This changes different locations to extract the reference to the wasm
object and the function index from the stack trace, and make it
available through all the APIs which process stack traces.
The javascript CallSite object now has the new methods isWasm(),
getWasmObject() and getWasmFunctionIndex(); the byte offset is
available via getPosition().
Function names of wasm frames should be fully functional with this
commit, position information works reliably for calls, but not for
traps like unreachable or out-of-bounds accesses.
R=titzer@chromium.org, yangguo@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1909353002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#36067}
In order to have a wasm object (as JSObject), this adds a method to
instantiate the TestingModule. In order for this to work, the bytecode
and the function names of the TestingModule are stored for usage during
instantiation.
R=titzer@chromium.org
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1916403002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35906}
[wasm] Binary 11: Swap the order of section name / section length.
[wasm] Binary 11: Shorter section names.
[wasm] Binary 11: Add a prefix for function type declarations.
[wasm] Binary 11: Function types encoded as pcount, p*, rcount, r*
[wasm] Fix numeric names for functions.
R=rossberg@chromium.org,jfb@chromium.org,ahaas@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:575167
LOG=Y
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1896863003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35897}
[wasm] Binary 11: br_table takes a value.
[wasm] Binary 11: Add implicit blocks to if arms.
[wasm] Binary 11: Add arities to call, return, and breaks
[wasm] Binary 11: Add experimental version.
This CL changes the encoder, decoder, and tests to use a postorder
encoding of the AST, which is more efficient in decode time and
space.
R=bradnelson@chromium.org,rossberg@chromium.org,binji@chromium.org
BUG=chromium:575167
LOG=Y
Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/1830663002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35896}
This patch provides a new implementation of popcnt and ctz in the case
where the platform does not provide these instructions. Instead of
building a TF graph which implements it we now call a C function.
Additionally I turned on additional tests in test-run-wasm-64.cc
R=titzer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1857363003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35685}
The background here is that graphs generated from WASM are not trimmed.
That means there can be some floating control diamonds that are not
reachable from end. An assertion in the scheduler for phis from floating
diamonds checks that the use edge in this situation is the control edge,
but in general, any edge could cause this.
Scheduling still works without this assertion. The longer term fix
is to either trim the graphs (more compile time overhead for WASM)
or improve the scheduler's handling of dead code in the graph. Currently
it does not schedule dead code but the potential use positions of
dead code are used in the computation of the common dominator of uses. We could
recognize dead nodes in PrepareUses() and check in GetBlockForUse()
as per TODO.
R=bradnelson@chromium.org, mstarzinger@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1846933002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35245}
Run_Wasm_F32CopySign was failing because function copysign
that is used to verify the results does implicit conversion
from float to double. In this conversion we lose information
about NaN sign and the test fails.
Fix by using copysignf to avoid unnecessary float to double
conversion.
TEST=cctest/test-run-wasm/Run_Wasm_F32CopySign
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1857753002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35237}
We expect that the majority of malloc'd memory held by V8 is allocated
in Zone objects. Introduce an Allocator class that is used by Zones to
manage memory, and allows for querying the current usage.
BUG=none
R=titzer@chromium.org,bmeurer@chromium.org,jarin@chromium.org
LOG=n
TBR=rossberg@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1847543002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35196}
*) For all tests the input validation was incorrect, i.e. some values
were considered invalid although they were valid. The problem was that
values which are outside int range can get in range through truncation.
*) Removed an assertion in the x64 code generation of
TruncateFloat64ToUint32 which trapped on negative inputs.
*) Introduced a new TF operator TruncateFloat32ToUint32 which does
the same as ChangeFloat32ToUint32 but does not trap on negative inputs.
R=titzer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1843983002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35176}
Int64Mul is lowered to a new turbofan operator, Int32MulPair. The new
operator takes 4 inputs an generates 2 outputs. The inputs are the low
word of the left input, high word of the left input, the low word of the
right input, and high word of the right input. The ouputs are the low
and high word of the result of the multiplication.
R=titzer@chromium.org, v8-arm-ports@googlegroups.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1807273002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35131}
The new implementation deals with cycles in the TF graph in two steps:
1) The lowering of phis is delayed to avoid cyclic dependencies.
2) The replacement nodes of phis are created already when the phi is
pushed onto the stack so that other nodes can use these replacements
for their lowering.
R=titzer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1844553002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35126}
In JavaScript code and stubs, JSSP mirrors the CSP but may be unaligned.
But in WASM code only CSP is used, like native code, and it must be
aligned.
Calls into WASM from JS need to carefully align the C stack
pointer (csp) and restore the previous JSSP, while calls from WASM
to JS need to compute a new JSSP and restore their CSP after the
call.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1811283003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#35096}
The CL #34701 (https://codereview.chromium.org/1779123002/) added the Run_WasmF32SConvertI64/Run_WasmF64SConvertI64 test cases and X87 failed at them.
The reason is same as the CL #33630 (Issue 1649323002: X87: Change the test case for X87 RunRoundInt32ToFloat32), please refer: https://codereview.chromium.org/1649323002.
Here is the key comments from CL #33630:
Some new test cases use CheckFloatEq(...) and CheckDoubleEq(...) function for result check. When GCC compiling the CheckFloatEq() and CheckDoubleEq() function,
those inlined functions has different behavior comparing with GCC ia32 build and x87 build.
The major difference is sse float register still has single precision rounding semantic. While X87 register has no such rounding precsion semantic when directly use register value.
The V8 turbofan JITTed has exactly same result in both X87 and IA32 port.
For CHECK_EQ(a, b) function, if a and b are double or float, it will has similar behaviors like CheckFloatEq(...) and CheckDoubleEq(...) function when compiled by GCC and causes the test case fail.
So we add the following sentence to do type case to keep the same precision for Run_WasmF32SConvertI64/Run_WasmF64SConvertI64. Such as: volatile double expect = static_cast<float>(*i).
ahaas put those codes in CHECK_FLOAT_EQ and CHECK_DOUBLE_EQ macros in CL #34534 (https://codereview.chromium.org/1773513002 ).
So this CL replaced the CHECK_EQ in Run_WasmF32SConvertI64/Run_WasmF64SConvertI64 to CHECK_FLOAT_EQ/CHECK_DOUBLE_EQ for x87 can pass Run_WasmF32SConvertI64/Run_WasmF64SConvertI64 tests.
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1784813004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34813}
Int64Sub is lowered to a new turbofan operator, Int32SubPair. The new
operator takes 4 inputs an generates 2 outputs. The inputs are the low
word of the left input, high word of the left input, the low word of the
right input, and high word of the right input. The ouputs are the low
and high word of the result of the subtraction.
The implementation is very similar to the implementation of Int64Add.
@v8-arm-ports: please take a careful look at the implementation of sbc
in the simulator.
R=titzer@chromium.org, v8-arm-ports@googlegroups.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1778893005
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34808}
Word64Popcnt is lowered to Word32Popcnt(low-word) + Word32Popcnt(high_word).
Since the optional Word64Popcnt operator does not exist on 32 bit platforms,
I introduced a new operator "Word64PopcntPlaceholder" which is generated
in the WasmCompiler and then lowered in the Int64Lowering.
R=titzer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1803453003
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34777}
On 32-bit systems these instructions are compiled to calls to
C functions. The TF node for the function call is already generated in
the wasm compiler, the lowering of the I64 parameters is done in the
Int64Lowering. We use the return value of the C function to determine
whether the calculation should trap or not.
R=titzer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1804513002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34768}
Int64Add is lowered to a new turbofan operator, Int32AddPair. The new
operator takes 4 inputs an generates 2 outputs. The inputs are the low
word of the left input, high word of the left input, the low word of the
right input, and high word of the right input. The ouputs are the low
and high word of the result of the addition.
R=titzer@chromium.org, v8-arm-ports@googlegroups.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1778493004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34747}
Move all tests that use i64 values into test-run-wasm-64.cc. Introduce
macros that enable tests as they are implemented on 32 bit platforms.
R=ahaas@chromium.org
BUG=
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1784343004
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34742}
On 32-bit systems I64XConvertFXX instructions are compiled to calls to
C functions. The TF node for the function call is already generated in
the wasm compiler, the lowering of the I64 parameter is done in the
Int64Lowering. We use the return value of the C function to determine
whether the conversion should trap or not.
R=titzer@chromium.org
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1775903002
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#34738}
