Conditionally including Array and TypedArray methods seems to cause
a slowdown in V8 context creation, possibly due to the new code added.
BUG=chromium:504629
R=adamk@chromium.org
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1215863003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29430}
The enumerable expression in a for-in/of loop is supposed to have a TDZ for any
lexically bound names in that loop (there can be more than one with destructuring).
This patch accomplishes this with an almost-correct desugaring. The only thing missing
is proper debugger support (the let declarations added by the desugaring, while invisible
to code due to shadowing, are visible to the debugger).
BUG=v8:4210
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1218543003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29396}
Before this we were using String.prototype.replace. Now
we call the internal StringReplace instead.
BUG=v8:4221
LOG=N
R=adamk, littledan
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1199933005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29206}
Before this we were using + which calls valueOf which is not correct
for these methods.
BUG=v8:4222
LOG=N
R=adamk, littledan
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1194173004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29202}
Currently, the desugaring of for loops of the form for
(let/const ...; bla; bla) causes them to always have a
completion value of 1, regardless of whether the loop body
is executed or not. This CL fixes this, realigning
initializer blocks as a more general purpose way to avoid
the completion value rewriter (since that's all they really
do anyway).
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1177053006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29108}
According to the ES6 spec, the main methods and getters shouldn't
be properties of the individual TypedArray objects and prototypes
but instead on %TypedArray% and %TypedArray%.prototype. This
difference is observable through introspection. This patch moves
some methods and getters to the proper place, with the exception
of %TypedArray%.prototype.subarray and harmony methods. These will
be moved in follow-on patches.
BUG=v8:4085
LOG=Y
R=adamk
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1186733002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29057}
This invariant will save us some head ache.
The changes to test-debug/DebugStub is due to the fact that it abuses
the ability to set break points in code that has no debug break slots.
This is now no longer possible.
R=ulan@chromium.org
BUG=v8:4132
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1181013007
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#29038}
Reason for revert:
Test failures are bogus. Snapshot blob and natives blob are out of sync due to build being weird.
Original issue's description:
> Revert of Promise assimilation fix. (patchset #8 id:160001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1098663002/)
>
> Reason for revert:
> Test failures: https://chromegw.corp.google.com/i/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64/builds/3829
>
> Original issue's description:
> > Promise assimilation fix.
> >
> > Let x be a fulfilled promise and y be another promise. |x.then(() => y)|
> > should call |y.then|, but the current implementation calls PromiseChain.
> > We can see the difference when we set a custom function to |y.then|.
> >
> > This CL fixes the spec violation, but as a result |then| is no longer
> > a wrapper of |chain| and in some cases it does not work well with
> > |accept| or |chain|. That is not a problem for ES6 promise users because
> > ES6 promise doesn't have them.
> >
> > LOG=N
> > BUG=477921
> >
> > Committed: https://crrev.com/2f57dff3ea0c45e1a61b334fda962460f89d71bc
> > Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28926}
>
> TBR=arv@chromium.org,caitpotter88@gmail.com,rossberg@chromium.org,yhirano@chromium.org
> NOPRESUBMIT=true
> NOTREECHECKS=true
> NOTRY=true
> BUG=477921
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/5bb75f514027f79303396dba823c2d78c6add83b
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28927}
TBR=arv@chromium.org,caitpotter88@gmail.com,rossberg@chromium.org,yhirano@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=477921
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1181533006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28928}
Reason for revert:
Test failures: https://chromegw.corp.google.com/i/client.v8/builders/V8%20Linux64/builds/3829
Original issue's description:
> Promise assimilation fix.
>
> Let x be a fulfilled promise and y be another promise. |x.then(() => y)|
> should call |y.then|, but the current implementation calls PromiseChain.
> We can see the difference when we set a custom function to |y.then|.
>
> This CL fixes the spec violation, but as a result |then| is no longer
> a wrapper of |chain| and in some cases it does not work well with
> |accept| or |chain|. That is not a problem for ES6 promise users because
> ES6 promise doesn't have them.
>
> LOG=N
> BUG=477921
>
> Committed: https://crrev.com/2f57dff3ea0c45e1a61b334fda962460f89d71bc
> Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28926}
TBR=arv@chromium.org,caitpotter88@gmail.com,rossberg@chromium.org,yhirano@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=477921
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1176163004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28927}
Let x be a fulfilled promise and y be another promise. |x.then(() => y)|
should call |y.then|, but the current implementation calls PromiseChain.
We can see the difference when we set a custom function to |y.then|.
This CL fixes the spec violation, but as a result |then| is no longer
a wrapper of |chain| and in some cases it does not work well with
|accept| or |chain|. That is not a problem for ES6 promise users because
ES6 promise doesn't have them.
LOG=N
BUG=477921
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1098663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28926}
This also fixes issues with
- kMaxUint32 being a valid length but not index cornercases
- exotic integer objects masking "exotic indexes" even though its in the prototype chain
- concating of holey sloppy arguments
BUG=v8:4137
LOG=n
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1159433003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28754}
The April 14 2015 final draft of the ES6 specification states that the
`prototype` property of generator function instances should be writable.
BUG=v8:4140, v8:4140
LOG=N
R=arv@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1153633003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28641}
Also support patterns in ``for (var p in/of ...)``
This CL extends the rewriting we used to do for ``for (let p in/of...)`` to
``for (var p in/of ...)``. For all for..in/of loop declaring variable,
we rewrite
for (var/let/const pattern in/of e) b
into
for (x' in/of e) { var/let/const pattern = e; b }
This adds a small complication for debugger: for a statement
for (var v in/of e) ...
we used to have
var v;
for (v in/of e) ...
and there was a separate breakpoint on ``var v`` line.
This breakpoint is actually useless since it is immediately followed by
a breakpoint on evaluation of ``e``, so this CL removes that breakpoint
location.
Similiraly, for let, it used to be that
for (let v in/of e) ...
became
for (x' in/of e) { let v; v = x'; ... }
``let v``generetaed a useless breakpoint (with the location at the
loop's head. This CL removes that breakpoint as well.
R=arv@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=v8:811
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1149043005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28565}
All the builtin iterators as well as the generator objects have an
object called %IteratorPrototype% in the spec between them and
%ObjectPrototype%.
BUG=v8:3568
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1128233008
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28426}
ArgumentsAdaptorStub for derived constructor (the one that needs
new.target) works in this way:
- If the constructor is invoked via the Construct stub, we know that
actual arguments always include new.target. ``arguments`` object
however should not include a new.target, therefore we remove it.
We achieve this by decrementing the argument count.
- If the constructor is invoked as a call, we do not care for a correct
``arguments`` array since the constructor will immediately throw on
entrance.
The bug is that the call could actually pass 0 actual arguments, but I
decrement unconditionally :(. The fix is to detect this case and avoid
decrementing. ``arguments`` is bogus, but it is ok as constructor
throws.
Long-term we should just remove mucking about with arguments for
new.target and just get it from the stack.
R=arv@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:474783
LOG=Y
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1126783003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28242}
When comparing a symbol to istself using <, <=, > or >= we need to
throw a TypeError. This is correctly handled in the runtime function
so if we are comparing a symbol fall back to use the runtime.
BUG=v8:4073
LOG=Y
R=rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1125783002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28226}
This reverts commit d5565c1f68.
Getter and setter function names in ES6 are defined as "get foo" and
"set foo".
This also moves the logic for handling symbols from runtime-function.cc
to v8natives.js.
BUG=None
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1093183006
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28050}
ES6 specifies the function name property (it was not part of ES5) and
it specifies the name of Function.prototype to the empty string ("" and
not "Empty"). This makes us match Firefox, Safari and IE developer
preview.
BUG=v8:4033
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1080393004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#28021}
In ES6 function name and length are configurable. However, the length
and name properties of the poison pill function must not be
configurable.
BUG=v8:4011
LOG=N
R=adamk@chromium.org, rossberg@chromium.org
CQ_INCLUDE_TRYBOTS=tryserver.chromium.linux:linux_chromium_rel_ng;tryserver.blink:linux_blink_rel
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1061393002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27855}
The ES6 specification does not explicitly state the attributes for the
'next' and 'throw' property descriptors, so their values are defined by
Section 17 [1]:
> Every other data property described in clauses 18 through 26 and in
> Annex B.2 has the attributes
> { [[Writable]]: true, [[Enumerable]]: false, [[Configurable]]: true }
> unless otherwise specified.
[1]
https://people.mozilla.org/~jorendorff/es6-draft.html#sec-ecmascript-standard-built-in-objects
BUG=v8:3986
LOG=N
R=wingo,arv
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1051363003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27770}
When ObjectToString is installed on Object.prototype twice (once in v8natives.js, and once in harmony-tostring.js), this pollutes old code spaces on some devices. To prevent this, the function is only installed once, preventing test failures when the --harmony-tostring flag is flipped on by default.
BUG=v8:3502
LOG=N
R=arv@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1072083002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27720}
If we optimize a function before gathering feedback it may be
peppered with soft deoptimizations. So it can't help but deoptimize.
A judicious reading of the code isn't enough to determine what the
optimization state should be in the face of such chaotic gyrations.
BUG=
R=verwaest@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1069363003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27671}
From ES6 25.2.3 ("Properties of the GeneratorFunction Prototype
Object"):
> The GeneratorFunction prototype object is an ordinary object. It is
> not a function object and does not have an [[ECMAScriptCode]] internal
> slot or any other of the internal slots listed in Table 27 or Table
> 56.
Introduce one assertion for the value's type and additional tests for its
properties. Remove an invalid assertion that fails as a result of this
fix.
BUG=v8:3991
LOG=N
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1062633002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27603}
The removed assertion consistently passes not because the invoked
`close` method internally throws a `TypeError` but because the `close`
method does not exist. The ES6 specification does not define a `close`
method on the GeneratorPrototype, so this test is a tautology.
BUG=None
LOG=N
R=arv
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1046963002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#27567}
