When the scanner finds a '-->', it's either part of an HTMLCloseComment
or a '--' followed by a '>'. Previously, only a preceding newline would
make it an HTMLCloseComment. Now, a preceding multiline comment also
makes it an HTMLCloseComment. The effect is that now the following is
not a SyntaxError:
x/*
*/-->this is now a comment
BUG=v8:5142
LOG=y
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2119763003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37656}
Add a flag harmony_trailing_commas_in_parameters that allows trailing
commas in function parameter declaration lists and function call
parameter lists. Trailing commas are allowed in parenthetical lists like
`(a, b, c,)` only if the next token is `=>`, thereby making it an arrow
function declaration. Only 1 trailing comma is allowed, not `(a,,)`. A
trailing comma must follow a non-rest parameter, so `(,)` and `(...a,)`
are still SyntaxErrors. However, a trailing comma is allowed after a
spread parameter, e.g. `a(...b,);`.
Add parser tests for all of the above.
BUG=v8:5051
LOG=y
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2094463002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37355}
Previously, an async arrow function would be parsed if any valid
ConditionalExpression began with the identifier "async", and its following token
was on the same line.
So for example, `async.bar foo => 1` was parsed as a valid async arrow function.
This patch corrects this behaviour by asserting that the following token is a
valid arrow parameters start.
BUG=v8:4483
R=littledan@chromium.org, henrique.ferreiro@gmail.com
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2089733002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#37154}
Reporting use counts by invoking a callback once per occurrence has
a large overhead cost in certain situations, for example when it needs
to be dispatched to a different thread (which is the case for Web Workers).
Parsing large scripts can produce a lot of occurrences (strict/sloppy mode
once per function).
Chromium (the only known user of UseCounters so far) does not actually care
about number of occurrences, but simply whether they happened at least once.
This commit changes behavior to report features at most once, which dramatically
improves performance for impacted use cases, and should not affect the only
known real world usage.
R=littledan@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:614775
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2062203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36979}
Annex B 3.3 applies only for ordinary FunctionDeclarations, not
GeneratorDeclarations or AsyncFunctionDeclarations. This patch
- Skips applying Annex B 3.3 to async functions
- Adds a flag to refrain from applying it to generators
- UseCounter for how often duplicate function in block occurs
with generators (unclear how to measure need for hoisting from block)
BUG=v8:4806
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1995863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36557}
Some IdentifierNames are only included in the set of FutureReservedWords
for strict mode code. Outside of strict mode, these IdentifierNames may
be used as Identifiers. Notably, this includes their use as
BindingIdentifiers in LexicalBindings.
From ES2015 12.1.1 Static Semantics: Early Errors (Identifiers):
> It is a Syntax Error if this phrase is contained in strict mode code
> and the StringValue of IdentifierName is: "implements", "interface",
> "let", "package", "private", "protected", "public", "static", or
> "yield".
http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-identifiers-static-semantics-early-errors
Due to a error in its heuristic for disambiguating the `let` token, V8
does not currently allow any of the strict-mode-only FutureReservedWords
to be used as a BindingIdentifier outside of strict mode.
Update V8's heuristic for disambiguating the `let` keyword to account
for strict mode, enabling these IdentifierNames to be used
BUG=v8:4918
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1891453005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36296}
Yield expressions are not allowed in formal parameter initializers of
generators, but we weren't properly catching the case where the yield
expression appeared in the 'extends' clause of a class expression.
They also aren't allowed in arrow functions, which we were failing to
catch due to not looking at the obscurely-named "FormalParameterInitializerError"
bit of ExpressionClassifier.
This patch passes along an ExpressionClassifier when parsing class
expressions and accumulates the proper error for that case.
For the arrow function case, the fix is simply to check for the
"formal parameter initializer" error once we know we've parsed
an arrow function. The error message used for this has also
been made specific to yield expressions.
Tests are added both for the error case and the non-error cases (where
yield is used in such a position inside the class body).
BUG=v8:4966, v8:4968, v8:4974
LOG=n
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1941823003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35957}
Restrict the use of the `await` token as an identifier when parsing
source text as module code.
From
http://www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/6.0/#sec-future-reserved-words:
> 11.6.2.2 Future Reserved Words
>
> The following tokens are reserved for used as keywords in future
> language extensions.
>
> Syntax
>
> FutureReservedWord ::
> enum
> await
>
> await is only treated as a FutureReservedWord when Module is the goal
> symbol of the syntactic grammar.
BUG=v8:4767
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1723313002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35914}
The legacy function declaration locations from Annex B 3.2 and 3.4 do not
apply for generator declarations. This patch cracks down on those usages,
which is tested for by new incoming test262 tests.
BUG=v8:4824
LOG=Y
R=adamk
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1900033003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35835}
The first version of --harmony-for-in avoided throwing PreParser
errors in order to retain use counting. This patch threads
use_counts_ through to the PreParser to allow use counting in
the PreParser while also throwing errors for this case.
Also slightly refactored the Parser code to do a little less
code duplication.
BUG=v8:4942
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1913203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35780}
Refactor the Scope object to automatically enable strict mode when
initialized as a "module" scope, relieving the caller of this
responsibility.
BUG=v8:4941
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1906923002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35730}
[15.2.1.11 Static Semantics:
LexicallyDeclaredNames](https://tc39.github.io/ecma262/#sec-module-semantics-static-semantics-lexicallydeclarednames)
(in contrast with its definition for StatementListItem) makes no
explicit provision for HoistableDeclarations. This means that function
declarations are treated as lexically scoped in module code, as
described in section 15.2.1.11's informative note:
> At the top level of a function, or script, function declarations are
> treated like var declarations rather than like lexical declarations.
BUG=v8:4884
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1851673007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35633}
The parser should never need to look at the underlying closure object,
hence the field can be moved from ParseInfo into CompilationInfo.
R=rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1863083002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35358}
We expect that the majority of malloc'd memory held by V8 is allocated
in Zone objects. Introduce an Allocator class that is used by Zones to
manage memory, and allows for querying the current usage.
BUG=none
R=titzer@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,jarin@chromium.org
LOG=n
TBR=rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1847543002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35196}
Makes --ignition cause eager compilation if we aren't building the startup
snapshot.
BUG=v8:4280
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1811553003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35066}
ES#sec-islabelledfunction specifies that labelled function declarations
may not occur as the body of a control flow construct such as an if
statement. This patch implements those restrictions, which also
eliminates a previous case resulting in a DCHECK failure which is now
a SyntaxError.
BUG=chromium:595309
R=adamk
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1808373003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35049}
Now that ES2015 const has shipped, in Chrome 49, legacy const declarations
are no more. This lets us remove a bunch of code from many parts of the
codebase.
In this patch, I remove parser support for generating legacy const variables
from const declarations. This also removes the special "illegal declaration"
bit from Scope, which has ripples into all compiler backends.
Also gone are any tests which relied on legacy const declarations.
Note that we do still generate a Variable in mode CONST_LEGACY in one case:
function name bindings in sloppy mode. The likely fix there is to add a new
Variable::Kind for this case and handle it appropriately for stores in each
backend, but I leave that for a later patch to make this one completely
subtractive.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1819123002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35002}
Reason for revert:
Violates ES6 spec (crbug.com/4850), and implementation was over-eager. Will revert for now.
Original issue's description:
> Parser: Make skipping HTML comments optional.
>
> API change: This adds a new flag skip_html_comments to v8::ScriptOriginOptions. This flag controls whether V8 will attempt to honour HTML-style comments in JS sources.
>
> (That is: Gracefully ignore <!-- ... ---> in JS sources, which was a popular technique in the early days of JavaScript, to prevent non-JS-enabled browsers from displaying script sources to uses.)
>
> The flag defaults to 'true' when using v8::ScriptOrigin constructor, which preserves the existing behaviour. Embedders which are happy with the existing behaviour will thus not need any changes.
>
> BUG=chromium:573887
> LOG=Y
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/91d344288aa51ed03eaaa1cb3e368ac1e82f0173
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34904}
TBR=jochen@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
# Not skipping CQ checks because original CL landed more than 1 days ago.
BUG=chromium:573887, v8:4850
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1817163003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34958}
API change: This adds a new flag skip_html_comments to v8::ScriptOriginOptions. This flag controls whether V8 will attempt to honour HTML-style comments in JS sources.
(That is: Gracefully ignore <!-- ... ---> in JS sources, which was a popular technique in the early days of JavaScript, to prevent non-JS-enabled browsers from displaying script sources to uses.)
The flag defaults to 'true' when using v8::ScriptOrigin constructor, which preserves the existing behaviour. Embedders which are happy with the existing behaviour will thus not need any changes.
BUG=chromium:573887
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1801203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34904}
Modules already have a separate entrypoint into the engine (at the moment,
this is v8::ScriptCompiler::CompileModule, though that will change to
something like ParseModule). This meant that requiring a commandline flag
simply added an extra complexity burden on embedders. By removing the v8
flag, this lets embedders use their own flagging mechanism (such as d8's
"--module", or Blink's RuntimeEnabledFeatures) to control whether
modules are to be used.
Also remove old modules tests that were being skipped (since they test
very old, pre-ES2015 modules syntax).
R=littledan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:1569, chromium:594639
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1804693002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34764}
These flags have been on by default since version 4.9, which has been
in stable Chrome for over a week now, demonstrating that they're
here to stay.
Also moved the tests out of harmony/ and into es6/.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1776683003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34692}
ES2015 generally bans FunctionDeclarations in positions which expect a Statement,
as opposed to a StatementListItem, such as a FunctionDeclaration which constitutes
the body of a for loop. However, Annex B 3.2 and 3.4 make exceptions for labeled
function declarations and function declarations as the body of an if statement in
sloppy mode, in the latter case specifying that the semantics are as if the
function declaration occurred in a block. Chrome has historically permitted
further extensions, for the body of any flow control construct.
This patch addresses both the syntactic and semantic mismatches between V8 and
the spec. For the semantic mismatch, function declarations as the body of if
statements change from unconditionally hoisting in certain cases to acquiring
the sloppy mode function in block semantics (based on Annex B 3.3). For the
extra syntax permitted, this patch adds a flag,
--harmony-restrictive-declarations, which excludes disallowed function declaration
cases. A new UseCounter, LegacyFunctionDeclaration, is added to count how often
function declarations occur as the body of other constructs in sloppy mode. With
this patch, the code generally follows the form of the specification with respect
to parsing FunctionDeclarations, rather than allowing them in arbitrary Statement
positions, and makes it more clear where our extensions occur.
BUG=v8:4647
R=adamk
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1757543003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34470}
The preparser should ignore "use strong" if the --strong_mode flag
is not turned on, but this should not stop processing subsequent
directives.
R=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1752753002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34392}
This frees up one bit in FunctionKind, which I plan to make slightly
more syntactic info about functions available in SharedFunctionInfo
(needed for ES2015 Function.name support).
BUG=v8:3956, v8:4760
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1704223002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34125}
This is hopefully the last in a series of cleanup patches around
destructuring assignment. It simplifies the ParseAssignmentExpression
API, making the callers call CheckDestructuringElement() where appropriate.
CheckDestructuringElement has been further simplified to only emit the
errors that the parser depends on it emitting.
I've also beefed up the test coverage in test-parsing.cc to
handling all the destructuring flags being on, which caught an oddity
in how we disallow initializers in spreads in patterns (we need to treat
RewritableAssignmentExpressions as Assignments for the purpose of
error checking).
Finally, I added a few helper methods to ParserBase to handle a few
classes of expressions (assignments and literals-as-patterns).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1696603002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33961}
They were already treated as a BindingPattern error; this patch simply
replaces that call with one marking them as both a binding and assignment
error, and adds parsing tests for both cases.
BUG=v8:4707
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1632303002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33528}
Although the `for..in` statement allows Expressions to define the
iterator, only an AssignmentExpression may occupy this position in the
`for..of` statement.
BUG=v8:4692
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1602823003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33420}
The old handling of escaped keywords erroneously treated escaped versions
of "let" and "static" as ESCAPED_KEYWORD, leading to erroneous errors in
sloppy mode. Moreover, though the class literal parsing code attempted
to fix up the parsing of escaped versions of "static" to allow it in the
right places, that code wasn't complete.
Fixing the scanner to mark escaped "static" as ESCAPED_STRICT_RESERVED_WORD
allows simplifying the class literal parsing code. A little extra code
was needed to properly handle the new treatment of escaped "let".
Note that "yield" is still broken (that is, we're overly restrictive of
escaped "yield" in sloppy mode).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1602013007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33396}
This includes anonymous Function, Generator, and Class declarations when
preceded by 'export default'. Parsing only at the moment, nothing useful is
done with the parsed Function/ClassLiteral.
BUG=v8:1569
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1589173002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33344}
This patch moves the semantics of 'const' in sloppy mode to match those
in strict mode, that is, const makes lexical (let-like) bindings, must
have an initializer, and does not create properties of the global object.
R=adamk
LOG=Y
BUG=v8:3305
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1571873004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33218}
The sloppy block-scoped function declaration placeholder statements
are held in parser_zone_-allocated hashtables. These hashtables are
not updated when local_zone_s are removed. Therefore, the
NewSloppyBlockFunctionStatement method should allocate
SloppyBlockScopeFunctionStatements in the parser_zone_ to avoid a
use-after-free. Scope fixup code may end up updating something which
is thrown away, but this is a small cost and much simpler than
removing dead hashtable entries later.
R=adamk
LOG=Y
BUG=chromium:537816
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1564923007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#33185}
The test expectations should fail consistently in both release and debug
builds. DCHECK is only meant for debug-only checks in production code.
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1506753002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32639}
Attempt #<really big number>
Parses, and lazily rewrites Destructuring Assignment expressions. The rewriting strategy involves inserting a placeholder RewritableAssignmentExpression into the AST, whose content expression can be completely rewritten at a later time.
Lazy rewriting ensures that errors do not occur due to eagerly rewriting nodes which form part of a binding pattern, thus breaking the meaning of the pattern --- or by eagerly rewriting ambiguous constructs that are not immediately known
BUG=v8:811
LOG=Y
R=adamk@chromium.org, bmeurer@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1309813007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32623}
Fix several operations in the parser that rewrite constant expressions
to preserve knowledge regarding whether a value originally contained a ".".
This information is required to accurately validate Asm.js typing.
Making the assumption that if either side of a binary operation contains
a dot, that the rewritten expression should be treated as a double for
Asm.js purposes. This is a slight deviation from the spec (which
would forbid mix type operations).
BUG= https://code.google.com/p/v8/issues/detail?id=4203
TEST=test-asm-validator, test-parsing
R=titzer@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,aseemgarg@chromium.org
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1492123002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32581}
These bits were relevant back when we had nested lexical modules, but
I don't think they'll be of any use for ES2015 modules.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1485053002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32534}
Moves all files related to AST and scopes into ast/,
and all files related to scanner & parser to parsing/.
Also eliminates a couple of spurious dependencies.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1481613002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32351}
ES6 section 12.2.8.1 states that flags for regular expression literals
must be checked during parsing and invalid flags are early errors. This
change adapts the Scanner and (Pre)Parser to act according to the spec.
This is also a prerequisite to unify the handling of literal creation
(for Objects, Arrays, Regexps, and at some point Classes).
R=yangguo@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1472323002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32273}
In a function expression, 'yield' is allowed, even if the expression
occurs inside a generator. Similarly, even in a non-generator,
a generator expression's name must not be 'yield'.
BUG=v8:3983
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1460393003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32188}
This is in preparation for the addition of --harmony-destructuring-assignment.
BUG=v8:811
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1450193002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#32098}
This patch adds UseCounters for the various language modes. This may
be useful for helping us to prioritize future optimization and
language design decisions.
R=adamk
CC=seththompson
BUG=none
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1429173002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31841}
Reason for revert:
MSAN errors on arm64: http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux%20-%20arm64%20-%20sim%20-%20MSAN/builds/5123/
Original issue's description:
> [es6] Implement destructuring binding in try/catch
>
> The approach is to desugar
>
> try { ... }
> catch ({x, y}) { ... }
>
> into
>
> try { ... }
> catch (.catch) {
> let x = .catch.x;
> let y = .catch.y;
> ...
> }
>
> using the PatternRewriter's normal facilities. This has the side benefit
> of throwing the appropriate variable conflict errors for declarations
> made inside the catch block.
>
> No change is made to non-destructured cases, which will hopefully save
> us some work if https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/150 is adopted
> in the spec.
>
> There's one big problem with this patch, which is a lack of PreParser
> support for the redeclaration errors. But it seems we're already lacking
> good PreParser support for such errors, so I'm not sure that should
> block this moving forward.
>
> BUG=v8:811
> LOG=y
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/a316db995e6e4253664920652ed4e5a38b2caeba
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31797}
TBR=rossberg@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:811
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1408063013
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31798}
The approach is to desugar
try { ... }
catch ({x, y}) { ... }
into
try { ... }
catch (.catch) {
let x = .catch.x;
let y = .catch.y;
...
}
using the PatternRewriter's normal facilities. This has the side benefit
of throwing the appropriate variable conflict errors for declarations
made inside the catch block.
No change is made to non-destructured cases, which will hopefully save
us some work if https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/issues/150 is adopted
in the spec.
There's one big problem with this patch, which is a lack of PreParser
support for the redeclaration errors. But it seems we're already lacking
good PreParser support for such errors, so I'm not sure that should
block this moving forward.
BUG=v8:811
LOG=y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1417483014
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31797}
- inner_scope_uses_arguments_ was completely unused
- The public accessor for contains_with() was not called
- inside_with() had helper methods on Parser and PatternRewriter, but was
only called in one place.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1409253007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31587}
Previously, arrow function scopes had a separate ScopeType. However,
Scope::DeserializeScopeChain() erroneously deserialized ARROW_SCOPE
ScopeInfos as FUNCTION_SCOPE. This could lead to bugs such as the
attached one, where "super" was disallowed where it should have
been allowed.
This patch utilizes the Scope's FunctionKind to distinguish arrow
functions from others. Besides fixing the above bug, this also
simplifies code in various places that had to deal with two different
ScopeTypes both of which meant "function".
BUG=v8:4466
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1386253002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31154}
Previously, cases like
var [foo]
led to a parser crash because the parser tried to do something with
the initializer, which was not syntactically present.
This patch fixes the parser issue (implicitly creating an undefined
initializer) and inserts a check for array destructuring that the
right-hand side is coercible to an object, so it can have iterator
methods called on it safely.
BUG=v8:4462
LOG=Y
R=adamk
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1384413002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31128}
This patch prohibits lexical bindings from being called 'let', even in
sloppy mode, following the ES2015 specification. The change affects
multiple cases of lexical bindings, including simple let/const declarations
and both kinds of for loops. var and legacy const bindings still permit
the name to be let, including in destructuring cases. Tests are added to
verify, though some cases are commented out since they led to (pre-existing)
crashes.
BUG=v8:4403
R=adamk
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1371263003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31115}
Arrow functions have been enabled by default since the 4.5 branch.
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1373633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#31031}
Add support for `get` and `set` as shorthand properties. Also
supports them for CoverInitializedName in BindingPatterns and (once implemented)
AssignmentPatterns.
BUG=v8:4412, v8:3584
LOG=N
R=adamk, aperez, wingo, rossberg
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1328083002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30769}
Inner functions must be eagerly parsed for scope analysis, but the full AST is
also kept around even though it's not needed.
This CL mitigates this problem by allocating some AstNodes of the inner function
to a temporary Zone which is deallocated once the scope information has been
built. The remaining nodes (such as VariableProxy) must persist until scope
analysis actually happens, and have to be allocated to a parser-persistent Zone.
BUG=417697
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1304923004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30685}
Since the constructor is also the class object itself, allowing it to
retroactively become a strong object would have unintuitive consequences
wrt the strength of the other functions of the class, and whether instances
would be considered instances of a strong class.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1314203002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30519}
This patch makes 'let' a contextual keyword in both strict and sloppy mode.
It behaves as a keyword when used at the beginning of a StatementListItem
or lexical declaration at the beginning of a for statement, if it is followed
by an identifier, [ or {. Implementing this change requires an extra token
look-ahead by the parser which is only invoked in certain cases (so as to
avoid parsing RegExps as ECMAScript tokens). This might result in a slowdown
of the scanner, but performance testing of this patch hasn't yet found much
of a regression.
BUG=v8:3305
LOG=Y
R=adamk,vogelheim
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1315673009
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30451}
TC39 agreed to disallow "use strict" directives in function body when
non-simple parameter lists are used.
This is a continuation of caitp's CL https://codereview.chromium.org/1281163002/
with some refactorings removed for now.
Still TODO: there is a lot of duplication between the is_simple field of
FormalParametersBase and the NonSimpleParameter property ExpressionClassifier
keeps track of. It should be possible to remove the former with a minor
refactoring of arrow function parsing. This will be attempted in a follow-up CL.
BUG=
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1300103005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30388}
Not all parenthesized AssignmentExpressions whose components are valid
binding patterns are valid arrow function formal parameters. In
particular (a,b,c)() is not valid, and in general the existing code
wasn't catching the tail productions of ConditionalExpression,
BinaryExpression, PostfixExpression, LeftHandSideExpression,
and MemberExpression.
Thanks to Adrian Perez for the test case.
BUG=v8:4211
LOG=Y
R=rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1306583002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30286}
These flags weren't doing any real work, since the decision of whether some
source code is a script or module is made outside the parser (currently,
by the V8 API).
The only behavior change in this patch is to always parse 'import' and
'export' as their Token values, which changes the error message from
"Unexpected reserved word" to "Unexpected token import" (which doesn't
seem particularly harmful).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1262913003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30034}
Store arity in FormalParameters; store name (instead of var) and is_rest flag in individual parameters. Ensure that the arity is always maintained consistently.
This is preparation for more parameter destructuring adjustments. In particular, a follow-up CL will separate parameter recording from declaring the variables.
R=adamk@chromium.org, littledan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:811
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1259013003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#30002}
--harmony_sloppy includes behavior to turn on sloppy mode lexical
bindings. Before this patch, it also included a way to parse let
which is likely web-incompatible (let is disallowed as an
identifier). This patch splits off the let parsing from the more
general block scoping code, so that block scoping can be developed
independently.
R=adamk
LOG=N
BUG=v8:3305
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1255013002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29855}
While at it, remove the notion of INTERNAL variables.
@caitp: Took some parts from your CL, since I was blocked on the temp scope bug.
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=512574
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1250513004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29812}
For destructuring bind, the parser needs to complain about things
which are inappropriate to have on the left-hand side.
Previously, regexp literals and template literals were let through
the parser inappropriately. This patch turns those into errors.
This patch also fixes off-by-one errors in reporting the location
of this type of error for strings and numbers. Before the patch,
the error would look like:
d8> var {x: 3} = {x: 4}
(d8):1: SyntaxError: Unexpected number
var {x: 3} = {x: 4}
^
SyntaxError: Unexpected number
And with the patch, the error is
d8> var {x: 3} = {x: 4}
(d8):1: SyntaxError: Unexpected number
var {x: 3} = {x: 4}
^
SyntaxError: Unexpected number
R=rossberg
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1236803003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29661}
We used to only store the uses_super_property in the preparse data
logger. Let the logger use NeedsHomeObject instead.
BUG=v8:3768
LOG=N
R=wingo, adamk
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1164073003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28806}
When we enter a method that needs access to the [[HomeObject]]
we allocate a local variable `.home_object` and assign it the
value from the [[HomeObject]] private symbol. Something along
the lines of:
method() {
var .home_object = %ThisFunction()[home_object_symbol];
...
}
BUG=v8:3867, v8:4031
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1135243004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28644}
Also support patterns in ``for (var p in/of ...)``
This CL extends the rewriting we used to do for ``for (let p in/of...)`` to
``for (var p in/of ...)``. For all for..in/of loop declaring variable,
we rewrite
for (var/let/const pattern in/of e) b
into
for (x' in/of e) { var/let/const pattern = e; b }
This adds a small complication for debugger: for a statement
for (var v in/of e) ...
we used to have
var v;
for (v in/of e) ...
and there was a separate breakpoint on ``var v`` line.
This breakpoint is actually useless since it is immediately followed by
a breakpoint on evaluation of ``e``, so this CL removes that breakpoint
location.
Similiraly, for let, it used to be that
for (let v in/of e) ...
became
for (x' in/of e) { let v; v = x'; ... }
``let v``generetaed a useless breakpoint (with the location at the
loop's head. This CL removes that breakpoint as well.
R=arv@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:811
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149043005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28565}
This allows you to put iterables into your array literals
and the will get spread into the array.
let x = [0, ...range(1, 3)]; // [0, 1, 2]
This is done by treating the array literal up to the first
spread element as usual, including using a boiler plate
array, and then appending the remaining expressions and rest
expressions.
BUG=v8:3018
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1125183008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28534}
... and the following two
"PPC: Resolve references to "this" the same way as normal variables"
"Remove Scope::scope_uses_this_ flag"
R=hablich@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:487289
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1134003003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28395}
Reason for revert:
The reason for reverting is: [Sheriff] Need to fix compilation after this revert:
5cab6be83a
Original issue's description:
> Remove Scope::scope_uses_this_ flag
>
> Use of the "this" variable is now tracked using scopes, like any other variable.
>
> R=arv@chromium.org
> LOG=N
> BUG=
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/afba55965118d9ba57e53c729f52be2340e626e0
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28268}
TBR=arv@chromium.org,wingo@igalia.com
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1131713004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28285}
Reason for revert:
Was an infrastructure problem.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of [strong] checking of this & super in constructors (patchset #7 id:110001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1024063002/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> [Sheriff] Breaks mac gc stress:
> http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Mac%20GC%20Stress/builds/1024
>
> Original issue's description:
> > [strong] checking of this & super in constructors
> >
> > R=dslomov@chromium.org, marja@chromium.org
> > BUG=v8:3956
> > LOG=N
> >
> > Enforces for constructors that
> > - the only use of 'super' is the super constructor call
> > - the only use of 'this' is a property assignment
> > - both of these must happen at the top-level of the body
> > - 'this' may only be assigned after the 'super' call
> > - 'return' may only be used after the last assignment to 'this'
> >
> > Not yet working for arrow functions (there might be deeper bugs with those).
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/580d66bcda66220d2f3062ac58daf925436df74c
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27977}
>
> TBR=dslomov@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,conradw@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=v8:3956
TBR=dslomov@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,conradw@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3956
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1073103004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28001}
Reason for revert:
[Sheriff] Breaks mac gc stress:
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Mac%20GC%20Stress/builds/1024
Original issue's description:
> [strong] checking of this & super in constructors
>
> R=dslomov@chromium.org, marja@chromium.org
> BUG=v8:3956
> LOG=N
>
> Enforces for constructors that
> - the only use of 'super' is the super constructor call
> - the only use of 'this' is a property assignment
> - both of these must happen at the top-level of the body
> - 'this' may only be assigned after the 'super' call
> - 'return' may only be used after the last assignment to 'this'
>
> Not yet working for arrow functions (there might be deeper bugs with those).
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/580d66bcda66220d2f3062ac58daf925436df74c
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27977}
TBR=dslomov@chromium.org,marja@chromium.org,conradw@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3956
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1105453002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27991}
R=dslomov@chromium.org, marja@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Enforces for constructors that
- the only use of 'super' is the super constructor call
- the only use of 'this' is a property assignment
- both of these must happen at the top-level of the body
- 'this' may only be assigned after the 'super' call
- 'return' may only be used after the last assignment to 'this'
Not yet working for arrow functions (there might be deeper bugs with those).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1024063002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27977}
Two last forms supported in this patch:
- 'import' ModuleSpecifier
- 'export' '*' 'from' ModuleSpecifier.
BUG=v8:1569
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1094963002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27927}
Implements the strong mode proposal's restrictions on the syntax of the
switch statement. Also fixes a minor bug with empty statements in strong
mode and improves StrongUndefinedArrow parser synch tests.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1084983002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27885}
Does not entirely disallow the use of 'eval' as an identifier in strong mode,
as originally proposed.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1059273004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27796}
Implements the strong mode proposal's static restrictions on the use of the
identifier 'undefined', for arrow functions. Assumes these restrictions are
intended to be identical to the restrictions on the use of 'eval and 'arguments'
in strict mode. In addition, Location variables inconsistantly named (e.g.
dupe_error_loc vs dupe_loc) are now consistently named the shorter way.
Baseline: https://codereview.chromium.org/1070633002
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1060883004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27756}
identifier. Delete unused (and now incorrect) function IsValidStrictVariable.
Implements the strong mode proposal's static restrictions on the use of the
identifier 'undefined'. Assumes these restrictions are intended to be identical
to the restrictions on the use of 'eval' and 'arguments' in strict mode. The
AllowEvalOrArgumentsAsIdentifier enum has been renamed to
AllowRestrictedIdentifiers as logic involving it is now also used for this case.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1070633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27744}
These comparisons are only meant to be done by AstValueFactory itself (in
its string_table_ operations), so make the Compare() function a private
member of AstValueFactory.
All other clients of AstRawStrings should compare them by pointer value.
There were only two clients which failed to abide by this rule, one
recently-added (in ModuleDescriptor) and the other in Literal::Match
(in ast.cc, added in https://code.google.com/p/v8/source/detail?r=24396).
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1069423003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27715}
This enables eager optimization of top-level code with TurboFan and
extends test coverage by triggering it with the --always-opt flag.
Script contexts are now also properly allocated in TurboFan.
R=titzer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1053063003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27633}
We only report the usages when full parse is happening, i.e. only when the function that declares a legacy const is compiled. This is an approximation that is easy to implement, but still should reflect the real-world usage.
BUG=v8:3942
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1041863002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27526}
Gather references to unbound variables where the reference (VariableProxy) is
inside strong mode. Check them against the global object when a script is bound
to a context (during compilation).
This CL only checks unbound variables which are not inside lazy functions - TBD
how do we solve that; alternatives: add developer mode which disables laziness /
do the check whenever lazy functions are really compiled.
BUG=v8:3956
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1005063002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27422}
Since recursive modules are gone, only the top-level scope can have
module inner scopes. Rename Scope::AllocateModulesRecursively to
Scope::AllocateModules, and add test showing the module Variables
are still allocated appropriately in the top level scope.
BUG=v8:1569,v8:3940
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/999893003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27143}
Rationale: separate the inputs and outputs of parsing + analysis from the business of compiling (i.e. generating machine code).
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/974213002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27078}
This required fixing the exports_ hash map to use the appropriate
comparison function instead of pointer comparison.
BUG=v8:1569
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/960793003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26920}
This also adds a new VariableMode, IMPORT, which will be
used to do appropriate binding for Import-declared Variables.
Only named imports are handled for now. "import *" and default
import syntaxes have had their TODOs adjusted to match the new
code structure.
BUG=v8:1569
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/948303004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26895}
The FunctionLiteral returned from the parser for modules now has a MODULE_SCOPE,
instead of associating the module scope with a Block inside it. This makes
it easy to get at the ModuleDescriptor from the caller of Parse(), so I've added
a basic test that pokes at the scope and the descriptor. Expect more tests
in this vein.
BUG=v8:1569
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/953983002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26836}
Add() becomes AddLocalExport, which takes an export_name and a local_name.
New parsing tests exercise this.
Also start generating exports for default exports (though this doesn't yet
handle anonymous default exports).
BUG=v8:1569
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/934323004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26758}
This gets Variable and VariableProxy out of the business of worrying about
Interfaces.
At the same time, get rid of the notion of "module variables". In ES6, variables
that refer to modules will be simply be CONST bindings to module namespace
objects.
The only change in logic here is one more early error:
duplicate export names are now rejected.
BUG=v8:1569
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/918373002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26708}
The preparser needs to log the usage of super properties and then update
the scope when we create the function later.
BUG=v8:3888
LOG=N
R=dslomov@chromium.org, marja
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/923683002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26642}
Parser must be able to operate independent of Isolate and the V8 heap during
parsing. After the heap-independent phase, there is a heap dependent phase,
during which we internalize strings, handle errors, etc.
This makes Isolate (also via CompilationInfo) unaccessible during parsing, and
thus decreases the probability of accidental code changes which would add
heap-dependent operations into the heap-independent phase.
Since Isolate is also accessible via CompilationInfo, now CompilationInfo is
only passed to the entry points of parsing, and not stored in Parser.
R=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/908173003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26612}
super() is only allowed in a class constructor.
super.p is allowed in methods, accessors and constructors.
The parser now checks the FunctionState to see what kind of function
we are currently inside.
BUG=v8:3330
LOG=N
R=dslomov@chromium.org, marja@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/915563003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26557}
Scope, like Parser, must be able to operate independent of Isolate and the V8
heap (for background parsing). After the heap-independent phase, there is a heap
dependent phase, during which we do operations such as scope anaylysis.
This CL makes the phases explicit by not telling Scope about the Isolate too
early (during the heap-independent phase, Scope should know nothing about
Isolate). This decreases the probability of accidental code changes which would
add heap-dependent operations into the heap-independent phase.
R=rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/909093003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26546}
We incorrectly disallowed eval and arguments in accessor and method
names. This was because we checked the name inside the
ParseFunctionLiteral. We now flag accessors so that lazy parsing of
these functions are treated correctly.
BUG=v8:1984
R=adamk, dslomov@chromium.org
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/899363002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26497}
Previously it just had hacks to have NULLs instead of them and pretended to know
nothing about Zone. The hacks provide no real benefit (probably historically
based on some weird misconception about the relationship between Zone and
Isolate), and make it harder for the PreParser to start to know more about
variables and scoping.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/909463003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26494}
It doesn't do anything for now, but it implies strict mode. Added tests to
test-parsing.cc to test that.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/898983002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26460}
size_t is the correct data type for this purpose. Our APIs (in particular
ExternalSourceStream::GetMoreData) are already using it, and there were some
static_casts to convert between them.
This CL doesn't intend to fix all of V8, just the minimal sense-making part
around scanner character streams.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/864273005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26449}
This enables adding more language modes in the future.
For maximum flexibility, LanguageMode is a bitmask, so we're not restricted to
use a sequence of language modes which are progressively stricter, but we can
express the language mode as combination of features.
For now, LanguageMode can only be "sloppy" or "strict", and there are
STATIC_ASSERTS in places which need to change when more modes are added.
LanguageMode is a bit like the old LanguageMode when "extended" mode was still
around (see https://codereview.chromium.org/8417035 and
https://codereview.chromium.org/181543002 ) except that it's transmitted through
all the layers (there's no StrictModeFlag).
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/894683003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26419}
Also had to split ParseImportsList and ParseExportClause into separate
methods as they have different rules about reserved words and arguments/eval.
Added lots more test cases, including some export cases that were missed before
due to incorrect checking of reserved words.
BUG=v8:1569
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/887843002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26338}
For example let and class should only be allowed inside function/block/script.
We have to continue to support const in statements in sloppy mode for backwards compatibility.
BUG=3831
LOG=Y
R=dslomov@chromium.org, adamk
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/869293002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26337}
This removes the duplicate property check from object literals.
Instead we repurpose the ObjectLiteralChecker into two cases, implemented
by two subclasses to ObjectLiteralCheckerBase called ObjectLiteralChecker
and ClassLiteralChecker.
The object literal checker now only checks for duplicate __proto__ fields in
object literals.
The class literal checker checks for duplicate constructors, non constructor
fields named constructor as well as static properties named prototype.
BUG=v8:3819
LOG=Y
R=adamk, dslomov@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/873823003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26336}
The approach taken in this CL is to incrementally move toward the
currently-specced version of modules in ES6. The biggest change in this
patch is separating the parsing of modules from the parsing of scripts,
getting rid of the 'module' keyword and thus disallowing modules-in-scripts
as well as modules-in-modules.
The syntax supported by import/export declarations has not yet been significantly
changed, with the major exception being that import declarations require a string
as the 'from' part.
Most of the existing tests have been disabled, with a first new test added
in cctest/test-parsing.
BUG=v8:1569
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/881623002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26299}
Along the way:
- Thread isolate parameter explicitly through code that used to
rely on getting it from the zone.
- Canonicalize the parameter position of isolate and zone for
affected code
- Change Hydrogen New<> instruction templates to automatically
pass isolate
R=mstarzinger@chromium.org
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/868883002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26252}
This adds support for computed property names, under the flag
--harmony-computed-property-names, for both object literals and
classes.
This is a revert of the revert, 7d48fd9dc2.
BUG=v8:3754
LOG=Y
R=dslomov@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/798243004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#26084}
Reason for revert:
[sheriff] Still crashes on win32 (XP):
http://build.chromium.org/p/client.v8/builders/V8%20Win32%20-%201/builds/1380
Original issue's description:
> ES6 computed property names
>
> This adds support for computed property names, under the flag
> --harmony-computed-property-names, for both object literals and
> classes.
>
> This is a revert of the revert, a76419f0f4.
>
> This changes to do an early bailout in
> HOptimizedGraphBuilder::VisitObjectLiteral instead of doing that in the later
> loop.
>
> BUG=v8:3754
> LOG=Y
> TBR=dslomov@chromium.orgTBR=dslomov@chromium.org,arv@chromium.org
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3754
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/811593004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25872}
This adds support for computed property names, under the flag
--harmony-computed-property-names, for both object literals and
classes.
This is a revert of the revert, a76419f0f4.
This changes to do an early bailout in
HOptimizedGraphBuilder::VisitObjectLiteral instead of doing that in the later
loop.
BUG=v8:3754
LOG=Y
TBR=dslomov@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/792233008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25868}
Reason for revert:
Crashes Win32. It was not flake.
Original issue's description:
> ES6 computed property names
>
> This adds support for computed property names, under the flag
> --harmony-computed-property-names, for both object literals and
> classes.
>
> This is a revert of the revert, a76419f0f4 with
> no changes. I cannot reproduce the issue on Win8.1 or WinXP. Letting the bots
> try again.
>
> BUG=v8:3754
> LOG=Y
> TBR=dslomov@chromium.orgTBR=dslomov@chromium.org
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=v8:3754
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/807033003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25853}
This adds support for computed property names, under the flag
--harmony-computed-property-names, for both object literals and
classes.
This is a revert of the revert, a76419f0f4 with
no changes. I cannot reproduce the issue on Win8.1 or WinXP. Letting the bots
try again.
BUG=v8:3754
LOG=Y
TBR=dslomov@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/807173002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25851}
This adds support for computed property names, under the flag
--harmony-computed-property-names, for both object literals and
classes.
BUG=v8:3754
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/795573005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25821}
Instead, make it possible for indifidual tests to pass "always true flags" which
are not part of the varying flag set.
The downside is that if an experimental flag changes parsing of some of the
unrelated code snippets, it's noticed later (only after the flag is turned on by
default). But this is a reasonable trade off for faster tests.
Additional fix: Some tests (ErrorsFutureStrictReservedWords) were using
always_flags incorrectly (running two different tests with different
always_flags basically iterates over every flag combination anyway - most of
them twice).
BUG=v8:3707
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/772823002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25628}
Most of the run time came from testing with all possible flag combinations. None
of the flags passed affect the test, and there are specialized tests for testing
the features behind the flags; no need to slow down the generic test.
With these changes, run time for debug build goes from 186 s to 0.5 s.
In addition, fixed some missing commas between the test cases.
R=svenpanne@chromium.org
BUG=v8:3707
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/766673003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25612}
Running this in x64.release mode on a powerful HP620 takes 4 seconds,
this is at least 2 orders of magnitude too slow and leads to tons of
false positives on our build bots due to timeouts. As it is, the
cost-benefit ratio is far too low.
The whole approach needs to be changed: Instead of trying to exhaust
some search space in unit tests, this should be turned into a fuzzing
test where only a small but random number of things are tested. The
exhaustive approach can be done separately, but definitely not in the
unit tests.
BUG=v8:3707
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/762743002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25510}
Since checking all possible combinations is taking so long this
reduces the test to test the odd cases (let, yield and static) as
well as a single ordinary case.
BUG=v8:3707
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/724713004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25428}
The spec explicitly forbids them. V8 never handled them properly either, just
the Scanner accepted them (it had code to add them literally to the
LiteralBuffer) and later on, Regexp constructor disallowed them.
According to the spec, unicode escapes in regexp flags should be an early error
("It is a Syntax Error if IdentifierPart contains a Unicode escape sequence.").
Note that Scanner is still more relaxed about regexp flags than the
spec. Especially, it accepts any identifier parts (not just a small set of
letters) and doesn't check for duplicates.
R=rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/700373003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25215}
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@25215 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This simplifies escape handling and makes it easier to extend escapes for ES6.
PushBack just before detecting ILLEGAL is unnecessary, since we will abort the
scanning / parsing anyway at that point, and it doesn't matter where the cursor
exactly is. The error messages w/ PushBack are not any better or more correct
than without.
In addition: remove a comment about handling invalid escapes gracefully when we
no longer do. (*)
This CL includes a behavioral change: For input "var r = /foobar/g\urrrr;" we
used to report "unexpected_token: ILLEGAL" for "\u", but now we report
malformed_regexp_flags which is a more correct error message. (Note that the
code for reporting invalid_regexp_flags was dead, and invalid_regexp_flags is
not the right error message.)
Note that the V8 is more relaxed about unicode escapes in regexp flags than ES6
(see
http://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-regular-expressions )
and this CL doesn't change it. (V8 accepts any \uxxxx, ES6 spec says only a
certain value range is acceptable.)
(*) Code archaeology:
Originally, doing PushBack in ScanHexEscape made sense (see e.g., here
https://codereview.chromium.org/5063003/diff/6001/src/prescanner.h ), since we
wouldn't return ILLEGAL but treat an invalid escape sequence "\uxxxx" as
"uxxxx".
(The repo at that point contains another instance of the same function, from the
initial commit. The logic is the same.)
This behavior was changed in a "renaming" commit
https://codereview.chromium.org/7739020.
BUG=
R=rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/684873002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#25031}
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@25031 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
ES6 no longer makes duplicate properties an error. However, we
continue to treat duplicate properties in strict mode object
literals as errors. With this change we allow duplicate properties
in class bodies. We continue to flag duplicate constructors as an
error as required by ES6.
BUG=v8:3570
LOG=Y
R=marja@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/677953004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#24933}
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@24933 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
This adds flags in Scope to track wheter a Scope uses "this" and,
"arguments". The information is exposed via Scope::uses_this(),
and Scope::uses_arguments(), respectively. Flags for tracking
usage on any inner scope uses are available as well via
Scope::inner_uses_this(), and Scope::inner_uses_arguments().
Knowing whether scopes use "this" and "arguments" will be handy
to generate the code needed to capture their values when generating
the code for arrow functions.
BUG=v8:2700
LOG=
R=rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/422923004
Patch from Adrian Perez de Castro <aperez@igalia.com>.
git-svn-id: https://v8.googlecode.com/svn/branches/bleeding_edge@24663 ce2b1a6d-e550-0410-aec6-3dcde31c8c00
