeyedDefineOwnIC() as its now a duplicate of
    IsDefineKeyedOwnIC()
- KeyedDefineOwnIC -> DefineKeyedOwnIC,
  KeyedDefineOwnGenericGenerator() -> DefineKeyedOwnGenericGenerator:
  make the ordering of terms more consistent
- IsAnyStoreOwn() -> IsAnyDefineOwn(): this includes the renamed and
  DefineNamedOwn and DefineKeyedOwn. Also is_any_store_own() is
  removed since it's just a duplicate of this.
- IsKeyedStoreOwn() -> IsDefineNamedOwn(): it's unclear where the
  "keyed" part came from, but it's only used when DefineNamedOwnIC
  (previously StoreOwnIC) reuses KeyedStoreIC, so rename it accordingly

Interpreter & compiler:
- BytecodeArrayBuilder: following bytecode changes
    - StoreNamedProperty -> SetNamedProperty
  - StoreNamedOwnProperty -> DefineNamedOwnProperty
  - StoreKeyedProperty -> SetKeyedProperty
  - DefineKeyedProperty -> DefineKeyedOwnProperty
  - StoreDataPropertyInLiteral -> DefineKeyedOwnPropertyInLiteral
- FeedbackSlotKind:
  - kDefineOwnKeyed -> kDefineKeyedOwn: make the ordering of terms more
    consistent
  - kStoreOwnNamed -> kDefineNamedOwn: following the IC change
  - kStoreNamed{Sloppy|Strict} -> kSetNamed{Sloppy|Strict}: only
    used in StoreIC for set semantics
  - kStoreKeyed{Sloppy|Strict} -> kSetKeyed{Sloppy|Strict}: only used
    in KeyedStoreIC for set semantics
  - kStoreDataPropertyInLiteral -> kDefineKeyedOwnPropertyInLiteral:
    following the IC change
- BytecodeGraphBuilder
  - StoreMode::kNormal, kOwn -> NamedStoreMode::kSet, kDefineOwn: this
    is only used by BytecodeGraphBuilder::BuildNamedStore() to tell the
    difference between SetNamedProperty and DefineNamedOwnProperty
    operations.

Not changed:

- StoreIC and KeyedStoreIC currently contain mixed logic for both Set
  and Define operations, and the paths are controlled by feedback. The
  plan is to refactor the hierarchy like this:
  ```
  - StoreIC
    - DefineNamedOwnIC
    - SetNamedIC (there could also be a NamedStoreIC if that's helpful)
    - KeyedStoreIC
      - SetKeyedIC
      - DefineKeyedOwnIC
      - DefineKeyedOwnICLiteral (could be merged into DefineKeyedOwnIC)
      - StoreInArrayLiteralIC
    - ...
  ```
  StoreIC and KeyedStoreIC would then contain helpers shared by their
  subclasses, therefore it still makes sense to keep the word "Store"
  in their names since they would be generic base classes for both set
  and define operations.
- The Lda and Sta prefixes of bytecodes not involving object properties
  (e.g. Ldar, Star, LdaZero) are kept, since this patch focuses on
  property operations, and distinction between Set and Define might be
  less relevant or nonexistent for bytecodes not involving object
  properties. We could consider rename some of them in future patches
  if that's helpful though.

Bug: v8:12548
Change-Id: Ia36997b02f59a87da3247f20e0560a7eb13077f3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3481475
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79409}
2022-03-08 18:48:16 +00:00
jameslahm
28371a5781 [destructuring assignment] add CopyDataPropertiesWithExcludedProperties intrinsic
- add CopyDataPropertiesWithExcludedProperties intrinsic
- add CopyDataPropertiesWithExcludedProperties_Baseline intrinsic

Bug: v8:11614
Change-Id: Ie6a3db4c9edda40ecf84b8d1107e70fd7ff0d5fb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3470349
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79342}
2022-03-03 10:05:02 +00:00
Jakob Gruber
aad3e727ea Refactor tiering-related JSFunction methods
- Add the Isolate as an explicit param (we already have it at all
  callsites)
- Pass an explicit CodeKind param to MarkForOptimization in preparation
  for Maglev.
- Split EnsureFeedbackVector into that, plus
  CreateAndAttachFeedbackVector for when we know it has to be created.

Bug: v8:7700
Change-Id: Ie9022deccd31d472d6df3d442b25583af5569ab0
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3497383
Commit-Queue: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79318}
2022-03-01 14:33:09 +00:00
legendecas
62155dbd3c [ShadowRealm] ShadowRealm.prototype.evaluate and WrappedFunction
Bootstrap ShadowRealm.prototype.evaluate, WrappedFunction
and WrappedFunction.[[Call]].

Bug: v8:11989
Change-Id: Id380acb71cd5719e783c8f5d741cc4ccf2a93e78
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3432729
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Chengzhong Wu <legendecas@gmail.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79293}
2022-02-25 19:16:17 +00:00
Shu-yu Guo
efdf87aff8 Reland "[shared-struct] Prototype JS shared structs"
This is a reland of 1025bf26e3

Changes since revert:

- TSAN issue fixed by https://crrev.com/c/3475084
- Skip the shared-struct-workers test until shared GC deadlock is fixed,
  being tracked in v8:12645

Original change's description:
> [shared-struct] Prototype JS shared structs
>
> Unlike the Stage 1 proposal, for simplicity the prototype does not add
> any new syntax, instead opting for exposing a SharedStructType
> constructor which takes an array of field names. This type constructor
> returns constructors for shared structs.
>
> Shared structs can be shared across Isolates, are fixed layout, have no
> prototype, have no .constructor, and can only store primitives and
> other shared structs.
>
> The initial prototype does not have TurboFan support.
>
> Bug: v8:12547
> Change-Id: I23bdd819940b42139692bcdb53d372099b0d4426
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3390643
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79156}

Bug: v8:12547
Change-Id: Ic1f5cf9fa9791ae2d5d5dc7c110614ca10b5d98e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3475078
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79215}
2022-02-23 01:37:55 +00:00
Michael Achenbach
c1078b5e8e Revert "[shared-struct] Prototype JS shared structs"
This reverts commit 1025bf26e3.

Reason for revert: https://crbug.com/v8/12645

Original change's description:
> [shared-struct] Prototype JS shared structs
>
> Unlike the Stage 1 proposal, for simplicity the prototype does not add
> any new syntax, instead opting for exposing a SharedStructType
> constructor which takes an array of field names. This type constructor
> returns constructors for shared structs.
>
> Shared structs can be shared across Isolates, are fixed layout, have no
> prototype, have no .constructor, and can only store primitives and
> other shared structs.
>
> The initial prototype does not have TurboFan support.
>
> Bug: v8:12547
> Change-Id: I23bdd819940b42139692bcdb53d372099b0d4426
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3390643
> Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79156}

Bug: v8:12547
Change-Id: I44f2b8bb7487b4d39ba1282585e0b2282501230f
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3474676
Auto-Submit: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Owners-Override: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Michael Achenbach <machenbach@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79170}
2022-02-18 13:33:38 +00:00
Shu-yu Guo
1025bf26e3 [shared-struct] Prototype JS shared structs
Unlike the Stage 1 proposal, for simplicity the prototype does not add
any new syntax, instead opting for exposing a SharedStructType
constructor which takes an array of field names. This type constructor
returns constructors for shared structs.

Shared structs can be shared across Isolates, are fixed layout, have no
prototype, have no .constructor, and can only store primitives and
other shared structs.

The initial prototype does not have TurboFan support.

Bug: v8:12547
Change-Id: I23bdd819940b42139692bcdb53d372099b0d4426
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3390643
Reviewed-by: Tobias Tebbi <tebbi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dominik Inführ <dinfuehr@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79156}
2022-02-17 19:45:56 +00:00
jameslahm
60ac939f07 [bytecode-generator] dont get value when destructuring assignment with hole
according https://tc39.es/ecma262/#sec-runtime-semantics-iteratordestructuringassignmentevaluation,
when desturcturing assignment with elision, iteratorValue should not be called, thus
the returned object's "value" property should not be read during the assignment.

Bug: v8:12595
Change-Id: Id4b2c236c30486397683b4ccd4d156b718e12df3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3459922
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79093}
2022-02-15 10:53:20 +00:00
Joyee Cheung
1e6294d3c3 [class] initialize brand after super() in nested arrow function
Handle the case of nested super() by checking if the class scope
contains a private brand. In this case the ContextScope chain
is different from the actual context chain so this added back
the AddPrivateBrand() runtime function but with the additional
step of walking the context chain to get the correct class
context that will be stored as the value of the brand property
for the debugger.

Bug: v8:12354
Change-Id: Ieeb9b9d6372bfbb1a39c4c2dc9e9848e9109f02a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3275137
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#79032}
2022-02-10 14:05:48 +00:00
Shu-yu Guo
7d6deeb99a [interpreter] Add missing RegisterAllocationScope
Bug: v8:12563
Change-Id: I564c973d5d03c198bffc8edba8d9a3b7ec66c8e6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3423581
Auto-Submit: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78897}
2022-02-02 09:16:46 +00:00
Benedikt Meurer
41f0c0bac8 [debug] Simplify async function instrumentation.
This unifies and simplifies the way we instrument async functions for
the purpose of async stack traces and async stepping. It does so while
retaining the observable behavior on the inspector level (for now).

Previously we'd mark the implicit promise of the async function object
with the async task ID, and whenever we awaited, we'd copy the async
task ID to the throwaway promise that is created by the `await`. This
however made things unnecessarily interesting in the following regards:

1. We'd see `DebugDidHandle` and `DebugWillHandle` events after the
`AsyncFunctionFinished` events, coming from the throwaway promises,
while the implicit promise is "done". This is especially confusing
with rejection propagation and requires very complex stepping logic
for async functions (after this CL it'll be possible to unify and
simplify the stepping logic).
2. We have to thread through the "can suspend" information from the
Parser all the way through AsyncFunctionReject/AsyncFunctionResolve
to the async function instrumentation to decide whether to cancel the
pending task when the async function finishes.

This CL changes the instrumentation to only happen (non recurringly) for
the throwaway promises allocated upon `await`. This solves both problems
mentioned above, and works because upon the first `await` the stack
captured for the throwaway promise will include the synchronous part as
expected, while upon later `await`s the synchronous part will be empty
and the asynchronous part will be the stack captured for the previous
throwaway promise (and the V8Debugger automatically short circuits
stacks with empty synchronous part).

Bug: chromium:1280519, chromium:1277451, chromium:1246867
Change-Id: Id604dabc19ea133ea2e9dd63181b1fc33ccb5eda
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3383775
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78599}
2022-01-13 10:34:35 +00:00
Simon Zünd
c0682832f0 [debug] Add new 'CreateMessageFromException' function
CDP has a "ExceptionDetails" structure that is attached to various
CDP commands, e.g. "Runtime#exceptionThrown" or "Runtime#evaluate".
The stack trace in the "ExceptionDetails" structure is used in
various places in DevTools. The information in the "ExceptionDetails"
structure is extracted from a v8::Message object. Message objects
are normally created at the exception throw site and may augment
the error with manually inspecting the stack (both to capture a fresh
stack trace in some cases, as well as to calculate location info).

The problem is that in some cases we want to get an "ExceptionDetails"
structure after the fact, e.g. when logging a JS "Error" object in
a catch block. This means we can't reuse Isolate::CreateMessage as
the JS stack at call time is unrelated to the time when an Error
object was thrown.

To re-use some of the code, this CL introduces a new
"CreateMessageFromException" method that is only available from the
debugging interface (not public V8 API!). The new method works
similar to Isolate::CreateMessage, but:
  1) Does not look at the current JS stack, neither for a fresh
     stack trace nor for location information.
  2) Only uses the "detailed" stack trace for location info.
     This is because the "simple" stack trace could have already
     been serialized by accessing Error#stack.

Bug: chromium:1278650
Doc: https://bit.ly/runtime-get-exception-details
Change-Id: I0144516001c71786b9f76ae4dec4442fa1468c5b
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3337257
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78586}
2022-01-12 12:49:53 +00:00
Frank Tang
470bebc2b9 [Temporal] Implement Temporal.*.prototype.valueOf
Bug: v8:11544
Change-Id: If0a6eeb6591538a969efaac9d148d019300b4113
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3374067
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Frank Tang <ftang@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78555}
2022-01-11 05:37:44 +00:00
Frank Tang
f811e89269 [Temporal] Part2 Add constructor and simple getters.
Bug: v8:11544

Change-Id: I3206ca3e0c505b14e4497ccb2af25a31940a1c1e
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2967755
Reviewed-by: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Clemens Backes <clemensb@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Frank Tang <ftang@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78518}
2022-01-07 19:18:33 +00:00
Igor Sheludko
b5fabce811 [ext-code-space][cleanup] Remove CodeDataContainer table
This CL
* removes Builtins::codet() and Builtins::codet_handle() returning
  builtins as CodeT objects in favor of code() and code_handle(),
* removes BUILTIN_CODET macro in favor of BUILTIN_CODE,
* removes CodeDataContainer table.

Bug: v8:11880
Change-Id: Ic868549030744b0ff3ea5d5edbfcacf77c6de96d
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3344650
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78399}
2021-12-16 17:32:39 +00:00
Leszek Swirski
0c681483ba [ignition] Remove unused count from param index getters
We don't need this with reversed arguments.

Change-Id: I86c5183bccc62ba1727080ebbd685df083608d2f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3344947
Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78396}
2021-12-16 15:43:22 +00:00
Igor Sheludko
a0108291e2 [ext-code-space] Avoid Code <-> CodeT conversions in runtime, pt.2
This CL migrates JSFunction's code accessors to CodeT.

Bug: v8:11880
Change-Id: I8cf367eb79cc1d59548dd4f3e18c010f76f101cb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3330466
Reviewed-by: Nico Hartmann <nicohartmann@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78365}
2021-12-14 12:19:05 +00:00
Shu-yu Guo
a4b83dcf22 Reland "[top-level-await] Remove --harmony-top-level-await"
This is a reland of 3ee4804f83.

The CL was originally reverted for blink test failures. Since the
revert, the blink top-level await flag has been removed.

Original change's description:
> [top-level-await] Remove --harmony-top-level-await
>
> TLA has been shipped since v8.9.
>
> Bug: v8:9344, chromium:1271114
> Change-Id: Ibebf21da8bacb1f0d212390133847495ad8553e5
> Reviewed-on:
https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3307103
> Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78169}

Bug: v8:9344, chromium:1271114
Change-Id: I96a9641967a23a12ba2467a69e5859ad8647f3e3
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3318717
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78261}
2021-12-06 23:02:33 +00:00
Adam Klein
6f60dea6b8 Revert "[top-level-await] Remove --harmony-top-level-await"
This reverts commit 3ee4804f83.

Reason for revert: breaks blink_unit_tests:
https://ci.chromium.org/ui/p/v8/builders/ci/V8%20Blink%20Linux/15074/overview

Original change's description:
> [top-level-await] Remove --harmony-top-level-await
>
> TLA has been shipped since v8.9.
>
> Bug: v8:9344, chromium:1271114
> Change-Id: Ibebf21da8bacb1f0d212390133847495ad8553e5
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3307103
> Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78169}

Bug: v8:9344, chromium:1271114
Change-Id: I0874bcaba18fde3b48f5ef7eeae89f2fa4978d51
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3308422
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Commit-Queue: Adam Klein <adamk@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78170}
2021-11-30 22:14:41 +00:00
Shu-yu Guo
3ee4804f83 [top-level-await] Remove --harmony-top-level-await
TLA has been shipped since v8.9.

Bug: v8:9344, chromium:1271114
Change-Id: Ibebf21da8bacb1f0d212390133847495ad8553e5
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3307103
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78169}
2021-11-30 20:18:48 +00:00
Camillo Bruni
44166c6091 [api] V8::Initialize cleanup
- V8::Deprecate ShutdownPlatform in favor of V8::DisposePlatform
- Rename i::V8::TearDown to i::V8::Dispose
- Clean up i::V8::Initialize
- Remove needless V8::Initialize() calls in cctests
- Remove CcTest::DisableAutomaticDispose()
- Add checks to Isolate::Allocate and Isolate::Dispose that there is
  and active platform

Change-Id: Iac84f9ade9d1781e9e8b8c88ea8fe74013f51c4a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3306482
Commit-Queue: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Manos Koukoutos <manoskouk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78162}
2021-11-30 14:30:38 +00:00
Leszek Swirski
e518a2b203 [debugger] Throw exception if var x fails in debug eval
There are cases where DeclareEvalVar can fail to create a variable, in
particular when the declaration scope is not extensible. Throw an error
in such cases.

Fixed: chromium:1145119
Change-Id: I6260f570570c4d7801231bdb5f6724f3734444fd
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3295348
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#78017}
2021-11-22 13:35:29 +00:00
Kim-Anh Tran
f74ea020d5 [bytecode-generator] Move source code position for classes
Move the source code position for classes to the point where the block
context has already been created. Previously, there would be a mismatch
between the context and the scope when using the ScopeIterator.

We paused at a point where, according to the source position, we already
are in a class scope, but according to the bytecode (context), we would
not yet have created the block context for the class.


Also-by: leszeks@chromium.org, jarin@chromium.org
Fixed: chromium:1259878
Change-Id: I58b84f4dcfa8c4f51e16812c7a8caa21da99f262
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3284887
Reviewed-by: Benedikt Meurer <bmeurer@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Thier <pthier@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Kim-Anh Tran <kimanh@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77940}
2021-11-17 09:40:32 +00:00
Ng Zhi An
4edbdee196 [numbers] Rename ConversionFlags:NO_FLAG to NO_CONVERSION_FLAGS
This fixes a -Wshadow warning for NO_FLAG. The other option is to
make it an enum class, which makes test-conversions.cc a bit verbose.

Bug: v8:12244,v8:12245
Change-Id: I3ea429eb45e31b25d4c6658ceb86c33ba280ae51
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3274015
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Gozman <dgozman@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Zhi An Ng <zhin@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77860}
2021-11-11 22:04:22 +00:00
Leszek Swirski
18b6362551 [interpreter] Fix block resurrection by LoopHeader
Loop headers in the interpreter would start a new basic block, which
among other things would reset the liveness of that block. This meant
that a loop created after dead code, without a check for whether the
code is currently dead or not, would "resurrect" that block's liveness,
making the inside of the loop live even though the loop itself is
unreachable.

This works fine, since the loop is still unreachable, but can breaks
DCHECKs in bytecode liveness analysis for cases where a register is
supposed to be initialised before the loop, in the dead code, and is
then used inside the loop, in the resurrected code.

Normally this wouldn't be a problem, since blocks are normally killed on
the statement level and we check for deadness during statement
iteration, but `foo() = x` introduces an expression-level block killer
(being re-written to `foo[throw ReferenceError] = x`) and we don't check
for deadness after assignment Lhs preparation.

This does mean that we have to fix the InterpreterJumps test, to not try
to jump into the middle of a loop (since this could revive the loop).
This can only happen when manually creating bytecode, bytecode generated
from JavaScript is always reducible.

Bug: chromium:1230597
Change-Id: I8403ccdeae7e5450adf629026e2ca8a134c81877
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3275557
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77846}
2021-11-11 13:59:32 +00:00
Joyee Cheung
f77b05d464 [class] fix evaluation order and errors in private accessor assignments
In assignments the lhs should be evaluated first and shouldn't be
re-evaluated when the value of the rhs is available. Fix it by
saving the receiver and the key registers into AssignmentLhsData
before building the assignment and use them later, instead of visiting
the AST again to retrieve the receiver.

In addition, now that we save the receiver register, use it to
perform the brand check even when we know for sure that it's
going to fail later because it's a write to a private
method or accessing the accessor in the wrong way (v8:11364),
so that the brand check error always appears first if it is present,
as specified in
https://tc39.es/proposal-private-methods/#sec-privatefieldget

Drive-by: unify the brand check error messages, and replace "Object"
with "Receiver" in the messages for clarity. The instance private
brand check now throws "Receiver must be an instance of class <name>"
and the static private brand check now throws "Receiver must be
class <name>". Also always set the expression position to the
property load position, because the brand check failure comes from
the load operation.

Bug: v8:12352, v8:11364
Change-Id: I61a8979b2e02b561dd5b2b35f9e0b6691fe07599
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3266964
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Marja Hölttä <marja@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77797}
2021-11-09 15:36:28 +00:00
Igor Sheludko
13bcdc5b38 [ext-code-space] Avoid Code <-> CodeT conversions in runtime, pt.1
This CL
* adds forwarding accessors to CodeDataContainer for certain widely
  used Code object's fields and predicates,
* adds JSFunction::set_code() overloads accepting CodeT values,
* migrates SharedFunctionInfo getters to CodeT,
* migrates InterpreterData::interpreter_trampoline to CodeT.

Drive-by-fix: replace #if V8_EXTERNAL_CODE_SPACE with #ifdef to be
consistent.

Bug: v8:11880
Change-Id: I1e114076a0568068038ca6f70a86431a3a9cfb9f
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3262716
Commit-Queue: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Andreas Haas <ahaas@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77762}
2021-11-08 14:08:24 +00:00
Joyee Cheung
7083b10bb1 [class] use KeyedDefineOwnIC in private brand initialization
This improves the performance of initializing instances with
private methods by 5-6x and makes it on par with initializing
instances with only public methods.

Drive-by: remove the obsolete AddPrivateField runtime function
along with the AddPrivateBrand function.

Bug: v8:10793, v8:12355
Change-Id: Ic0896adb2102db7790f955fecbdd22f61ab2e7ad
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3256999
Commit-Queue: Joyee Cheung <joyee@igalia.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Sheludko <ishell@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77664}
2021-11-02 17:38:38 +00:00
Tim van der Lippe
52b4aae2d9 Improve error message when using await in DebugEvaluate
When evaluating a top-level expression while paused on a breakpoint, we
don't support an await expression as top-level statement. In these
cases, the error was not informative and could be improved.

To do so, we now propagate the information from DebugEvaluate to
ParseInfo and use the parse_info in parser-base to throw a more
informative error while parsing.

R=jarin@chromium.org

Fixed: chromium:1132245
Change-Id: I200c5af7391258256d1d86a09cbcae326327a0d9
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3247037
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Gruber <jgruber@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jaroslav Sevcik <jarin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Tim van der Lippe <tvanderlippe@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77587}
2021-10-28 09:56:40 +00:00
Shu-yu Guo
43633af0e3 [interpreter] Use fast paths again for object literals with spread cloning
[1] fixes the behavior of StaNamedOwnProperty to no longer do prototype
lookups. This lets us revert [2] and go back to using the fast path in
the clone spread object literal bytecode.

The test case from [2] is kept.

[1] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/2795831
[2] https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3178969

Bug: v8:9888, chromium:1251366
Change-Id: I9d2cb69b803c403f63365f55d27c4de20ff7dafb
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3224666
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Thier <pthier@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Shu-yu Guo <syg@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77444}
2021-10-18 16:54:00 +00:00
Toon Verwaest
177d09fc10 [parser] Allocate the receiver before parameters
This guarantees that if it's context-allocated, it'll be the first
slot in the context. That in turn allows us to drop a special index on
scope-info pointing at the receiver entry; once we update arguments
object handling to take the receiver possibly being there into
account.

Change-Id: Idfd06cf172e6905b02c8d17a962382e2a9ea0874
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3211999
Commit-Queue: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Maya Lekova <mslekova@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77360}
2021-10-12 15:32:34 +00:00
Jakob Kummerow
d7fc0134ee [cleanup][test] Don't rely on __COUNTER__ in expectations
Several of the cctest/test-bytecode-generator/* tests used to rely
on the __COUNTER__ C++ compiler macro, which could cause spurious
test failures due to mismatched expectations when usages of that
macro were added or removed elsewhere in the code. This patch switches
to a custom, controllable static counter variable instead, to make
the tests' behaviors self-contained.

Bug: v8:12244
Change-Id: I4d875b6095e4ee4ef91933ab8c60c89054d1894a
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3186836
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#77111}
2021-09-28 11:09:05 +00:00
Leszek Swirski
732f394c5d [sparkplug] Clobber accumulator in StaGlobal
StaGlobal didn't write the accumulator, but the baseline implementation
assumed that it could preserve the accumulator by taking the return
value of the StoreGlobalIC. This almost always worked, except for
setters on the global object.

Fix this by marking StaGlobal as clobbering the accumulator, same as
StaNamedProperty (StaNamedProperty needs to do this anyway to avoid
inlined setters from needing to create accumulator-preserving frames;
StaGlobal would have needed the same thing if we'd ever inlined setters
for it).

Also, add a new debug scope, EnsureAccumulatorPreservedScope, to the
baseline compiler, which checks if the accumulator value is preserved
across non-accumulator-writing bytecodes. This found a (benign) bug with
ForInPrepare, so fix that too.

Fixed: chromium:1242306
Change-Id: I220b5b1c41010c16ac9f944cbd55d2705c299434
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3122325
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Auto-Submit: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Toon Verwaest <verwaest@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76525}
2021-08-27 09:06:13 +00:00
Dan Elphick
ec06bb6ce5 Reland "[include] Split out v8.h"
This is a reland of d1b27019d3

Fixes include:
Adding missing file to bazel build
Forward-declaring classing before friend-classing them to fix win/gcc
Add missing v8-isolate.h include for vtune builds

Original change's description:
> [include] Split out v8.h
>
> This moves every single class/function out of include/v8.h into a
> separate header in include/, which v8.h then includes so that
> externally nothing appears to have changed.
>
> Every include of v8.h from inside v8 has been changed to a more
> fine-grained include.
>
> Previously inline functions defined at the bottom of v8.h would call
> private non-inline functions in the V8 class. Since that class is now
> in v8-initialization.h and is rarely included (as that would create
> dependency cycles), this is not possible and so those methods have been
> moved out of the V8 class into the namespace v8::api_internal.
>
> None of the previous files in include/ now #include v8.h, which means
> if embedders were relying on this transitive dependency then it will
> give compile failures.
>
> v8-inspector.h does depend on v8-scripts.h for the time being to ensure
> that Chrome continue to compile but that change will be reverted once
> those transitive #includes in chrome are changed to include it directly.
>
> Full design:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rTD--I8hCAr-Rho1WTumZzFKaDpEp0IJ8ejZtk4nJdA/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Bug: v8:11965
> Change-Id: I53b84b29581632710edc80eb11f819c2097a2877
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3097448
> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76424}

Cq-Include-Trybots: luci.v8.try:v8_linux_vtunejit
Bug: v8:11965
Change-Id: I99f5d3a73bf8fe25b650adfaf9567dc4e44a09e6
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3113629
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Simon Zünd <szuend@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76460}
2021-08-24 13:08:55 +00:00
Dan Elphick
44fe02ced6 Revert "[include] Split out v8.h"
This reverts commit d1b27019d3.

Reason for revert: Broke vtune build, tsan build and possibly others

Original change's description:
> [include] Split out v8.h
>
> This moves every single class/function out of include/v8.h into a
> separate header in include/, which v8.h then includes so that
> externally nothing appears to have changed.
>
> Every include of v8.h from inside v8 has been changed to a more
> fine-grained include.
>
> Previously inline functions defined at the bottom of v8.h would call
> private non-inline functions in the V8 class. Since that class is now
> in v8-initialization.h and is rarely included (as that would create
> dependency cycles), this is not possible and so those methods have been
> moved out of the V8 class into the namespace v8::api_internal.
>
> None of the previous files in include/ now #include v8.h, which means
> if embedders were relying on this transitive dependency then it will
> give compile failures.
>
> v8-inspector.h does depend on v8-scripts.h for the time being to ensure
> that Chrome continue to compile but that change will be reverted once
> those transitive #includes in chrome are changed to include it directly.
>
> Full design:
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rTD--I8hCAr-Rho1WTumZzFKaDpEp0IJ8ejZtk4nJdA/edit?usp=sharing
>
> Bug: v8:11965
> Change-Id: I53b84b29581632710edc80eb11f819c2097a2877
> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3097448
> Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
> Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
> Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76424}

Bug: v8:11965
Change-Id: Id57313ae992e720c8b19abc975cd69729e1344aa
No-Presubmit: true
No-Tree-Checks: true
No-Try: true
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3113627
Bot-Commit: Rubber Stamper <rubber-stamper@appspot.gserviceaccount.com>
Commit-Queue: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Owners-Override: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76428}
2021-08-23 11:54:09 +00:00
Dan Elphick
d1b27019d3 [include] Split out v8.h
This moves every single class/function out of include/v8.h into a
separate header in include/, which v8.h then includes so that
externally nothing appears to have changed.

Every include of v8.h from inside v8 has been changed to a more
fine-grained include.

Previously inline functions defined at the bottom of v8.h would call
private non-inline functions in the V8 class. Since that class is now
in v8-initialization.h and is rarely included (as that would create
dependency cycles), this is not possible and so those methods have been
moved out of the V8 class into the namespace v8::api_internal.

None of the previous files in include/ now #include v8.h, which means
if embedders were relying on this transitive dependency then it will
give compile failures.

v8-inspector.h does depend on v8-scripts.h for the time being to ensure
that Chrome continue to compile but that change will be reverted once
those transitive #includes in chrome are changed to include it directly.

Full design:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rTD--I8hCAr-Rho1WTumZzFKaDpEp0IJ8ejZtk4nJdA/edit?usp=sharing

Bug: v8:11965
Change-Id: I53b84b29581632710edc80eb11f819c2097a2877
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/v8/v8/+/3097448
Reviewed-by: Yang Guo <yangguo@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Camillo Bruni <cbruni@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jakob Kummerow <jkummerow@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Leszek Swirski <leszeks@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Lippautz <mlippautz@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Dan Elphick <delphick@chromium.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/main@{#76424}
2021-08-23 09:35:06 +00:00